Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- Crestron
- Messages
Search
Re: Control for NP-PA803UL / new protocol?
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýI don¡¯t think 015. Power On is the actual command just the command number and name (if you look at other fields in the document there are hex bytes provided for e.g. DATA 02 and DATA 03. I think you¡¯re missing the actual protocol document. ? See page 190 of for (a portion of) the protocol where power on = \x02\x00\x00\x00\x00\x02. ? I¡¯ve been able to throw more or less the same commands at every NEC projector I¡¯ve seen in the past 12ish years. Incidentally there was a run of NEC projectors that would randomly lock up the COM ports at 38400 (or maybe at 38400 + DM); setting the baud to 9600 resolved that issue so more or less out of superstition I¡¯ll always set a NEC projector to 9600 rather than leaving it at 38400 . ? -- Lincoln King-Cliby, CTS, DMC-E-4K/T/D ? From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Tray Schaeffer
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2022 8:48 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [crestron] Control for NP-PA803UL / new protocol? ? All,? Anyway, Seems that the control protocol may have changed since I last worked with one of these.? See this document.? ? ? The NP-PA803UL is listed.? Not sure if the command should include the preceding number or not..? From the document, power on = "015. POWER ON". Not sure of terminating char, if any is required.? ? Any experience with these?? Thanks in advance,? |
Re: NVX vs. SVSI
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHi again Jeff, ? Sorry for the delayed response, it¡¯s been a busy week.? Here are the answers to your follow-up questions:
You can do VLAN switching either way.? Some installers like the STACK approach when using multiple switches, but it is not mandatory.? This has been true since we launched HDMI over IP in 2008.? The turnkey drivers we came out with in 2010 were based on a STACK implementation, but it has always possible for a knowledgeable control system programmer to manage the switching on independent switches.
In a nutshell, using the VLAN approach we have eliminated the TCP handshake that happens when a multicast device switches to a new stream.? The result is instant seamless switching vs the pause or blank screen associated with multicast switching. Ed Qualls Chief Executive Officer +1-727-475-7033 ed@... ? ? |
Control for NP-PA803UL / new protocol?
All,?
Working with new laser projectors here at a job site.? Set the PC cotnrol within the projector to 38400.? Unfortunately, control via HDBaseT is not available due to the way things are wired.? These are connected to DM-RMC-200 receivers from DM 32x32 (not CPU3).? DM endpoints reports on line but have no comms at all with projector. Stereo mini is connected to the PC Control input on display, not the IR remote input next to it.? Anyway, Seems that the control protocol may have changed since I last worked with one of these.?
See this document.?
?
https://assets.sharpnecdisplays.us/documents/miscellaneous/pj-control-command-appendixes.pdf
?
The NP-PA803UL is listed.?
Not sure if the command should include the preceding number or not..?
From the document, power on = "015. POWER ON". Not sure of terminating char, if any is required.?
?
Any experience with these??
Thanks in advance,? Tray |
Bathroom/Spa Integration Options
Hi All,
I have a client that is interested in renovating an bathroom to be an integrated "Spa-Like" experience. Looking for things like Steam Shower control, Shower control, Floor heating control, etc. What have others found that works well in a Crestron-integrated situation (SMW of course!) TIA! |
Re: Crestron Processor with 3rd Party Touch Panel?
What about node-red and http control as a solution On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 9:18 AM Audvizer <Audvizer@...> wrote: Hi Zac, |
Re: Calling a C# method from Simpl+
If you want to be able to return the object "processor" you can use a delegate in C# with a delegate callback in SIMPL+. This is possible as long as the "processor" type only encapsulates types that are compatible with SIMPL+.
Alternatively you could use a number of smaller methods that return only a single piece of data using types that are compatible with SIMPL+, SimplSharpString and ushort for example. The C# > SIMPL+ process and limitations were about as clear as mud to me, before I followed Troy's course. Well worth checking out: Bruce |
Calling a C# method from Simpl+
After compiling C# and reviewing the API I am not seeing the method "?public static Processor GetProcessor()".
I have created another class called Processor that holds the Get;Set; for each string C# ?public class ProcessorUtility
? ? {
? ? ? ??
? ? ? ? public ProcessorUtility() // Default Constructor
? ? ? ? {
? ? ? ? ? ? // needed for SIMPL+ to work!!!
? ? ? ? }
?
?
? ? ? ? public static Processor GetProcessor()
? ? ? ? {
? ? ? ? ? ? var processor = GetProcessorWithIPAndMACAddress();
? ? ? ? ? ? processor.ModelName = GetProcessorType();
? ? ? ? ? ? processor.ModelVersion = GetProcessorVersion();
?
? ? ? ? ? ? return processor;
? ? ? ? } |
Re: TS-1542 table top mount
Thanks, Javier - i¡®ll have a look
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Von meinem iPhone gesendet Am 05.04.2022 um 21:14 schrieb Javier Vidal <javitu@...>: |