¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: Sadder but wiser


 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

The usual way is to print a 100x100mm square, then measure it.? Suppose you measure it at 101mm, your scaling factor becomes 100/101, or 99%.

?

If the software can¡¯t do it then the print dialog has a ¡°Scale¡± entry, so you¡¯d type in 99%, print it and measure again.

?

If like most people you¡¯re laying things out on a 0.1¡± grid (even us metric folk do that), a quick dummy check is you grab a 40 pin header and put it up against the component holes and see if it matches up.

?

Tony

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Clark Cone via groups.io
Sent: Wednesday, 28 August 2024 10:35 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [homebrewpcbs] Sadder but wiser

?

got it! Thanks!

Clark

?

On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 7:12?PM Morris Odell via <vilgotch1=[email protected]> wrote:

Hi again Clark,

?

I calibrated the printer by printing successive images on plain paper with different cal factors and measuring them until I got it right. A bit wasteful of paper but better that using anything more expensive. Also I had the printer set for A4 paper. I think US Letter will give a different image size again and will require a different cal factor. The printer is a Brother MFC-L8690

?

Morris

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.