Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
Etchants and rust
After seeing some guys post on leaving his etchant tank out in his shop, and the next day his drill press post was solid rust... I was thinking that I really don't want to mess up my steel building or anything in it. That said, if I use the muriatic/peroxide etchant outside, and then pour it into a sealed container, I should be ok? Or if not if I really want to be sure, what is the best of the other etchants that works the fastest with no worry of rusting my stuff? Or am I being too paranoid?
Thanks |
On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 13:05:18 -0600, you wrote:
After seeing some guys post on leaving his etchant tank out in his shop,Define "sealed"..... Or if not if I really wantLikely ammonium persulfate or ammonium perchloride. That still will release extra oxygen here and there, but not acid fumes, afaik.... You could put it in a jug, say one used for distilled water or the same one used for the acid (if you know someone who uses pool acid, see if they have an old empty bottle. I was tempted to (and almost did) get one of those brown resin containers to put the acid in (suitably bottled). No, you are not being too paranoid. I'd store it outside. I suspect that the main problem is the fumes from the acid, but then again, no idea of how well the container was sealed. what would work should be a bottle designed for acid storage, say from a chemical supply store. Harvey
|
D
1: Your paranoia is warranted. imho.? I too embarked on a DIY Etching setup which included the whole buffet of parts chemicals and storing them. ?After storing the chemicals in a explosion proof cabinet. +/- 6 months later? rust started to appear in the cabinet. quite a bit of rust. While in my scenario Im not to happy that my once pristine cabinet in now full of surface rust. I am happy? that its not my machines or the both of them! If you have valuable rust free machines? invest in storing the caustic chems properly. -Sam |
On 3/5/2019 2:45 PM, Harvey White wrote:
On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 13:05:18 -0600, you wrote:After seeing some guys post on leaving his etchant tank out in his shop,Define "sealed"..... In a one gallon glass or plastic bottle like the one the muriatic acid is sold in. Isn't a Hydrogen peroxide bottle a brown resin bottle like this one?Or if not if I really wantLikely ammonium persulfate or ammonium perchloride. That still will
|
开云体育Good info Sam. I have a large steel building workshop and would hate to see the panels rusting because of a stupid mistake. I guess if I stored my etchant in a plastic bottle like the muriatic acid bottle, and then put it inside of a 5 gallon bucket with a lid on it I may be ok? Or just use a different etchant. I have a bunch of expensive machines that I would like to keep rust free. Maybe I need to build a small wooden shed just for this kind of thing. Or one of those plastic sheds. :) Thanks On 3/5/2019 2:54 PM, a8050266 wrote:
D |
Dave,
I did just that. Plastic container liquid tight. Inside a 6/7 gallon pool bucket. Still rusted. I now keep the chems outside in a plastic bin. no more inside shop where metal resides. On another note. the chems are so inexpensive. and easy to make on the fly. I keep thinking Ill discard and make as needed. even if the chems were 10x as much? the costs pale in comparison to my machines rusting. I easily pay more for 1 cutting bit than the chems are worth. If you never see rust? you are lucky. Sam |
On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 15:32:36 -0600, you wrote:
Main problem with some enclosures is that the caps or seals are attacked by the HCL. Rubbermaid cereal containers (inexpensive, but while the bodies withstand the HCL, the seals don't). Isn't a Hydrogen peroxide bottle a brown resin bottle like this one?Or if not if I really wantLikely ammonium persulfate or ammonium perchloride. That still will Yep, H2O2 tends to decompose in the presence of light/ultraviolet light. I'd wonder about the caps, though, for the HCL. Harvey
|
Yikes! So my 5 gallon bucket with a lid on it won't be the answer. Drat!? What kind of plastic bin do you use outside? I have a dog so I need to be safe there too. Buy like you say, the chems are cheap enough and the peroxide is safe so I could make as needed and plan ahead and etch a bunch of boards one day and tin them and drill when needed. The chemical that causes all the trouble is the muriatc acid.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thanks On 3/5/2019 3:48 PM, a8050266 wrote:
Dave, |
Yeah on the cap seals. I think I have a pretty good idea as I have a large yard (2.6 acres). I will put the muriatc acid and/or the etchant mix in a 5 gallon plastic bucket with a lid. I will did a hole and put the 5 gallon bucket half way deep in the hole to keep it stable, and cover the works with an upside down old plastic garbage can. I don't know if I should vent the 5 gallon bucket or not??
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 3/5/2019 3:59 PM, Harvey White wrote:
On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 15:32:36 -0600, you wrote:On 3/5/2019 2:45 PM, Harvey White wrote:Main problem with some enclosures is that the caps or seals areOn Tue, 5 Mar 2019 13:05:18 -0600, you wrote:In a one gallon glass or plastic bottle like the one the muriatic acidAfter seeing some guys post on leaving his etchant tank out in his shop,Define "sealed"..... |
On 06/03/19 06:05, Dave wrote:
After seeing some guys post on leaving his etchant tank out in his shop, and the next day his drill press post was solid rust... I was thinking that I really don't want to mess up my steel building or anything in it. That said, if I use the muriatic/peroxide etchant outside, and then pour it into a sealed container, I should be ok? Or if not if I really want to be sure, what is the best of the other etchants that works the fastest with no worry of rusting my stuff? Or am I being too paranoid?I just put a slab of polystyrene over the container. If it's a bit warped, put a bit of wood on top of that. I've had the same setup and *same* etchant in my lab over 5+ years, topped up with a bit of HCl every time i use it. It's the HCl vapours that cause the corrosion. |
I would suggest the original HCl bottle (or something like it) inside a 5-gallon bucket with a lid, and put a container with some large surface area inside the bucket as well. Any HCl vapour will get neutralised by the baking soda. Check occasionally that you don't need to top it up. (The HCl even gets through the walls of the original bottle, so you will need something to neutralise it nearby.)
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Donald. -- *Plain Text* email -- it's an accessibility issue () no proprietary attachments; no html mail /\ <> On 2019-03-05 2:05 p.m., Dave wrote:
After seeing some guys post on leaving his etchant tank out in his shop, and the next day his drill press post was solid rust... I was thinking that I really don't want to mess up my steel building or anything in it. That said, if I use the muriatic/peroxide etchant outside, and then pour it into a sealed container, I should be ok? Or if not if I really want to be sure, what is the best of the other etchants that works the fastest with no worry of rusting my stuff? Or am I being too paranoid? |
I don't think you need to get too worried about this issue. Sure, leaving HCl fumes around steel or machinery is a bad thing but if you take a few sensible precautions you shouldn't have a problem. HCl is sold in pool shops in secure plastic bottles and you can repurpose them for keeping CuCl2 etching solution without too much trouble. I keep my solution in a thick plastic laundry detergent bottle with a childproof cap secure on a high shelf and clearly labeled. It's been like that for years with no problems. You're more likely to liberate fumes while you're actually doing the etching if you use a bubbler.
Actually I've found ferric chloride to be much harder on plastic and glass bottles than copper chloride. CuCls is just marvelous, I changed to it about 8 years ago and I'll never go back. I've been making boards for about 50 years and wish I'd known about it all those years ago. Morris |
Russel,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
? Do you use your etchant around tools like in a shop environment? I know the HCI is the troublemaker but how does the polystyrene help? I have somewhat of a machine shop so lots of steel and tooling etc to worry about. Thanks On 3/5/2019 7:51 PM, russell shaw wrote:
On 06/03/19 06:05, Dave wrote:After seeing some guys post on leaving his etchant tank out in his shop, and the next day his drill press post was solid rust... I was thinking that I really don't want to mess up my steel building or anything in it. That said, if I use the muriatic/peroxide etchant outside, and then pour it into a sealed container, I should be ok? Or if not if I really want to be sure, what is the best of the other etchants that works the fastest with no worry of rusting my stuff? Or am I being too paranoid?I just put a slab of polystyrene over the container. If it's a bit warped, put a bit of wood on top of that. |
So add a plate of baking soda to the 5 gallon bucket to absorb the HCI. Sounds reasonable. I have plenty of baking soda for my soda blaster. :)
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thanks On 3/5/2019 7:58 PM, Donald H Locker wrote:
I would suggest the original HCl bottle (or something like it) inside a 5-gallon bucket with a lid, and put a container with some large surface area inside the bucket as well. Any HCl vapour will get neutralised by the baking soda. Check occasionally that you don't need to top it up. (The HCl even gets through the walls of the original bottle, so you will need something to neutralise it nearby.) |
Morris,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
? Thanks for the info. I think the guy I read about was etching near his drill press and left the open etch tank on the bench overnight. Probably a bubble etcher too. So if I etch outside and pour my etchant into a good jug and keep it as far away from any steel that I can, I may be ok. On 3/6/2019 7:10 AM, Morris Odell wrote:
I don't think you need to get too worried about this issue. Sure, leaving HCl fumes around steel or machinery is a bad thing but if you take a few sensible precautions you shouldn't have a problem. HCl is sold in pool shops in secure plastic bottles and you can repurpose them for keeping CuCl2 etching solution without too much trouble. I keep my solution in a thick plastic laundry detergent bottle with a childproof cap secure on a high shelf and clearly labeled. It's been like that for years with no problems. You're more likely to liberate fumes while you're actually doing the etching if you use a bubbler. |
On 07/03/19 02:13, Dave wrote:
Russel,It sits in the corner of a normal room, about 1.2m from a small pcb drill press, and rust isn't higher than that from a normal room environment. I'm only using the polystyrene slab because it's a convenient size and doesn't fall apart or absorb much. You'd need some more weight on it to make sure the seal is good. I only make 6-8 runs of PCBs a year. Corrosion obviously happens some amount when the etcher is running, so having it on a separate table would be good if lots of shiny metal parts are nearby. |
On 3/6/2019 9:34 AM, russell shaw wrote:
On 07/03/19 02:13, Dave wrote:Russel,Russel,It sits in the corner of a normal room, about 1.2m from a small pcb drill press, and rust isn't higher than that from a normal room environment. ? Ok, good info. So if I do my etching under my 24x24x14 carport outside, I should be good and the carport should escape rusting too. I think I can rest easy on the rust thing now as I have enough info on how not to be careless. I have to also realize I am a noob and have to design stuff to etch. Or download other peoples stuff to etch I probably won't be etching all of the time to worry about it. Thanks |
On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 10:14:29 -0600, you wrote:
<snip> ? Ok, good info. So if I do my etching under my 24x24x14 carportIn a sense, there's really not a "design stuff to etch", but there are things to consider in terms of process. If you're using toner transfer, and especially just starting, I'd suggest no thinner than about 12 mil traces, 16 being better. Naturally that depends on the design. Larger pads are better if possible. Normal traces could be 16 or 24, but you'll get an idea of how much that is in terms of the board. If you're using EAGLE (for example), draw a polygon around the entire board on the bottom layer, following the dimension line. Name it "GND" for the bottom (assuming you're doing single sided boards). In EAGLE, the command to remove the effects (but not the polygon) is RIPUP @ That's a ground fill, ground pour, etc. It fills some unused areas of the board and reduces etchant use. Mostly, for beginning stuff, larger traces are better because the process can tolerate more pinholes and the like. Once you get down to 10 mil traces with 10 mil spacing, the process is less forgiving, and you'll have to be a bit better at it. A note on EAGLE (and likely some other programs), the size of the pad is optimized for a board house, so it's rather thin in diameter. This can be difficult when drilling holes and soldering. In a board house produced board, this hole is automatically plated through and is more sturdy as well as has more contact area for solder. You may want to start making a library with larger pads for parts depending on how you design things. I'd especially suggest this for single sided boards, although the nature of the parts lead (through board and then soldered) tends to hold things in place. Harvey Thanks |
Thanks for the info Harvey. I have a new question. What is the closest pads should be to each other? And if you are making a bunch of small boards and transferring them to copper for etching what is the minimal space between designs? In other words, what should the remaining border width be? Seems I may have placed my circuits too close to the center and have to shrink the width a little.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thanks On 3/6/2019 10:52 AM, Harvey White wrote:
On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 10:14:29 -0600, you wrote: |
On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 12:33:13 -0600, you wrote:
Thanks for the info Harvey. I have a new question. What is the closestThere's two limits, design and process. Process limits simply say that you can't physically make the board like that. Either too close to the edge, or holes too small, or pads/traces too small. Those limits vary with respect to the process, but typically 0.030 or 0.060 are decent limits (roughly 1/16 or 1/32) for pad to pad, and spacing betwen tracks, but that's process.... Now, voltage wise, that determines the minimum track spacing as well. I'm not sure of the limits here, you'd have to look that up. Ditto with track current carrying capacity for width (varies also with respect to the copper foil thickness). You also want to allow for heat dissipation for things like resistors. Typical power resistors are often at the end of longer leads and spaced off the boards. Seen scorched boards because of resistors. Now on the other hand, those resistor long leads will fail any sort of vibration test. (military stuff used clamps for bulky parts like that). So for home analog stuff, not necessarily digital, you want a small enough trace that you can put one between the pads of a DIP (more requires finer stuff than can be happily done at home). WIthout an autorouter (which is of limited use for home built boards), I tend to use the airwires (unrouted traces) to determine which parts need to be near which parts for shortest wire runs, then try to manually route the shortest wires. It's a learning process... Once you go to surface mount parts, the design rules start to change, but I'm not sure where you are on this design. Harvey
|
to navigate to use esc to dismiss