primosprimpsprimos on ibmpension writes:
"SIX HUNDRED THOUSAND PLUS?
?And it was a bad deal (!), which means this very good player got?moreas an annuity. Holy c***.
No?wonder?the 1000 year old suck-up dinosaur I sat with in 1999 was gloating and wouldn't lift a finger to help me, who would have stood to get a pathetic little sum had Janet et al not come to my rescue.?
NOW?I understand. So in 1999 it either paid to suck up mightily or be older than Methuselah.
Now?I know to whom Socks Bouchard was speaking when he touted the CB screw.
Ahhhhhh, I can't wait for the de-risking screw. Like the CB screw, I'm sure IBM will have our best interests at heart.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
"
The moderators decided not be post my response to this unbelievable append. ?Does this woman actually realize what she is saying?
My reading is that since primos-cubed was screwed in 1999 (her often voiced opinion), she now hopes that those who her were not screwed as badly as she was back then, finally receive their fair share thru de-risking. ?A real team player, isn't she. ?No wonder her "1000 year old suck-up dinosaur" colleague, did not "lift a finger" to help her. ? As if he could have really done anything about it, even if he wanted to, which he clearly didn't. ?
