开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

Re: D-Rats, Packet, and UZ7HO


 

开云体育

Got it!?? Jeff, I read your email about 100 times and finally understood (my fault, not yours)!??

?

So, I've got three PCs running.? One is the ratflector/client.? The second is a DRATS client connected to ratflector/client via packet.? The third is connected to the ratflector over the internet.??? All three can communicate!? Nirvana at last!? ?The packet traffic is a little chatty because of the TCP header (I suppose), but I think it's workable.?? Tomorrow I will try to add a fourth PC connected via DSTAR RF.? Will also be able to add another packet-connected PC.

?

Thanks for your work on this, Jeff and others.?? Brilliant solution!?

?

Working through this has helped me understand the TCP Forwarding and Gateway functions as well.?? May be even more possibilities there.

?

Wow!? Huge leap, IMHO!?

?

73,

Dan

W4DTO

?

From: d-rats_group@... [mailto:d-rats_group@...] On Behalf Of ae5me@...
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 11:52 AM
To: d-rats_group@...
Subject: RE: [d-rats_group] RE: D-Rats, Packet, and UZ7HO

?

?

Good news from the Tulsa DRATS group. ?We were able to run multiple clients on the TCP forwarding to the "server" to tie in packet users to the ratflector repeater. ?Have some issues with it generating a lot of traffic on a given channel, but it works.

?

Thinking of using DPRS tied to APRS for short messaging (since TCP adds a lot of overhead to it). ?Has anyone tied DPRS into DRATS? ?Another way to tie packet side to DSTAR (I think).

?

Best Regards,

Jeff Scoville

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.