¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: replacing a sliding table saw with a CNC router


 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Exactly, these things are fun to drool over, but out of reach for 99% of us. I almost went pod and rail machine because they can be pretty cheap, but most of them needed 440V or way more amperage than I can get here at home. They also tend to be a lot longer in physical size compare to their length of cut, an 8¡¯ machine might be 12-13¡¯ long.

I lost so much shop space with my relatively compact 4x8 machine that I can¡¯t imagine anything bigger.

Brian Lamb
blamb11@...
www.lambtoolworks.com




On May 23, 2021, at 10:48 AM, Michael Garrison Stuber <mtgstuber@...> wrote:

Fascinating video Brian.? I really liked the plunge cut chain-saw head for mortises.? If I wanted to make a couple hundred thousands of something and I had the necessary capital, this would be a lot of fun.

On 5/23/2021 10:16 AM, Brian Lamb wrote:
For an idea of what¡¯s out there in aggregate heads, watch this video:??

The problem here is the machines stout enough to handle them are usually pricey, like over $100k. They are either Cat40 spindles or HSK63, so big in hp too. And don¡¯t forget, each aggregate head could easily run $4000 to $10,00 in cost. Ones where you see the head rotate, to saw say in the X and Y directions, you have to have a C axis built into the spindle.

None of these things are usually found in a 4x8 machine sized for the home shop. Now, can you edge joint large slabs with an end mill, sure, not a problem, and do tenons and mortises, most likely if you have enough Z travel. Ripping boards, not so much if they get very thick. I don¡¯t like to cut with smaller than a 1/4¡± bit to go through 3/4¡±, for 8/4 I would be looking at 1/2¡±, maybe 3/8¡± if you run slow and multiple depths. That¡¯s a lot of wasted material and time to just cut something.

Facing slabs or glue ups is easy, not as fast as a planer or drum sander, and you still have to figure out how to hold it.

Brian Lamb
blamb11@...





On May 23, 2021, at 9:30 AM, Bill James via <xxrb2010@...> wrote:

Thanks for all the feedback,

I do get than for most of you this is not a replacement, but for my use case I am still no convinced. For examples, I do not cut anything taller than 8/4. I have done cross cut on 4x4 or 4x6, but this can be done on a miter saw. I do not have a shaper, and do everything on my table saw and jointer/planer. I plan to keep my jointer/planer and miter saw.

I do get that thin rip (1/8") or face frame stock are too thin for a CNC. As I do those kind of rip cuts, I can live with a small traditional table saw along a wall for that. Then I am left with bigger hardwood stocks out of the jointer/planer for glue ups or others that I normally cut to final size on my table saw. First, I guess I can get final size on the planer.
However, can you rip and cross cut 8/4, 4/4 hardwood with a cutter on a CNC as well as do joinery like dado, rabbet on those same 8/4, 4/4? Let's assume lumbers have been jointed and planed and are big enough to work either with a modest vacuum such as hurricane type or a small rotary vane vacuum pump for pods table? Like 4 inches wide at least and a couple of feet long, I guess?

What about aggregates? Brian mentioned them and I am wondering what are those aggregates used for beside joinery on the side (drilling) and bevel cut? Are they adding anything for hardwood cutting?

I have not yet a shaper, but I am wondering which kind of shaper tasks a modern CNC with vacuum as mentioned above can do without crazy jigs? I see stock longer than 8 ft not feasible on a CNC, but I do not know enough about CNC and shaper to know anything here.

Thanks

Bill

-- 
Michael Garrison Stuber

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.