Re: iGate from direwolf or YAAC
|
When I think of YAAC (and many other APRS Clients), I think of maps, and other 'visual' aspects of receiving APRS data from a variety of sources.
When I think of Direwolf, AGW, aprx, etc.? I think of only the interface part.
So, if you are just looking at moving data around between ports (radios, internet, etc.) then Direwolf has a lot less overhead - and you can still interface with applications like YAAC.
On Thursday, October 14, 2021, 11:10:39 AM EDT, Danny K5CG via groups.io <k5cg@...> wrote:
Hello all,
I've got a PI400 connected to a TM-V71A and I've been using YAAC to iGate.
I've shut off the YAAC port for aprsis and added the parameters to direwolf.conf and verified it is working.
Is there any advantage/disadvantage/difference having direwolf do it instead of YAAC?
Thanks
Danny
|
