Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- Ham-Amplifiers
- Messages
Search
Re: SB-1000
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýSee ? for the full treatise. 73, Kim N5OP On 4/17/2025 6:47 PM, Adrian Fewster
via groups.io wrote:
--
Kim Elmore, Ph.D. (Adj. Assoc. Prof., OU School of Meteorology, CCM, PP SEL/MEL/Glider, UAS, N5OP, 2nd Class Radiotelegraph, GROL) ¡°Listen, it's too big a world to be in competition with everybody else. The only guy I have to get better than is who I am right now.¡± ¨C Col. Sherman T. Potter, 4077 M.A.S.H. |
Re: SB-1000
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýPower is RMS. Power can vary, but it's always RMS. The idea is
that for sine wave AC, RMS voltage and current will dissipate the
same power as the DC values for both. My digital vector RF watt
meter does not magically switch to computing power from the peak
RF voltage when I switch it to peak. To do would be
nonsensical.When I select "average" it yields the average over
some integration period; it doesn't switch to RMS.? 73, Kim N5OP On 4/17/2025 6:47 PM, Adrian Fewster
via groups.io wrote:
--
Kim Elmore, Ph.D. (Adj. Assoc. Prof., OU School of Meteorology, CCM, PP SEL/MEL/Glider, UAS, N5OP, 2nd Class Radiotelegraph, GROL) ¡°Listen, it's too big a world to be in competition with everybody else. The only guy I have to get better than is who I am right now.¡± ¨C Col. Sherman T. Potter, 4077 M.A.S.H. |
Re: SB-1000
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýKeep in mind that a single sine wave cycle has an RMS value that is peak/1.414. 73, Kim Elmore On 4/17/2025 6:32 PM, Kim Elmore wrote:
--
Kim Elmore, Ph.D. (Adj. Assoc. Prof., OU School of Meteorology, CCM, PP SEL/MEL/Glider, UAS, N5OP, 2nd Class Radiotelegraph, GROL) ¡°Listen, it's too big a world to be in competition with everybody else. The only guy I have to get better than is who I am right now.¡± ¨C Col. Sherman T. Potter, 4077 M.A.S.H. |
Re: SB-1000
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýI believe those were peak *input* power levels. This is what
upset AM fans so much when it was changed to 1500 W peak output,
because they could get more than 1500 W peak? power with 2000 W
peak input running Class C plate modulation. 73, Kim N5OP On 4/17/2025 5:46 PM, Dave w6de wrote:
--
Kim Elmore, Ph.D. (Adj. Assoc. Prof., OU School of Meteorology, CCM, PP SEL/MEL/Glider, UAS, N5OP, 2nd Class Radiotelegraph, GROL) ¡°Listen, it's too big a world to be in competition with everybody else. The only guy I have to get better than is who I am right now.¡± ¨C Col. Sherman T. Potter, 4077 M.A.S.H. |
Re: SB-1000
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThat's simply incorrect. Our voice "peaks" are very long,
compared to the RF frequency, they they have do indeed have a
running RMS value. "Peak" on a watt meter is the peak power, which
is always part of a a running-RMS (like a running mean but RMS
instead) power.? Your house current id 60 Hz and has a peak voltage of about 169
V. Is your light blulb or power input to you amp rated based on
120 VAC or 169 V peak AC? Yes, wire insulation must be rated for
the peak voltage it is to with stand, but it's current carrying
capacity is rated in the RMS current. There is no such thing as
"RMS power": it's simply power, computed based on the RMS voltage,
current, or the RMS voltage squared over the impedance, or the RMS
current squared milipaited by the impedance. 73, Kim N5OP On 4/17/2025 6:04 PM, Adrian Fewster
via groups.io wrote:
--
Kim Elmore, Ph.D. (Adj. Assoc. Prof., OU School of Meteorology, CCM, PP SEL/MEL/Glider, UAS, N5OP, 2nd Class Radiotelegraph, GROL) ¡°Listen, it's too big a world to be in competition with everybody else. The only guy I have to get better than is who I am right now.¡± ¨C Col. Sherman T. Potter, 4077 M.A.S.H. |
Re: SB-1000
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýGrids don¡¯t have enough thermal mass for protection like a plate has.? Exceeding peak values are enough to blow out a grid. ? Many moons ago, I had a Henry 3-KA it had a pair of Eimac 3-500Zs had sheet metal plates and ~ 3500 Volts on the plates.? It was a beast.? It was a mess when I bought it.? I had to rebuilt the plate circuit wiring and replace the noisy plate circuit fan.? I replaced the fan with a more powerful Dayton squirrel cage blower. This was in the days when the US FCC power limits were 2K peak output.? The FCC intended that 2K peak to be for SSB. ?But the rule was written 2KW peak.? 2KW peak for SSB is also 2 KW peak for CW. ?At that power level the plates were a nice dull red¡ªjust like the spec sheets says.? And a Bird Wattmeter indicated 2 KW output¡ªprobably exceeded the 500 Watt per tube dissipation but the greater air volume helped mitigate that some.? Worked out well for a bunch of CQ World-Wide Contests. ? 73, Dave, w6de ? From: [email protected]
<[email protected]> On Behalf Of Kim Elmore via groups.io
Sent: 17 April, 2025 19:33 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ham-amplifiers] SB-1000 ? I can¡¯t help but chime in: RMS is the only value that makes sense. Outlet voltage in your house is 120 V RMS. There¡¯s no such thing as ¡°RMS power¡±; peak power come from peak RMS values.? ? Kim N5OP ? ? "People that make music together cannot be enemies, at least as long as the music lasts."?-- Paul Hindemith
|
Re: SB-1000
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýOn 4/17/2025 1:51 PM, Peter Voelpel
wrote:
Ahhha... in that example, Eimac is calling the SWING of plate or grid voltage "peak". *I've* always considered the "peak plate voltage" to be the most positive voltage that the plate can attain (and the corollary is the "negative peak plate voltage" would be the most negative plate voltage), and I think the rest of us have done so, too. But in that example, that writer is NOT using that same "definition" and in fact, at the end of that first paragraph, he seems to mix (or at least combine) terms when he says "This is a peak swing of 220 volts, and the peak r-f grid voltage is 220 volts.".? And just prior to that, he writes "... the greatest each value swings away from the d-c value. This is known as the peak value of the r-f voltage." Looks like a matter of semantics? 8-) Steve, K0XP |
Re: SB-1000
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýSorry, Eimac said different in "care and feeding of power grid tubes". Your formula is for driving power. ? 73 Peter ? ? ? ? ? ? ? -----Original-Nachricht----- Betreff: Re: [ham-amplifiers] SB-1000 Datum: 2025-04-16T03:03:50+0200 Von: "KG2RG via groups.io" <justinandyazny@...> ?
The Eimac formula for grid dissipation is:
Pg=Vgc X Ig
where Vgc is the peak positive grid to cathode voltage
and Ig is the DC grid current. ?
? ? |
Re: SB-1000
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýI can¡¯t help but chime in: RMS is the only value that makes sense. Outlet voltage in your house is 120 V RMS. There¡¯s no such thing as ¡°RMS power¡±; peak power come from peak RMS values.?Kim N5OP "People that make music together cannot be enemies, at least as long as the music lasts."?-- Paul Hindemith On Apr 17, 2025, at 11:55, KG2RG via groups.io <justinandyazny@...> wrote:
|
Re: SB-1000
Duty cycle is considered. These are peak voltage obtained by 100% duty cycle continues wave.
?
the Eimac formula for calculating grid dissipation is based on peak.?
Pg = vga X Ig ?
anyway, anything I state is like I said, this is what I know, how I calculate it. I¡¯m not an engineer, just an amateur. There are plenty of engineers floating around here and if I¡¯m incorrect, I would love to be corrected as that would benefit myself and I¡¯m always open to learning more. Any day I can learn is a day of victory.
?
PS, this stuff is the fun part of the hobby!?
?
73!!
|
Re: SB-1000
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHmmmm¡.It seems to me that Vgc should be the RMS, NOT the peak value in determining the grid dissipation.? The RMS value will determine the actual amount of heating.? This makes the dissipation calculation better.? Additionally, duty cycle should also be considered. -Chuck K1KW ? From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of KG2RG via groups.io ? The formula for grid dissipation is? Pg = Vgc X Ig ? where vgc is the peak positive grid to cathode voltage. Ig is the DC grid current.? grid dissipation is peak voltage multiplied by Grid current.? If you run 100W CW exciter drive into an Eimac 3-500Z at the SB-1000 and AL-80B max limits listed in their manuals of Ig 200mA and Ip 550mA, then this is what calculates.? as per Eimac data sheet, drive impedance is 115 and ?grid dissipation is 20W.? 2 figure out peak voltage: ? if voltage squared divided by resistance = power.? ? then 100W CW drive X 115 drive impedance = 11,500. Extracting the sq root = 107.2V RMS.? finally 150 peak V multiplied by 0.2mA Ig = 30W grid dissipation. That exceeds Eimac listed grid dissipation by 50%.? |
Re: SB-1000
Don¡¯t forget that the ratings on the tube are key down 24/7 CCS.. ?W8JI will tell you like he said hundreds of times before that the killer of tubes is not a slight over plate or grid current it¡¯s dissipation over time the ruins tubes. ?The only downside to over current is the plate and grid dissipation reaches?its limit faster, hence if you run it that way to ?get?higher pep power you need to lower the duty cycle. ?Since SSB is around 30% of key down the ICAS current rating his higher but of course not CCS. ?Time is the deciding factor.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Thursday, April 17, 2025, 9:51 AM, Jim VE7RF via groups.io <jim.thom@...> wrote:
|
Re: SB-1000
The formula for grid dissipation is?
Pg = Vgc X Ig
?
where vgc is the peak positive grid to cathode voltage.
Ig is the DC grid current.?
grid dissipation is peak voltage multiplied by Grid current.?
If you run 100W CW exciter drive into an Eimac 3-500Z at the SB-1000 and AL-80B max limits listed in their manuals of Ig 200mA and Ip 550mA, then this is what calculates.?
as per Eimac data sheet, drive impedance is 115 and ?grid dissipation is 20W.?
2 figure out peak voltage:
?
if
voltage squared divided by resistance = power.?
?
then
100W CW drive X 115 drive impedance = 11,500. Extracting the sq root = 107.2V RMS.?
for peak voltage, 107.2V x1.4 (2sq) = 150 peak voltage.? finally
150 peak V multiplied by 0.2mA Ig = 30W grid dissipation. That exceeds Eimac listed grid dissipation by 50%.? |
Re: SB-1000
On 4/17/2025 6:51 AM, Jim VE7RF via groups.io wrote:
###? ?On the SB-1000,? AL-80B, they rate it at 1000w? pep out on SSB? (550 ma).....and? only 850 watts out on CW (450 ma).The person to ask to clarify this would be the man who designed the SB1000 and AL-series: Mr. W8JI, hisself. Steve, K0XP |
Re: SB-1000
On 4/17/2025 6:41 AM, Jim VE7RF via groups.io wrote:
(A) 70.7 vrms x .3 =? 21.21 watts? ?grid dissV-rms obviously yields watts-RMS, and Volts-peak gives watts-peak. Perhaps Reid Brandon? will chime in.? ?Right now, I can't fathom why Eimac would use peak cathode RF voltage? instead of RMD cathode voltage.Because SSB is measured by it's peak: Peak Envelope Power. RMS only applies under continous carrier conditions. Steve, K0XP |
Re: SB-1000
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 08:20 AM, KG2RG wrote:
###? ?On the SB-1000,? AL-80B, they rate it at 1000w? pep out on? SSB? (550 ma).....and? only 850 watts out on CW (450 ma).??
|
Re: SB-1000
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 08:59 AM, Peter Voelpel wrote:
Yes, power is never calculated with peak voltages. That's what I thought too.? It shoulda been? RMS cathode voltage? X? DC grid current? =? Grid dissipation.................. BUT it's not.? Eimac uses? PEAK? RF? cathode voltage X? DC grid current =? grid diss.? On a L4B, it runs 300 ma? DC grid current and 800 ma plate current? at 2.5 kv under load.? With 100 watts? drive it amounts to either: (A) 70.7 vrms x .3 =? 21.21 watts? ?grid diss (B) 100 V peak? x .3? =? 30 watts grid diss.? The above is for TWO tubes.? ?Each tube has? 20 watts of? CCS grid diss.? ?So a total of 40 watts? CCS grid diss.? Perhaps Reid Brandon? will chime in.? ?Right now, I can't fathom why Eimac would use peak cathode RF voltage? instead of? RMD cathode voltage.? |
Re: SB-1000
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 07:32 AM, Fran?ois wrote:
That 1 kw pep output from the single 3-500Z? is because they are using IVS? (intermittent voice ratings) for SSB.? ?That operation was approved by Eimac. IE:? it's because of the low duty cycle on SSB.? They rate the same amp at 850 watts? output on CW mode.? Same idea,? CW is a reduced duty cycle....... but not as much as SSB...... hence the 1000/850 ratings? for SSB / CW.? |
Re: SB-1000
Francois.? No problems with removing all those grid caps and grid chokes.? ?Save the 2 x grid chokes.?? Use 3 x separate copper straps? for each tube....then bond the? 3 x grid pins directly to the chassis.? Best mod for those amps yet. IMD improves a bit.? And also less drive required.? But with any bias diodes installed, more drive required to overcome the grid bias,? ?so it's like one step forward.....then one step backwards.? ?It comes out a wash.? |