Re: Re-4: Fw: Re-4: [direwolf] Reporting to aprs-is shows no digipeaters? 3. April 2023, 22:04 Uhr Von Andrew P. <andrewemt@...> An [email protected] <[email protected]>

Do you mean:

1. Report _from_ your station _to_ APRS-IS, or

2. Report _from_ APRS-IS to your Internet client?

Where "your station" is UIView32 or Direwolf.

I know from experience that I-gate software varies in how long they take to get a packet from the radio to the Internet. My own APRS program YAAC is known to be a very slow I-gate, but I optimized it for fast reporting to the local user versus fast pushing to the APRS-IS.

What exactly is openwebrx? Is this being placed between Direwolf and your Internet connection, rather than letting Direwolf send directly to the APRS-IS?

Andrew, KA2DDO

author of YAAC

---

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Hiermur <murdocker@...>
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023, 3:53 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re-4: Fw: Re-4: [direwolf] Reporting to aprs-is shows no digipeaters?

Hi Andrew,

?

but why does the station reports?with uiview-32 sucessful, but with direwolf under openwebrx not?

?

Alone because of the running time?

?

I'm confused

?

?

Re: Re-2: Fw: Re-4: [direwolf] Reporting to aprs-is shows no digipeaters? 3. April 2023, 21:38 Uhr Von Andrew P. <andrewemt@...> An [email protected] <[email protected]>

Uh, are we back with the misunderstanding and false assumption that APRS-IS can be used for propagation analysis?

Remember, the APRS-IS _always_ discards all but the first-received (by the APRS-IS backbone) copy of any given packet. So, if multiple I-gates hear the same packet, only the _earliest_ I-gate's copy of the packet will get through to APRS-IS receiving clients. Period. You can't make the APRS-IS send duplicate packets from a slow I-gate.

Please keep this in mind when designing your APRS-IS client.

Andrew, KA2DDO

---

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Hiermur <murdocker@...>
Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023, 3:17 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re-2: Fw: Re-4: [direwolf] Reporting to aprs-is shows no digipeaters?

But the received traffic can be seen in the screenshot of the console in the previous post?

?

?

Re: Fw: Re-4: [direwolf] Reporting to aprs-is shows no digipeaters? 1. April 2023, 00:13 Uhr Von David Ranch <direwolf-groupsio@...> An [email protected] <[email protected]>

I don't know what to say here other than aprs.fi is not showing any real heard traffic from your station.? I would assume this is a levels issue with your SDR or an I/O issue between the SDR software --> Direwolf.? In the terminal window that has Direwolf running, you should be seeing decoded packets from all of the packets stations on frequency.? If you're not seeing decodes, this again points back to a form of "audio level issues".?


--
Stations heard directly by DB0DAN:

callsign ??? ??? pkts ??? first heard - PDT ??? last heard ??? longest ??? (rx => tx) ??? longest at - PDT ?
DL6YEA-8 ??? ??? 1878 ??? 2023-02-28 19:28:37 ??? 2023-03-31 07:04:19 ??? IO53AE > JO53KB ??? 862.7 miles 279° ??? 2023-03-30 22:29:17
DF3YG-8 ??? ?? ? ?? 1 ??? 2023-03-26 06:09:33 ??? 2023-03-26 06:09:33 ??? JO53MM > JO53KB ?? ? 30.7 miles? 11° ??? 2023-03-26 06:09:33
DL2VPL-9 ??? ?????? 6 ??? 2023-03-21 04:14:05 ??? 2023-03-31 05:26:25 ??? JO52GV > JO53KB ?? ? 19.0 miles 236° ??? 2023-03-21 04:14:05
DB0PER ??? ?????? 402 ??? 2023-02-28 16:19:58 ??? 2023-03-20 18:07:03 ??? JO53WB > JO53KB ?? ? 39.6 miles? 89° ??? 2023-03-20 18:07:03
DG5SUX-10 ??? ?? ?? 4 ??? 2023-03-17 07:17:38 ??? 2023-03-17 07:27:26 ??? JO52NX > JO53KB ?? ? 13.0 miles 120° ??? 2023-03-17 07:27:26
--


--David

On 03/31/2023 02:44 PM, Hiermur wrote:

Nothing but mobile stations?are reported to aprs-is.

?

?

Sry, but, what can I do?

?

?

?

?