开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

Etchants and rust


 

After seeing some guys post on leaving his etchant tank out in his shop, and the next day his drill press post was solid rust... I was thinking that I really don't want to mess up my steel building or anything in it. That said, if I use the muriatic/peroxide etchant outside, and then pour it into a sealed container, I should be ok? Or if not if I really want to be sure, what is the best of the other etchants that works the fastest with no worry of rusting my stuff? Or am I being too paranoid?

Thanks


 

On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 13:05:18 -0600, you wrote:

After seeing some guys post on leaving his etchant tank out in his shop,
and the next day his drill press post was solid rust... I was thinking
that I really don't want to mess up my steel building or anything in it.
That said, if I use the muriatic/peroxide etchant outside, and then pour
it into a sealed container, I should be ok?
Define "sealed".....

Or if not if I really want
to be sure, what is the best of the other etchants that works the
fastest with no worry of rusting my stuff? Or am I being too paranoid?
Likely ammonium persulfate or ammonium perchloride. That still will
release extra oxygen here and there, but not acid fumes, afaik....

You could put it in a jug, say one used for distilled water or the
same one used for the acid (if you know someone who uses pool acid,
see if they have an old empty bottle.

I was tempted to (and almost did) get one of those brown resin
containers to put the acid in (suitably bottled).

No, you are not being too paranoid. I'd store it outside. I suspect
that the main problem is the fumes from the acid, but then again, no
idea of how well the container was sealed.

what would work should be a bottle designed for acid storage, say from
a chemical supply store.

Harvey



Thanks




 

D
1: Your paranoia is warranted. imho.?
I too embarked on a DIY Etching setup which included the whole buffet of parts chemicals and storing them.
?After storing the chemicals in a explosion proof cabinet. +/- 6 months later? rust started to appear in the cabinet.
quite a bit of rust. While in my scenario Im not to happy that my once pristine cabinet in now full of surface rust. I am happy?
that its not my machines or the both of them! If you have valuable rust free machines? invest in storing the caustic chems properly.
-Sam


 

On 3/5/2019 2:45 PM, Harvey White wrote:
On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 13:05:18 -0600, you wrote:

After seeing some guys post on leaving his etchant tank out in his shop,
and the next day his drill press post was solid rust... I was thinking
that I really don't want to mess up my steel building or anything in it.
That said, if I use the muriatic/peroxide etchant outside, and then pour
it into a sealed container, I should be ok?
Define "sealed".....

In a one gallon glass or plastic bottle like the one the muriatic acid is sold in.


Or if not if I really want
to be sure, what is the best of the other etchants that works the
fastest with no worry of rusting my stuff? Or am I being too paranoid?
Likely ammonium persulfate or ammonium perchloride. That still will
release extra oxygen here and there, but not acid fumes, afaik....

You could put it in a jug, say one used for distilled water or the
same one used for the acid (if you know someone who uses pool acid,
see if they have an old empty bottle.

I was tempted to (and almost did) get one of those brown resin
containers to put the acid in (suitably bottled).

No, you are not being too paranoid. I'd store it outside. I suspect
that the main problem is the fumes from the acid, but then again, no
idea of how well the container was sealed.

what would work should be a bottle designed for acid storage, say from
a chemical supply store.
Isn't a Hydrogen peroxide bottle a brown resin bottle like this one?




Harvey


 

开云体育

Good info Sam. I have a large steel building workshop and would hate to see the panels rusting because of a stupid mistake. I guess if I stored my etchant in a plastic bottle like the muriatic acid bottle, and then put it inside of a 5 gallon bucket with a lid on it I may be ok? Or just use a different etchant. I have a bunch of expensive machines that I would like to keep rust free. Maybe I need to build a small wooden shed just for this kind of thing. Or one of those plastic sheds. :)

Thanks

On 3/5/2019 2:54 PM, a8050266 wrote:

D
1: Your paranoia is warranted. imho.?
I too embarked on a DIY Etching setup which included the whole buffet of parts chemicals and storing them.
?After storing the chemicals in a explosion proof cabinet. +/- 6 months later? rust started to appear in the cabinet.
quite a bit of rust. While in my scenario Im not to happy that my once pristine cabinet in now full of surface rust. I am happy?
that its not my machines or the both of them! If you have valuable rust free machines? invest in storing the caustic chems properly.
-Sam


 

Dave,
I did just that.
Plastic container liquid tight.
Inside a 6/7 gallon pool bucket.
Still rusted.


I now keep the chems outside in a plastic bin. no more inside shop where metal resides.
On another note. the chems are so inexpensive. and easy to make on the fly.
I keep thinking Ill discard and make as needed. even if the chems were 10x as much?
the costs pale in comparison to my machines rusting. I easily pay more for 1 cutting bit
than the chems are worth.

If you never see rust? you are lucky.
Sam


 

On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 15:32:36 -0600, you wrote:


On 3/5/2019 2:45 PM, Harvey White wrote:
On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 13:05:18 -0600, you wrote:

After seeing some guys post on leaving his etchant tank out in his shop,
and the next day his drill press post was solid rust... I was thinking
that I really don't want to mess up my steel building or anything in it.
That said, if I use the muriatic/peroxide etchant outside, and then pour
it into a sealed container, I should be ok?
Define "sealed".....

In a one gallon glass or plastic bottle like the one the muriatic acid
is sold in.
Main problem with some enclosures is that the caps or seals are
attacked by the HCL. Rubbermaid cereal containers (inexpensive, but
while the bodies withstand the HCL, the seals don't).




Or if not if I really want
to be sure, what is the best of the other etchants that works the
fastest with no worry of rusting my stuff? Or am I being too paranoid?
Likely ammonium persulfate or ammonium perchloride. That still will
release extra oxygen here and there, but not acid fumes, afaik....

You could put it in a jug, say one used for distilled water or the
same one used for the acid (if you know someone who uses pool acid,
see if they have an old empty bottle.

I was tempted to (and almost did) get one of those brown resin
containers to put the acid in (suitably bottled).

No, you are not being too paranoid. I'd store it outside. I suspect
that the main problem is the fumes from the acid, but then again, no
idea of how well the container was sealed.

what would work should be a bottle designed for acid storage, say from
a chemical supply store.
Isn't a Hydrogen peroxide bottle a brown resin bottle like this one?


Yep, H2O2 tends to decompose in the presence of light/ultraviolet
light.

I'd wonder about the caps, though, for the HCL.

Harvey




Harvey


 

Yikes! So my 5 gallon bucket with a lid on it won't be the answer. Drat!? What kind of plastic bin do you use outside? I have a dog so I need to be safe there too. Buy like you say, the chems are cheap enough and the peroxide is safe so I could make as needed and plan ahead and etch a bunch of boards one day and tin them and drill when needed. The chemical that causes all the trouble is the muriatc acid.

Thanks

On 3/5/2019 3:48 PM, a8050266 wrote:
Dave,
I did just that.
Plastic container liquid tight.
Inside a 6/7 gallon pool bucket.
Still rusted.


I now keep the chems outside in a plastic bin. no more inside shop where metal resides.
On another note. the chems are so inexpensive. and easy to make on the fly.
I keep thinking Ill discard and make as needed. even if the chems were 10x as much?
the costs pale in comparison to my machines rusting. I easily pay more for 1 cutting bit
than the chems are worth.

If you never see rust? you are lucky.
Sam


 

Yeah on the cap seals. I think I have a pretty good idea as I have a large yard (2.6 acres). I will put the muriatc acid and/or the etchant mix in a 5 gallon plastic bucket with a lid. I will did a hole and put the 5 gallon bucket half way deep in the hole to keep it stable, and cover the works with an upside down old plastic garbage can. I don't know if I should vent the 5 gallon bucket or not??

On 3/5/2019 3:59 PM, Harvey White wrote:
On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 15:32:36 -0600, you wrote:

On 3/5/2019 2:45 PM, Harvey White wrote:
On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 13:05:18 -0600, you wrote:

After seeing some guys post on leaving his etchant tank out in his shop,
and the next day his drill press post was solid rust... I was thinking
that I really don't want to mess up my steel building or anything in it.
That said, if I use the muriatic/peroxide etchant outside, and then pour
it into a sealed container, I should be ok?
Define "sealed".....
In a one gallon glass or plastic bottle like the one the muriatic acid
is sold in.
Main problem with some enclosures is that the caps or seals are
attacked by the HCL. Rubbermaid cereal containers (inexpensive, but
while the bodies withstand the HCL, the seals don't).


Or if not if I really want
to be sure, what is the best of the other etchants that works the
fastest with no worry of rusting my stuff? Or am I being too paranoid?
Likely ammonium persulfate or ammonium perchloride. That still will
release extra oxygen here and there, but not acid fumes, afaik....

You could put it in a jug, say one used for distilled water or the
same one used for the acid (if you know someone who uses pool acid,
see if they have an old empty bottle.

I was tempted to (and almost did) get one of those brown resin
containers to put the acid in (suitably bottled).

No, you are not being too paranoid. I'd store it outside. I suspect
that the main problem is the fumes from the acid, but then again, no
idea of how well the container was sealed.

what would work should be a bottle designed for acid storage, say from
a chemical supply store.
Isn't a Hydrogen peroxide bottle a brown resin bottle like this one?

Yep, H2O2 tends to decompose in the presence of light/ultraviolet
light.

I'd wonder about the caps, though, for the HCL.

Harvey



 

On 06/03/19 06:05, Dave wrote:
After seeing some guys post on leaving his etchant tank out in his shop, and the next day his drill press post was solid rust... I was thinking that I really don't want to mess up my steel building or anything in it. That said, if I use the muriatic/peroxide etchant outside, and then pour it into a sealed container, I should be ok? Or if not if I really want to be sure, what is the best of the other etchants that works the fastest with no worry of rusting my stuff? Or am I being too paranoid?
I just put a slab of polystyrene over the container. If it's a bit warped, put a bit of wood on top of that.

I've had the same setup and *same* etchant in my lab over 5+ years, topped up with a bit of HCl every time i use it.

It's the HCl vapours that cause the corrosion.


 

I would suggest the original HCl bottle (or something like it) inside a 5-gallon bucket with a lid, and put a container with some large surface area inside the bucket as well. Any HCl vapour will get neutralised by the baking soda. Check occasionally that you don't need to top it up. (The HCl even gets through the walls of the original bottle, so you will need something to neutralise it nearby.)

Donald.
--
*Plain Text* email -- it's an accessibility issue
() no proprietary attachments; no html mail
/\ <>

On 2019-03-05 2:05 p.m., Dave wrote:
After seeing some guys post on leaving his etchant tank out in his shop, and the next day his drill press post was solid rust... I was thinking that I really don't want to mess up my steel building or anything in it. That said, if I use the muriatic/peroxide etchant outside, and then pour it into a sealed container, I should be ok? Or if not if I really want to be sure, what is the best of the other etchants that works the fastest with no worry of rusting my stuff? Or am I being too paranoid?
Thanks


 

I don't think you need to get too worried about this issue. Sure, leaving HCl fumes around steel or machinery is a bad thing but if you take a few sensible precautions you shouldn't have a problem. HCl is sold in pool shops in secure plastic bottles and you can repurpose them for keeping CuCl2 etching solution without too much trouble. I keep my solution in a thick plastic laundry detergent bottle with a childproof cap secure on a high shelf and clearly labeled. It's been like that for years with no problems. You're more likely to liberate fumes while you're actually doing the etching if you use a bubbler.

Actually I've found ferric chloride to be much harder on plastic and glass bottles than copper chloride. CuCls is just marvelous, I changed to it about 8 years ago and I'll never go back. I've been making boards for about 50 years and wish I'd known about it all those years ago.

Morris


 

Russel,

? Do you use your etchant around tools like in a shop environment? I know the HCI is the troublemaker but how does the polystyrene help? I have somewhat of a machine shop so lots of steel and tooling etc to worry about.

Thanks

On 3/5/2019 7:51 PM, russell shaw wrote:
On 06/03/19 06:05, Dave wrote:
After seeing some guys post on leaving his etchant tank out in his shop, and the next day his drill press post was solid rust... I was thinking that I really don't want to mess up my steel building or anything in it. That said, if I use the muriatic/peroxide etchant outside, and then pour it into a sealed container, I should be ok? Or if not if I really want to be sure, what is the best of the other etchants that works the fastest with no worry of rusting my stuff? Or am I being too paranoid?
I just put a slab of polystyrene over the container. If it's a bit warped, put a bit of wood on top of that.

I've had the same setup and *same* etchant in my lab over 5+ years, topped up with a bit of HCl every time i use it.

It's the HCl vapours that cause the corrosion.


 

So add a plate of baking soda to the 5 gallon bucket to absorb the HCI. Sounds reasonable. I have plenty of baking soda for my soda blaster. :)

Thanks

On 3/5/2019 7:58 PM, Donald H Locker wrote:
I would suggest the original HCl bottle (or something like it) inside a 5-gallon bucket with a lid, and put a container with some large surface area inside the bucket as well. Any HCl vapour will get neutralised by the baking soda. Check occasionally that you don't need to top it up. (The HCl even gets through the walls of the original bottle, so you will need something to neutralise it nearby.)

Donald.
--
*Plain Text* email -- it's an accessibility issue
() no proprietary attachments; no html mail
/\ <>

On 2019-03-05 2:05 p.m., Dave wrote:
After seeing some guys post on leaving his etchant tank out in his shop, and the next day his drill press post was solid rust... I was thinking that I really don't want to mess up my steel building or anything in it. That said, if I use the muriatic/peroxide etchant outside, and then pour it into a sealed container, I should be ok? Or if not if I really want to be sure, what is the best of the other etchants that works the fastest with no worry of rusting my stuff? Or am I being too paranoid?

Thanks


 

Morris,

? Thanks for the info. I think the guy I read about was etching near his drill press and left the open etch tank on the bench overnight. Probably a bubble etcher too. So if I etch outside and pour my etchant into a good jug and keep it as far away from any steel that I can, I may be ok.

On 3/6/2019 7:10 AM, Morris Odell wrote:
I don't think you need to get too worried about this issue. Sure, leaving HCl fumes around steel or machinery is a bad thing but if you take a few sensible precautions you shouldn't have a problem. HCl is sold in pool shops in secure plastic bottles and you can repurpose them for keeping CuCl2 etching solution without too much trouble. I keep my solution in a thick plastic laundry detergent bottle with a childproof cap secure on a high shelf and clearly labeled. It's been like that for years with no problems. You're more likely to liberate fumes while you're actually doing the etching if you use a bubbler.

Actually I've found ferric chloride to be much harder on plastic and glass bottles than copper chloride. CuCls is just marvelous, I changed to it about 8 years ago and I'll never go back. I've been making boards for about 50 years and wish I'd known about it all those years ago.

Morris


 

On 07/03/19 02:13, Dave wrote:
Russel,
? Do you use your etchant around tools like in a shop environment? I know the HCI is the troublemaker but how does the polystyrene help? I have somewhat of a machine shop so lots of steel and tooling etc to worry about.
It sits in the corner of a normal room, about 1.2m from a small pcb drill press, and rust isn't higher than that from a normal room environment.

I'm only using the polystyrene slab because it's a convenient size and doesn't fall apart or absorb much.

You'd need some more weight on it to make sure the seal is good.

I only make 6-8 runs of PCBs a year.

Corrosion obviously happens some amount when the etcher is running, so having it on a separate table would be good if lots of shiny metal parts are nearby.


 

On 3/6/2019 9:34 AM, russell shaw wrote:
On 07/03/19 02:13, Dave wrote:
Russel,

?? Do you use your etchant around tools like in a shop environment? I know the HCI is the troublemaker but how does the polystyrene help? I have somewhat of a machine shop so lots of steel and tooling etc to worry about.
It sits in the corner of a normal room, about 1.2m from a small pcb drill press, and rust isn't higher than that from a normal room environment.

I'm only using the polystyrene slab because it's a convenient size and doesn't fall apart or absorb much.

You'd need some more weight on it to make sure the seal is good.

I only make 6-8 runs of PCBs a year.

Corrosion obviously happens some amount when the etcher is running, so having it on a separate table would be good if lots of shiny metal parts are nearby.

Russel,

? Ok, good info. So if I do my etching under my 24x24x14 carport outside, I should be good and the carport should escape rusting too. I think I can rest easy on the rust thing now as I have enough info on how not to be careless. I have to also realize I am a noob and have to design stuff to etch. Or download other peoples stuff to etch I probably won't be etching all of the time to worry about it.

Thanks


 

On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 10:14:29 -0600, you wrote:

<snip>
? Ok, good info. So if I do my etching under my 24x24x14 carport
outside, I should be good and the carport should escape rusting too. I
think I can rest easy on the rust thing now as I have enough info on how
not to be careless. I have to also realize I am a noob and have to
design stuff to etch. Or download other peoples stuff to etch I probably
won't be etching all of the time to worry about it.
In a sense, there's really not a "design stuff to etch", but there are
things to consider in terms of process.

If you're using toner transfer, and especially just starting, I'd
suggest no thinner than about 12 mil traces, 16 being better.
Naturally that depends on the design.

Larger pads are better if possible. Normal traces could be 16 or 24,
but you'll get an idea of how much that is in terms of the board.

If you're using EAGLE (for example), draw a polygon around the entire
board on the bottom layer, following the dimension line. Name it
"GND" for the bottom (assuming you're doing single sided boards).

In EAGLE, the command to remove the effects (but not the polygon) is
RIPUP @

That's a ground fill, ground pour, etc. It fills some unused areas of
the board and reduces etchant use.

Mostly, for beginning stuff, larger traces are better because the
process can tolerate more pinholes and the like. Once you get down to
10 mil traces with 10 mil spacing, the process is less forgiving, and
you'll have to be a bit better at it.

A note on EAGLE (and likely some other programs), the size of the pad
is optimized for a board house, so it's rather thin in diameter. This
can be difficult when drilling holes and soldering. In a board house
produced board, this hole is automatically plated through and is more
sturdy as well as has more contact area for solder.

You may want to start making a library with larger pads for parts
depending on how you design things. I'd especially suggest this for
single sided boards, although the nature of the parts lead (through
board and then soldered) tends to hold things in place.


Harvey

Thanks


 

Thanks for the info Harvey. I have a new question. What is the closest pads should be to each other? And if you are making a bunch of small boards and transferring them to copper for etching what is the minimal space between designs? In other words, what should the remaining border width be? Seems I may have placed my circuits too close to the center and have to shrink the width a little.

Thanks

On 3/6/2019 10:52 AM, Harvey White wrote:
On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 10:14:29 -0600, you wrote:

<snip>
? Ok, good info. So if I do my etching under my 24x24x14 carport
outside, I should be good and the carport should escape rusting too. I
think I can rest easy on the rust thing now as I have enough info on how
not to be careless. I have to also realize I am a noob and have to
design stuff to etch. Or download other peoples stuff to etch I probably
won't be etching all of the time to worry about it.
In a sense, there's really not a "design stuff to etch", but there are
things to consider in terms of process.

If you're using toner transfer, and especially just starting, I'd
suggest no thinner than about 12 mil traces, 16 being better.
Naturally that depends on the design.

Larger pads are better if possible. Normal traces could be 16 or 24,
but you'll get an idea of how much that is in terms of the board.

If you're using EAGLE (for example), draw a polygon around the entire
board on the bottom layer, following the dimension line. Name it
"GND" for the bottom (assuming you're doing single sided boards).

In EAGLE, the command to remove the effects (but not the polygon) is
RIPUP @

That's a ground fill, ground pour, etc. It fills some unused areas of
the board and reduces etchant use.

Mostly, for beginning stuff, larger traces are better because the
process can tolerate more pinholes and the like. Once you get down to
10 mil traces with 10 mil spacing, the process is less forgiving, and
you'll have to be a bit better at it.

A note on EAGLE (and likely some other programs), the size of the pad
is optimized for a board house, so it's rather thin in diameter. This
can be difficult when drilling holes and soldering. In a board house
produced board, this hole is automatically plated through and is more
sturdy as well as has more contact area for solder.

You may want to start making a library with larger pads for parts
depending on how you design things. I'd especially suggest this for
single sided boards, although the nature of the parts lead (through
board and then soldered) tends to hold things in place.


Harvey


 

On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 12:33:13 -0600, you wrote:

Thanks for the info Harvey. I have a new question. What is the closest
pads should be to each other? And if you are making a bunch of small
boards and transferring them to copper for etching what is the minimal
space between designs? In other words, what should the remaining border
width be? Seems I may have placed my circuits too close to the center
and have to shrink the width a little.
There's two limits, design and process.

Process limits simply say that you can't physically make the board
like that. Either too close to the edge, or holes too small, or
pads/traces too small.

Those limits vary with respect to the process, but typically 0.030 or
0.060 are decent limits (roughly 1/16 or 1/32) for pad to pad, and
spacing betwen tracks, but that's process....

Now, voltage wise, that determines the minimum track spacing as well.
I'm not sure of the limits here, you'd have to look that up. Ditto
with track current carrying capacity for width (varies also with
respect to the copper foil thickness).

You also want to allow for heat dissipation for things like resistors.
Typical power resistors are often at the end of longer leads and
spaced off the boards. Seen scorched boards because of resistors. Now
on the other hand, those resistor long leads will fail any sort of
vibration test. (military stuff used clamps for bulky parts like
that).

So for home analog stuff, not necessarily digital, you want a small
enough trace that you can put one between the pads of a DIP (more
requires finer stuff than can be happily done at home).

WIthout an autorouter (which is of limited use for home built boards),
I tend to use the airwires (unrouted traces) to determine which parts
need to be near which parts for shortest wire runs, then try to
manually route the shortest wires. It's a learning process...

Once you go to surface mount parts, the design rules start to change,
but I'm not sure where you are on this design.

Harvey



Thanks

On 3/6/2019 10:52 AM, Harvey White wrote:
On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 10:14:29 -0600, you wrote:

<snip>
? Ok, good info. So if I do my etching under my 24x24x14 carport
outside, I should be good and the carport should escape rusting too. I
think I can rest easy on the rust thing now as I have enough info on how
not to be careless. I have to also realize I am a noob and have to
design stuff to etch. Or download other peoples stuff to etch I probably
won't be etching all of the time to worry about it.
In a sense, there's really not a "design stuff to etch", but there are
things to consider in terms of process.

If you're using toner transfer, and especially just starting, I'd
suggest no thinner than about 12 mil traces, 16 being better.
Naturally that depends on the design.

Larger pads are better if possible. Normal traces could be 16 or 24,
but you'll get an idea of how much that is in terms of the board.

If you're using EAGLE (for example), draw a polygon around the entire
board on the bottom layer, following the dimension line. Name it
"GND" for the bottom (assuming you're doing single sided boards).

In EAGLE, the command to remove the effects (but not the polygon) is
RIPUP @

That's a ground fill, ground pour, etc. It fills some unused areas of
the board and reduces etchant use.

Mostly, for beginning stuff, larger traces are better because the
process can tolerate more pinholes and the like. Once you get down to
10 mil traces with 10 mil spacing, the process is less forgiving, and
you'll have to be a bit better at it.

A note on EAGLE (and likely some other programs), the size of the pad
is optimized for a board house, so it's rather thin in diameter. This
can be difficult when drilling holes and soldering. In a board house
produced board, this hole is automatically plated through and is more
sturdy as well as has more contact area for solder.

You may want to start making a library with larger pads for parts
depending on how you design things. I'd especially suggest this for
single sided boards, although the nature of the parts lead (through
board and then soldered) tends to hold things in place.


Harvey