ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Coax to connect between exciter and SB-200

 

Hi Mike, Again, SWR does not change along a coax unless the coax has loss. If you put the SWR meter anywhere in the coax between the rig and the amp, the SWR should read the same. Sometimes, there are strange SWR readings when the RF travels both inside the coax and on the outer conductor as common mode currents. This has lead to some incorrect understanding about SWR. Putting a SWR meter at the input of an amp would be interesting. I have a SWR meter between my rig and my SB-220. I use the meter to check my antenna SWR before turning the amp on. It also shows the SWR at the input of the amp. I am happy with anything less than 1.75:1 going into the amp. I get all the power output that I need. GL with your amp. ....Bill K3HZP


Re: Coax to connect between exciter and SB-200

 

What is the name for those labels used on that tuner ?? I have seen em white on black, white on blue, and white on red. Used in industrial commercial applications.


Re: Coax to connect between exciter and SB-200

 

On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 10:48 PM, mfle2001 wrote:
Thats interesting Bill, I guess VSWR read by an SWR meter varies along the length of coax because of the changing impedance / voltage ratio, but the actual SWR does not. I am currently building a GG amp and wondering about having a VSWR meter coupler directly at the input.

Mike
VK2AMF

I don't buy that for one second. SWR won't change at all with different line lengths. Only the R / X will change, but swr remains the same. Having said that, with real long lines to ants, like say 200-300' on upper HF, swr at the shack end will decrease, simply cuz of line loss. IE: say 3 db of line loss. Reflected power (after line loss to the ant, gets attenuated by the same 3 db). IE: joe ham puts put 200 watts frwd power.... but only 100 w gets to the ant. With a 3:1 swr ( measured at the ant), he has 25% reflected power...( 25 watts reflected). That same 25 watts gets attenuated by 3db, and only 12.5 watts is shown as reflected power at shack end.

200 frwd and 12.5 watts reflected is the same as 100w frwd and 6.25 watts reflected = 1.4:1 swr. Meanwhile his real swr is 3:1 at the ant, and he only has 75 watts radiated.

In the case of coax to the amp, we are only talking abt real short lengths, like 3' to 10'...and coax loss is dick. The input Z of the amp didn't change... and the stray C, between cathode and chassis (via the grnded grid) didn't change, it's constant....and it's also directly in parallel with the C2 cap of the tuned input for each band. On the L4B, a single .01uf @ 2 kv disc coupling cap, directly between the tuned input...and the cathode. There is NO coax between the output of the tuned inputs...and cathode of tube....just the single coupling cap.


Re: Coax to connect between exciter and SB-200

 

Interesting, not familiar with those tuners, thanks for the info Hal.

Actually thinking further about it, whilst reflected voltage would change along the line not sure if the ratio to forward would alter, but I have experienced different readings depending on the length.

Mike.
VK2AMF

At 09:05 AM 2/11/2023, you wrote:

Dear Mike,



The ETO/Alpha AC-77 antenna tuner has a Bird

wattmeter right in the chassis, with a front panel

slug socket.

[]

John Bliss adopted that idea into his Bliss Z-Matchmaster tuners.



I know W9AC has one of Johns tuners and that came with two separate wattmeters.







Hal Mandel

W4HBM

Mike Fleetwood
Canberra Australia and Sidcup UK.

Worldwide email address is: mfleetwood@...


Re: Coax to connect between exciter and SB-200

 

Dear Mike,

The ETO/Alpha AC-77 antenna tuner has a Bird

wattmeter right in the chassis, with a front panel

slug socket.

John Bliss adopted that idea into his Bliss Z-Matchmaster tuners.

I know W9AC has one of John’s tuners and that came with two separate wattmeters.

Hal Mandel

W4HBM


Re: Coax to connect between exciter and SB-200

 

Thats interesting Bill, I guess VSWR read by an SWR meter varies along the length of coax because of the changing impedance / voltage ratio, but the actual SWR does not. I am currently building a GG amp and wondering about having a VSWR meter coupler directly at the input.

Mike
VK2AMF

At 01:28 AM 2/11/2023, you wrote:

The best way to view the mismatch at the amp input is to look at a point on the Smith chart. If the amp input impedance is not 50+j0, the point will NOT be at the center of the Smith chart. It will be on a SWR circle going around the center. This circle is centered on the center location of the Smith chart. The distance the point moves on the circle is a function of its electrical length of the coax. The SWR does NOT change along the coax unless there ls loss in the coax. What does change is the reactance and resistance combination. Assume the amp input impedance is on a 2:1 SWR circle. Then the impedance could be 100+j0 ohms at a certain coax length or could be 25+j0 at another coax length. In other words the real and imaginary combination change a lot but the point stays on the 2:1 SWR circle. The SWR does not change. ...Bill K3HZP

Mike Fleetwood
Canberra Australia and Sidcup UK.

Worldwide email address is: mfleetwood@...


Re: Coax to connect between exciter and SB-200

 

The best way to view the mismatch at the amp input is to look at a point on the Smith chart. If the amp input impedance is not 50+j0, the point will NOT be at the center of the Smith chart. It will be on a SWR circle going around the center. This circle is centered on the center location of the Smith chart. The distance the point moves on the circle is a function of its electrical length of the coax. The SWR does NOT change along the coax unless there ls loss in the coax. What does change is the reactance and resistance combination. Assume the amp input impedance is on a 2:1 SWR circle. Then the impedance could be 100+j0 ohms at a certain coax length or could be 25+j0 at another coax length. In other words the real and imaginary combination change a lot but the point stays on the 2:1 SWR circle. The SWR does not change. ...Bill K3HZP


Re: Coax to connect between exciter and SB-200

 

Thanks, Adrian � a very good explanation ! I wrote an article on SWR for AR magazine many years ago. Covered the same ground.

Cheers,

John

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Adrian Fewster
Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2023 6:52 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ham-amplifiers] Coax to connect between exciter and SB-200

Also ;

On 1/11/23 08:43, Adrian Fewster via groups.io wrote:

I would have thought such information would be in the public domain, if a web link etc, ... the reluctance to share to the group, I find odd.

Here is another interesting site on the subject ;

73

vk4tux


Re: Coax to connect between exciter and SB-200

 

John,
Send me a personal email with the address to send it to. I got the address off of here, used this one...

vk6jx=[email protected]"

sent it but it bounced.
Bob W4JFA


On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 8:17 PM John Sparkes via <vk6jx=[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Bob � I would like to read that too, if you would put it on here or send it to me directly.

Thanks !

John VK6JX

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Bob
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2023 8:44 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ham-amplifiers] Coax to connect between exciter and SB-200

Jim, I sent you an email directly. The address copied kinda strange so not sure if you'll get it or not.

Let me know. You'll be interested in reading. Not that long.

Bob W4JFA

On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 8:30 AM Bob via <W4JFABob=[email protected]> wrote:

Jim, If a 50 ohm coax is NOT terminated into a 50R - j0 load, the impedance will change with length. Somewhat like using a 1/4 wave 75 ohm coax to match/change impedance of

certain antennas. Now some will say that the impedance will change but the SWR does/should not. I have a little write up from a feed line expert

explaining why the SWR does indeed change, just like your 3 foot to 6 foot example changed the SWR.

Personally I've noticed this change more so on ten meters than lower bands. Makes sense because for example a 3 foot piece of coax is a larger percentage of a wabvelength

on ten meters than on the lower bands.

Bob W4JFA

On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 2:43 AM Jim VE7RF <jim.thom@...> wrote:

Watch out with length of coax between xcvr + input of the amp. On all 4 of my Drake L4B amps, if coax is 3' long, input swr is flat on all bands. But when I use a 6' jumper, input swr increases to aprx 1.4:1 or 1.5:1 and no amount of slug tuning will reduce it. And the Q of the tuned input PI networks on the drake amps is a helluva lot higher vs a SB-220. (cap values are higher)

On my big hb amps, they all use a manually tuned, PI tuned input. Same deal, but at least I can tune it dead flat.

I still have not figured out why the interconnecting coax length affects input swr.

Jim VE7RF


Re: Coax to connect between exciter and SB-200

 

Yep. Just to clarify, with 50 ohm coax/feedline, if the load is 50 ohms resistance with zero reactance, the SWR will not change.
Bob W4JFA

On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 12:37 PM Jim VE7RF <jim.thom@...> wrote:

Tnx Bob.... got it. Into a 50 ohm DL..... swr is 1:1 regardless of coax length. My guess is since the C1 and C2 caps in the tuned inputs are fixed...and only the coil is adjustable, there is no real way to adjust it correctly. It's probably off a tiny bit, and enough such that it's not 50 ohms + zero reactance. Then when the cable length is changed, the values used on the tuned input are even more outa whack.

On my hb tube amps, I use a manually tuned, PI tuned input, with a tapped coil, and a pair of broadcast caps. ( both padded on 160m only). Coax length is a non issue.

On the next manually tuned, tuned input, I'm going to use a 0 - 4.4 uh roller coil (8 ga wire used)..and a pair of broadcast caps ( padded on 160m). Then I can vary the loaded Q between extremes, on each band..... which is more of an experiment to see the effects on IMD vs loaded Q, and some other tests.

Years ago, I used a pair of Arco trimmer caps ( padded on the lower bands) and a T-50 coil...... one assy for each band. Simple tweak for flat swr. Again, cable length did not enter the equation.


Re: Coax to connect between exciter and SB-200

 

Tnx Bob.... got it. Into a 50 ohm DL..... swr is 1:1 regardless of coax length. My guess is since the C1 and C2 caps in the tuned inputs are fixed...and only the coil is adjustable, there is no real way to adjust it correctly. It's probably off a tiny bit, and enough such that it's not 50 ohms + zero reactance. Then when the cable length is changed, the values used on the tuned input are even more outa whack.

On my hb tube amps, I use a manually tuned, PI tuned input, with a tapped coil, and a pair of broadcast caps. ( both padded on 160m only). Coax length is a non issue.

On the next manually tuned, tuned input, I'm going to use a 0 - 4.4 uh roller coil (8 ga wire used)..and a pair of broadcast caps ( padded on 160m). Then I can vary the loaded Q between extremes, on each band..... which is more of an experiment to see the effects on IMD vs loaded Q, and some other tests.

Years ago, I used a pair of Arco trimmer caps ( padded on the lower bands) and a T-50 coil...... one assy for each band. Simple tweak for flat swr. Again, cable length did not enter the equation.


Re: Coax to connect between exciter and SB-200

 

Hi Bob � I would like to read that too, if you would put it on here or send it to me directly.

Thanks !

John VK6JX

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Bob
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2023 8:44 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ham-amplifiers] Coax to connect between exciter and SB-200

Jim, I sent you an email directly. The address copied kinda strange so not sure if you'll get it or not.

Let me know. You'll be interested in reading. Not that long.

Bob W4JFA

On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 8:30 AM Bob via <W4JFABob=[email protected]> wrote:

Jim, If a 50 ohm coax is NOT terminated into a 50R - j0 load, the impedance will change with length. Somewhat like using a 1/4 wave 75 ohm coax to match/change impedance of

certain antennas. Now some will say that the impedance will change but the SWR does/should not. I have a little write up from a feed line expert

explaining why the SWR does indeed change, just like your 3 foot to 6 foot example changed the SWR.

Personally I've noticed this change more so on ten meters than lower bands. Makes sense because for example a 3 foot piece of coax is a larger percentage of a wabvelength

on ten meters than on the lower bands.

Bob W4JFA

On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 2:43 AM Jim VE7RF <jim.thom@...> wrote:

Watch out with length of coax between xcvr + input of the amp. On all 4 of my Drake L4B amps, if coax is 3' long, input swr is flat on all bands. But when I use a 6' jumper, input swr increases to aprx 1.4:1 or 1.5:1 and no amount of slug tuning will reduce it. And the Q of the tuned input PI networks on the drake amps is a helluva lot higher vs a SB-220. (cap values are higher)

On my big hb amps, they all use a manually tuned, PI tuned input. Same deal, but at least I can tune it dead flat.

I still have not figured out why the interconnecting coax length affects input swr.

Jim VE7RF


Yumper Profiles

 

Gentlemen,

If you can spare the time, calibrate your

nanoVNA boxes and run some profiles

on various coax jumpers.

Setting up the IRIG-B network at work required

any number of coax jumpers between various

panelboard instruments because everybody

in the band hadda be on the same beat.

So one day it all had to be proof-tested by

a third party, just like most of the other

control widgets, and this guy showed up

with a R&S VNA with a bag full of factory

jumpers, and the tech ran a Calibrate between

all tests, and we could plainly see that $50

jumpers were nowhere near one another

on the curve screen.

So yes, using a longer chunka coax does make

a difference, especially if it’s premium flavor.

Hal Mandel

W4HBM


Re: Coax to connect between exciter and SB-200

 

Phase angle.

If the coax length does not matter, phasing lines would not work.



On Oct 30, 2023 5:30 AM, "Bob via groups.io" <W4JFABob@...> wrote:
Jim, If a 50 ohm coax is NOT terminated into a 50R - j0 load, the impedance will change with length. Somewhat like using a 1/4 wave 75 ohm coax to match/change impedance of
certain antennas. Now some will say that the impedance will change but the SWR does/should not. I have a little write up from a feed line expert
explaining why the SWR does indeed change, just like your 3 foot to 6 foot example changed the SWR.

Personally I've noticed this change more so on ten meters than lower bands. Makes sense because for example a 3 foot piece of coax is a larger percentage of a wabvelength
on ten meters than on the lower bands.
Bob W4JFA

On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 2:43 AM Jim VE7RF <jim.thom@...> wrote:

Watch out with length of coax between xcvr + input of the amp. On all 4 of my Drake L4B amps, if coax is 3' long, input swr is flat on all bands. But when I use a 6' jumper, input swr increases to aprx 1.4:1 or 1.5:1 and no amount of slug tuning will reduce it. And the Q of the tuned input PI networks on the drake amps is a helluva lot higher vs a SB-220. (cap values are higher)

On my big hb amps, they all use a manually tuned, PI tuned input. Same deal, but at least I can tune it dead flat.

I still have not figured out why the interconnecting coax length affects input swr.

Jim VE7RF


Re: Coax to connect between exciter and SB-200

 

Jim, I sent you an email directly. The address copied kinda strange so not sure if you'll get it or not.
Let me know. You'll be interested in reading. Not that long.
Bob W4JFA

On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 8:30 AM Bob via <W4JFABob=[email protected]> wrote:
Jim, If a 50 ohm coax is NOT terminated into a 50R - j0 load, the impedance will change with length. Somewhat like using a 1/4 wave 75 ohm coax to match/change impedance of
certain antennas. Now some will say that the impedance will change but the SWR does/should not. I have a little write up from a feed line expert
explaining why the SWR does indeed change, just like your 3 foot to 6 foot example changed the SWR.

Personally I've noticed this change more so on ten meters than lower bands. Makes sense because for example a 3 foot piece of coax is a larger percentage of a wabvelength
on ten meters than on the lower bands.
Bob W4JFA

On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 2:43 AM Jim VE7RF <jim.thom@...> wrote:

Watch out with length of coax between xcvr + input of the amp. On all 4 of my Drake L4B amps, if coax is 3' long, input swr is flat on all bands. But when I use a 6' jumper, input swr increases to aprx 1.4:1 or 1.5:1 and no amount of slug tuning will reduce it. And the Q of the tuned input PI networks on the drake amps is a helluva lot higher vs a SB-220. (cap values are higher)

On my big hb amps, they all use a manually tuned, PI tuned input. Same deal, but at least I can tune it dead flat.

I still have not figured out why the interconnecting coax length affects input swr.

Jim VE7RF


Re: Coax to connect between exciter and SB-200

 

Jim, If a 50 ohm coax is NOT terminated into a 50R - j0 load, the impedance will change with length. Somewhat like using a 1/4 wave 75 ohm coax to match/change impedance of
certain antennas. Now some will say that the impedance will change but the SWR does/should not. I have a little write up from a feed line expert
explaining why the SWR does indeed change, just like your 3 foot to 6 foot example changed the SWR.

Personally I've noticed this change more so on ten meters than lower bands. Makes sense because for example a 3 foot piece of coax is a larger percentage of a wabvelength
on ten meters than on the lower bands.
Bob W4JFA

On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 2:43 AM Jim VE7RF <jim.thom@...> wrote:

Watch out with length of coax between xcvr + input of the amp. On all 4 of my Drake L4B amps, if coax is 3' long, input swr is flat on all bands. But when I use a 6' jumper, input swr increases to aprx 1.4:1 or 1.5:1 and no amount of slug tuning will reduce it. And the Q of the tuned input PI networks on the drake amps is a helluva lot higher vs a SB-220. (cap values are higher)

On my big hb amps, they all use a manually tuned, PI tuned input. Same deal, but at least I can tune it dead flat.

I still have not figured out why the interconnecting coax length affects input swr.

Jim VE7RF


Re: Tube testers

 

Hi Alek, I did consider that but I have some old AA5 radios, and an old Zenith floor radio to kinda restore so I will need it then.
I said kinda restore because I don't really restore them, I just make them work reliably.
73, Bob W4JFA


On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 8:11 PM Alek Petkovic via <vk6apk=[email protected]> wrote:

Sounds like a true ham shack Bob. Congratulations.

Another thing to consider is the actual need for a tube tester.

How often do you use it and how often are you likely to use it in the next 10 years?

You might find, like me, that the better option is to sell it or pass it on to somebody that will use it.

73, Alek VK6APK.

On 27/10/2023 10:06 pm, Bob wrote:
Jim, My shack/shop inside is getting cramped! I know it doesn't sound like it would save much space but it will.
Thanks, Bob W4JFA

On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 9:55 AM Jim VE7RF <jim.thom@...> wrote:
Store it inside the home. If you store it outside, it will end up with mildew, condensation etc, on everything. IF it has to be stored outdoors, I would put it in a sealed container, packed with a ton of silica gel (desiccant). Then change out the silica gel once per year.


Re: Coax to connect between exciter and SB-200

 

Hi fellas

For 24 out of my 41 years as an Electrical/Instrument Engineer, I worked in Alumina Refineries. Both of the refineries I worked in were owned by US companies. The first - Worsley Alumina, owned by Reynolds Metals, the second (3 sites) by Alcoa.
Hence, both companies used Honeywell process control equipment. When I started at Worsley in 1989, I was trained in the intricacies of the equipment and one thing that stuck in my memory (being a radio ham) was their recommendation that ANY coax jumper cable had to be at least 10 feet long (even if the distance between connections may have only been 1 foot) as the cable needed time to establish it's inherent impedance. This sounded like voodoo to me, but your comment on the different swr seen with different length coax jumpers brought back the memory.

Any comments ?

Cheers,

John VK6JX

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Adrian Fewster
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2023 3:24 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ham-amplifiers] Coax to connect between exciter and SB-200

I think the reason different lengths of coax effect measured swr is because its not a purely resistive load and is effected by reactance.

The type of swr measurement system would make a difference. Measured true power out compared to reflected would be better

with more expensive meters.

Some use an inline tuner to deliver dialled watts between amp and txcr.

If you replace the amp input with a purely resistive 50 ohm dummy load, do you see the same shift in measurement from 6" to 3 feet

coax patch length ?


73


vk4tux



On 29/10/23 16:43, Jim VE7RF wrote:

I still have not figured out why the interconnecting coax length
affects input swr.

Jim VE7RF


Re: Coax to connect between exciter and SB-200

 

Watch out with length of coax between xcvr + input of the amp. On all 4 of my Drake L4B amps, if coax is 3' long, input swr is flat on all bands. But when I use a 6' jumper, input swr increases to aprx 1.4:1 or 1.5:1 and no amount of slug tuning will reduce it. And the Q of the tuned input PI networks on the drake amps is a helluva lot higher vs a SB-220. (cap values are higher)

On my big hb amps, they all use a manually tuned, PI tuned input. Same deal, but at least I can tune it dead flat.

I still have not figured out why the interconnecting coax length affects input swr.

Jim VE7RF


Re: Coax to connect between exciter and SB-200

 

Don't we all know a million places we can buy jumpers if we want to ?