¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: Redundancy


 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Yes, sure, but bear in mind that the second user has to pay separately for all the market data subscriptions it needs.

?

Given that both TWS and Gateway are pretty stable, it¡¯s likely that there would only be a few minutes per day (during the daily reset period, where nothing much is happening in the markets anyway) that this could provide any benefit, and it probably won¡¯t be needed then anyway, so I doubt whether it would be worth the additional costs involved.

?

My philosophy has always been that things will inevitably happen that prevent you trading for one reason or another, and it¡¯s better to just accept that and deal with the issue manually on a case-by-case basis rather than try to program round them in some way. This philosophy makes it imperative to ensure that you always have a suitable stop-loss in place when you have an open position. I would say that it really doesn¡¯t matter if you miss a trading opportunity occasionally: the markets will still be there tomorrow¡­

?

Richard

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of PaulMac
Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2023 1:52 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ibc] Redundancy

?

As IB allows for multiple userts for the same account it is possible to build in redundancy.

I have not implemented this yet but planning to.

?A 2nd user running a 2nd instance of the IBC/GW

If a trade signal comes in and the Primary GW is down for some reason (or is busy restarting) the client can simply send the Order to the Backup GW

For a fully redundant system, one could use a seperate virtual EC2 server on AWS

Paul.

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.