Re: Why is wideband VHF coverage only to 154MHz?
|
Or, if you really want to listen in that extended frequency range, get an FT-857D. It isn't all that much bigger than an FT-817, covers that range and has features the FT-817 doesn't have. I find the DSP very useful.
73, Zack W9SZ
On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 1:33 AM JD Erskine VA7OTC via <va7otc= [email protected]> wrote: On 2022.04.30 2232, Ken N2VIP wrote:
> One of the great frustration many US FT-817/818 owners have is that the
> receiver can not pick up the US National Weather Service VHF broadcasts,
> it is a hard limitation of the FT-817/818, the reason for which I can
> only speculate on.
>
> Ken, N2VIP
>
>> On Apr 30, 2022, at 23:20, g8tzl2004 via
>> <g8tzl2004=[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> ?Any reason why the 817 only covers up to 154 MHz rather than 175 MHz?
>>
>> All my other Yaesu VHF radios have 136 - 175 MHz RX ?
>>
>> I guess there must have been a technical issue in going beyond 154 MHz RX?
>>
>> Has anybody modded an 817 to provide RX up to 175 MHz?
Sure,
Environment Canada also has Weather Radio Canada in that range. It's
also the Shore Transmit range for Marine VHF and near to North American
rail frequencies. None of these mean there'd be any need to include them
in a ham rig.
So, Why: it's 1. a ham rig, 2. designed to replace the FT-690, FT-290,
FT-790 -- no need to include anything other than ham radio coverage.,
and lastly, designed in a country, for a world, that has no NOAA/Wx Rdo
Can (other CANUS.)
If you need/want it on/with one radio, try a converter. There used to be
the MFJ-313 VHF Converter. The schematic for the MFJ one is in the Files
area for this list. There are other possibilities to acquiring one,
having one made, making it oneself.
73, John VA7OTC
|
