This group is for all folks running the original IBM VM/370 Release 6 operating system (or later (e.g. VMTCE (Community Edition)) on Hercules. Like the other early IBM operating systems this version has always been in the public domain and so can be freely distributed. The base version as supplied by IBM is lacking in many facilities. IBM solved this by providing additional extension products which were licensed and so are not available. There are however many user enhancements available which can be installed. In addition, in order to get users up and running quickly updated "releases" of VM/370 included the most popular updates are available for download, so novices can start to learn VM without having to delve into the system internals. It is intended that this wiki will provide information on the base release and these updates.
The available versions are here :-
?
?
What is special about the 3066?
Not wanting to highjack the "[h390-vm] Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal" thread. What was unique about the 3066? I understand it was the integrated console for the /165 and /168, but what unique
By
Doug Wegscheid
·
#6137
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
Fish, I would prefer not to do this as I believe it would stop VM/CE running on my P/390. Dave
By
Dave Wade
·
#6136
·
|
Re: XNET v1.4.1
If you tackle the SMSG, then we wouldn't need commands in the CONFIG, as
By
Mark A. Stevens
·
#6135
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
Hello, How about following IBM and splitting the module into two? Just a thought. [email protected]> wrote:
By
Bertram Moshier
·
#6134
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
I've been following this thread with interest, so allow me to offer what may be, while somewhat radical, a nevertheless viable solution: Require your Hercules control file to have a "FACILITY ENABLE
By
Fish Fish
·
#6133
·
|
Re: XNET v1.4.1
Mark, Having a heartbeat really wouldn't help matters much for detecting that a system on the other side has gone away.? The main problem is really the nature of CTCE devices on Hercules.? When one
By
Bob Polmanter
·
#6132
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
Tony, If you look at the link I sent to the VMSHARE archives :- http://vm.marist.edu/~vmshare/browse.cgi?fn=DMKGRF <http://vm.marist.edu/~vmshare/browse.cgi?fn=DMKGRF&ft=PROB&args=dmkgrf+split#hit>
By
Dave Wade
·
#6131
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
On Sun, 22 Sept 2024 at 17:19, Tony Harminc <tharminc@...> wrote: [...] > Some shops made a hardware mod to support the ENTER (or maybe it was CR) key as, well, an ENTER key. The 3066 as it came
By
Tony Harminc
·
#6130
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
[email protected]> wrote: Some shops made a hardware mod to support the ENTER (or maybe it was CR) key as, well, an ENTER key. The 3066 as it came required the operator to hit the separate and very
By
Tony Harminc
·
#6129
·
|
Re: Reserving Modification Numbers
Nicely done and THANK YOU! ... Mark S.
By
Mark A. Stevens
·
#6128
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
I have played around with the ZOC TN3270 emulator, EE V1.2.5. could handle 200 columns and 81 lines at first glance. There were warning messages on exit about memory overwrites though. I have seen
By
Martin Scheffler
·
#6127
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
If this leads to dynamic screen sizes I am all for it. I already run it with a large screen size (c3270 localhost:3270 -model 3279-5 -oversize 159x48 -defaultfgbg) and the works quite nicely - for
By
[email protected]
·
#6126
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
Bertram, Addressability and space in DMKGRF always was a problem. Well in 1985 at least one site removed the 3066 support. http://vm.marist.edu/~vmshare/browse.cgi?fn=DMKGRF
By
Dave Wade
·
#6125
·
|
Reserving Modification Numbers
Beloved Members, Sorry to impose upon your day of rest and relaxation, but subsequent to the discussion on Modification Numbers, and prompted by todays note on DMKGRF I am reminded that most
By
Group Moderator
·
#6124
·
|
Re: Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
Hello, I dislike removing support from the product, but I'm not against removing 3066 console support. Just some questions. When did IBM remove support for the 3066? Is it possible to add an
By
Bertram Moshier
·
#6123
·
|
Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal
Would anyone have any heartache about deleting support for the 3066 terminal (370/168 console)??? I have mixed personal experiences with the device but, as far as I can see, there in not a single 168
By
William Denton
·
#6122
·
|
Re: XNET v1.4.1
I've written down my experiences as a How-To. I will post that in the Files section. ... Mark S.
By
Mark A. Stevens
·
#6121
·
|
Re: XNET v1.4.1
Does the lack of a "heartbeat" help or hinder? I don't know. I have kept my two KVMs up and running for 8 days, and sessions dialed to/through each XNET, and it doesn't drop. What I did discover, is
By
Mark A. Stevens
·
#6120
·
|
SX20-4400-0 IBM Virtual Machine/System Product,Quick Guide for Users
I have preserved SX20-4400-0 IBM Virtual Machine/ System Product Quick Guide for Users which I did not see in BitSavers.? There is a later version but sometimes one a couple years earlier is better
By
Sam Knutson
·
#6118
·
|
Re: TOOLSTAPE Contents
I think is this one¡ This tape contains the contributions from the attendees of the 1991 VM Workshop held June 4 through 7 on the campus of the University of Kentucky in Lexington. This tape may be
By
Dave Wade
·
#6117
·
|