¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Complaints

 

I have also spoken with a number of people in Crestron leadership and head engineers about various issues as mentioned before. When speaking with them at Master's classes and CSP meetings at Infocomm, they never fail to acknowledge that there's room for improvement. For example, they know that Crestron Studio is a work in progress. But if they wait to release it until it's all "done", it will certainly not be done anywhere close to where full time programmers need it to be to be able to program a job with it. Last time I spoke to those at Crestron in the know, they did not recommend that I use Studio exclusively, and that I should be careful about using it on live projects at that point. And so I have Studio installed, and I have used it for my own personal stuff, and I have provided some feedback in the Crestron Labs and at the last InfoComm. I was a Crestron programmer back when Crestron made the move from the DOS Workshop programming to the Windows environment and SIMPL Windows. It wasn't pretty, and I think Crestron has learned from that. So the transition to Studio and Smart Graphics in my opinion has been slow and methodical. And probably for good reason. I have only done two projects with a Core 3 processor so far, and only one of those had Smart Graphics. I charged hourly for those projects due to these unknowns with the new gear and Smart Graphics. So I came out OK. I do mostly commercial work, and maybe my clients are slow adopters due to corporate policies and red tape. I am not too antsy to dive into newly released products that have no known track record. I realize that some others don't have much choice. But series 2 processors and non-smart graphics touch panels are still viable in my opinion, and as long as I can keep my clients happy I will continue to program these proven products. Since Crestron does not have internal project programmers like they used to, we do have a roll to fill in helping Crestron help us in making better products. Some people will say that this should not be our job, but the reality is that it is in our best interest to provide valuable and constructive feedback when we can. I will do as much as I can to help, while being careful to limit my risk with new technology as much as practical for my business, so I can continue to deliver successful solutions.

--- In Crestron@..., Heath Volmer <hvolmer@...> wrote:

It all seems to fall on deaf ears regardless of where we "vent." Believe me, I've talked to almost everyone up to the top.

Heath Volmer
Digital Domain Systems
Littleton, CO

Sent from my iTypo 4

On Aug 14, 2013, at 6:48 PM, "RobK" <fooguy89@...> wrote:

Hey all

Just out of curiosity, I know a lot of people do like to vent on the board here (and I was once told as such), but when all of you have serious complaints about Crestron product (Smart graphics & Studio keep getting mentioned) do any of you do anything about it? Do you get your bosses to complain to Crestron - and not just calling tech support or Rich - I'm talking calls to higher ups such as Fred?

Normally I'm not inclined to drop names, but it's not like these guys are hidden.

I'm not saying that will necessarily do anything, but it seems like if enough people get their higher ups to complain en mass, maybe some change can be effected, albeit slow?

Maybe this has been done, I don't know, but just curious how you guys have been attempting to deal with the problems that we can't fix.




Re: 3-series out of bounds array references FYI...

 

Exactly

Try
//Doing something that's likely to generate an error <-- gets executed
//Something that generates an error <-- gets executed up to the point of erroring out
//Something else <-- doesn't get executed
Catch
// Handle the something that generated an error only if it actually generated an error
End try

// Continue with execution flow..

Lincoln

--
Lincoln King-Cliby, CTS
Commercial Market Director
Sr. Systems Architect | Crestron Certified Master Programmer (Silver)
ControlWorks Consulting, LLC
Crestron Services Provider

-----Original Message-----
From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf Of Heath Volmer
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 7:27 PM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: Re: [Crestron] Re: 3-series out of bounds array references FYI...

I wouldn't really expect the code in a try to continue after being caught - unless I misunderstand your meaning.

Good to know that's there. Thanks Rob.

Heath Volmer
Digital Domain Systems
Littleton, CO

Sent from my iTypo 4

On Aug 14, 2013, at 7:08 PM, "RobK" <fooguy89@...> wrote:

Not sure if it continues after the exception,

------------------------------------



Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the Database area.
Yahoo! Groups Links


Re: Complaints

 

Absolutely.

That's part of my frustration... while I haven't reached Fred level yet (because while I've _met_ Fred, I certainly don't have an actual relationship, much less one where I would feel comfortable going directly to him with everything that's "wrong") I've had conversation with _many_ others on the inside.

I don't want to provide too much detail but some of the conversations have been very productive, some have been "that's the way it is, so suck it", and some of the conversations have been frustrating because everyone involved in the conversation acknowledges there's a major issue and has possible solutions but there's too much institutional inertia to get them fixed anytime soon. In one of those key cases we, as an organization we can't even /consider/ using the tool until the issue is fixed.

In another case I have a project with a substantial amount of Crestron hardware (IIRC $60-80k at dealer cost...for a single room) at risk because the Pro3 is missing one feature the Pro2 has. I think I've calmed that client down enough for now.

I've all but given up on labs, and when I do browse over there I usually find myself wanting to throw something.


--
Lincoln King-Cliby, CTS
Commercial Market Director
Sr. Systems Architect | Crestron Certified Master Programmer (Silver)
ControlWorks Consulting, LLC
Crestron Services Provider

-----Original Message-----
From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf Of RobK
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 6:49 PM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: [Crestron] Complaints

Hey all

Just out of curiosity, I know a lot of people do like to vent on the board here (and I was once told as such), but when all of you have serious complaints about Crestron product (Smart graphics & Studio keep getting mentioned) do any of you do anything about it? Do you get your bosses to complain to Crestron - and not just calling tech support or Rich - I'm talking calls to higher ups such as Fred?

Normally I'm not inclined to drop names, but it's not like these guys are hidden.

I'm not saying that will necessarily do anything, but it seems like if enough people get their higher ups to complain en mass, maybe some change can be effected, albeit slow?

Maybe this has been done, I don't know, but just curious how you guys have been attempting to deal with the problems that we can't fix.




------------------------------------



Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the Database area.
Yahoo! Groups Links


Re: Crestron for iPad

 

I set up a few pages in Mobile Pro to get them started.

--- In Crestron@..., "RobK" <fooguy89@...> wrote:

I don't really understand. How have they paid for iPad functionality in their system already?

--- In Crestron@..., "rogiervs" <rogier@> wrote:

That's not true, these 30 iPads will not be on the same Apple ID. I don't mind my customers paying $99 for the iPad app, but think that customers that have paid for iPad functionality in their system should not have to pay twice. The explanation is techy, communication to customers should always be solution driven imo.

--- In Crestron@..., "amdtech2000" <jack.kolesar@> wrote:

For $99? Hell if they have 1 iPad it is $99. If they have 30 iPads, it is $99. Sounds like a non-issue. You have a multiple factor of that invested in redesigning the panels.

Could be worse. AMX is over $700 PER DEVICE because they use a licensing system and the customer doesn't buy the app (it's free). They buy a license from YOU. That is a lot tougher to explain but is still WAY cheaper than buying an AMX/Crestron touch panel.

Jack

--- In Crestron@..., "rogiervs" <rogier@> wrote:

Hey guys, am I the only one who finds it hard to explain to my customers who bought the Mobile Pro app recently that if they want to upgrade their experience they need to purchase the upgrade for another $99?


Re: Crestron for iPad

 

Yeah, I just read the specs and assumed it would be an upgrade. Wrong, I know, but still think it's a legit assumption. Never mind, I'm obviously the only one having this issue.

--- In Crestron@..., "Andre Bouchard" <alexanbo@...> wrote:

Info on the new app has been up since the middle of March in Labs and since at least June on the main site.

--- In Crestron@..., "rogiervs" <rogier@> wrote:

Maybe I don't get the Apple thing good enough, I was under the impression that Crestron got most of the purchase and thus should be able to do a refund for something bought two months ago they'll never use...
For the record, it's not about the $99, just the principle.

--- In Crestron@..., Paul Cunningham <paul.cunningham@> wrote:

Pretty much (btw - just misquoting your "hard to explain" bit below, not being snarky). No one paid anything for the AV2 firmware because Crestron chose not to charge for it; Apple of course chooses differently. Whaddayagonnado...

-----Original Message-----
From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf Of rogiervs
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 4:21 PM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: [Crestron] Re: Crestron for iPad

That's exactly what will happen, they will install the new app, I will be able to copy my TSW programming to the iPads and they will get a refund for something I didn't get any margin on in the first place. Has nothing to do with "being bad" at explaining stuff.
How much did you pay for the AV2 firmware that enabled the Core 3 Smartobjects?

--- In Crestron@..., Paul Cunningham <paul.cunningham@> wrote:

Correct on the device count; Apple limits you to a total combination of 10 iOS devices and computers (or non-iOS iTunes instances technically) per AppleID.



It's not about "paying twice", it's about playing by Apple's rules, over which neither you nor Crestron has any control - Apple is the gatekeeper here. Like Chip said, if they already paid for iPad functionality they don't have to pay twice - they have to pay to UPGRADE the app to enable better features. Or you can just take $99 out of your bottom line if you're bad at explaining it to them.

-----Original Message-----
From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf Of rogiervs
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 1:06 PM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: [Crestron] Re: Crestron for iPad

That's not true, these 30 iPads will not be on the same Apple ID. I don't mind my customers paying $99 for the iPad app, but think that customers that have paid for iPad functionality in their system should not have to pay twice. The explanation is techy, communication to customers should always be solution driven imo.

--- In Crestron@..., "amdtech2000" <jack.kolesar@> wrote:

For $99? Hell if they have 1 iPad it is $99. If they have 30 iPads, it is $99. Sounds like a non-issue. You have a multiple factor of that invested in redesigning the panels.

Could be worse. AMX is over $700 PER DEVICE because they use a licensing system and the customer doesn't buy the app (it's free). They buy a license from YOU. That is a lot tougher to explain but is still WAY cheaper than buying an AMX/Crestron touch panel.

Jack

--- In Crestron@..., "rogiervs" <rogier@> wrote:

Hey guys, am I the only one who finds it hard to explain to my customers who bought the Mobile Pro app recently that if they want to upgrade their experience they need to purchase the upgrade for another $99?



------------------------------------



Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the Database area.
Yahoo! Groups Links


------------------------------------



Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the Database area.
Yahoo! Groups Links


DMPS and Sharp 80" displays

 

I have a DMPS300, a slave MC50, an RMC-100 at each display, and 2 80" monitors. I am using a relatively standard Sharp Module and using basic commands, power, input, volume, mute. I would use the serial strings alone, but sharp does not offer the incremental volume commands, only a set numerical volume command. My RMC's have never gone offline nor have I lost video, but my commandsto the monitors get wacky sometimes. At times, i may loose commands going to either one of the TV's. They seem to lock up. In debugger, I can see the command strings going to them, along with all the polling from the module. When it freezes I either have to wait for it to "catch up" or do a reboot. Sometimes a RSPW1 command will snap it back in shape, but thats only when I'm there troubleshooting. I did notice a ton of chatter from the DMPS in debugger. I wish there was a way to turn off some of the processes I'm not using. Anyone have any insight?


Re: DMPS300 and RS232 on DM room boxes...

 

I have almost the exact same set up. I have a DMPS300, a slave MC50, an RMC-100 at each display, and 2 80" monitors. I am using a relatively standard Sharp Module and using basic commands, power, input, volume, mute. I would use the serial strings alone, but sharp does not offer the incremental volume commands, only a set numerical volume command. My RMC's have never gone offline nor have I lost video, but my commands get wacky sometimes. At times, i may loose commands going to either one of the TV's. They seem to lock up. In debugger, I can see the command strings going to them, along with all the polling from the module. When it freezes I either have to wait for it to "catch up" or do a reboot. Sometimes a RSPW1 command will snap it back in shape, but thats only when I'm there troubleshooting. I did notice a ton of chatter from the DMPS in debugger. I wish there was a way to turn off some of the processes I'm not using. Did you find a solution to your system?

--- In Crestron@..., Lincoln King-Cliby <lincoln@...> wrote:

Hi Fabio,

I don't know the model # off the top of my head & I'm on the road without it this week but I do know it's rather pricy (I want to say $10k-or-more-ish) so we only have one in the office; it's not quite "just throw it in your bag" material but it is very handy when you're commissioning a DM system or having "weird problems"

Lincoln

--
Lincoln King-Cliby, CTS
Commercial Market Director
Sr. Systems Architect | Crestron Certified Master Programmer (Silver)
ControlWorks Consulting, LLC
Crestron Services Provider

-----Original Message-----
From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf Of fabiodaubermann
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 11:28 AM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: [Crestron] Re: DMPS300 and RS232 on DM room boxes...

Hi Lincoln,

do you happen to know what model is the Fluke meter that Crestron recommends? Sounds like a must have tool in the bag...
I am suspecting that I might have some wiring and/or termination issues.

Thanks,
Fabio

--- In Crestron@..., Lincoln King-Cliby <lincoln@> wrote:

Check the IP table when the control doesn't seem to work -- specifically if the IP ID is "offline".

If the IPID is offline but you're passing video recheck and recertify (not just continuity test--use the Fluke meter that Crestron recommends) the DM cable. I've seen some "questionable" DM cables that pass video and DMNet (so you can use RCON .... commands) but not (good enough) Ethernet for the control side of the box to come online with the program.

Earlier this month I had a project where the box was dropping offline more frequently than I could count (literally)...the installers jiggled the DM cable and problem solved. (They did reterminate the suspect end, of course)

Lincoln

--
Lincoln King-Cliby, CTS
Commercial Market Director
Sr. Systems Architect | Crestron Certified Master Programmer (Silver)
ControlWorks Consulting, LLC
Crestron Services Provider

-----Original Message-----
From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On Behalf Of fabiodaubermann
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 6:46 PM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: [Crestron] DMPS300 and RS232 on DM room boxes...

I am here on site with a DMPS-300 and I have a feeling that the RS232 on the DM-RMC-100-C's are flaky... sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't... I can't put my finger in it yet, but it appears so...
I am controlling two Sharp TV's... very basic commands via SIO symbol (POWR0 &#92;x0D , RSPW1 &#92;x0D, POWR1 &#92;x0D , etc...)

Anybody with similar experiences?




------------------------------------



Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the Database area.
Yahoo! Groups Links



------------------------------------



Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the Database area.
Yahoo! Groups Links


Re: Complaints

 

I am trying to quit complaining on here about it. Improvements are being made and it is getting better. One of the reasons I quit posting for a little was to get out of that habit. The complaining wasn't being productive for the group. As far as someone at crestron, no. Just on Labs a little and I have not been on there in a while.

--- In Crestron@..., "RobK" <fooguy89@...> wrote:

Hey all

Just out of curiosity, I know a lot of people do like to vent on the board here (and I was once told as such), but when all of you have serious complaints about Crestron product (Smart graphics & Studio keep getting mentioned) do any of you do anything about it? Do you get your bosses to complain to Crestron - and not just calling tech support or Rich - I'm talking calls to higher ups such as Fred?

Normally I'm not inclined to drop names, but it's not like these guys are hidden.

I'm not saying that will necessarily do anything, but it seems like if enough people get their higher ups to complain en mass, maybe some change can be effected, albeit slow?

Maybe this has been done, I don't know, but just curious how you guys have been attempting to deal with the problems that we can't fix.


Re: Complaints

Heath Volmer
 

It all seems to fall on deaf ears regardless of where we "vent." Believe me, I've talked to almost everyone up to the top.

Heath Volmer
Digital Domain Systems
Littleton, CO

Sent from my iTypo 4

On Aug 14, 2013, at 6:48 PM, "RobK" <fooguy89@...> wrote:

Hey all

Just out of curiosity, I know a lot of people do like to vent on the board here (and I was once told as such), but when all of you have serious complaints about Crestron product (Smart graphics & Studio keep getting mentioned) do any of you do anything about it? Do you get your bosses to complain to Crestron - and not just calling tech support or Rich - I'm talking calls to higher ups such as Fred?

Normally I'm not inclined to drop names, but it's not like these guys are hidden.

I'm not saying that will necessarily do anything, but it seems like if enough people get their higher ups to complain en mass, maybe some change can be effected, albeit slow?

Maybe this has been done, I don't know, but just curious how you guys have been attempting to deal with the problems that we can't fix.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: 3-series out of bounds array references FYI...

Heath Volmer
 

I wouldn't really expect the code in a try to continue after being caught - unless I misunderstand your meaning.

Good to know that's there. Thanks Rob.

Heath Volmer
Digital Domain Systems
Littleton, CO

Sent from my iTypo 4

On Aug 14, 2013, at 7:08 PM, "RobK" <fooguy89@...> wrote:

Not sure if it continues after the exception,


Re: 3-series out of bounds array references FYI...

 

Ooh! Nifty :)

On 2013-08-14, at 5:08 PM, "RobK" <fooguy89@...> wrote:

From the SIMPL+ help:

"TRY-CATCH blocks catch and handle exceptions generated by working code. Exceptions can be caught and handled in the CATCH portion of the block. The exception can also be evaluated using either the GetExceptionMessage or GetExceptionCode function."

Not sure if it continues after the exception, however, it does have it. 3 series only.

--- In Crestron@..., Neil Dorin <neildorin@...> wrote:

Only if you use a S# library Linc ;)


On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Lincoln King-Cliby <
lincoln@...> wrote:

**


I don't know why I'm asking this question, but I don't suppose SIMPL+ on
the 3 series has gained Try/Catch/End Try style error handling has it?

Heck at least with VB in the old days you could at least On Error Resume
Next ;)

Why do I sound so bitter this week?

Lincoln

--
Lincoln King-Cliby, CTS
Commercial Market Director
Sr. Systems Architect | Crestron Certified Master Programmer (Silver)
V: 440.449.1100 x1107 F: 440-449-1106 I:
Crestron Services Provider


-----Original Message-----
From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On
Behalf Of Chip
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 12:19 PM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: [Crestron] 3-series out of bounds array references FYI...

Here's a lowdown on a great "feature" in case anyone trips across it
before you spend too much time tearing your hair out.

In the 2-series, if you have an array and attempt to access an element
beyond what it's declared for, you get a zero result and (I believe) an
error in the log. (A slap on the wrists, and obviously not the results
you're expecting)

In the 3-series, however - the remainder of the code following the line
the error is on is THROWN OUT like last week's rancid leftovers. You get an
error in your log, sure - but anything that relied on the block of code
completing ain't gonna get satisfied. (Y'know, like, turning off the
semaphore on a parsing routine)

So make sure you do range checking before accessing arrays on the 3s... :(

- Chip

------------------------------------





Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the
Database area.
Yahoo!
Groups Links



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: Crestron for iPad

 

I don't really understand. How have they paid for iPad functionality in their system already?

--- In Crestron@..., "rogiervs" <rogier@...> wrote:

That's not true, these 30 iPads will not be on the same Apple ID. I don't mind my customers paying $99 for the iPad app, but think that customers that have paid for iPad functionality in their system should not have to pay twice. The explanation is techy, communication to customers should always be solution driven imo.

--- In Crestron@..., "amdtech2000" <jack.kolesar@> wrote:

For $99? Hell if they have 1 iPad it is $99. If they have 30 iPads, it is $99. Sounds like a non-issue. You have a multiple factor of that invested in redesigning the panels.

Could be worse. AMX is over $700 PER DEVICE because they use a licensing system and the customer doesn't buy the app (it's free). They buy a license from YOU. That is a lot tougher to explain but is still WAY cheaper than buying an AMX/Crestron touch panel.

Jack

--- In Crestron@..., "rogiervs" <rogier@> wrote:

Hey guys, am I the only one who finds it hard to explain to my customers who bought the Mobile Pro app recently that if they want to upgrade their experience they need to purchase the upgrade for another $99?


Re: Get IP Address of Device In IP Table

 

Not sure about the rcon, but I do know the WHO command will show connected
IP addresses in the IP table (as well as console sessions).

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Jonathan <jtgill@...> wrote:

Hi all,

I'm putting together a database for a college that receives information
from DM classrooms (IP Address, Host Name, Room Name, etc) and sorts it
into tables. The classrooms are run with DMPS-300-C's and TPMC-4SM's. The
touch panels are connected via IP, and I was wondering if there is a way to
retrieve the TPMC's IP address from the DMPS's IP table (similar to the way
that Network Device Tree will retrieve the IPs of connected devices). Maybe
a hidden console command? Some sort of rcon to the ENET-1 slot of the DMPS?

The TPMC's are connected to IPID 7 of the ENET-1 slot, performing

rcon slot 7.7 <command>

gives back no response.

I'm waiting on a call back from TB, so I figured I'd check with the wisdom
of the crowds in the mean time.

Any help is much appreciated!

Gill
GSAA, LLC



------------------------------------




Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the
Database area.
Yahoo!
Groups Links


--
Jeremy Weatherford


Re: 3-series out of bounds array references FYI...

 

From the SIMPL+ help:

"TRY-CATCH blocks catch and handle exceptions generated by working code. Exceptions can be caught and handled in the CATCH portion of the block. The exception can also be evaluated using either the GetExceptionMessage or GetExceptionCode function."

Not sure if it continues after the exception, however, it does have it. 3 series only.

--- In Crestron@..., Neil Dorin <neildorin@...> wrote:

Only if you use a S# library Linc ;)


On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Lincoln King-Cliby <
lincoln@...> wrote:

**


I don't know why I'm asking this question, but I don't suppose SIMPL+ on
the 3 series has gained Try/Catch/End Try style error handling has it?

Heck at least with VB in the old days you could at least On Error Resume
Next ;)

Why do I sound so bitter this week?

Lincoln

--
Lincoln King-Cliby, CTS
Commercial Market Director
Sr. Systems Architect | Crestron Certified Master Programmer (Silver)
V: 440.449.1100 x1107 F: 440-449-1106 I:
Crestron Services Provider


-----Original Message-----
From: Crestron@... [mailto:Crestron@...] On
Behalf Of Chip
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 12:19 PM
To: Crestron@...
Subject: [Crestron] 3-series out of bounds array references FYI...

Here's a lowdown on a great "feature" in case anyone trips across it
before you spend too much time tearing your hair out.

In the 2-series, if you have an array and attempt to access an element
beyond what it's declared for, you get a zero result and (I believe) an
error in the log. (A slap on the wrists, and obviously not the results
you're expecting)

In the 3-series, however - the remainder of the code following the line
the error is on is THROWN OUT like last week's rancid leftovers. You get an
error in your log, sure - but anything that relied on the block of code
completing ain't gonna get satisfied. (Y'know, like, turning off the
semaphore on a parsing routine)

So make sure you do range checking before accessing arrays on the 3s... :(

- Chip

------------------------------------





Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the
Database area.
Yahoo!
Groups Links





Problems with Carrier Infinity Module

 

Hi,
I'm using the Carrier Infinity module from Crestron (v2), and I'm having
one heck of a time with it. I thought I'd reach out to this group for
ideas.
Fundamental problem: The module works for a while, then stops querying
the HVAC system for information. This can happen in a few hours after
boot, or as long as a few days. But eventually, it happens. The
obvious result is that displayed data becomes stale.
When this occurs, if I do something to change the state of the system
(put a zone in HOLD mode, say), then the module will start communicating
again. Until it stops again at some later time.
Things I have tried to resolve this:
1. First occurred on PRO2. Upgraded to PRO3, no change.
2. Modified code to run in separate "slot" of PRO3 (as a separate
program). No change.
3. Put the code on a QM-RMC running older (v3) firmware. No change.
4. Went to Carrier to report the problem, they said Crestron supports
the module.

Worked with Crestron. This is ongoing, no solution (yet). I did get a
BETA version (v2.3, not on the WWW site yet), but this occurs as well.
I believe Crestron verified that they can replicate the problem, but
there is no solution as of yet.
I did recently upgrade to the Infinity Touch control, which (presumably)
allows me to use the Crestron Infinity Touch module (although, with the
same SAM board, the old module works perfectly). I can try that if
folks are having better luck with that.
Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks so much!
/Jeff


Re: Complaints

 

CrestronLabs.com and/or directly to those that I know at Crestron. There's a nice thread on Smart Objects and standard joins now.

--- In Crestron@..., "RobK" <fooguy89@...> wrote:

Hey all

Just out of curiosity, I know a lot of people do like to vent on the board here (and I was once told as such), but when all of you have serious complaints about Crestron product (Smart graphics & Studio keep getting mentioned) do any of you do anything about it? Do you get your bosses to complain to Crestron - and not just calling tech support or Rich - I'm talking calls to higher ups such as Fred?

Normally I'm not inclined to drop names, but it's not like these guys are hidden.

I'm not saying that will necessarily do anything, but it seems like if enough people get their higher ups to complain en mass, maybe some change can be effected, albeit slow?

Maybe this has been done, I don't know, but just curious how you guys have been attempting to deal with the problems that we can't fix.


Wirepath DVR & TSW

Georges Khalil
 

Just a note to everyone who had issues with the mjpeg from the Wirepath
DVRs on the TSW. The new firmware (released today) fixes it. I can confirm
it actually works now (tested on the TSW-750).



--
Georges Khalil, Ph.D.
514-360-3419
www.homesync.ca


Re: Wow Prodigy

 

Thanks Heath and Kevin.

I appreciate your responses.


Sent with AquaMail for Android

On August 14, 2013 6:04:27 PM Heath Volmer <hvolmer@...> wrote:
This is experience from before Crestron pulled prodigy... You only needed
the -XP unit to talk to non-prodigy Crestron things (not Crestron's best
marketing move)). All of the Prodigy stuff could be programmed in Simpl. I
don't know why that would have changed.
I would assume that Prodigy programming in Simpl isn't officially supported
by support - whoever does said support.
Heath Volmer
Digital Domain Systems
Littleton, CO

Sent from my iTypo 4

On Aug 14, 2013, at 5:53 PM, Nick Mitchell <nick@...> wrote:

I just asked this same question while in the Rockleigh office and I was
told you need the pmc3-xp processor in order to program in simpl. Otherwise
you need to use system builder.
Heath does the processor matter like crestron said? Or do you think the
pmc2 I have on this take over project will allow me to upload a simpl project?
Thanks
Nick
Sent with AquaMail for Android

On August 14, 2013 2:19:20 PM Heath Volmer <hvolmer@...> wrote:
I'd be balking too. We aren't lawyers after all.
Yes, you can program in Simpl and system builder. There is a wizard, if
you > like canned stuff.
Heath Volmer
Digital Domain Systems
Littleton, CO

Sent from my iTypo 4

On Aug 14, 2013, at 1:16 PM, "Oliver" <oliver@...> wrote:

Just went to look at a system on behalf of a home inspection company.
I > found a Prodigy system (Tstats, dimmers) but no main processor. The >
homeowner decided not to finish it off because he balked at the $400/hour >
programming costs he was quoted. No end of surprises in this business....
I never touched the stuff myself, but can you program Prodigy in
Simpl or > wasn't there some dedicated wizard program for it? Composer?
OP





Complaints

 

Hey all

Just out of curiosity, I know a lot of people do like to vent on the board here (and I was once told as such), but when all of you have serious complaints about Crestron product (Smart graphics & Studio keep getting mentioned) do any of you do anything about it? Do you get your bosses to complain to Crestron - and not just calling tech support or Rich - I'm talking calls to higher ups such as Fred?

Normally I'm not inclined to drop names, but it's not like these guys are hidden.

I'm not saying that will necessarily do anything, but it seems like if enough people get their higher ups to complain en mass, maybe some change can be effected, albeit slow?

Maybe this has been done, I don't know, but just curious how you guys have been attempting to deal with the problems that we can't fix.


Re: Get IP Address of Device In IP Table

Jonathan
 

Found it!

If you send the console command 'who' to the DMPS, it lists all active ethernet consoles, which includes the TPMC-4SM.

A quick module in S+ will pick out the IP of any IP ID that you want.