开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

PA : L7 (Polarization 3-500Z)

 

开云体育

Hello

?

Could you help me validate the attached schematic? The goal is to negatively bias the 3-500Z grid using a Zener diode, without passing the cathode current through the Zener diode.

?

The components added to the original schematic are shown in red. The biased wires in the diagram have already been set up in a previous experiment to bake the anodes under low anodic voltage.

?

With the original zero bias wiring, I observe, at rest, 250 mA under 2400 V (2x300 W) which seems exaggerated to me.

?

I'd like your opinion on this schematic before I do something stupid.

?

Could you add to the diagram the diode(s) to be installed in order to limit the effects of an arc which is always possible in a 3-500Z.

--

F1AMM

Fran?ois


Re: CTR Engineering/W8JI Response?

 

OK got it. I didn't know he put together a "kit" for that.
Bob W4JFA

On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 11:36?PM T. Scott Griffin via <scottandalene=[email protected]> wrote:
The W8JI amp stability kit is designed to prevent damage caused by tube flash overs. It consists of components like gas discharge tubes, a larger diode to protect the meters, a bias zener diode, a glitch resistor, and some other components.?
?
73
Scott
N6CIC


Re: CTR Engineering/W8JI Response?

 

The W8JI amp stability kit is designed to prevent damage caused by tube flash overs. It consists of components like gas discharge tubes, a larger diode to protect the meters, a bias zener diode, a glitch resistor, and some other components.?
?
73
Scott
N6CIC


Re: CTR Engineering/W8JI Response?

 

I ordered a TOF from Jim via email on 3/21 and installed it on 3/24. ?He responded quickly and shipped Priority Mail.
?
73
Dave
KB2NGK


Re: CTR Engineering/W8JI Response?

 

Is that a parasitic suppressor?
Bob W4JFA

On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 9:47?AM T. Scott Griffin via <scottandalene=[email protected]> wrote:
I just ordered his amp stability kit for 811/811H amps and received the kit in about a week.?
?
73
Scott
N6CIC


Re: CTR Engineering/W8JI Response?

 

I just ordered his amp stability kit for 811/811H amps and received the kit in about a week.?
?
73
Scott
N6CIC


Re: PA : LTspice

 

开云体育

I have […] also LT spice.? ?And both are a steep? learning curve.?

?

Oh yes, it's difficult.

I bought a large book in French, ISBN 978-2-10-076893-6. It helps me a lot, but... it's not easy.

?

In the examples I find, there's never a vacuum tube.

--

F1AMM

Fran?ois

De la part de Jim VE7RF via groups.io
贰苍惫辞测é?: mardi 25 mars 2025 15:09


Re: PA : LTspice

 

开云体育

There is one bugaboo about Spice modelling that

differed from some practical designs brought to us

through experiments, and that’s in figuring hysteresis.

?

Even though running numbers gave me starting points

to find pieces to fit, inevitably the finished product

was different than the paint-by-number sketch.

?

So the place to really find is to research historical

(hysterical) data and find various spread sheet

calculators, and see if they say the same basic

thing.

?

Right?

?

(I still ended up putting 30% of everything in

the junk drawer.)

?

Hal

W4HBM

?


Re: PA : LTspice

 

No... not yet.? ?I have Spice....and also LT spice.? ?And both are a steep? learning curve.?


PA : LTspice

 

开云体育

Hello

?

Has anyone ever built a model of a tube-equipped power amplifier in ?

--

F1AMM

Fran?ois


Re: US screws - name

 

开云体育

Better try your big toe nail size socket, then…!!!!

On 20 Mar 2025, at 10:16?pm, Don Roden via groups.io <donroden@...> wrote:

?

I have lost my 10mm socket.

W4DNR


On 2025-03-20 2:33 am, Steve wrote:

On 3/19/2025 11:06 PM, Fran?ois via groups.io wrote:

Surface area =? length x width.? 27 1/4"? = 27.25"?
5/16 = .315"

7/8" = .875"?

etc, etc.

?

Ah, ok.

You convert the mixed numbers into decimals and you get "? (square inches).

?

5/16 = .315"

7/8" = .875"

?

Do you have these correspondences in your head like the multiplication tables?

Many of them, I do, yes. Many of us who have done very much "homebrewing" of chassis, panels, etc. through the years have sorta memorized those fractions of inches. At the least, you will almost always find charts posted on our workshops showing those fractions in large print so we can easily read it across the shop (when we can't remember one right off the bat). And yes, we also sometimes more-formally call our system of inches and feet the "imperial" measurement system; although more often, we call it the SAE system, which stands for Society of Automotive Engineers, which in years past, used to "champion" the use of inches and feet especially in American automobiles.

Also, approximating converting mm to inches isn't very difficult: just remember that 1 mm is just a little bit less than 0.04" (0.039371", to be more exact). Therefore, you're almost always "close enough" to just use 0.040" as the length of 1 mm. The easy way to imagine 0.04" is that it's just a little bit wider than the gap of olden time automotive spark plugs used to be set at (which was almost always 0.032", sometimes as wide as 0.038"; but more recently with the use of high performance electronic ignition systems, 0.045" or even 0.060").

Thus, 3.5 mm is 3 times 0.04", plus half of another 0.04" or 0.02"; and so 3.5mm = 0.12 + 0.02 = a total of about 0.14", compared to 0.13779535" if you use all the least significant digits of the exact measurement. You would only be off by a bit more than 0.002" which is less than the thickness of a sheet of tissue paper. As the saying goes, "close enough for government work" 8-)

It's fairly easy to imagine 3mm since that's just a little bit less than 1/8" (which is actually 0.125").

Similarly, 1 inch is 2.54cm; just to get in the ballpark, simply use 2.5. Thus, 20" = 20 x 2.5 or 50cm, then that little bit extra is 20 x 0.04 = 0.8. And so adding all that together, you get 50.8cm.

Converting meters in inches becomes more difficult since you have a much larger portion of a whole to account for, 39.38" = 1 meter; that 0.38 becomes significant and makes it a bit more difficult just to "guess" the total. Typically, we might "guess" and add a third plus a bit more for that 0.38. Or sometimes simply multiply by 39.4 instead of 39.38, then subtract just a tiny bit.

For another but wholly different type of "approximate-guesswork": say you want to know approximately how long a hunk of coax is. First you estimate the diameter of the cable when rolled up; then count the number of turns in the coil of cable, and simply multiply that times 3, then add in a bit more (because circumference = diameter times Pi, or 3.14).

Say you have 30 turns of coax in a coil that's roughly 1 foot in diameter; then it's "at least" 30 times 3 feet long = 90 feet, more probably about 95 feet or so altogether when you add in that portion needed for the 0.14. If you cheat and use your calculator instead, it says your coil of cable is actually 94.2 feet long: once again, "close nuff fer guvmint work" 8-).

Steve K0XP


Re: US screws - name

 

yes, I have em all memorized in my head.?


Re: US screws - name

 

Loews, Menards, Autozone sells sockets :)

On Thursday, March 20, 2025 at 10:16:57 AM EDT, Don Roden <donroden@...> wrote:


I have lost my 10mm socket.

W4DNR


On 2025-03-20 2:33 am, Steve wrote:

On 3/19/2025 11:06 PM, Fran?ois via groups.io wrote:

Surface area =? length x width.? 27 1/4"? = 27.25"?
5/16 = .315"

7/8" = .875"?

etc, etc.

?

Ah, ok.

You convert the mixed numbers into decimals and you get "? (square inches).

?

5/16 = .315"

7/8" = .875"

?

Do you have these correspondences in your head like the multiplication tables?

Many of them, I do, yes. Many of us who have done very much "homebrewing" of chassis, panels, etc. through the years have sorta memorized those fractions of inches. At the least, you will almost always find charts posted on our workshops showing those fractions in large print so we can easily read it across the shop (when we can't remember one right off the bat). And yes, we also sometimes more-formally call our system of inches and feet the "imperial" measurement system; although more often, we call it the SAE system, which stands for Society of Automotive Engineers, which in years past, used to "champion" the use of inches and feet especially in American automobiles.

Also, approximating converting mm to inches isn't very difficult: just remember that 1 mm is just a little bit less than 0.04" (0.039371", to be more exact). Therefore, you're almost always "close enough" to just use 0.040" as the length of 1 mm. The easy way to imagine 0.04" is that it's just a little bit wider than the gap of olden time automotive spark plugs used to be set at (which was almost always 0.032", sometimes as wide as 0.038"; but more recently with the use of high performance electronic ignition systems, 0.045" or even 0.060").

Thus, 3.5 mm is 3 times 0.04", plus half of another 0.04" or 0.02"; and so 3.5mm = 0.12 + 0.02 = a total of about 0.14", compared to 0.13779535" if you use all the least significant digits of the exact measurement. You would only be off by a bit more than 0.002" which is less than the thickness of a sheet of tissue paper. As the saying goes, "close enough for government work" 8-)

It's fairly easy to imagine 3mm since that's just a little bit less than 1/8" (which is actually 0.125").

Similarly, 1 inch is 2.54cm; just to get in the ballpark, simply use 2.5. Thus, 20" = 20 x 2.5 or 50cm, then that little bit extra is 20 x 0.04 = 0.8. And so adding all that together, you get 50.8cm.

Converting meters in inches becomes more difficult since you have a much larger portion of a whole to account for, 39.38" = 1 meter; that 0.38 becomes significant and makes it a bit more difficult just to "guess" the total. Typically, we might "guess" and add a third plus a bit more for that 0.38. Or sometimes simply multiply by 39.4 instead of 39.38, then subtract just a tiny bit.

For another but wholly different type of "approximate-guesswork": say you want to know approximately how long a hunk of coax is. First you estimate the diameter of the cable when rolled up; then count the number of turns in the coil of cable, and simply multiply that times 3, then add in a bit more (because circumference = diameter times Pi, or 3.14).

Say you have 30 turns of coax in a coil that's roughly 1 foot in diameter; then it's "at least" 30 times 3 feet long = 90 feet, more probably about 95 feet or so altogether when you add in that portion needed for the 0.14. If you cheat and use your calculator instead, it says your coil of cable is actually 94.2 feet long: once again, "close nuff fer guvmint work" 8-).

Steve K0XP


Re: US screws - name

 


Re: US screws - name

 

开云体育

I have lost my 10mm socket.

W4DNR


On 2025-03-20 2:33 am, Steve wrote:

On 3/19/2025 11:06 PM, Fran?ois via groups.io wrote:

Surface area =? length x width.? 27 1/4"? = 27.25"?
5/16 = .315"

7/8" = .875"?

etc, etc.

?

Ah, ok.

You convert the mixed numbers into decimals and you get "? (square inches).

?

5/16 = .315"

7/8" = .875"

?

Do you have these correspondences in your head like the multiplication tables?

Many of them, I do, yes. Many of us who have done very much "homebrewing" of chassis, panels, etc. through the years have sorta memorized those fractions of inches. At the least, you will almost always find charts posted on our workshops showing those fractions in large print so we can easily read it across the shop (when we can't remember one right off the bat). And yes, we also sometimes more-formally call our system of inches and feet the "imperial" measurement system; although more often, we call it the SAE system, which stands for Society of Automotive Engineers, which in years past, used to "champion" the use of inches and feet especially in American automobiles.

Also, approximating converting mm to inches isn't very difficult: just remember that 1 mm is just a little bit less than 0.04" (0.039371", to be more exact). Therefore, you're almost always "close enough" to just use 0.040" as the length of 1 mm. The easy way to imagine 0.04" is that it's just a little bit wider than the gap of olden time automotive spark plugs used to be set at (which was almost always 0.032", sometimes as wide as 0.038"; but more recently with the use of high performance electronic ignition systems, 0.045" or even 0.060").

Thus, 3.5 mm is 3 times 0.04", plus half of another 0.04" or 0.02"; and so 3.5mm = 0.12 + 0.02 = a total of about 0.14", compared to 0.13779535" if you use all the least significant digits of the exact measurement. You would only be off by a bit more than 0.002" which is less than the thickness of a sheet of tissue paper. As the saying goes, "close enough for government work" 8-)

It's fairly easy to imagine 3mm since that's just a little bit less than 1/8" (which is actually 0.125").

Similarly, 1 inch is 2.54cm; just to get in the ballpark, simply use 2.5. Thus, 20" = 20 x 2.5 or 50cm, then that little bit extra is 20 x 0.04 = 0.8. And so adding all that together, you get 50.8cm.

Converting meters in inches becomes more difficult since you have a much larger portion of a whole to account for, 39.38" = 1 meter; that 0.38 becomes significant and makes it a bit more difficult just to "guess" the total. Typically, we might "guess" and add a third plus a bit more for that 0.38. Or sometimes simply multiply by 39.4 instead of 39.38, then subtract just a tiny bit.

For another but wholly different type of "approximate-guesswork": say you want to know approximately how long a hunk of coax is. First you estimate the diameter of the cable when rolled up; then count the number of turns in the coil of cable, and simply multiply that times 3, then add in a bit more (because circumference = diameter times Pi, or 3.14).

Say you have 30 turns of coax in a coil that's roughly 1 foot in diameter; then it's "at least" 30 times 3 feet long = 90 feet, more probably about 95 feet or so altogether when you add in that portion needed for the 0.14. If you cheat and use your calculator instead, it says your coil of cable is actually 94.2 feet long: once again, "close nuff fer guvmint work" 8-).

Steve K0XP


Re: US screws - name

 

开云体育

On 3/19/2025 11:06 PM, Fran?ois via groups.io wrote:

Surface area =? length x width.? 27 1/4"? = 27.25"?
5/16 = .315"

7/8" = .875"?

etc, etc.

?

Ah, ok.

You convert the mixed numbers into decimals and you get "? (square inches).

?

5/16 = .315"

7/8" = .875"

?

Do you have these correspondences in your head like the multiplication tables?

Many of them, I do, yes. Many of us who have done very much "homebrewing" of chassis, panels, etc. through the years have sorta memorized those fractions of inches. At the least, you will almost always find charts posted on our workshops showing those fractions in large print so we can easily read it across the shop (when we can't remember one right off the bat). And yes, we also sometimes more-formally call our system of inches and feet the "imperial" measurement system; although more often, we call it the SAE system, which stands for Society of Automotive Engineers, which in years past, used to "champion" the use of inches and feet especially in American automobiles.

Also, approximating converting mm to inches isn't very difficult: just remember that 1 mm is just a little bit less than 0.04" (0.039371", to be more exact). Therefore, you're almost always "close enough" to just use 0.040" as the length of 1 mm. The easy way to imagine 0.04" is that it's just a little bit wider than the gap of olden time automotive spark plugs used to be set at (which was almost always 0.032", sometimes as wide as 0.038"; but more recently with the use of high performance electronic ignition systems, 0.045" or even 0.060").

Thus, 3.5 mm is 3 times 0.04", plus half of another 0.04" or 0.02"; and so 3.5mm = 0.12 + 0.02 = a total of about 0.14", compared to 0.13779535" if you use all the least significant digits of the exact measurement. You would only be off by a bit more than 0.002" which is less than the thickness of a sheet of tissue paper. As the saying goes, "close enough for government work" 8-)

It's fairly easy to imagine 3mm since that's just a little bit less than 1/8" (which is actually 0.125").

Similarly, 1 inch is 2.54cm; just to get in the ballpark, simply use 2.5. Thus, 20" = 20 x 2.5 or 50cm, then that little bit extra is 20 x 0.04 = 0.8. And so adding all that together, you get 50.8cm.

Converting meters in inches becomes more difficult since you have a much larger portion of a whole to account for, 39.38" = 1 meter; that 0.38 becomes significant and makes it a bit more difficult just to "guess" the total. Typically, we might "guess" and add a third plus a bit more for that 0.38. Or sometimes simply multiply by 39.4 instead of 39.38, then subtract just a tiny bit.

For another but wholly different type of "approximate-guesswork": say you want to know approximately how long a hunk of coax is. First you estimate the diameter of the cable when rolled up; then count the number of turns in the coil of cable, and simply multiply that times 3, then add in a bit more (because circumference = diameter times Pi, or 3.14).

Say you have 30 turns of coax in a coil that's roughly 1 foot in diameter; then it's "at least" 30 times 3 feet long = 90 feet, more probably about 95 feet or so altogether when you add in that portion needed for the 0.14. If you cheat and use your calculator instead, it says your coil of cable is actually 94.2 feet long: once again, "close nuff fer guvmint work" 8-).

Steve K0XP


Re: US screws - name

 

开云体育

Surface area =? length x width.? 27 1/4"? = 27.25"?
5/16 = .315"

7/8" = .875"?

etc, etc.

?

Ah, ok.

You convert the mixed numbers into decimals and you get "? (square inches).

?

5/16 = .315"

7/8" = .875"

?

Do you have these correspondences in your head like the multiplication tables?

?

5

7

16

8

0,3125

0,875

?

--

F1AMM

Fran?ois

De la part de Jim VE7RF via groups.io
贰苍惫辞测é?: jeudi 20 mars 2025 05:15


Re: US screws - name

 

Surface area =? length x width.? 27 1/4"? = 27.25"?
5/16 = .315"
7/8" = .875"?
etc, etc.


12 KW CCS ON 160-15M....USING THE 3CX-6000A7..... PART 23

 

12 KW CCS ON 160-15M....USING THE 3CX-6000A7..... PART 23

Here, the 7.0 vac @ 80 amp CCS? ?fil xfmr and the mating? 4 amp,? 240 vac variac is installed.? ?Along with the pair of 100 amp? CCS rated....'supercon connectors'.? ?4 ga wire? from supercon connectors? over to RF deck...where another pair of 100 amp connectors will be installed.? ?The supercon 100 amp connectors use? 5/16" studs on the back end. (The larger 250 amp version uses? 1/2"? studs? They also come in a 50 amp version, using 1/4-28 studs......and also a 25 amp version, using 10-32 studs).? The power supply is progressing slowly due to time constraints.? Fil voltage will be measured at the cathode terminals....via a small RF choke in each leg.? On new / rebuilt tubes, it's run at rated V? for the 1st 200 hrs. Emission increases during the 1st 200 hrs, then levels off.? ?After 200 hrs, the fil V is reduced by 10 %.... like down to 6.3 vac.


Re: US screws - name

 

开云体育

In Canada, we use both SAE and Metric. […] However,? cars are all metric, including cars built in the usa.?

When you mix the two, it must be terrible. And yet the US'OM counts wavelengths in meters.

?

How do you calculate a surface area when the dimensions are like 27 1/4 inches?

?

Strange about cars. At home, I have gardening equipment with Briggs & Stratton engines; they're US screws. In France, they're called "imperial size."

?

It's a pain, and even then, when it comes to screws, the choice is limited, but when you use tubes...

--

F1AMM

Fran?ois

De la part de Jim VE7RF via groups.io
贰苍惫辞测é?: mardi 18 mars 2025 20:58