¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: NVidia Shield control from Crestron

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

If you need any more testers I will help.
Andy


On Feb 13, 2022, at 4:05 PM, Albert Cunningham <albertlcunningham@...> wrote:

?

I would also like to be added to the list. I have a shield box at every tv in my home as the main (only at most) source.

Thanks


Re: NVidia Shield control from Crestron

 

I would also like to be added to the list. I have a shield box at every tv in my home as the main (only at most) source.

Thanks


Re: NVidia Shield control from Crestron

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Same!? Happy to beta test, with both 2017 Pro and 2019 versions.


Re: Mobile Pro G app on iPad - archive download error

 

Thank you dblpnt. That helps a lot. I didn't know about this bug and it's very possible that special characters are the problem given that this is a french installation which means possible accented letters. Thanks.


Crestron CLW-DIMEX-P questions

 

Hello,
? ?I have a two-fold question. I have a single button CLW-DIMEX-P installed and my MC3 does see it.

1) How do I raise and lower the light levels using an analog initialize which has a 0% to 100% scale by tens, an analog divmod which takes the result from the analog initialize and makes a quotient (the divisor is set at 1%)
? ? ?I also have an analog equate which takes the quotient from the analog divmod and it makes analog values. I also have a sliding bar under the 0% through 100% buttons.?

2) Or, how can I make lighting presets?

Now, I have to add that my knowlegde of Crestron is limited. I wrote my Crestron program looking at Youtube videos :)?

Thank you for your assistance, dsmith.


Re: Mobile Pro G app on iPad - archive download error

 

Hi Ingrid,

this sounds like an issue with the layout archive, it's either corrupt or what I've seen in the past also it contains umlauts/special characters in filenames and or page/subpage names which newer versions of the Crestron Mobile Pro app has issues with. The reason why its working on your old iPad is that there the layout was downloaded before this issue was introduced.?
No matter which of the above is true, you need your integrator to have a look at it.


Re: Mobile Pro G app on iPad - archive download error

 

I'm not sure what you are asking. The app is downloading the files from the server. I don't know how the Mobile Pro G app works but it needs the files on the iPad in order to display the Crestron configuration for the end user. (This is not a cloud server it is a local server.)?
I am hoping I will not have to upgrade the whole back-end just so I can use newer iPads.
The reason they provide the older Mobile Pro G app is supposed to be for the clients which still have older (like 2012) Crestron installation, right?


Re: NVidia Shield control from Crestron

 

Same here, would be happy to help beta test. I use both shield versions all the time and have tried a few options.


Re: NVidia Shield control from Crestron

 

Hi Richard,
would be interested too. I have a Shield 2019 Pro and 2017 in my system. At the moment I am using
CEC from NVX, but of course with no feedback and limited control.

thanks and regards


Re: NVidia Shield control from Crestron

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Hi,

?

please add me to the list. ? Would be great to get rid of the hard dongles.

?

Cheers,

Thorsten

?

Von: [email protected] <[email protected]> Im Auftrag von richard.k.mullins@...
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Februar 2022 23:37
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [crestron] NVidia Shield control from Crestron

?

We (Chowmain Software) have just released a Crestron Home driver which doesn't require any hardware, connects immediately and provides controls for pretty much every app and has a list of apps (with app launching, favourites, etc).

When it came out we were asked for a SIMPL version as well, which we now how in the pipeline. The module itself isn't too hard, but I still have to write licencing code so I don't have an ETA just yet. If anyone wants to help us beta test though I'd love to get some help. Just let me know and I'll add you to the list.


Re: Mobile Pro G app on iPad - archive download error

 

Are you hosting the iPad file on processor or locally on iPad?


Re: NVidia Shield control from Crestron

 

Another beta tester interest here. I have 2017 and 2019 Pro versions


Re: NVidia Shield control from Crestron

 

I too would like to test for personal use at home.?

Please let me know. - Tray


On Fri, Feb 11, 2022, 6:11 PM <joshua.p.mckown@...> wrote:
I'd be very interested to help beta test.

For whatever it's worth, I would only be testing on my system at home; my employer never integrates these things (not very applicable to our clientele). I, on the other hand, use my Shield every day, normally controlled via my Crestron system.?


Re: NVidia Shield control from Crestron

 

I'd be very interested to help beta test.

For whatever it's worth, I would only be testing on my system at home; my employer never integrates these things (not very applicable to our clientele). I, on the other hand, use my Shield every day, normally controlled via my Crestron system.?


Re: NVidia Shield control from Crestron

 

We (Chowmain Software) have just released a Crestron Home driver which doesn't require any hardware, connects immediately and provides controls for pretty much every app and has a list of apps (with app launching, favourites, etc).

When it came out we were asked for a SIMPL version as well, which we now how in the pipeline. The module itself isn't too hard, but I still have to write licencing code so I don't have an ETA just yet. If anyone wants to help us beta test though I'd love to get some help. Just let me know and I'll add you to the list.


Re: Server for testing

 

You can easily use WebAPI or something similar to mock one up.

--
?
Crestron Service Provider - TBD Enterprises Inc.


Re: HttpsClient => Content-Length issue

 

On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 08:54 AM, fabiodaubermann wrote:
Troy: I ran a test with your utility to send out a GET request to??and the exact same thing happened: crestron does not seem to send Content-Length, but if I add a Content-Length as custom header (which matches my payload, of course)? the module doesn't work (I suspect Crestron never sends the request to begin with).
I've never seen the need for a Content-Length on a GET requests because it isn't really standard to have a message body in GET requests. Think about what happens when you type a URL in your browser.
?
--
?
Crestron Service Provider - TBD Enterprises Inc.


Re: Server for testing

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

I used an Amazon s3 bucket for testing

On Feb 11, 2022, at 3:40 PM, Dustin Hurlock <dustinhurlock@...> wrote:

?If it works in the browser, there is likely something off with your http request in C#. I've found when something isn't working it is often a missing or incorrectly formatted header in the request. I typically use Postman to test http requests and make sure I'm including all the correct headers.?Are you getting any response and if so, what status code does it have?
You can also host files from the built-in webserver of a processor.?


Re: Server for testing

 

If it works in the browser, there is likely something off with your http request in C#. I've found when something isn't working it is often a missing or incorrectly formatted header in the request. I typically use Postman to test http requests and make sure I'm including all the correct headers.?Are you getting any response and if so, what status code does it have?
You can also host files from the built-in webserver of a processor.?


Re: HttpsClient => Content-Length issue

Master He
 

When you send a "GET" request, there should be no Content.

I have never needed to add content length myself in the header for Crestron http or https.

Cheers,

On Friday, February 11, 2022, 07:54:42 a.m. PST, fabiodaubermann <fdaubermann@...> wrote:


Thank you guys for the replies, but the issue seems to be very peculiar indeed.
Important to note that things work properly on the http version. This issue?only?occurs?on https .
The problem seems to be that Crestron https fails to include the Content-Length in the header, and if I try to add it myself, it will cause the https client to fail (becomes unresponsive, with nothing on the error log that I can tell).
Important to note that this is not a matter of making a mistake when adding the header: I tested this by adding some other custom headers and they work just fine. But as soon as I try to add a Content-Length header it will freeze without any clues as to why (which is something I shouldn't have to do to begin with).
?
Here is a more simplified version of the code with a functional example demonstrating both the pass/fail scenarios. It can be loaded in a 3-series and tested from the console.
?
Troy: I ran a test with your utility to send out a GET request to??and the exact same thing happened: crestron does not seem to send Content-Length, but if I add a Content-Length as custom header (which matches my payload, of course)? the module doesn't work (I suspect Crestron never sends the request to begin with).
Erik: I gave it a shot using your way as well but the problem persisted. The issue seems deeper than the just the code-base we are using.
?
Based on some reading I did, Content-Length is one of those things that is optional or mandatory depending on the HTTP version, and I can't really sniff anything meaningful with Wireshark because its all encrypted.
I'm starting to think if this has anything to do with what HTTP Version Crestron is using... I might open a case with crestron, will keep trying...?
?