¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Date
Dirwolf and MAC OS
I am new to this group. I sucessfully use Direwolf on one of my Ubuntu boxes. I would like to get it to run on my Macbook Pro (running OS 10.9.5 Mavericks). I would appreciate some help. Thanks in
By frank_zappa@... · #1720 ·
Re: Direwolf stuck in transmit
I recently tried my Rigblaster plug n play on Windows 10, and using the UZ7HO soundmodem it will start transmitting with the PTT but it does release it, and I have to kill my UZ7 modem app to get it
By Kevin Hooke · #1719 ·
Packets not Seen in UISS Monitor
I've got UISS running with Direwolf so I can use the IGate feature of Direwolf. It all seems to be working fine except no packets appear in the UISS monitor as when using AGWPE and I wanted to see
By Edward Johnson · #1718 ·
Re: Permission Denied with mkiss to Direwolf on Debian Hamradio Pure
$ Sudo adduser (your login name) dialout Perhaps ? Dave G0WBX
By Dave_G0WBX · #1717 ·
Re: Permission Denied with mkiss to Direwolf on Debian Hamradio Pure blend install
As an experiment I started direwolf with sudo, and mkiss connects ok, and I can use axcall to make a call to a nearby node successfully. Is there something I need to do to open permissions on
By Kevin Hooke · #1716 ·
Re: Permission Denied with mkiss to Direwolf on Debian Hamradio Pure blend install
Thanks David, here's the output from strace: kev@kh-debian:~$ sudo mkiss /tmp/kisstnc /dev/pts/3 mkiss: open: Permission denied kev@kh-debian:~$ sudo strace mkiss /tmp/kisstnc
By Kevin Hooke · #1715 ·
Re: Permission Denied with mkiss to Direwolf on Debian Hamradio Pure blend install
Strange. Try installing 'strace' and send us the trailing part from the output of: sudo strace mkiss /tmp/kisstnc /dev/pts/4 --David
By David Ranch <dranch@...> · #1714 ·
Permission Denied with mkiss to Direwolf on Debian Hamradio Pure blend install
I have direwolf and ax25 setup on a Raspberry Pi with Raspbian and it's all working good. I just tried to install and setup Debian Hamradio Pure Blend on a desktop that comes with ax25 and Direwolf
By Kevin Hooke · #1713 ·
Re: Direwolf Command Line Options
Howdy David.. It is not gating aprs traffic because i am not using it on APRS here.. Using it as a traditional packet station on Net105 for 300 baud hf with LinBPQ. A fix was issued, which is
By Steve/KB9PVH · #1712 ·
Re: Direwolf Command Line Options
Indeed...? that makes sense.? Yes, i am using the direwolf modem in a traditional packet enviroment.? It has been performing extremely well on hf.?? Tnx for the explanation and fix... 73,?
By Steve/KB9PVH · #1710 ·
Re: Direwolf Command Line Options
Short answer: Use of the "-qd" (quiet, don't decode as APRS) command line option will now suppress that error message. The fix is now in the "dev" branch. Just ignore the error message until you
By WB2OSZ · #1709 ·
Re: Direwolf Command Line Options
Here is another one: KB7ITU audio level = 30(15/14) [NONE] _|||||| [0.3] KB7ITU>BEACON:This is an ERC station in Rexburg, Idaho. Mailbox=KB7ITU-1 Error: Information part of telemetry packet must
By Steve/KB9PVH · #1708 ·
Re: Direwolf Command Line Options
Hmmm... this VE1JOT-5 station is gating non-APRS traffic which Direwolf is complaining about: #It didn't complain about this packet for some reason but this is not an APRS formatted packet [0.2]
By David Ranch <dranch@...> · #1711 ·
Direwolf Command Line Options
Hello... Since updating to the newest version (1.4d), ?i have beengetting telemetry error messages on decodes. ?Starting itlike this: ?[steve@localhost ~]$ direwolf -p -qd Here is an
By Steve/KB9PVH · #1707 ·
Re: Very simple, low level texting possible??
Hi David, I can't thank you and the other folks here profusely enough. What a wealth of information for me to chew on!! Fantastic thought about the pen drive idea... I have long known linux could
By Stan Ham <wb9gfa@...> · #1706 ·
Re: Very simple, low level texting possible??
Hello Stan, DR> Without going to extra steps, NO, a classic connected session is only between the net control and a specific station. Now with that said, it can be done using special software of
By David Ranch <dranch@...> · #1705 ·
Re: Very simple, low level texting possible??
Responses embedded into your reply.... I will prefix my new comments with the word "Comment:", because I'm not sure how my reply here to you will appear at your end.
By Stan Ham <wb9gfa@...> · #1704 ·
Re: Very simple, low level texting possible??
Hello Stan, Ok. Ok.. so during your activation, you'd like to have station-A use a CONNECTED session back to net control. That will work fine and even have lots of other stations such as
By David Ranch <dranch@...> · #1703 ·
Re: Very simple, low level texting possible??
I think the most common and versitile software for node and BBS in current use and development would be BPQ32. In the basic it is a NODE that has APRS and BBS build in waiting to be activated if
By Andre v Schaijk · #1702 ·
Re: Very simple, low level texting possible??
Hi David, Ok.... I've done a bit more reading, and it looks like my lack of knowledge has caused me to make the wrong statements and ask the wrong questions toward achieving the objective. I think
By Stan Ham <wb9gfa@...> · #1701 ·