Hi Robert G6LLP ,
Maybe some of the problems come from the fact that KAM , and many
similar TNC made for Packet, are not really complaining with the
Pactor lev.1 protocol !!
I never had such troublem with SCS PtcII 1st version ( I have it
from 1993) and followers, but had many many with a KAM+ that was not
able to stay synchro with the SCS , because of the intrinsic
weakness that their protocol implementation discount gave them.
Apart from them, the implementation of soft with sound carts for the
Pactor protocols suffer from the timing issues of Windows. A well
known issue among soundcard soft developers.
If you like more doc on pactor prootocols, look for them in the SCS
Gmbh PTCII pages, and have a glance at the Dragon , the Level4
monster.
73 de Augusto I2JJR HB9TZA
?
Il 18/11/2013 7.34, BT Yahoo!?2013 ha
scritto:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Hi Most of
these modes where used using a KAM which was a TNC with two
ports the move to using sound cards and software is only as good
as the software which is written.
?so many seem to be having issues it does make me think it must
be the software which really is the issue.
the simple TNC programs gave little problems unlike the mess i
see these days.
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Best Regards Robert G6LLP
From:
"w4ayk@..."
To:
ic7000@...
Sent:
Sunday, 17 November 2013, 23:57
Subject:
Re: [IC-7000] Is IC 7000 a good pactor radio ?
?
I use the SCS Modem with Pactor II and III and
no problem with the 7000 or the 706 MK IIG
Gene
Eugene C. Clark W4AYK
Section Manager, Georgia
ARRL, the national organization for Amateur Radio
email:
w4ayk@...,
Telephone Home(229) 888-1090 Cell(229)344-1895
----- Original Message -----
From:
kg5ks@...
To:
ic7000@...
Sent: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 16:37:11 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [IC-7000] Is IC 7000 a good pactor radio
?
Would like to hear how well the IC 7000 does
digital modes such as pactor ?
Thank you
73
Kenny
Augusto