Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- Direwolf
- Messages
Search
Re: Very simple, low level texting possible??
Stan Ham
开云体育Wow!? Great info... Hmmmm..... I think that I mentioned earlier that I am just technical enough to be dangerous. I am just now wading into the world of packet radio, and it is quite obvious that I have much more reading and studying to do.
This new connect mode with DireWolf 1.4 sounds interesting.? However, my lack of adequate knowledge is killing me once again.? The first version I used was installed here on Kubuntu 16.04 using the apt-get command, but version 1.2 is the only one available that way.? Yesterday, I uninstalled that version, also using the apt-get command.? Then, I installed version 1.3 using the "make" method, and got that working, but that was before the email about the connect method of 1.4 was posted.? So, now, I don't know how to uninstall ver 1.3 so I can then install ver 1.4.? The apt-get method doesn't even find it, and Google searches have not yet bailed me out.? I find myself down a rabbit hole!!? I seem to stumble into many of these rabbit holes .... oh well, it's all fun! I have had a couple of days to study and read, hoping to discover how to do this, but I see it is way more complex than I had anticipated.? I am running out of time to keep reading and studying, as the holidays approach. My window of time is closing soon, and the effort will be catch as catch can for time spent afterward. I cannot even begin to express how much I have appreciated the patience and knowledge afforded to me with my posts here. I'm not gone yet, and have one more day, but that day also has other responsibilities pulling me away, starting this afternoon. 73's, Stan On 12/14/2016 01:10 PM, David Ranch
dranch@... [direwolf_packet] wrote:
? |
Re: Very simple, low level texting possible??
David Ranch
开云体育Hello Bill,
UI-Chat (both the legacy Bash based program and the newer Java program) will work with packet AX.25 packet.? It's very similar to FSQCall and/or D-Rats's interface FSQCall program implements the FSQ protocol strictly uses it's own IFK mode which can be used over say a FM VHF radio.? Fldigi also supports the FSQ protocol but via any existing data mode supported by Fldigi.? This makes it more flexible and reliable depending on the propagation conditions of a given day.? This too can run over a FM radio if you want.
Easyterm, axcall, etc. are all CONNECTED mode AX.25 packet programs.? I had the original impression that he was looking for UNCONNECTED sessions (UI packets) but maybe I was "putting words in his mouth".? If he doesn't care on the transport, yes, there are even more programs that could be considered.? We really need to better understand what he's looking to do, the constraints, etc. --David |
Re: Very simple, low level texting possible??
It is starting to sound like what I am looking for does not exist (using packet radio in a manner like a texting app on my cell phone).There isn't a robust app yet. Several are close and hopefully some next generation APRS tools will provide what we're all looking for. In the meantime - check these out: uichat - fsqcall - easyterm - - airchat - -- Easyterm is a windows application for the 'other' soundcard packet program. I haven't tested it yet but if the interfaces are close enough- it should work with DireWolf. Airchat has other issues... :) 73 Bill, WA7NWP |
Re: Very simple, low level texting possible??
David Ranch
开云体育Hello Stan, ? With understanding what your goals are, I think we can help out more.? APRS supports a simple text messaging system that is supported on most APRS-enabled HTs (Kenwood, Yaesu, etc).? If you're looking for a computer program that can send/receive these APRS messages, I know that Aprsisce (windows), UIView32 (Windows - Java), APRS+SA (windows but old), Xastir (Linux), APRSDroid (Android), and say N7NIX's DanTracker (Linux) supports it.? I don't know if YAAC (runs in Java) does or not but I bet it does.? There are other programs out there as well.
If you're looking for people to setup remote, portable stations in the field... do you expect people to buy Windows computers, etc. to create this GoKit?? I know of several projects out there that use a Raspberry Pi ($35), Raspberry Pi 7" display ($80), an HT, and Xastir all built into a Pelican box.? Very nice!
Let us know if you're looking for purpose built or something that various people on various systems might try it on.? Btw, what about a dual boot system like what you're running but instead of the OS being on the hard drive, you boot off a USB pendrive?? Something like Andy's HamRadio ISO booting into a custom configred APRS setup would work well - .? This already has 99% of everything you would ever want to install on Linux already!
Well, sending data over a TNC it's specific layers: ?? Layer 1 - If your TNC is running in KISS mode (meaning all the smarts are running on an attached computer), the data going to the TNC needs to be formatted into specific KISS frames ?? Layer 2 - The AX.25 packet is a very specific protocol and like you said.. it needs to be specifically formatted to be "legal" ?? Layer 3 - APRS Text messaging uses specific formatting on top of those AX.25 UI formatted packets ?? Layer 3 - D-RATS uses it's own formatting for it's messaging ?? Layer 3 - Linux's beacon program is a free-form packet which you can put any text into Lots of possibilities here so if you give us some more specific ideas and thoughts on what you're looking for, the skills, equipment and budget your users might have... I'm sure we can help you narrow things down. --David KI6ZHD |
Re: Very simple, low level texting possible??
David Ranch
开云体育Hello John, Yes, that's right!? Not only has WB2OSZ added both CONNECTED mode AX.25 sessions but they also support the AX.25 v2.2 specification for selective ACKs, etc.? This is a significant improvement over most TNCs out there that require to resend their entire "window" worth of packets over again! Ps.? This connected mode is only available via an AGW/PE socket.? I've successfully used Outpost's ipagwpe.exe program running under Wine ( ) to use this new connected interface.? It's a very basic user interface but it works!? What we need now is to find more native AGW API compatible "terminal clients" for Mac and Linux users to leverage this new stack. --David KI6ZHD On 12/13/2016 06:55 PM, John Huggins
john.huggins.ee@... [direwolf_packet] wrote:
? |
Re: Very simple, low level texting possible??
The latest direwolf 1.4 development version, on the "dev" branch, has support for AX.25 v2.2 "connected" mode.
The application interface is available only thru the AGW network protocol, usually active on TCP port 8000. To have a conversation with another person, or automated system like a BBS, you need some sort of packet radio terminal application that speaks the AGW network protocol. AGWterm is known to work. ?There are surely others but I haven't tried them yet. See Chapter 10 of the User Guide for details. |
Re: Very simple, low level texting possible??
开云体育On 12/13/2016 6:55 PM, John Huggins
john.huggins.ee@... [direwolf_packet] wrote:
? I've used the connected-mode support with a few local PBBSes; admittedly not extensive but it worked well. It implements support for AX.25 V2.2 and initial connections to some types of stations may take a few retries when the other station deviates from the earlier AX.25 specifications. 73, Dana? K6JQ
|
Re: Very simple, low level texting possible??
Stan Ham
开云体育Hi David, Thanks for the info.? It's been a long day for my learning curve on digital packet. I need to break off for today, and hit it again tomorrow. It is starting to sound like what I am looking for does not exist (using packet radio in a manner like a texting app on my cell phone). I am interested in learning how to do this whether Linux or Windows for a number of reasons.? For one, I use dual boot on my computers, and can choose Win7 or Kubuntu.? In my radio club, we are all individuals, with all the differences that go therewith. Most, of course normally use Windows.? Some, like me, prefer Linux. A very few are very technical, but most, not so much, and a few, like me, are just technical enough to be dangerous.? When we deploy for ARES practice operations, it would be very useful to have such a capability as I have described for use at the very beginning of setting up operations, until all parties are up and running on the final platform.... like maybe Winlink Express, or whatever. My hunch is that something Java based might be the most universally deployable across OS platforms. Tomorrow, I will look into your suggestions, including YAAC, which sounds somewhat promising, except it apparently comes along with all the overhead of the mapping, etc, etc. It is starting to sound like that a TNC needs to have data sent to it in some sort of required formatting, and thus needing an application to take just plain typing text, and formatting it into acceptable form for ANY TNC. 73's for now, Stan
On 12/13/2016 08:02 PM, David Ranch
dranch@... [direwolf_packet] wrote:
? |
Re: Very simple, low level texting possible??
Allegedly there is now a "connected mode" for DireWolf in development snapshot d... ?? John On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 8:02 PM, David Ranch dranch@... [direwolf_packet] <direwolf_packet@...> wrote:
|
Re: Very simple, low level texting possible??
David Ranch
开云体育Hello Stan, ? With Direwolf alone, no, this isn't possible.? Now, if you install LinBPQ and the TNC2 emulator package, yes, it's possible.? ? The BPQ32 package is very powerful but from the sounds of your use case, it could be like killing a fly with a sledgehammer but the choice is up to you.?
I assume you want to send just strings of text out on your packet channel?? On a physical TNC, you could do this with the "unproto" command (sends UI frames).? If you have Direwolf configured to work with the Linux AX.25 stack, you can use the "beacon" program to send those strings.? You can also use the Linpac program with the Linux native AX.25 stack to send UI packets as well as use it's dedicated F10 UI-mode screen.?? There are also other programs out there that can use Direwolf's KISS interface directly like UI-Chat or LinkUp - or even D-RATS (does a lot more than just D-star).? There are other programs out there but I don't want to choke you with too may options.
You have to make some decision here.? Which environment do you want to use?? Windows or Linux?? Thinking a little longer term, do you want to ultimately run a BBS (BPQ32) or would you rather only have a packet client (Linpac)?? Maybe you would want a more pretty UI to send the packets (LinkUp, UI-Chat, D-RATS) --David |
Very simple, low level texting possible??
Stan Ham
With physical TNC's there is a serial connection from the computer to the TNC, whereby an operator can go into a "command" mode interaction between the computer and the TNC. Is this possible with direwolf on linux by doing telnet in the terminal emulator to connect to localhost on port 8000 or 8001??
I would like to learn how, if even possible, to do very simple "texting" in this manner, keyboard to keyboard via a digipeater without any other software involved. Can I do this with direwolf whether linux or windows, and is so, how? I am thinking putty terminal connected to direwolf via localhost, and the other fellow doing the same with us going through a digipeater or even direct. Thanks, Stan |
Re: v1.4 Differences
David Ranch
开云体育Hello Keith, ? 1.4 is a development release and is expected to have bugs.? If you're willing to try it out, report bugs to the Github page, and wait for fixes, it would be great to get your help.? If you need a reliable, stable TNC, I recommend you stick with the production version which is v1.3. --David |
v1.4 Differences
开云体育I recently downloaded and installed v1.4 on my Raspberry Pi. It was a new Pi so I chose to use 1.4 instead of the 1.3 that I had always used before. My question is are they the same for interpreting APRS TT commands, and will 1.4 decode the same macros?The reason I ask is because it’s not doing any of those things that I have grown to love in 1.3. Thoughts? |
Re: Linux install ver 1.3 fails. How do I fix it?
Stan Ham
开云体育Thanks David; that did it; sorry to waste your time with my oversight. 73's Stan On 12/13/2016 02:34 PM, David Ranch
dranch@... [direwolf_packet] wrote:
? |
Re: Linux install ver 1.3 fails. How do I fix it?
David Ranch
开云体育Hello Stan, Please read section 5.2 of the Direwolf User Guide (it's in the doc/ directory in the tarball as well) to understand what other packages (dependencies) need to be installed before compiling. --David KI6ZHD
|
Linux install ver 1.3 fails. How do I fix it?
Stan Ham
I am running Kubuntu 16.04.
Downloaded the tar ball for version 1.3 Following is copy / paste of terminal cli commands and responses: stan@CoolerMaster-16-04:~/0_DireWolf$ ls -al total 13536 drwxrwxr-x 2 stan stan 4096 Dec 13 14:06 . drwxr-xr-x 34 stan stan 4096 Dec 13 14:06 .. -rw-rw-r-- 1 stan stan 13848615 Dec 13 13:35 direwolf-1.3.tar.gz stan@CoolerMaster-16-04:~/0_DireWolf$ tar xfz direwolf-1.3.tar.gz stan@CoolerMaster-16-04:~/0_DireWolf$ ls -al total 13540 drwxrwxr-x 3 stan stan 4096 Dec 13 14:08 . drwxr-xr-x 34 stan stan 4096 Dec 13 14:06 .. drwxrwxr-x 8 stan stan 4096 May 2 2016 direwolf-1.3 -rw-rw-r-- 1 stan stan 13848615 Dec 13 13:35 direwolf-1.3.tar.gz stan@CoolerMaster-16-04:~/0_DireWolf$ cd direwolf-* stan@CoolerMaster-16-04:~/0_DireWolf/direwolf-1.3$ make gcc -O3 -pthread -Igeotranz -ffast-math -DUSE_ALSA -c -o direwolf.o direwolf.c gcc -O3 -pthread -Igeotranz -ffast-math -DUSE_ALSA -c -o config.o config.c gcc -O3 -pthread -Igeotranz -ffast-math -DUSE_ALSA -c -o recv.o recv.c gcc -O3 -pthread -Igeotranz -ffast-math -DUSE_ALSA -o gen_fff -DGEN_FFF demod_afsk.c dsp.c textcolor.c -lm -lpthread -lrt -lasound /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lasound collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status Makefile.linux:257: recipe for target 'fsk_fast_filter.h' failed make: *** [fsk_fast_filter.h] Error 1 stan@CoolerMaster-16-04:~/0_DireWolf/direwolf-1.3$ |
Re: Question about RAW packets from IF to Internet
David Ranch
开云体育Hello Koval, ? This doesn't read correctly.? This text above says that UR3PHP-10 heard UR3PHP-10?? Self-reporting should be ignored
What is IF?? You mean the Internet?? That's what I'm going to assume for the moment.
It's very very unlikely your Internet based position reports are being gated from the Internet to RF via a local Igate.? It's technically possible but it's ever the default.? The operator running the remote Igate would need to setup specific filters to allow for this.? What is more common is Igates that will send or "gate" Internet to RF *aprs MESSAGES*.? This is not position reports.. just the APRS txt messages.
UR5KSH-1 is most likely a different station from UR5KSH-0.? I also question the reports from this aprsdirect.com website.? It might be right but the numbers weren't aligning with what has been seen on APRS.fi.? With that said, I do know that aprs.fi doesn't retain data for long so some of the numbers on the aprsdirect.com site might be correct.? Ultimately, I don't think these various APRS counter discrepancies are really a Direwolf issue beyond the known lower decode rates using cheap RTL dongles.? --David KI6ZHD |
Re: Question about RAW packets from IF to Internet
Hello David,?
I've calibrated rtl-dongle at the beginning. As you said, rtl after some times working is much more warmer than before.?I will try to calibrate it again.? I've also checked SSID (aka -0). It doesn't help.? I just don't understand one thing.? Stations that heard UR3PHP-10 directly during December 2016. ?UR3PHP-10 211 10.12.2016 10:22:02+01:00 0 km As I understand I am received packet from IF about my position. I don't have RF. That's why I assume that this is packet from the?nearest iGate-IF station. In my case this is UR5KSH-1. I think that??UR5KSH-1 received information about my beacon from Internet and then redirect it to RF. If this is right, so why I am able to receive packet from?UR5KSH-1 about myself, but I couldn't received packet from?UR5KSH about?UR5KSH position? This is very, very strange. ? |
Re: Question about RAW packets from IF to Internet
David Ranch
开云体育Hello Koval, ? In your original email, your example APRS comment said "RaspberryPi + RTL-SDR".? If you're indeed using an RTL dongle for this setup, are you also using that with your MixW setup?? I'm assuming NO.? I bet you're using a regular FM radio with MixW.? If I'm correct, have you read the bottom portion of: ?? specifically about the calibration?? RTL dongles are cheap for many reasons.? They aren't very frequency accurate and your unit might be a few Khz off and even have birdies in your desired frequency.? You should calibrate your receiver after its been plugged in for a few days to be completely warmed up.? You might consider trying out Gqrx or SDR# to see how off your unit is visually, etc.? Even better, consider getting a better SDR.? I personally have an AirSpy v2 and it's night and day better than my RTL E4000-based unit. Next. consider from the User-Guide - Section 12.4.4: -- Decodes: 100% - Dire Wolf, audio input on system board. 88% - Kenwood TM-D710A 65% - Dire Wolf, software defined radio (SDR) adapter. The exact percentage should not be taken too seriously because they can be manipulated by the amount of time spent in the zone where Dire Wolf could receive the signal but the TNC inside the TM- D710A could not. The software defined radio did pretty well when you consider that it costs only about $22. There is potential for possible improvement by: ?? - Finding better configuration options ?? - Using higher quality hardware such as the FUNcube Pro dongle. ?? - Using other SDR software such as gqrx. This experiment applies only to 9600 baud operation. Results with 1200 baud could be much different. There is one remaining mystery. Why doesn’t the data change? When walking around, the GPS location -- Though those numbers above are for 9600 baud, a 35% drop compared to using a real radio for the receiver is a BIG performance drop.? I'm not exactly sure why that is.... it could be the rtl_fm program doesn't work very well.? Could be that 8bit samples aren't good enough.? Dunno but knowing how well WB2OSZ does his evaluations and benchmarks with Direwolf, I *do* believe that using an SDR with Direwolf today is a compromise and you'll get better performance with a real radio for now.
Using an empty SSID (aka -0) is perfectly legal.? I doubt it will have any bearing on the numbers your seeing but it might be worth a try. --David KI6ZHD |