Re: Barth Multipress RP3001 with clamps and casework supports [Seattle area]
You're probably right, David :-). Interestingly, a few years ago I was stupid enough to sell the 500V when I was moving homes and ended up buying the next version of it recently - much more expensive and not as heavy weight in construction.? So I'm in two minds about this listing..
?
|
Re: Barth Multipress RP3001 with clamps and casework supports [Seattle area]
Ah okay, thanks Lucky, I had not realized that. ?Usually I only move it when I reconfigure my shop, though I’ve done it a few times this year :-)
?
Anil
|
Ven 4 apr 2025 05:36 Brad Wall ha scritto:
Grande stretta
How much would a possible shipment to Italy cost?
|
Re: Barth Multipress RP3001 with clamps and casework supports [Seattle area]
Just be aware that the multipress is not rigid enough to be moved on a regular basis. It loses calibration alarmingly quickly. I have the mobility kit but no longer move the press because of the calibration
issues.
?
I love my press very much. But it has limitations.
?
Warm regards,
Lucky
?
Dr David Luckensmeyer
Designer & Maker
@luckensmeyer
M: 0413 013 115
?
From:
felderownersgroup@groups.io <felderownersgroup@groups.io> on behalf of David Davies via groups.io <myfinishingtouch@...>
Date: Saturday, 5 April 2025 at 13:13
To: felderownersgroup@groups.io <felderownersgroup@groups.io>
Subject: Re: [FOG] Barth Multipress RP3001 with clamps and casework supports [Seattle area]
You know you're going to kick yourself later if? you sell it.? Check with Joel Gelman.? He used the space on the back side of the multipress.? I can't remember?exactly now what he did but I remembered being
impressed at the time?with?his ingenuity.
?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 10:10?PM Anil via
<anil00=gmail.com@groups.io> wrote:
The press is ~10' wide and 3.5' deep (4' when using the case support arms) and ~90" tall.? ?The mobility casters make it super easy to roll around.
--
Dave & Marie Davies
318-219-7868
|
Re: Barth Multipress RP3001 with clamps and casework supports [Seattle area]
You know you're going to kick yourself later if? you sell it.? Check with Joel Gelman.? He used the space on the back side of the multipress.? I can't remember?exactly now what he did but I remembered being impressed at the time?with?his ingenuity. Dave Davies
Hi Michael
?
The press is ~10' wide and 3.5' deep (4' when using the case support arms) and ~90" tall.? ?The mobility casters make it super easy to roll around.
?
Anil
-- Dave & Marie Davies
318-219-7868
|
Re: Barth Multipress RP3001 with clamps and casework supports [Seattle area]
Hi Michael
?
The press is ~10' wide and 3.5' deep (4' when using the case support arms) and ~90" tall.? ?The mobility casters make it super easy to roll around.
?
Anil
|
You don't appear to be bouncing from what I can see, so you should be getting messages if that is what you are signed up for, individual messages.
Brian Lamb blamb11@... lambtoolworks.com
On Friday, April 4, 2025 at 05:24:32 PM MST, Daniel Thompson via groups.io <danthompson5371@...> wrote:
I believe I have fixed my account. Please resume sending me posts to this group.
Thanks!
Daniel Thompson
|
I believe I have fixed my account. Please resume sending me posts to this group.
Thanks!
Daniel Thompson
|
Re: Barth Multipress RP3001 with clamps and casework supports [Seattle area]
How much floor space does the rack consume?
?
-Michael Wolf
Tahoe City, CA
|
Barth Multipress RP3001 with clamps and casework supports [Seattle area]
Includes:
| BN-35 |
Barth Multipress RP3001 3000mm c/w 3 Manual / Hydraulic Clamps and 90? Stop |
| BM-35-10 |
Barth Hold Down Clamp |
| BM-35-20 |
Barth Lateral Press with 2 manual R&P |
| BM-35-42 |
Barth Casework support Top 3x |
| BM-35-41 |
Barth Casework support Bottom 3x |
| BM-35-55 |
Barth Mobility Kit |
| BM-35-57 |
Mitering Frame Bond Device |
?
In excellent, almost unused condition.
?
Asking $14500 picked up in Seattle area.? I will likely regret it as it will be super expensive if I ever want to re-acquire it!? As much as I want to keep it, I'm finding that I'm not doing as much of large cabinet and case work that I thought I would.? May be someone can put it to much better use.
?
|
Re: File /3D Printer Files/Felder splinter block.stl uploaded
#file-notice
Perfect, glad it worked out!
Brian Lamb blamb11@... lambtoolworks.com
On Friday, April 4, 2025 at 06:44:49 AM MST, Jason Holtz via groups.io <jholtzy@...> wrote:
Brian,?
My friend printed the thicker version as it matches my stop thickness. It turned out great, was about 4 hours of print time.  --
Jason
J. Holtz Furniture
3307 Snelling Ave. South
Minneapolis, MN 55406
|
Re: File /3D Printer Files/Felder splinter block.stl uploaded
#file-notice
Brian,?
My friend printed the thicker version as it matches my stop thickness. It turned out great, was about 4 hours of print time.  --
Jason
J. Holtz Furniture
3307 Snelling Ave. South
Minneapolis, MN 55406
|
Re: Raising an FB710 off its crate
Doug,?
Vertical at balance point or a distance "further" away from final position would be preferred, safest, if you don't have abundance of ceiling height. The extra angle on the load line will assist in controlling descent and keeping humans a safe distance from the action.
Brett,
?
The bandsaw decreases topside load as the CoG shifts closer to the center of the base, and increases weight on the bottom. If you can use a chainfall?from the joists to get it as close as you can to the balance point, you can manage the rest with much lighter duty devices like cam-lever straps or a couple of 2x4s serving as levers, or a couple of friends with ropes/pulleys safely out of harm's way. You may not want to lift from a direct overhead point as when it reaches the last 10 degrees or so? of vertical after the balance point, next the CoG is within the footprint of the base, the machine will shift behavior to want to fall into correct position, there may be not enough angle on the lifting line to resist over-tipping in a controlled and safe fashion. Your ceiling height should not be an issue if you can rig from the roof structure at the right angles. If your machine isn't already marked where the CoG is, I'd suggest a ceiling attachment point about a foot toward the top of the geometrical center of the bandsaw.
?
I want to make sure I understand what you’re saying.? If I imagine the saw having been raised just to the balance point at which the CG will begin to create a moment to rotate the saw to vertical, are you suggesting the chain fall should be vertical at that point, or farther away from the direction of rotation of the rising saw, or toward the direction it is rotating into??
?
Thank you,
Doug
-- Brett Wissel Saint Louis Restoration 1831 S Kingshighway Blvd (at Shaw Blvd) St Louis, MO 63110 314.772.2167 brett@...
|
Re: Raising an FB710 off its crate
Brett,
?
The bandsaw decreases topside load as the CoG shifts closer to the center of the base, and increases weight on the bottom. If you can use a chainfall?from the joists to get it as close as you can to the balance point, you can manage the rest with much lighter duty devices like cam-lever straps or a couple of 2x4s serving as levers, or a couple of friends with ropes/pulleys safely out of harm's way. You may not want to lift from a direct overhead point as when it reaches the last 10 degrees or so? of vertical after the balance point, next the CoG is within the footprint of the base, the machine will shift behavior to want to fall into correct position, there may be not enough angle on the lifting line to resist over-tipping in a controlled and safe fashion. Your ceiling height should not be an issue if you can rig from the roof structure at the right angles. If your machine isn't already marked where the CoG is, I'd suggest a ceiling attachment point about a foot toward the top of the geometrical center of the bandsaw.
?
I want to make sure I understand what you’re saying. ?If I imagine the saw having been raised just to the balance point at which the CG will begin to create a moment to rotate the saw to vertical, are you suggesting the chain fall should be vertical at that point, or farther away from the direction of rotation of the rising saw, or toward the direction it is rotating into??
?
Thank you,
Doug
|
Have a set of "Big squeeze" air clamps for sale. I haven't had the time to properly install these on my current saw and have used them a few times and they work awesome. Just not using them enough to justify keeping them.
?
Willing to ship on the buyers dime // Asking $600
?
?
?
?
|
Re: Hammer dust chute revisited...
Sorry, didn't realize that the group was truncating the address. It is blamb11 at cox dot net, or you can alwass reply down by clicking below on all messages where it says "reply to sender".
Brian Lamb blamb11@... lambtoolworks.com
On Thursday, April 3, 2025 at 03:17:51 PM MST, ibsenafshar <brian@...> wrote:
Brian, I can't figure out how to get your entire mail address, but I am interested in the hammer chute
|
Re: Hammer dust chute revisited...
Brian, I can't figure out how to get your entire mail address, but I am interested in the hammer chute
|
Re: F700Z fence plate alignment issue
Would be much appreciated, thank you!
|
Re: F700Z fence plate alignment issue
Yes that’s the Extrema rail-master coping sled. I love it to bits, makes coping a breeze. One cool feature it has is an air cushion in the base when you flick the air clamp on. This helps it glide smoothly on the surface. It’s better suited for a cast iron surface, I used some uhmw tape on the bottom of mine to prevent the aluminum slider portion from getting scratched up. If you’d like I can show a better video of it tomorrow??
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Apr 2, 2025, at 9:44?AM, KRPatel via groups.io <kamalsonal@...> wrote:
? Dan, a service ticket is most likely needed as I have the same machine and cannot locate any type of mechanism/bolt/nut or adjustment means.? Out of curiosity, is the turqouise colored device some type of coping sled?
?
Kamal Patel
|
Re: F700Z fence plate alignment issue
I’ll have to get a better look at it tomorrow, hoping that’s the easy fix for it.?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Apr 2, 2025, at 3:11?PM, Bryce Comer via groups.io <bryce@...> wrote:
? HI Dan,
That was what i thought initially but when i check it with a straight edge, the castings were machined spot on. It does end up spot on though after a good clean up, it's just that sometimes it catches me out when i start to run something and then notice it. That first piece is normally a test piece anyway, so not an issue.
Regards,
Bryce
--
https://www.brycecomerwoodworks.com/
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHdrRaAZd_pOa7wwbdNPUEw
|
David Luckensmeyer
Jason Holtz
Brad Wall
Dan Gavrilyuk