Lutron integration issue

Amjad Ali

we are doing integration with lutron QS System using r04 modules?
First the integration was working well... but after I updated the Pro3 to the latest firmware the connection with lutron processors missed and it always waiting,? unknown and sometimes connected .. but we cannot control lutron anymore?
I found that the new firmware blocks the telent port 23?
and can not be enabled again .. the true blue support mentioned that I need to generate a license... I am not sure if this will fix the problem or not ...?
then I tried to use rmc3 processor with the old firmware and purchased after jul 2019 ... but the same no connection available with lutron ...?
can any one help what are we missing out here ??

Re: Compiler Error "Local" #simplwindows #crestron #lighting

#237970

开云体育

Did you use the signal list function at the bottom of the logic tree in simpl?

Show quoted text

On Oct 29, 2020, at 3:01 AM, Ivan Wild <c_rezz@...> wrote:

?Hi guys,
I have a strange compiler error... "failure - signal label Local"

I have searched the whole program for a signal "Local" but cannot find one.? It is listed in the extended signal list.

I cannot figure out how to rename, delete, relabel or fix this issue.?

Compiler Error "Local" #simplwindows #crestron #lighting

Ivan Wild

#237969

Hi guys,
I have a strange compiler error... "failure - signal label Local"

I have searched the whole program for a signal "Local" but cannot find one.? It is listed in the extended signal list.

I cannot figure out how to rename, delete, relabel or fix this issue.?

Re: Samsung IP control in a post 200 Database world #samsung

#237968

I avoid IP control of Samsungs, specifically for this reason, and because of the many similar complaints from other programmers.  

FYI,  should be able to update the module for 200+ compatibility, even if you don't have the S# source.

Show quoted text

--- On Wednesday, October 28, 2020 at 7:30 PM, ftvenezia wrote:

What is everyone doing for IP control of Samsung? The Samsung IP driver from
the application market isn't being updated to work with the new database. Has
everyone switched to certified drivers? I really don't like them as they are
allot to deal with, but I need a solution to replace that module if / when I
update these programs. Has anyone tried the Creston Connected models, it
doesn't help me with older TVs but just curious?

Re: Setting a Simpl# Array Size based on a constant in Simpl+?

#237967

I totally agree actually, a list would make more sense. Thanks for the suggestion!

Re: Lexicon MC-10

#237966

开云体育

Man I feel dumb. ?How did I miss that module? I actually pulled the command protocol from the site and started building my own…

Show quoted text

On Oct 28, 2020, at 2:59 PM, gablerjohn <ComeAlive@...> wrote:

There are MC-10 modules available. Got them from their site.? There is both an RS232 module and an IP module.? I installed one about 3 months ago.? FYI you can not simultaneously have the ethernet port available and control via RS232.? It is one or the other.? So if you plan on controlling via RS232 you will need to do the CAL before changing the control option.? I just switched the client to RS232 because the PRO2 stop controlling via IP for some reason.

Re: Samsung QE series & Samsung IP Display v1.3 driver #samsung

#237965

Hi

?

With which processor do you want to use this module?

?

I use this module but not for the same Samsung reference and it works on the other hand, I had a problem when I wanted to use it with a PMC3 : it can't work. You need a series 3.

?

The module works strangely: the analog FB of the selected input is incorrectly returned either by the Samsung or by the module.

?

It is a pity that there is no documentation on the information exchanged between the module and the Samsung.

Manu.

Re: Interlogix alternative

#237964

So are you saying that HAI is no longer available?? It has been a while since I integrated one in a new project but I too have always like HAI products.? Seems like most security panels come with there own app nowadays so we seldom add Security panels to a Crestron systems anymore.

Thanks,
Steve

@johnmax

12/19/19 ? #233164??

I never found HAI to be unreliable at all. Those things are solid and we will miss them. But like you we are in the same boat need need something more custom than Honeywell. Our company owner was holding on to hope that there would be something on the Bosch-Crestron front but it appears they have stopped development so looks like we only have a few options.?

Samsung IP control in a post 200 Database world #samsung

#237963

What is everyone doing for IP control of Samsung? The Samsung IP driver from the application market isn't being updated to work with the new database. Has everyone switched to certified drivers? I really don't like them as they are allot to deal with, but I need a solution to replace that module if / when I update these programs. Has anyone tried the Creston Connected models, it doesn't help me with older TVs but just curious?

Re: Interlogix alternative

#237962

+1 for Elk

I even installed one at my own house.? I don't really need an alarm system per se but it is a great way to define whether the home is occupied or not (armed away vs. armed stay or disarmed) along with an inexpensive way of integrating a wide range of sensors.

Jay

Show quoted text

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 4:23 PM Brian Matson <bmatson@...> wrote:

We use ELK, and it is extremely reliable.? I've been
Lately, I've been hounding Crestron to add it to Home as a supported system.
I believe that it will be integrated with that soon.
We don't use Home very often, but it would be a nice addition.

Most of our projects are SIMPL, and the ELK systems work perfectly.
They can be integrated via Serial or IP and the protocol is identical for each (just need a TCP/IP client symbol).
Modules have been available for a long, long time.
It supports up to 208 zones, 8 partitions, 205 outputs (relay/voltage) and is easily programmed with their ELK RP software.
There's a really nice custom rules engine built into their software.
I've installed both Honeywell and ELK for many years, and the ELK is so much more "friendly" to install and program.
Also, if your replacing a Interlogix system with wireless, they have a 319.5MHz wireless receiver that is compatible with Interlogix sensors.

Probably the best thing about them is that you can get a human on the phone in no time should you ever have a question!

Re: Interlogix alternative

#237961

We use ELK, and it is extremely reliable.? I've been
Lately, I've been hounding Crestron to add it to Home as a supported system.
I believe that it will be integrated with that soon.
We don't use Home very often, but it would be a nice addition.

Most of our projects are SIMPL, and the ELK systems work perfectly.
They can be integrated via Serial or IP and the protocol is identical for each (just need a TCP/IP client symbol).
Modules have been available for a long, long time.
It supports up to 208 zones, 8 partitions, 205 outputs (relay/voltage) and is easily programmed with their ELK RP software.
There's a really nice custom rules engine built into their software.
I've installed both Honeywell and ELK for many years, and the ELK is so much more "friendly" to install and program.
Also, if your replacing a Interlogix system with wireless, they have a 319.5MHz wireless receiver that is compatible with Interlogix sensors.

Probably the best thing about them is that you can get a human on the phone in no time should you ever have a question!

Re: Biamp Control Subnet

#237960

We did something like this and I want to say we had to turn off (disable) IGMP Snooping on the subnet.?

Re: Lexicon MC-10

#237959
Edited

1. Who says it needs to have XLRs?
2. I said 1U or 2U
3. There is so many products and options that are 4U, with or without XLR. There are none in 2U or under that has all the current HDMI AV formats
and I am not even considering HDMI2.1.?

LOL

Re: Lexicon MC-10

#237958

LOL.? Could you even get all the XLRs on a 1U.

Re: Lexicon MC-10

#237957

There are MC-10 modules available. Got them from their site.? There is both an RS232 module and an IP module.? I installed one about 3 months ago.? FYI you can not simultaneously have the ethernet port available and control via RS232.? It is one or the other.? So if you plan on controlling via RS232 you will need to do the CAL before changing the control option.? I just switched the client to RS232 because the PRO2 stop controlling via IP for some reason.

Re: Interlogix alternative

#237956

SB2000AM is required for Concord series.? There is a module in the DB.? The problem is getting one.? GE stopped manufacturing in December and Distys have not had GE/ITI parts since then.? There are 3rd party wireless peripherals available and they are just OK.? We have moved on to DSC Power series with the IT100 and it has been solid.? Not as quick to setup a system as GE, but not much more involved.? I hoping that without the goto of GE that Crestron would have more drive to integrate the NEO, but nothing yet.

Re: Samsung QE series & Samsung IP Display v1.3 driver #samsung

#237955

No, but I haven’t had a chance yet to go back and try using port 1516 as has been suggested, although, considering this driver is specifically listed as for this “The Frame” model, I don’t see why it would be connecting to the wrong port by default.

Have you tried using 1516?

Re: Samsung QE series & Samsung IP Display v1.3 driver #samsung

#237954

Good morning Rick,

Have you had any luck with this driver?? I am getting the same thing.? Very frustrating...Thanks.
--
Matt Grisafe
AV Programming Associates

760-632-6996

Re: Setting a Simpl# Array Size based on a constant in Simpl+?

#237953

开云体育

But why....

Limitations of the S+/S# mechanism prevent you from doing this easily as S+ automatically instantiates the S# class using the default constructor and you don’t have control over when.?

Just use a collection type like List rather than Array and it grows as necessary to match whatever data you feed it from S+.?

There’s no need to use an Array in S# just to match the Array in S+.?

Show quoted text

On Oct 28, 2020, at 9:12 AM, aecohn0210@... wrote:

?
[Edited Message Follows]
I'm looking to create an array in Simpl# whose size is dependent on a constant in Simpl+.

With Simpl+, I can just have the constant be 10, for example, and then point inputs/outputs/arrays to that constant size, and recompile whenever I'd like to expand or contract the module.

But attempting the same with Simpl#, I get errors. I tried to pass the value into the new array in the constructor, via function Main, but it didn't take.

Is there a best practice for achieving this?

Thank you

Re: Interlogix alternative

#237952

I am looking through this old thread and wondering about Interlogix SuperBus 2000 Automation module. Would that help in integrating to older GE systems and is there a Crestron module out there for it?