开云体育

You know, I dread that day of moving to "assisted" living, too. Perhaps you're allowed a computer and can check into "Hamsphere" or "CWHotline" to stay active in the hobby. I'm sure a local ham would

Guys, It seems that you have missed exactly what this antenna is.? The cage acts like a capacity hat, adding enough impedance at the ends to bring the antenna to resonance.? I think you may also be

Unit Sold. Awaiting payment. Tnx for looking. Rich

Toledo ohio. My hometown, I am in holland. I have an 818 but if you need any assistance please reach out brother. Scott A Fosgate

Comes in original box. Options TCXO-9 High-Stability Oscillator.W1GHZ Panadapter IF output. MH-31A8J Hand Mic, NC-72B Battery Charger. Antenna. Carry Strap. Will Insure Package. Works great. Full

I’m mindful that a dummy load has a pretty good SWR. So what would be a good metric for a new antenna? Likewise, adding a tuner, in my mind, does not make an antenna better, only more compatible

Thank you Ron N9EE/R, I'll keep your request in mind. [email protected]> wrote:

Not sure if this antenna is one I had seen years ago for AM broadcast.? Was made by European group, but when FCC required them to field test in US to get approval for AM broadcast, the group claimed

W8LM, Instead of the word "new" what would you you consider acceptable? Technology is reinvented and adapted everyday. What we are developing is practical functional examples of the original

A headline such as? "Results of new US antenna design" is somewhat disappointing when all references in this thread indicate it's a revisit of published material from 50 years ago. SWR is NOT --IS

yes, finally ! well, almost. On a PCB meander line antenna the radiation resistance equation gets complicated due to PCB dielectric and also co-planar and planar conductive surfaces (other traces that

Looks like a "meander line" antenna. Not uncommon to see an entire antenna done this way on 433MHz and up radio modules. I swear, every 2.4GHz transceiver module must use the meander line antenna. --

N2VIP, not sure if you have read the other comments (Jeff KN8A & James M0JMX) in this thread. I didn't claim to know either way (yes/no) if any ARRL (or any other US predecessor) publication covered

"N2VIP Which ARRL era publication would have published this?" You said hams were discussing this antenna design for three decades, "a very old design HF antenna (post WW2 apparently from the

Sam The antenna does work. I struggled with keeping it all in line at times. I tried a couple of ideas with a few different prototypes in my practical experiments I may have it somewhere still John

Jeff K8NA, It took about a year of design, several jigs and a two & three person effort to get the assembly working as the elements needed stringing with wires that always sagged until we came up with

Thanks James M0JMX, the original article (1950s) is what I used to model practical antennas that can be made from now on. There were couple of versions, possibly a technical paper as well but I didnt

Not enough coffee yet...

It sure sounds like this: https://www.n5ese.com/notebk_ant.htm The date of the article is probably around 2003, given the comment here: https://www.n5ese.com/notebk_ant_comment.htm In the 70's and

It appears to be mentioned in this amusing radio club newsletter from 1963: https://rsars.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/mercury-4.pdf Apparently a version of it enabling an operator in Bradford to cause