Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- Crestron
- Messages
Search
Re: NVidia Shield control from Crestron
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýIf you need any more testers I will help.Andy On Feb 13, 2022, at 4:05 PM, Albert Cunningham <albertlcunningham@...> wrote:
|
Re: NVidia Shield control from Crestron
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýSame!? Happy to beta test, with both 2017 Pro and 2019 versions. |
Crestron CLW-DIMEX-P questions
Hello,
? ?I have a two-fold question. I have a single button CLW-DIMEX-P installed and my MC3 does see it. 1) How do I raise and lower the light levels using an analog initialize which has a 0% to 100% scale by tens, an analog divmod which takes the result from the analog initialize and makes a quotient (the divisor is set at 1%) ? ? ?I also have an analog equate which takes the quotient from the analog divmod and it makes analog values. I also have a sliding bar under the 0% through 100% buttons.? 2) Or, how can I make lighting presets? Now, I have to add that my knowlegde of Crestron is limited. I wrote my Crestron program looking at Youtube videos :)? Thank you for your assistance, dsmith. |
Re: Mobile Pro G app on iPad - archive download error
Hi Ingrid,
this sounds like an issue with the layout archive, it's either corrupt or what I've seen in the past also it contains umlauts/special characters in filenames and or page/subpage names which newer versions of the Crestron Mobile Pro app has issues with. The reason why its working on your old iPad is that there the layout was downloaded before this issue was introduced.? No matter which of the above is true, you need your integrator to have a look at it. |
Re: Mobile Pro G app on iPad - archive download error
I'm not sure what you are asking. The app is downloading the files from the server. I don't know how the Mobile Pro G app works but it needs the files on the iPad in order to display the Crestron configuration for the end user. (This is not a cloud server it is a local server.)?
I am hoping I will not have to upgrade the whole back-end just so I can use newer iPads. The reason they provide the older Mobile Pro G app is supposed to be for the clients which still have older (like 2012) Crestron installation, right? |
Re: NVidia Shield control from Crestron
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHi, ? please add me to the list. ? Would be great to get rid of the hard dongles. ? Cheers, Thorsten ? Von: [email protected] <[email protected]> Im Auftrag von richard.k.mullins@... ? We (Chowmain Software) have just released a Crestron Home driver which doesn't require any hardware, connects immediately and provides controls for pretty much every app and has a list of apps (with app launching, favourites, etc). |
Re: NVidia Shield control from Crestron
I too would like to test for personal use at home.? Please let me know. - Tray On Fri, Feb 11, 2022, 6:11 PM <joshua.p.mckown@...> wrote: I'd be very interested to help beta test. |
Re: NVidia Shield control from Crestron
I'd be very interested to help beta test.
For whatever it's worth, I would only be testing on my system at home; my employer never integrates these things (not very applicable to our clientele). I, on the other hand, use my Shield every day, normally controlled via my Crestron system.? |
Re: NVidia Shield control from Crestron
We (Chowmain Software) have just released a Crestron Home driver which doesn't require any hardware, connects immediately and provides controls for pretty much every app and has a list of apps (with app launching, favourites, etc).
When it came out we were asked for a SIMPL version as well, which we now how in the pipeline. The module itself isn't too hard, but I still have to write licencing code so I don't have an ETA just yet. If anyone wants to help us beta test though I'd love to get some help. Just let me know and I'll add you to the list. |
Re: HttpsClient => Content-Length issue
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 08:54 AM, fabiodaubermann wrote:
Troy: I ran a test with your utility to send out a GET request to??and the exact same thing happened: crestron does not seem to send Content-Length, but if I add a Content-Length as custom header (which matches my payload, of course)? the module doesn't work (I suspect Crestron never sends the request to begin with).I've never seen the need for a Content-Length on a GET requests because it isn't really standard to have a message body in GET requests. Think about what happens when you type a URL in your browser. ? -- ?
Crestron Service Provider - TBD Enterprises Inc.
|
Re: Server for testing
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Feb 11, 2022, at 3:40 PM, Dustin Hurlock <dustinhurlock@...> wrote:
|
Re: Server for testing
If it works in the browser, there is likely something off with your http request in C#. I've found when something isn't working it is often a missing or incorrectly formatted header in the request. I typically use Postman to test http requests and make sure I'm including all the correct headers.?Are you getting any response and if so, what status code does it have?
You can also host files from the built-in webserver of a processor.? |
Re: HttpsClient => Content-Length issue
Master He
When you send a "GET" request, there should be no Content. I have never needed to add content length myself in the header for Crestron http or https. Cheers,
On Friday, February 11, 2022, 07:54:42 a.m. PST, fabiodaubermann <fdaubermann@...> wrote:
Thank you guys for the replies, but the issue seems to be very peculiar indeed.
Important to note that things work properly on the http version. This issue?only?occurs?on https .
The problem seems to be that Crestron https fails to include the Content-Length in the header, and if I try to add it myself, it will cause the https client to fail (becomes unresponsive, with nothing on the error log that I can tell).
Important to note that this is not a matter of making a mistake when adding the header: I tested this by adding some other custom headers and they work just fine. But as soon as I try to add a Content-Length header it will freeze without any clues as to why (which is something I shouldn't have to do to begin with).
?
Here is a more simplified version of the code with a functional example demonstrating both the pass/fail scenarios. It can be loaded in a 3-series and tested from the console.
?
Troy: I ran a test with your utility to send out a GET request to??and the exact same thing happened: crestron does not seem to send Content-Length, but if I add a Content-Length as custom header (which matches my payload, of course)? the module doesn't work (I suspect Crestron never sends the request to begin with).
Erik: I gave it a shot using your way as well but the problem persisted. The issue seems deeper than the just the code-base we are using.
?
Based on some reading I did, Content-Length is one of those things that is optional or mandatory depending on the HTTP version, and I can't really sniff anything meaningful with Wireshark because its all encrypted.
I'm starting to think if this has anything to do with what HTTP Version Crestron is using... I might open a case with crestron, will keep trying...?
?
|