ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Simpl + Change Analog

 

Thanks for the reply's,

Will have a look at the wrapper for my simpl+ module.
Also will have a look into buffers.

--- In Crestron@..., Jason Melvin <jwmelvin@...> wrote:

Hm, I thought the behavior was exactly the opposite, because of the
statement in ABUF help: "If the input/output pair contains the same analog
value, the analog input will still be propagated."

I have, however, seen a loop created with SBUF and analog signals, so the
same signal continuously propagages and repropagates. Perhaps there is some
subtlety that I am missing.


On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Steve Kaudle <skaudle@...> wrote:

**


A buffer can certainly help, but I'd typically recommend using a ABUF (as
opposed to the SBUF) and latching the enable only after an
honest-to-goodness change has been generated in the logic. This way you
eliminate what is probably a superfluous Change event from running
automatically (either at boot or sometime thereafter), and you have the
added benefit of the ABUF's ability to eliminate unwanted repropigations
when the output already matches the input, further reducing the number of
unwanted SIMPL+ Change events.


-----Original Message-----
From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf
Of Jason Melvin
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 8:22 AM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: Re: [Crestron] Simpl + Change Analog

I use an SBUF in SIMPL for this, which gets enabled after ~10 sec on boot.
That way, the initially 0 analog signals don't cause switchers to change
sources before the old settings get recalled from memory. The SBUF blocks
serial and analog signals that would otherwise go to devices. Also, a BUF
signal prevents the program from triggering motion-detector logic for
contact-closure-output detectors, which have inverted logic due to the
pullup resistor.

On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Steve Kaudle <skaudle@...> wrote:

**


The only SIMPL+ 'event' that will automatically run when the program
is initialized is the Main, so if your Change is running at bootup
it's because something is causing the analog connected to the input to
propagate a zero at bootup (IE: the issue is in your SIMPLWindows
code).

There's nothing wrong with encapsulating the output calculation in an
IF statement to prevent a transition of the output you don't want, but
it won't do anything to prevent the unnecessary SIMPL+ thread from
being generated.
I'd concentrate my efforts on preventing the input analog from
propagating at bootup.

From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On
Behalf Of constantcharge2
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 2:33 AM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: [Crestron] Simpl + Change Analog


Hi All,

Have a issue that has me stumped.
using the below

Change Analog_in
{
Print("Analog_in %d &#92;n",Analog_in);
Level$ = IToHex(Analog_In);
}

When program initializes it enters this module and outputs unwanted
code eg sets hex levels to 0. (turns off amp's) Is there a way to stop
this happening?

my only way of fixing this currently is to do a feedback loop eg

Change Analog_in
{
Print("Analog_in %d &#92;n",Analog_in);
if (Analog_in <> Current_Level)
{
Level$ = IToHex(Analog_In);
}
}

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------


*

****

Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the
Database area.

*
****Yahoo! Groups Links



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: Capture Live HD

 

Thanks for all the input. My application is a small city govt that has to record meetings.

They occasionally have laptop presentations that would need to appear on the recordings. Does this aspect of the system work well? My idea is to have the secretary control the system via a touch panel. He/she would be responsible for actuating then PC input as needed.

Is this a reasonable application for this product?

Thanks again.

--- In Crestron@..., Steve Robinson <stever101010@...> wrote:

My main issue is that you can't record and stream at the same time so you are unable to use the TSW(for example) as a confidence monitor.  You can set it up but the minute you hit record....it's gone.  Then you need to run it out of the HDMI Out to a flat panel for a confidence monitor which causes more cost and less real estate on a instructor's podium.  I was told future firmware may accommodate that.


________________________________
From: eagrubbs <eagrubbs@...>
To: Crestron@...
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 11:47 PM
Subject: [Crestron] Re: Capture Live HD


The main issue I have with it is you cannot playback from it. If that feature could be added it would be a lot better. Easy to control. Setting up the IPT/z or whatever part # that sony camera is, sucks if you go by the manual. I had to download some sony software to set it up so I could set up the stream to the panels. my .01

--- In Crestron@..., Lincoln King-Cliby <lincoln@> wrote:

What are you looking for -- programming? End user? Sales?

It's stupid easy to program basic functionality, though some aspects require more reading of the tea leaves in the help file than I'd like but for your first time there's enough to build a framework that gets you to a point where you don't waste much time onsite.

Setting a static IP via the front panel is a PITA until you realize that DHCP (completely different menu) has to be turned off for before a static IP will "stick" & the one time I tried using one in "Streaming" mode (I had some time to kill on a jobsite) I don't recall it working well, again that was only one time, and every CaptureHD I've done has been used in "Record" mode/as a VCR replacement -- e.g. user plugs their USB drive in, hits record, at end of meeting hits stop and take the drive with them.

Using a composite video camera input in the 2010s feels dirty to me and, it seems, most of my clients as well. As a result, every CaptureHD I've deployed has been the CaptureHD Pro (which accepts Composite or HD-SDI camera inputs; about 75% of them are using HD-SDI now, the remainder for future resistance) but I assume the differences between the two are not that great aside from that.

HTH,

Lincoln

-----Original Message-----
From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf Of Gerard
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 9:14 PM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: [Crestron] Capture Live HD

Opinions on this?

Thanks.



------------------------------------



Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the Database area.
Yahoo! Groups Links



------------------------------------



Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the Database area.
Yahoo! Groups Links





Re: Pretty Toolbox splash

 

Chip and I are implementing backwards day...
On 2013-05-17, at 6:25 AM, "ChrisK" <chris@...> wrote:

--- In Crestron@..., Neil Dorin <neildorin@...> wrote:

You guys are all haters.

I think it's pretty :)
Neil,
That sounds like something Chip would say... :)

Chris K


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: Core 3 - Cant print project document?!

 

Yes you can run Core3UI xpanels from a 2-series but not a QM-RMC yet.

Only the PRO2 family and the DMPS's support full core3UI functions with smart objects and only 3 series supports smart applications.
On 2013-05-17, at 6:24 AM, "ChrisK" <chris@...> wrote:

You can run Core3UI xPanels from 2-series, I think even QM-RMC. Obviously I'd use an .EXE version for simplicity and not having to deal with memory issues, which would likely be very problematic in more complex xPanels...

HTH,
Chris K.................;)

--- In Crestron@..., "avsystemdesign" <avsystemdesign@...> wrote:

Thanks Neil, yeah I do the same but don't have a 3 series processor available right now. Oh well.....never a dull moment!

--- In Crestron@..., Neil Dorin <neildorin@> wrote:

Considering the dynamic nature of most Core3UI content it's pretty much useless anyway. I run my projects as xpanels and use a screenshot tool like Win7 snippet tool or Greenshot to capture the actual state of the UI including button fb and indirect text.

Sent from my iPhone

On 2013-05-16, at 4:45 PM, "avsystemdesign" <avsystemdesign@> wrote:

Really?! We cant print out our pages, or save them as images?
Please tell me I am missing something.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: Autonomic mms media player

 

Thanks! I'll be trying this next week.

--- In Crestron@..., Eric Williams <ewilliams0305@...> wrote:

I just setup my mms using the media player object. Works pretty well, few txt glitches and searching problems that need to worked out. The mms need a firmware update that may not show up on its configuration GUI. If not you'll need to telnet into the server and send the command "autoupdate hotfix"

Once that's complete under the source tab you see a place for an iP Id and processor IP address.

Thought I would save some folks some trouble.

Eric Williams
Head of Engineering
ABE Networks
240-604-4771

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: Simpl + Change Analog

 

Hm, I thought the behavior was exactly the opposite, because of the
statement in ABUF help: "If the input/output pair contains the same analog
value, the analog input will still be propagated."

I have, however, seen a loop created with SBUF and analog signals, so the
same signal continuously propagages and repropagates. Perhaps there is some
subtlety that I am missing.

On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Steve Kaudle <skaudle@...> wrote:

**


A buffer can certainly help, but I'd typically recommend using a ABUF (as
opposed to the SBUF) and latching the enable only after an
honest-to-goodness change has been generated in the logic. This way you
eliminate what is probably a superfluous Change event from running
automatically (either at boot or sometime thereafter), and you have the
added benefit of the ABUF's ability to eliminate unwanted repropigations
when the output already matches the input, further reducing the number of
unwanted SIMPL+ Change events.


-----Original Message-----
From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf
Of Jason Melvin
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 8:22 AM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: Re: [Crestron] Simpl + Change Analog

I use an SBUF in SIMPL for this, which gets enabled after ~10 sec on boot.
That way, the initially 0 analog signals don't cause switchers to change
sources before the old settings get recalled from memory. The SBUF blocks
serial and analog signals that would otherwise go to devices. Also, a BUF
signal prevents the program from triggering motion-detector logic for
contact-closure-output detectors, which have inverted logic due to the
pullup resistor.

On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Steve Kaudle <skaudle@...> wrote:

**


The only SIMPL+ 'event' that will automatically run when the program
is initialized is the Main, so if your Change is running at bootup
it's because something is causing the analog connected to the input to
propagate a zero at bootup (IE: the issue is in your SIMPLWindows
code).

There's nothing wrong with encapsulating the output calculation in an
IF statement to prevent a transition of the output you don't want, but
it won't do anything to prevent the unnecessary SIMPL+ thread from
being generated.
I'd concentrate my efforts on preventing the input analog from
propagating at bootup.

From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On
Behalf Of constantcharge2
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 2:33 AM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: [Crestron] Simpl + Change Analog


Hi All,

Have a issue that has me stumped.
using the below

Change Analog_in
{
Print("Analog_in %d &#92;n",Analog_in);
Level$ = IToHex(Analog_In);
}

When program initializes it enters this module and outputs unwanted
code eg sets hex levels to 0. (turns off amp's) Is there a way to stop
this happening?

my only way of fixing this currently is to do a feedback loop eg

Change Analog_in
{
Print("Analog_in %d &#92;n",Analog_in);
if (Analog_in <> Current_Level)
{
Level$ = IToHex(Analog_In);
}
}

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------


*

****

Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the
Database area.

*
****Yahoo! Groups Links



Re: Pretty Toolbox splash

 

I agree. Before this Toolbox would just sit there not moving, and we just had to hope it was working. Now at least there is action to reassure us.

--- In Crestron@..., "robbie_ray" <rlray@...> wrote:

As my computer has grown older, I find that I appreciate an acknowledgement that the program actually started after I clicked the icon.

Nothing more annoying than after waiting 5 minutes winding up with 3 instances of Toolbox open...

--- In Crestron@..., Marc Nield <nieldm@> wrote:

Is it me or is that new, pretty Toolbox startup splash more annoying than useful? You start an upload or a compile and then think "oh I'll start Toolbox" then you can't see what's going on for as long as it takes Toolbox to start coz the damn splash hogs the screen and won't go away.

Like I said, maybe I am doing something wrong, but if I am not I can't believe I am alone in my grumpiness�.


Streaming Live Audio and Video to a TPMC8XG

 

Greetings,
I am looking to stream a live feed to a TPMC8XG from a camera with audio. Does anyone know of a camera or Hardware codec that will facilitate this?


Re: Simpl + Change Analog

 

A buffer can certainly help, but I'd typically recommend using a ABUF (as
opposed to the SBUF) and latching the enable only after an
honest-to-goodness change has been generated in the logic. This way you
eliminate what is probably a superfluous Change event from running
automatically (either at boot or sometime thereafter), and you have the
added benefit of the ABUF's ability to eliminate unwanted repropigations
when the output already matches the input, further reducing the number of
unwanted SIMPL+ Change events.

-----Original Message-----
From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf
Of Jason Melvin
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 8:22 AM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: Re: [Crestron] Simpl + Change Analog

I use an SBUF in SIMPL for this, which gets enabled after ~10 sec on boot.
That way, the initially 0 analog signals don't cause switchers to change
sources before the old settings get recalled from memory. The SBUF blocks
serial and analog signals that would otherwise go to devices. Also, a BUF
signal prevents the program from triggering motion-detector logic for
contact-closure-output detectors, which have inverted logic due to the
pullup resistor.


On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Steve Kaudle <skaudle@...> wrote:

**


The only SIMPL+ 'event' that will automatically run when the program
is initialized is the Main, so if your Change is running at bootup
it's because something is causing the analog connected to the input to
propagate a zero at bootup (IE: the issue is in your SIMPLWindows
code).

There's nothing wrong with encapsulating the output calculation in an
IF statement to prevent a transition of the output you don't want, but
it won't do anything to prevent the unnecessary SIMPL+ thread from
being generated.
I'd concentrate my efforts on preventing the input analog from
propagating at bootup.

From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On
Behalf Of constantcharge2
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 2:33 AM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: [Crestron] Simpl + Change Analog


Hi All,

Have a issue that has me stumped.
using the below

Change Analog_in
{
Print("Analog_in %d &#92;n",Analog_in);
Level$ = IToHex(Analog_In);
}

When program initializes it enters this module and outputs unwanted
code eg sets hex levels to 0. (turns off amp's) Is there a way to stop
this happening?

my only way of fixing this currently is to do a feedback loop eg

Change Analog_in
{
Print("Analog_in %d &#92;n",Analog_in);
if (Analog_in <> Current_Level)
{
Level$ = IToHex(Analog_In);
}
}









------------------------------------

*
****

Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the
Database area.
*
****Yahoo! Groups Links


Re: Pretty Toolbox splash

 

--- In Crestron@..., Neil Dorin <neildorin@...> wrote:

You guys are all haters.

I think it's pretty :)
Neil,
That sounds like something Chip would say... :)

Chris K


Re: Core 3 - Cant print project document?!

 

You can run Core3UI xPanels from 2-series, I think even QM-RMC. Obviously I'd use an .EXE version for simplicity and not having to deal with memory issues, which would likely be very problematic in more complex xPanels...

HTH,
Chris K.................;)

--- In Crestron@..., "avsystemdesign" <avsystemdesign@...> wrote:

Thanks Neil, yeah I do the same but don't have a 3 series processor available right now. Oh well.....never a dull moment!

--- In Crestron@..., Neil Dorin <neildorin@> wrote:

Considering the dynamic nature of most Core3UI content it's pretty much useless anyway. I run my projects as xpanels and use a screenshot tool like Win7 snippet tool or Greenshot to capture the actual state of the UI including button fb and indirect text.

Sent from my iPhone

On 2013-05-16, at 4:45 PM, "avsystemdesign" <avsystemdesign@> wrote:

Really?! We cant print out our pages, or save them as images?
Please tell me I am missing something.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: Simpl + Change Analog

 

I use an SBUF in SIMPL for this, which gets enabled after ~10 sec on boot.
That way, the initially 0 analog signals don't cause switchers to change
sources before the old settings get recalled from memory. The SBUF blocks
serial and analog signals that would otherwise go to devices. Also, a BUF
signal prevents the program from triggering motion-detector logic for
contact-closure-output detectors, which have inverted logic due to the
pullup resistor.


On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Steve Kaudle <skaudle@...> wrote:

**


The only SIMPL+ 'event' that will automatically run when the program is
initialized is the Main, so if your Change is running at bootup it's
because
something is causing the analog connected to the input to propagate a zero
at bootup (IE: the issue is in your SIMPLWindows code).

There's nothing wrong with encapsulating the output calculation in an IF
statement to prevent a transition of the output you don't want, but it
won't
do anything to prevent the unnecessary SIMPL+ thread from being generated.
I'd concentrate my efforts on preventing the input analog from propagating
at bootup.

From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf
Of constantcharge2
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 2:33 AM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: [Crestron] Simpl + Change Analog


Hi All,

Have a issue that has me stumped.
using the below

Change Analog_in
{
Print("Analog_in %d &#92;n",Analog_in);
Level$ = IToHex(Analog_In);
}

When program initializes it enters this module and outputs unwanted code eg
sets hex levels to 0. (turns off amp's)
Is there a way to stop this happening?

my only way of fixing this currently is to do a feedback loop eg

Change Analog_in
{
Print("Analog_in %d &#92;n",Analog_in);
if (Analog_in <> Current_Level)
{
Level$ = IToHex(Analog_In);
}
}

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: Pretty Toolbox splash

Heath Volmer
 

How big of a deal is it really? ;-) It's only up for 2-3 seconds.


On May 16, 2013, at 7:51 PM, Chip <cfm@...> wrote:


I thought the SIMPL Windows splash was annoying.

This is exponentially worse.

Clearly the people that implemented this thinking it was a good idea have never tried to use more than one application at a time on their computers.

- Chip

--- In Crestron@..., Marc Nield <nieldm@...> wrote:

Is it me or is that new, pretty Toolbox startup splash more annoying than useful? You start an upload or a compile and then think "oh I'll start Toolbox" then you can't see what's going on for as long as it takes Toolbox to start coz the damn splash hogs the screen and won't go away.

Like I said, maybe I am doing something wrong, but if I am not I can't believe I am alone in my grumpiness�.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: Core 3 - Cant print project document?!

 

.+1 greenshot

{Paf}
Le 16 mai 2013 18:57, "Neil Dorin" <neildorin@...> a crit :

**


Considering the dynamic nature of most Core3UI content it's pretty much
useless anyway. I run my projects as xpanels and use a screenshot tool like
Win7 snippet tool or Greenshot to capture the actual state of the UI
including button fb and indirect text.

Sent from my iPhone

On 2013-05-16, at 4:45 PM, "avsystemdesign" <avsystemdesign@...>
wrote:

Really?! We cant print out our pages, or save them as images?
Please tell me I am missing something.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: Not looking for IR codes, just need to know what they would be in rs232 protocol

 

No, it's actually not pretty cool.

Knowing the difference between IR and RS-232 protocols is the very basic function of the control systems we are programming. You should know this from day 1.

This used to be taught in the Basic class. In order for you to take your cert test, you have to go through 3 classes, Basic, Intermediate and Advanced. It's very hard to believe you made it through all of this not knowing. Actually, someone should probably have a basic understanding of this before even taking the basic class. Either you weren't paying attention or the instructor was lacking. I don't think it was the instructor. This isn't something I would be proud of.

Let's say you picked a different TV for your test. One that had a module readily available and you didn't have to ask your question. You then somehow passed the test and became certified. Your now sitting there with the client trying to program his new TV by sending IR into the RS-232 connection. It's not working and your trying different things, making phone calls, posting questions and taking days to try and control a simple TV.

The client looks at you with a bewildered look on his face and you just shrug your shoulders and say "I don't know why it's not working".
The client says to your boss, I thought you guys were certified by Crestron. Boy these crestron systems suck.Your the kind of programmer that makes crestron systems look bad.

No, it's not pretty cool at all.

--- In Crestron@..., "jhuerta2803" <jav-gen@...> wrote:

If not the wrong way, how else could this be taken?

I don't program 24/7 or anything close to that, so yes I did make it through the cert course without knowing this. Pretty cool, huh?

Thanks for the vote of confidence.



--- In Crestron@..., "Ted" <ted_brincka@> wrote:

Don't take this the wrong way, but you actually made it all the way to taking the cert exam thinking that IR codes can just be translated to 232? Wow!

--- In Crestron@..., "jhuerta2803" <jav-gen@> wrote:

Sorry for the confusion Chip. I thought that IR codes could be easily converted to rs232 serial commands. I have now learned thanks to you and others that they are not they same.

I was able to find the serial commands in the Files section, and there was also a module that might be useful as well.

Thanks for the input.



--- In Crestron@..., "Chip" <cfm@> wrote:


Your posts are very confusing. (Or it's just been a long day. Or both)

You mention that you want to use RS232 control, but then you talk about capturing IR codes and using an IR bud. Not the same thing.

RS232 control would be using the DB-9 connector on the display and connecting it to a COM port on your processor. No IR. No buds.

There are at least two PFM series RS232 modules already in the SIMPL windows library. There's a decent chance one of them will get you at least power control of the unit, so I'd suggest looking at the documentation for one of the modules and fashioning up an RS232 cable...

If none of those modules work, I'm afraid your best bet to find the RS-232 commands (did I mention these have nothing to do with IR?) would be to call Sony and see if you are lucky enough to find a tech that's willing to dig them out for you.

- Chip


--- In Crestron@..., "jhuerta2803" <jav-gen@> wrote:

New to this forum, or maybe a long time since my last post. I am working on one of my certification programs and have plasma display that is not listed in the Crestron DB. I managed to capture the IR commands from the remote using the Crestron IR learner, but I need to convert the commands from IR to rs232 since the cert instructions call for rs232 control instead of IR.

I entered the IR codes via the Tx signal to see if they work the way I thought they should be entered into a Serial I/O, but they aren't working. The power_cycle code is 0x010F, and I entered it into the Tx signal as &#92;x00x010F&#92;x03 and the plasma does not turn on.

I guess I am just missing how to enter the command into the serial I/O param. I tried "0x101F", but that doesn't do anything either.

I haven't tried connecting an IR bud to make sure they even work that way, but they seem to be the same as another model that is listed in the database.

Ah, I just saw the bit about Geoffrey Reynold's conversion program. I will try that and see how that works.



--- In Crestron@..., "davestaud" <DaveStaud@> wrote:

I think this belongs in the "Connecting Devices" section...

=================================================================

Q: Where can I find Crestron IR codes for a <brand> <model> ?
A: Discrete codes for most brands that support them, can usually be
found in the Crestron Database -- search by Manufacturer, then look
in the "Generic", "Multiple", or "UnClassified" folders.

Also, most devices will respond to IR drivers for similar models
within the same brand -- ie., the driver for the Mitsubishi HSU-780
will probably work with the 580.

The Remote Central web site has IR codes for a large number of
devices, in Philips Pronto format (see
).
Pronto-style codes can be converted into Crestron format by either of
two pieces of software: 1) Crestron's "Driver Editor And Learner for
Windows" (aka DEAL) can import Pronto-style codes one at a time, or
2) group member Geoffrey Reynolds has written an excellent utility
program that will convert an entire set of Pronto codes (embodied in
a .ccf file) into a Crestron IR driver in one step (see
for details)

Please don't ask the group for IR drivers until you've tried all of
the above -- it's generally considered rude to ask others to do
research that you should be doing for yourself.

=================================================================


Re: Question to the Core3 Experts

Eric Williams
 

Not yet, the SDK supports building dynamic lists however there is no control that implements it other than the media player object.

Sent from my pocket robot!

-----Original Message-----
From: "joehostyn" <joehostyn@...>
Sent: �5/�17/�2013 12:36 AM
To: "Crestron@..." <Crestron@...>
Subject: [Crestron] Question to the Core3 Experts


I see the new mobile app that supports Core3 has been released and I feel it's about time I spend more time understanding it. My hope was it was going to make many things easier, and doable without multiple work arounds. At first glance it looks pretty good, we now have button modes and gestures to use on mobile.

The one key thing I was looking for was a simple way to create flexible scrolling lists. My wish list isn't huge, I'd like to programmatically define the number of items, give each one a serial text join, plus an analog join for an icon or mode.

Hopefully someone out there will tell me after Crestron has worked on this for the past three years and learned from the DNav 'limitations' that they now have made this possible but I'm just to simple to find the right list or secret to CED object to make it work.




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: Simpl + Change Analog

 

The only SIMPL+ 'event' that will automatically run when the program is
initialized is the Main, so if your Change is running at bootup it's because
something is causing the analog connected to the input to propagate a zero
at bootup (IE: the issue is in your SIMPLWindows code).



There's nothing wrong with encapsulating the output calculation in an IF
statement to prevent a transition of the output you don't want, but it won't
do anything to prevent the unnecessary SIMPL+ thread from being generated.
I'd concentrate my efforts on preventing the input analog from propagating
at bootup.



From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf
Of constantcharge2
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 2:33 AM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: [Crestron] Simpl + Change Analog





Hi All,

Have a issue that has me stumped.
using the below

Change Analog_in
{
Print("Analog_in %d &#92;n",Analog_in);
Level$ = IToHex(Analog_In);
}

When program initializes it enters this module and outputs unwanted code eg
sets hex levels to 0. (turns off amp's)
Is there a way to stop this happening?

my only way of fixing this currently is to do a feedback loop eg

Change Analog_in
{
Print("Analog_in %d &#92;n",Analog_in);
if (Analog_in <> Current_Level)
{
Level$ = IToHex(Analog_In);
}
}


A TPMC-4xg...

Marc Nield
 

…should charge via USB, right? It isn't charging properly in the cradle; the blue light on cradle stays on for about 30 seconds, then it, and the charging icon on the device, go off and the "low battery" warning appears. Via USB the device is recognised but the charging icon doesn't appear.

I tried a different battery with no difference. I also tried cleaning the contacts on the device and the cradle and even scraped them a little with a screwdriver to "clean" them a bit more, all to no avail.

Has anyone seen this behaviour? I suspect, but hope it isn't, a dying device�..

Marc


Simpl + Change Analog

 

Hi All,

Have a issue that has me stumped.
using the below

Change Analog_in
{
Print("Analog_in %d &#92;n",Analog_in);
Level$ = IToHex(Analog_In);
}

When program initializes it enters this module and outputs unwanted code eg sets hex levels to 0. (turns off amp's)
Is there a way to stop this happening?

my only way of fixing this currently is to do a feedback loop eg

Change Analog_in
{
Print("Analog_in %d &#92;n",Analog_in);
if (Analog_in <> Current_Level)
{
Level$ = IToHex(Analog_In);
}
}


Question to the Core3 Experts

joehostyn
 

I see the new mobile app that supports Core3 has been released and I feel it's about time I spend more time understanding it. My hope was it was going to make many things easier, and doable without multiple work arounds. At first glance it looks pretty good, we now have button modes and gestures to use on mobile.

The one key thing I was looking for was a simple way to create flexible scrolling lists. My wish list isn't huge, I'd like to programmatically define the number of items, give each one a serial text join, plus an analog join for an icon or mode.

Hopefully someone out there will tell me after Crestron has worked on this for the past three years and learned from the DNav 'limitations' that they now have made this possible but I'm just to simple to find the right list or secret to CED object to make it work.