Dirwolf and MAC OS
I am new to this group. I sucessfully use Direwolf on one of my Ubuntu boxes. I would like to get it to run on my Macbook Pro (running OS 10.9.5 Mavericks). I would appreciate some help. Thanks in
By
frank_zappa@...
·
#1720
·
|
Re: Direwolf stuck in transmit
I recently tried my Rigblaster plug n play on Windows 10, and using the UZ7HO soundmodem it will start transmitting with the PTT but it does release it, and I have to kill my UZ7 modem app to get it
By
Kevin Hooke
·
#1719
·
|
Packets not Seen in UISS Monitor
I've got UISS running with Direwolf so I can use the IGate feature of Direwolf. It all seems to be working fine except no packets appear in the UISS monitor as when using AGWPE and I wanted to see
By
Edward Johnson
·
#1718
·
|
Re: Permission Denied with mkiss to Direwolf on Debian Hamradio Pure
$ Sudo adduser (your login name) dialout
Perhaps ?
Dave G0WBX
By
Dave_G0WBX
·
#1717
·
|
Re: Permission Denied with mkiss to Direwolf on Debian Hamradio Pure blend install
As an experiment I started direwolf with sudo, and mkiss connects ok, and I can use axcall to make a call to a nearby node successfully.
Is there something I need to do to open permissions on
By
Kevin Hooke
·
#1716
·
|
Re: Permission Denied with mkiss to Direwolf on Debian Hamradio Pure blend install
Thanks David, here's the output from strace:
kev@kh-debian:~$ sudo mkiss /tmp/kisstnc /dev/pts/3
mkiss: open: Permission denied
kev@kh-debian:~$ sudo strace mkiss /tmp/kisstnc
By
Kevin Hooke
·
#1715
·
|
Re: Permission Denied with mkiss to Direwolf on Debian Hamradio Pure blend install
Strange. Try installing 'strace' and send us the trailing part from the output of:
sudo strace mkiss /tmp/kisstnc /dev/pts/4
--David
By
David Ranch <dranch@...>
·
#1714
·
|
Permission Denied with mkiss to Direwolf on Debian Hamradio Pure blend install
I have direwolf and ax25 setup on a Raspberry Pi with Raspbian and it's all working good. I just tried to install and setup Debian Hamradio Pure Blend on a desktop that comes with ax25 and Direwolf
By
Kevin Hooke
·
#1713
·
|
Re: Direwolf Command Line Options
Howdy David..
It is not gating aprs traffic because i am not using it on APRS here.. Using it as a traditional packet station on Net105 for 300 baud hf with LinBPQ. A fix was issued, which is
By
Steve/KB9PVH
·
#1712
·
|
Re: Direwolf Command Line Options
Indeed...? that makes sense.? Yes, i am using the direwolf modem
in a traditional packet enviroment.? It has been performing extremely
well on hf.?? Tnx for the explanation and fix...
73,?
By
Steve/KB9PVH
·
#1710
·
|
Re: Direwolf Command Line Options
Short answer:
Use of the "-qd" (quiet, don't decode as APRS) command line option will now suppress that error message. The fix is now in the "dev" branch. Just ignore the error message until you
By
WB2OSZ
·
#1709
·
|
Re: Direwolf Command Line Options
Here is another one:
KB7ITU audio level = 30(15/14) [NONE] _||||||
[0.3] KB7ITU>BEACON:This is an ERC station in Rexburg, Idaho. Mailbox=KB7ITU-1
Error: Information part of telemetry packet must
By
Steve/KB9PVH
·
#1708
·
|
Re: Direwolf Command Line Options
Hmmm... this VE1JOT-5 station is gating non-APRS traffic which Direwolf is complaining about:
#It didn't complain about this packet for some reason but this is not an APRS formatted packet
[0.2]
By
David Ranch <dranch@...>
·
#1711
·
|
Direwolf Command Line Options
Hello...
Since updating to the newest version (1.4d), ?i have beengetting telemetry error messages on decodes. ?Starting itlike this: ?[steve@localhost ~]$ direwolf -p -qd
Here is an
By
Steve/KB9PVH
·
#1707
·
|
Re: Very simple, low level texting possible??
Hi David,
I can't thank you and the other folks here profusely enough. What a wealth of information for me to chew on!!
Fantastic thought about the pen drive idea... I have long known linux could
By
Stan Ham <wb9gfa@...>
·
#1706
·
|
Re: Very simple, low level texting possible??
Hello Stan,
DR> Without going to extra steps, NO, a classic connected session is only between the net control and a specific station. Now with that said, it can be done using special software of
By
David Ranch <dranch@...>
·
#1705
·
|
Re: Very simple, low level texting possible??
Responses embedded into your reply.... I will prefix my new comments with the word "Comment:", because I'm not sure how my reply here to you will appear at your end.
By
Stan Ham <wb9gfa@...>
·
#1704
·
|
Re: Very simple, low level texting possible??
Hello Stan,
Ok.
Ok.. so during your activation, you'd like to have station-A use a CONNECTED session back to net control. That will work fine and even have lots of other stations such as
By
David Ranch <dranch@...>
·
#1703
·
|
Re: Very simple, low level texting possible??
I think the most common and versitile software for node and BBS in current use and development would be BPQ32.
In the basic it is a NODE that has APRS and BBS build in waiting to be activated if
By
Andre v Schaijk
·
#1702
·
|
Re: Very simple, low level texting possible??
Hi David,
Ok.... I've done a bit more reading, and it looks like my lack of knowledge has caused me to make the wrong statements and ask the wrong questions toward achieving the objective.
I think
By
Stan Ham <wb9gfa@...>
·
#1701
·
|