开云体育

The wiki page Reserved CP Modification Numbers ( /g/h390-vm/wiki/37734/211259 ) has been updated by William Denton <williamedenton@...>. Compare Revisions (

The wiki page Reserved CMS Modification Numbers ( /g/h390-vm/wiki/37735/211258 ) has been updated by William Denton <williamedenton@...>. Compare Revisions (

I will check if the current snapshot is stable enough to show another bleeding edge preview. There are a lot of exciting new features and capabilities, at least as a Proof of Concept. Implementation

Well - me too. René.

William, I think more than that, looking at the Functional Characteristics manuals for these from BitSavers https://bitsavers.org/pdf/ibm/370/funcChar/ and I was interested to read some had a light

Perfect!! Thanks!! -- William

Personally, I would like to see efforts on EE going into creating a rich enough REXX integration that would allow the "side modes" to be implemented in REXX.like IBM did. cheers, William

From a programming standpoint, the 3066 had different geometry (80x33), different set of buffer orders, and completely different CCWs, interrupts, and sense data. I think IBM only put software support

The /168 console (like the 158 & later) didn't have very many blinky lights. As I recall, just the five above the Interrupt, Start, Stop, Load buttons. So, the "not" microfiche viewer was the

How important are the "side modes" of EE like FSLIST and FSVIEW ? I did not care of these up to now. I have reworked EE focussed on XEDIT as it was in VM/SP 1 (that means no FILELIST, RDRLIST ...).

Dave Wade wrote: [...] You don't?! Wow. Just... wow. Which, when eliminated, would free up those registers for other uses. Which, when replaced with relative instructions that don't need base

[email protected]> wrote: It was interesting from both the hardware and software points of view. I understand that the hardware was based on a stripped down 2250 with no actual graphics

Dave Wade wrote: Yes, you're right: it would. Oh well. Just a thought. -- "Fish" (David B. Trout) Software Development Laboratories http://www.softdevlabs.com mail: fish@...

Not wanting to highjack the "[h390-vm] Support for 3066 Graphic Terminal" thread. What was unique about the 3066? I understand it was the integrated console for the /165 and /168, but what unique

Fish, I would prefer not to do this as I believe it would stop VM/CE running on my P/390. Dave

If you tackle the SMSG, then we wouldn't need commands in the CONFIG, as

Hello, How about following IBM and splitting the module into two? Just a thought. [email protected]> wrote:

I've been following this thread with interest, so allow me to offer what may be, while somewhat radical, a nevertheless viable solution: Require your Hercules control file to have a "FACILITY ENABLE