Re: Mil 810 C, D, E for shock......Mil 810 C, D, E, for vibration in IC706/7000
My 706 brick is surrounded by concrete :)
By
Per Eriksson <sm4xiu@...>
·
#245
·
|
Re: Digest Number 21
It was the commercial version .. now to figure out which computer it is on .. pretty nice, though. In the midst of changin' from 1.5 MB DSL to 5 MB Cable ... w/ wireless, all that... so slo on
By
Mark - AA6DX
·
#244
·
|
Re: Mil 810 C, D, E for shock......Mil 810 C, D, E, for vibration in IC706/7000
Let's see. Will that increase or decrease tha amount of drool?
Slurp!
73, Steve, K9DCI
By
Steve <steve.noskowicz@...>
·
#243
·
|
Did that "Manual" ever materalize?
Or was it a typo...or a (friendly) spoof?!
I want a cup holder...and APRS...and PSK and all them modes...
73, Steve, K9DCI
P.S. It *had* to be a pregnant chicken that came first.
By
Steve <steve.noskowicz@...>
·
#242
·
|
Re: Received email from Icom support centre
page
The Japan Icom website only has this "Technical Support" email
address available, Nothing else. So I thought it was at least worth
a try, But as I said will keep uplifting stones to find
By
bty806030
·
#241
·
|
Re: Wishes for remote control (was Do our comments affect the design of the IC7000 ?)
To: <ic7000@...>
Sent: 2005 March, 05, Saturday 17:21
Subject: [ic7000] Wishes for remote control (was Do our comments affect the
design of the IC7000 ?)
By
jdow <jdow@...>
·
#240
·
|
Wishes for remote control (was Do our comments affect the design of the IC7000 ?)
The radio should support both, the push and pull mode. By default the
push mode should be deactivated since not every client might desire (or
even be capable to handle) it.
I completely agree on
By
Ralf Reiterer <ralfreit@...>
·
#239
·
|
Re: Mil 810......... I hereby close the thread
Hi Tom,
Oh, no problem, guys - MIL-STD 810 compliance of Icom products is very
relevant to the group (and also most interesting!)
Cheers for now, 73,
Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ
By
Adam Farson
·
#238
·
|
Mil 810......... I hereby close the thread
Hi Group,
Thanks for the comments on how Icom is meeting
Mil Spec 810 on shock and vibration.
I do not own a 706, but I would venture to guess the 7000
will meet Mil 810 for shock and vibration as
By
Tom <tgleeman@...>
·
#237
·
|
Re: Mil 810 C, D, E for shock......Mil 810 C, D, E, for vibration in IC706/7000
From: "Tom" <tgleeman@...>
However, properly mounted PCBs do not vibrate as much with SMT as they
do with the heavier leaded components. I believe it's a net win if the
PCB is made stiff enough.
By
jdow <jdow@...>
·
#236
·
|
Re: Mil 810 C, D, E for shock......Mil 810 C, D, E, for vibration in IC706/7000
Great story.
Thanks.
By
MKM <starlight04@...>
·
#235
·
|
Re: Mil 810 C, D, E for shock......Mil 810 C, D, E, for vibration in IC706/7000
Ah yes, that is likely true about the missing analog filters.
Now the time was in the very early 70s. The setting was a small company
in Arcadia that was building a Sonobouy receiver for the S3A
By
jdow <jdow@...>
·
#234
·
|
Re: Mil 810 C, D, E for shock......Mil 810 C, D, E, for vibration in IC706/7000
Also, the IC-7000 does not require analog filters so it is mechanically / electrically more robust in theory.
I heard last night from the 3840 group that the rig will have digital in / out for
By
MKM <starlight04@...>
·
#233
·
|
Re: Do our comments affect the design of the IC7000 ?
From: "Steve" <steve.noskowicz@...>
It should be, "All paramaters can be remotely controlled AND remotely
read." Anything else will annoy someone, say a perfectionist like me.
{^_-}
If the
By
jdow <jdow@...>
·
#232
·
|
Re: Mil 810 C, D, E for shock......Mil 810 C, D, E, for vibration in IC706/7000
Hi Mike(W8MM) and the Group,
Mike wrote:
That is a good impression, Mike. I used to watch
the guys at the surplus house get the surface mounted
parts off boards by flexing the board. They didn't
By
Tom <tgleeman@...>
·
#231
·
|
Re: Do our comments affect the design of the IC7000 ?
--- In ic7000@...,
"Ralf Reiterer" <ralfreit@g...>
all functions to be controlled from the computer.
No, all! and not just conrolled, but readable as well.
And
By
Steve <steve.noskowicz@...>
·
#230
·
|
Re: Mil 810 C, D, E for shock......Mil 810 C, D, E, for vibration in IC706/7000
Hi Tom,
I am under the impression that surface mounted components have less
mass, shorter cantilever length, and therefore much, much higher
mechanical resonant frequencies than leaded parts.
Am
By
Mike Valentine <mike@...>
·
#229
·
|
Re: May or June?
So did the rest of us, as a matter of fact.
{^_-}
By
jdow <jdow@...>
·
#228
·
|
Mil 810 C, D, E for shock......Mil 810 C, D, E, for vibration in IC706/7000
Hi IC7000 Fans,
Does anyone out there know how Icom achieves Mil 810 C, D, E for
shock and vibration when using surface mounted components?
Just curious.
Tom
KE6YNH, 73
----------
No virus
By
Tom <tgleeman@...>
·
#227
·
|
Re: May or June?
Hi Mike,
No problem - I just felt that the thread had reached a good cut-off point.
Cheers for now, 73,
Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ
By
Adam Farson
·
#226
·
|