Re: iGate from direwolf or YAAC
|
That's a great idea Craig, but I'd need to dedicate a radio to that and I only have the one which I also use for FSQ locally (fldigi).
And the answer is! Buy more radios!
From: "Craig, KM6LYW" <craig@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021 1:11:44 PM
Subject: Re: [direwolf] iGate from direwolf or YAAC
I'd use both!
A PiZero running direwolf with wifi KISS interface enabled, doing
all the day-to-day work.
But, from time to time, when you want a cool user interface, map,
messaging, etc, fire up yaac, and connect
to Direwolf over the KISS interface.? You can use another SSID, etc,
direwolf will continue to digipeat
concurrently.
best,
-craig
KM6LYW
On 10/14/21 11:06 AM, Andrew P. wrote:
Direwolf will be a faster I-gate than YAAC. Also, DireWolf
can run without a graphical desktop UI.
Note that YAAC can still tap into such a DireWolf setup.
However, YAAC would only log incoming traffic and traffic
that YAAC itself sends. Any transmissions solely by DireWolf
(either to RF [digipeat or Tx I-gate] or Internet [Rx
I-gate]) would only be known to DireWolf's logging.
Andrew, KA2DDO
author of YAAC
-------- Original message --------
From: "Danny K5CG via groups.io"
<k5cg@...>
Date: 10/14/21 11:10 (GMT-05:00)
To: [email protected]
Subject: [direwolf] iGate from direwolf or YAAC
Hello all,
I've got a PI400 connected to a TM-V71A and I've been using
YAAC to iGate.
I've shut off the YAAC port for aprsis and added the
parameters to direwolf.conf and verified it is working.
Is there any advantage/disadvantage/difference having direwolf
do it instead of YAAC?
Thanks
Danny
|
Danny K5CG