I think it will have a good CW performance. Icom DSP filters are very
good indeed. They will use the same code and algorithms from the
7800/pro3. In fact this is what dsp is all about, consistency across
the board with good software QC. Once you have a piece of code working
right, you just implement it on the other radios just like object
oriented programming.
OT: I have been thinking about the digital audio in/out of the
7800....maybe, just maybe the 7000 will have it as well. That will be
sweet for PSK/RTTY operation. I doubt it though because of cost.
Speculating, of course.
-best
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Feb 27, 2005, at 1:03 PM, Ya`akov N. Miles wrote:
--- In ic7000@..., Adam Farson <farson@s...> wrote:
> Hi Paul,
[snip]
> Your comments about DSP vs. analogue/crystal-filter architecture are
> absolutely correct. Economics, as well as performance and capability
> are driving the shift to 100% DSP implementations.
Yeah, tell me about it.? Here I pay on the average of $150 for each
crystal filter that goes into my Icom IC-706mkiiG.? I would like to
install more, but the IC-706mkiiG will accept a maximum of two
filters.? Then I am into the uncharted waters of replacing FL-272
filter 2.4 kHz with FL-223 filter 1.9 kHz, as I want the narrow SSB
filter more than I want the nice-sounding SSB filter which is soldered
in as default :(
If the IC-7000 does check in at around USD$1000 with no filters to
buy, then it would be a Good Thing (IMHO)? I hope that Icom does not
compromise on CW performance, even though that mode has been
deprecated recently.? I do all my HF operating in Morse Code.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
<22305_0205_016_b_300250_a.gif>
<l.gif>
Yahoo! Groups Links
? To visit your group on the web, go to:
?
? To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ic7000-unsubscribe@...
?
? Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
