Re: Heatsink relationship
|
Bill and Jim,
?
In my first response it was mentioned about
the fractal relationships
of the molecular structure of materials and
their exhibitions of
varying qualities regarding excitation by
energy sources.
?
Weight and Mass were never mentioned and
maybe should be completely
disregarded, as only the structural
relationship(s) of the
component building blocks were being
considered.
?
Hal
>
> In light of your statements above, I have two questions:
>
> 1. Why is diamond, which is less dense than copper, a better heat
> conductor?
>
> 2. Why is lead, which is more dense than copper, a worse heat
> conductor.
### as I mentioned b4... steel weighs aprx the same as copper...
and doesn't conduct heat worth a damn .2 to 1 ratio for steel
to copper [all the heat trnasfer tables use copper as the
reference = 1] AL is only .57 to 1 Lead is heavy as
hell... and doesn't conduct heat worth banana's.
Jim VE7RF
>
> Bill, W6WRT
|
