Your challenge to Sue about not being an IBMer is pretty silly. And I challenged you in return in an attempt to show you how silly it is.
But you still don't get it.
Perhaps if I called IBM, they might tell me that Mel Z. is a retiree. But how would we know that you didn't simply pluck the name of an IBMer off the internet and use that as your Yahoo id? You see, you can't really prove you are indeed an IBMer.
Suppose that Sue and I are not really IBMers. Do you think we joined this group just to bother you because.... because... because...
Well, I can't even come up with a good reason for that one.
How about we are just real IBMers who happen to disagree with you? Sue has tried to back up her side of the argument with lots of facts. And you do lots of hand waving about why none of it is true and they can't be facts while presenting very little data to back up your side. Instead, you seem to have a need to disenfranchise anyone who does not share your opinions.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In ibmpensionissues@..., "zimowski@..." <zimowski@...> wrote:
You can call IBM and verify the fact that I an an IBM retiree. I think it's very clear that Sue is not part of the IBM club. Given that you're so intent on defending her, I am now also beginning to wonder about you.
