Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- Crestron
- Messages
Search
Re: Sensibo and crestron stopped working
I'm just a bystander here, but the exception seems to be complaining about the certificate on the remote site, which for this module appears to be .? I would start by updating the firmware on the processor - it is possible Sensibo switched to a new Certificate Authority which is not accepted by your processor, and the newer firmware would include this new CA.? If that doesn't work, you can modify the module code by adding "client.HostVerification = false;" after each "HttpsClient client = new HttpsClient();" line (there are 9 of them).? This allows for the possibility of someone intercepting your traffic and impersonating the Sensibo server.? Only proceed if this is an acceptable risk.? :) On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 2:40?AM gbnet.hifi via <gbnet.hifi=[email protected]> wrote:
|
TST-1080 (html5 Construct) Subpage and text punch-through
In VT-Pro, overlaying text or a subpage over a button enables you to interact with controls underneath.
This no longer appears to be the case in Construct.
?
I have two instances in this particular project:
* I have a footer menu subpage with a clear background - I'm using a Div (border) to form a background image with a button acting as a tab to hide or show this menu
? ? ?|--tab--|
|--------------|
|? ? ? menu? ? ?|
|--------------|
?
The area each side of the tab is clear. One of the buttons in the menu slides up a wireless mic list from the bottom of the page (under the menu) and then appears on the main page. The bottom mic in the list cannot be controlled because the menu clear space sits over it. I can't change the UI as this is a pre-agreed UI based on an existing TSW VTP project and I'm not allowed to deviate.
?
* I have a button in a widget list that has 3 text objects over it containing event information
This takes the form of:
number - event name - event time
Placing the text straight on the button just looks like shit as the placement gets messed up with the List header and it's impossible to get the text to line up correctly.
In VTP, this works perfectly, in Construct, it appears that you can't pass a press event through a text object.
?
Anyone know if it's possible to enable press-through? |
question about using ODT censor to turn on/off TV
Hi all,?
For a newly installed Flex Teams room, the client wish to turn on / off the TVs (2 x LG) automatically based on occcupancy. aside form the MX70 kit, I'm using an RMC4 and CEN-ODT-POE.
?
I basically have the ?Room_Occupied / Room_Vacant? going to ?Multiple One shot? then to ?Crestron Connected ?. A senior programmer suggested i? insert a ?Toggle? between the ?One Shot? and ?Crestron Connected?. Any reasons/advantages doing it this way?
?
Thanks,
?
? |
Re: Alternativce SACN module
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýYou might want to chat with folks at ETC, MA Lighting, or Doug Fleenor Design; they are the two premier stage lighting control companies, both of whom have extensive experience and knowledge of sACN, as they helped write it. ? SACN control allows for each control device to be assigned a priority. In addition, sACN is a multicast protocol. ? --?Steven ? ? From:
[email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Thorsten K?hler via groups.io <thorsten.koehler@...> Hi Lincoln, ? thanks for your response. Splitting player-controlled and Crestron-controlled loads would be the easiest approach, but I need to be able to control the same fixture via pre-recorded playlist and also via Crestron. ? I just came across the ¡°ESP DMX over Ethernet¡± protocol supported by the Enttec Ethergate. Documentation is in the file section of this group. This seems to support updating single values. Does anybody have any experience with this? ? Thanks, Thorsten ? ? Von: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Im Auftrag von Lincoln King-Cliby via groups.io ? This may be the expected behavior since sACN is, essentially, an encapsulation of DMX over IP and DMX is designed to be a single-master/multiple-slave topology where one and only one device must be aware of the current state of the universe, and DMX on RS485 just constantly loops sending the values of channels 1-512 in a loop at 230,400 baud. ? It appears sACN has embraced that behavior by the sACN packet consisting of a header followed by all 512 bytes (addresses) and at least from the documentation I¡¯ve found there is no way to not send the entire universe / update a single channel which would be a little antithetical to the design, potentially allowing individual channels to get out of sync with the master¡¯s view of the state of the universe. ? (In a quick search I haven¡¯t come across a comprehensive discussion of the protocol implementation so there may be a different protocol version that supports a per-channel update that I haven¡¯t come across¡) ? If the player has an input capability that you can then apply (highest/lowest/last)-takes precedence logic to that would likely be the best bet allowing the player to maintain knowledge of the state of the universe similarly to how you may approach things with a CueServer for example. Similarly if there¡¯s another device that can act as a sACN merger. Or if possible the simplest option may be to move Crestron-controlled loads to a different universe than the player-controlled loads. ? Lincoln ? -- Lincoln King-Cliby Commercial Market Director ? ? ? ? ? From:
[email protected] <[email protected]>
On Behalf Of Thorsten K?hler ? Hi, ? I?m using the ?SACN SenderDirectSockets¡± module from the SIMPL device database to control an Enttec Ethergate Artnet/SACN to DMX gateway. In general, it works. However, it seems as if the module sends out all 512 channels, even if I change only one of them. This is very unfortunate, as I?m using an Enttec S-Play mini to send out prerecorded scenes to my fixtures via the Ethergate in parallel to the Crestron processor. ? Is there any alternative to SACN module (Artnet would be OK as well) available that sends out only the values for the DMX channel that has actually changed? ? Thanks, Thorsten |
Re: Alternativce SACN module
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHi Lincoln, ? thanks for your response. Splitting player-controlled and Crestron-controlled loads would be the easiest approach, but I need to be able to control the same fixture via pre-recorded playlist and also via Crestron. ? I just came across the ¡°ESP DMX over Ethernet¡± protocol supported by the Enttec Ethergate. Documentation is in the file section of this group. This seems to support updating single values. Does anybody have any experience with this? ? Thanks, Thorsten ? ? Von: [email protected] <[email protected]> Im Auftrag von Lincoln King-Cliby via groups.io ? This may be the expected behavior since sACN is, essentially, an encapsulation of DMX over IP and DMX is designed to be a single-master/multiple-slave topology where one and only one device must be aware of the current state of the universe, and DMX on RS485 just constantly loops sending the values of channels 1-512 in a loop at 230,400 baud. ? It appears sACN has embraced that behavior by the sACN packet consisting of a header followed by all 512 bytes (addresses) and at least from the documentation I¡¯ve found there is no way to not send the entire universe / update a single channel which would be a little antithetical to the design, potentially allowing individual channels to get out of sync with the master¡¯s view of the state of the universe. ? (In a quick search I haven¡¯t come across a comprehensive discussion of the protocol implementation so there may be a different protocol version that supports a per-channel update that I haven¡¯t come across¡) ? If the player has an input capability that you can then apply (highest/lowest/last)-takes precedence logic to that would likely be the best bet allowing the player to maintain knowledge of the state of the universe similarly to how you may approach things with a CueServer for example. Similarly if there¡¯s another device that can act as a sACN merger. Or if possible the simplest option may be to move Crestron-controlled loads to a different universe than the player-controlled loads. ? Lincoln ? -- Lincoln King-Cliby Commercial Market Director ? ? ? ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Thorsten K?hler
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2025 1:53 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [crestron] Alternativce SACN module ? Hi, ? I?m using the ?SACN SenderDirectSockets¡± module from the SIMPL device database to control an Enttec Ethergate Artnet/SACN to DMX gateway. In general, it works. However, it seems as if the module sends out all 512 channels, even if I change only one of them. This is very unfortunate, as I?m using an Enttec S-Play mini to send out prerecorded scenes to my fixtures via the Ethergate in parallel to the Crestron processor. ? Is there any alternative to SACN module (Artnet would be OK as well) available that sends out only the values for the DMX channel that has actually changed? ? Thanks, Thorsten |
Re: Alternativce SACN module
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThis may be the expected behavior since sACN is, essentially, an encapsulation of DMX over IP and DMX is designed to be a single-master/multiple-slave topology where one and only one device must be aware of the current state of the universe, and DMX on RS485 just constantly loops sending the values of channels 1-512 in a loop at 230,400 baud. ? It appears sACN has embraced that behavior by the sACN packet consisting of a header followed by all 512 bytes (addresses) and at least from the documentation I¡¯ve found there is no way to not send the entire universe / update a single channel which would be a little antithetical to the design, potentially allowing individual channels to get out of sync with the master¡¯s view of the state of the universe. ? (In a quick search I haven¡¯t come across a comprehensive discussion of the protocol implementation so there may be a different protocol version that supports a per-channel update that I haven¡¯t come across¡) ? If the player has an input capability that you can then apply (highest/lowest/last)-takes precedence logic to that would likely be the best bet allowing the player to maintain knowledge of the state of the universe similarly to how you may approach things with a CueServer for example. Similarly if there¡¯s another device that can act as a sACN merger. Or if possible the simplest option may be to move Crestron-controlled loads to a different universe than the player-controlled loads. ? Lincoln ? -- Lincoln King-Cliby Commercial Market Director ? ? ? ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
On Behalf Of Thorsten K?hler
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2025 1:53 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [crestron] Alternativce SACN module ? Hi, ? I?m using the ?SACN SenderDirectSockets¡± module from the SIMPL device database to control an Enttec Ethergate Artnet/SACN to DMX gateway. In general, it works. However, it seems as if the module sends out all 512 channels, even if I change only one of them. This is very unfortunate, as I?m using an Enttec S-Play mini to send out prerecorded scenes to my fixtures via the Ethergate in parallel to the Crestron processor. ? Is there any alternative to SACN module (Artnet would be OK as well) available that sends out only the values for the DMX channel that has actually changed? ? Thanks, Thorsten |
Alternativce SACN module
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHi, ? I?m using the ?SACN SenderDirectSockets¡± module from the SIMPL device database to control an Enttec Ethergate Artnet/SACN to DMX gateway. In general, it works. However, it seems as if the module sends out all 512 channels, even if I change only one of them. This is very unfortunate, as I?m using an Enttec S-Play mini to send out prerecorded scenes to my fixtures via the Ethergate in parallel to the Crestron processor. ? Is there any alternative to SACN module (Artnet would be OK as well) available that sends out only the values for the DMX channel that has actually changed? ? Thanks, Thorsten |
Re: TST-1080 image resource path
have you try ./app/project/assets/img i'm using embedded iconfrom the theme at?"./assets/svgs/media-transports/light/" thru image_URL contract. {Paf} Le?mar. 8 avr. 2025 ¨¤?20:25, Slip Cougan via <gk.otoole=[email protected]> a ¨¦crit?:
|
UMC Creation issue
I'm wondering if anyone has started to see this lately. It's been pinching me this week...
When making or updating .UMCs I will often have version as the suffix.
ex: Module v1.0.1
Historically when I SaveAs, the Windows SaveAs dialog has the .umc type already selected and everything is good, like for decades...
This week I noticed that when I update/save a module ending in a dot-#, even though Windows dialog has the type, the module gets saved WITHOUT the .umc extension.
It will be saved as file name - Module v1.0 (Not Module v1.0.1.umc) and of course has no file reference.
?
This is an easy fix, except for the wasted time and process workflow, but just wondering if others have seem this.
Not sure if this is SMW, Windows or general digital crap...but I've only just started seeing this.
?
It could be my PC, Windows 11... |
Re: Topics in Home Automation - New Article in Residential Tech Today
Thanks.? The shades look well designed. The only challenge is that they are being sold through Kickstarter and won¡¯t ship until September.? Given this is a Kickstarter campaign you¡¯re never quite sure if that will be September 2025 or 2026? The other challenge is that the manufacturer is in reality paying Kickstarter for their marketing efforts. My experience with companies in this situation is that they don¡¯t feel that there is much value working with the press because Kickstarter is doing the work. That may change when the hoopla of the Kickstarter campaign dies down.? But I'll give it a try Thanks again? On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 6:16?PM ZS via <zac.sparrow=[email protected]> wrote:
|
Re: Topics in Home Automation - New Article in Residential Tech Today
Sorry, yes 48". I have couple of 60" windows and have been monitoring IKEA for a while as I like to touch and feel a product before I buy, and most of the custom cut solutions aren't easy to return.?
?
Somewhat on topic, a new company/product has popped up that I think it's unique in two ways:
- cut at home motorized cellular shade, AND more importantly, solar panel integrated into the bottom part of the shade. I think this part is genius, as it will allow for better solar charging when shade is [almost] fully retracted without exposing solar panel, charging cables etc.?
?
Try to get your hand on one for testing:
https://madodynamic.com/
? |