Re: Packet connector and other accessories
AES's online site is showing the 2 Collins filters @ $160 each. Dont
remember the prices on the other items. Check www.aesham.com for the
prices
Denny wa8shc
<erik.schmidt@m...> wrote:
By
Denny
·
#462
·
|
Packet connector and other accessories
Known accessories
CT39, Data cable Same as FT-100
CT62, CAT Interface cable Same as FT-100
FNB72, 9.6V/1000maH NiCad cattery
NC72B, Wall charger
By
Erik Schmidt - OZ1GIY <erik.schmidt@...>
·
#461
·
|
Re: Packet connector
According to the diagram and the odd pieces from various japanese
site's the two connectors are the same as the FT-100 one's, yaesu p/n
CT-62 and CT-39
Erik
OZ1GIY
By
Erik Schmidt - OZ1GIY <erik.schmidt@...>
·
#460
·
|
Packet connector
Does anyone know if the packet connector is the same as the FT100?
Tom NY4I
By
Thomas M. Schaefer <toms@...>
·
#459
·
|
Re: expanded tx ?
Bonnie, I have a gut feeling the rig will be as the 706/ft100 in that
you will be able to open full tx coverage but not just add MARS freqs
yourself,i'm sure some other mod will be needed until
By
g0vgz@...
·
#458
·
|
Re: BNC vs. SO-239
No John, The rig is menu programmable to do either v-uhf & hf ie. all
bands at the bnc (front) or SO239 (rear) it will come shipped with 6
2 70 on bnc & 1.6-30 on SO239.
cheers John G0VGZ.
By
g0vgz@...
·
#457
·
|
Re: Interesting 50W (approx) HF amp in new ARRL handbook...
I built this project and it works very well. I used a heat sink
substantially larger than the one the author used. I have had no thermal
problems. I built it with a switchable attenuator so that I can
By
mikemo@...
·
#456
·
|
BNC vs. SO-239
If this rig has a BNC on the front and an SO-239 on
the back...does this mean if I wanted to use the radio
at home on VHF/UHF, that I would need to have that
ugly piece of coax looped around the front
By
Ken Wood <w00dy65@...>
·
#455
·
|
Re: attachments/pictures
Tracy ku4fl wrote:
Tracy, you are generally right, but that old "majordomo" practice
does not apply to egroups lists, since all users can set their own
preference. This list is a list that was set
By
KQ6XA
·
#453
·
|
Re: expanded tx ?
Steve ki0ky wrote:
Is it unclear whether that means present production units will be
unable to be MARS-Modded?
73---Bonnie KQ6XA
By
KQ6XA
·
#452
·
|
Interesting 50W (approx) HF amp in new ARRL handbook...
Folks...
Just picked up the new ARRL handbook (2001 version, I'd guess, with a
brownish colored cover). Something the prospective '817ers here may
be interested in:
There's an nifty little
By
Bill Wiese <wiese@...>
·
#450
·
|
Re: attachments/pictures
And beleive it or not some folks only have e-mail accounts and can't gp to web pages.
By
Michael Minor <nh6cj@...>
·
#454
·
|
Re: expanded tx ?
An email to me from Yaesu stated that undoubtedly in the future there would
be a MARS Mod for the F817.
Steve KI0KY
By
Steve Schroder <ki0ky@...>
·
#447
·
|
Re: attachments/pictures
I agree with Bjornung; it is poor nettiquite to send unsolicited photos, as folks with a slow connection can't receive them and it can lock up their email so they can't access anything. Posting
By
Tracy Underwood <ku4fl@...>
·
#451
·
|
Re: BNC antenna connector on 817
actually
likewise
817 with
Howard,
Tell us more about your 8 foot whip you use. Is this a commercial
product with a BNC on it? That would be by far the longest
commercial BNC connected whip
By
n5em@...
·
#449
·
|
Re: attachments/pictures
Oops!
Sorry about that, I subscribe to several list and forgot what type this one
is!!
My appologies!
Bjrnung
By
Bj?rnung Jensen <bjjen13b@...>
·
#448
·
|
pictures
Just put the pictures in the files section of the group, and use the
post to tell us you put them there.
By
polrbear@...
·
#446
·
|
Re: attachments/pictures
Hi John,
Yes, I have seen it. Actually that's where the fake FT-817 came
from... So in the interest of fairness, we should mention any
copyright statsment here...... HI HI.
No, honestly, if you
By
Erik Schmidt - OZ1GIY <erik.schmidt@...>
·
#445
·
|
expanded tx ?
Can the FT817 tx be opened for MARS/CAP use?
Thanks, Dave
By
Dave <rokon@...>
·
#444
·
|
Re: Built-in Attenuator
I read all the posts on the attenuator and I think (unless I missed one)
that people have actually missed the real reason why an attenuator is needed.
In the presence of very strong adjacent signals,
By
Eric Freund <freund@...>
·
#443
·
|