开云体育

WHat would be the full year it was made? Mine starts with 1N... 73, Zack W9SZ [email protected]> wrote:

Hi David - Many thanks for this - Ive worked it out 2015! 73 Kev [email protected]> wrote:

Hi Kev, Mike, N1EVH posted this information to the list: ----- Yaesu's serial number scheme is as follows... 1st digit is the year it was made. 2nd digit is the month it was made 3rd and 4th digits

Hi all - Ive just bought a Yaesu FT817ND and I wanted to know how you can determine from the serial number how old it is?

For anyone interested in winding the RF output right down to 1mW or less, I had a little go at this, today, and here's how I got on. Before starting, I first wrote down all the settings within the

Dan, 1) the flashing display, when all is otherwise well, indicates that the PLL is unlocked (either a PLL fault or an attempt to transmit out-of-band), but read on: 2) there is also a syndrome where

Well, I removed the front cover and tightened the connector with a blade of a screw driver. I was very careful not to disturb the flat flex cable during the process. I actually didn't see how to

That's an entirely different approach to what I described but thanks for trying. Joe n1khb? Sent from the all new AOL app for Android

All the major manufacturers, at various times, offered low Power versions of their high-power radios to appeal to foundation/entry level license holders. While they may be able to possess

I don't think that there was any specific intent to target the FT-817 at foundation or basic licence classes. It is certainly true that many countries have entry-level licence classes that are

I may be off here, but as I understand it, the FT-817 was originally designed for “foundation” or “basic” class licenses (non-FCC countries). I think these are all-mode all-band licenses that

My mileage is about the same as Demetre's, and I agree with Ken that the 705 and the 817 are both great radios.. I do wish the 705 was smaller. Though the weight is about the same, the volume of the

Hi Andy and all, Really you can't compare the IC-705 with the FT-817/818 because the YAESU Rig uses 22 year old technology. As for the IC-705 not being able to do this that and the other that you are

Joseph, It sounds like you want what the LDG Z817 provides. It uses latching relays to tune so it doesn't require power once it finds the best tune. It reads band and frequency data from the radio and

Joe, sounds like a fun experiment.? You may be more ambitious than me. I did make a settings chart with each band as a quick reference. I may need to make adjustments, depending on where I tune in

The FTdx101 is not direct sampling - it's a hybrid like the FTdx10. This was a lot of the reason why I bought my 101D rather than the IC7610 - direct sampling is not a great idea when done on a

I have an MFJ random wire tuner which I like. What I've done with various antennas is to create a table of settings that I can return to as needed. It's a simple unbalanced L network.?? ?I have

Finally getting back on this, regarding a new MFJ-9219 manual tuner that was not working for me. I returned the original unit, and they sent me out a new one.? This seems to be working fine. I was

I really enjoy the FT-817ND, and was highly disappointed when there was very minimal change when they released the FT-818ND. Comparing this with the IC-705, which was a substantial improved product.

That's funny, since we're discussing a radio that has been virtually unchanged the past 23 years, but OK. Funny, I don't remember the collective yawns from the Amateur community when Icom released the