开云体育

Indeed. At least some manufacturers will give you the option of buying a rack mount power supply that can power multiple units though.

--- In Crestron@..., "Gregg M" <jets_in_2003@> wrote:

Building a Rack....WHY CAN'T ALL THESE MANUFACTURES JUST GIVE ME A FREAKING D-CORD AND PUT THE TRANSFORMERS IN THE UNITS....ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR. Its so damn frustrating to try an hide all these things...........

Managing power in a rack is really the most difficult part. Does anyone else put new ends on the power cords or buy power cords of various short lengths for rack building?

Power bricks can go the heck... including Crestron power bricks like the one for the CEN-SW-POE5 and the POE supply for the DMPS. Couldn't they have just built that in?

Meh.


--- In Crestron@..., "robbie_ray" <rlray@> wrote:

Indeed. At least some manufacturers will give you the option of buying a rack mount power supply that can power multiple units though.

--- In Crestron@..., "Gregg M" <jets_in_2003@> wrote:

Building a Rack....WHY CAN'T ALL THESE MANUFACTURES JUST GIVE ME A FREAKING D-CORD AND PUT THE TRANSFORMERS IN THE UNITS....ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR. Its so damn frustrating to try an hide all these things...........

The last time I did one of Cisco's bundles like that, it turned out that the Cisco monitors were actually LG's. As I understand it, they have deals with both LG and Samsung.

You should be able to tell by looking at the FCC sticker on the back of the display what it was before it was Ciscoised.

--- In Crestron@..., "ediablo80" <ediablo80@> wrote:

Hey Guys-
I am new to the commercial world and am being asked to integrate a Tandberg C60 that has an all in one dual display system. Control to the Tandberg is fine but I have no idea what kind of monitors they are. DM Tools is reporting that they are FSN, FS5202C (L) and (R) but I can't find anything on the internet for that. I have tried NEC, Panasonic, Sharp, and Pionner codes but no control. Best is I get a return string for &#92;FF. So at least I know its responding. Has anyone worked with this kind of system? Are the displays normally controlled from the codec? I am confused.

TIA and apologize if this is a stupid question.
- Evan

I have Studio 1.4.63 on a machine that I'm trying to clean up. When I try
to uninstall it, the installer just hangs and nothing happens. Any
suggestions what I might do that won't leave things inconsistent?

--
Heath Volmer
Digital Domain Systems
Littleton, CO


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Indeed. At least some manufacturers will give you the option of buying a rack mount power supply that can power multiple units though.

--- In Crestron@..., "Gregg M" <jets_in_2003@> wrote:

Building a Rack....WHY CAN'T ALL THESE MANUFACTURES JUST GIVE ME A FREAKING D-CORD AND PUT THE TRANSFORMERS IN THE UNITS....ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR. Its so damn frustrating to try an hide all these things...........

The last time I did one of Cisco's bundles like that, it turned out that the Cisco monitors were actually LG's. As I understand it, they have deals with both LG and Samsung.

You should be able to tell by looking at the FCC sticker on the back of the display what it was before it was Ciscoised.

--- In Crestron@..., "ediablo80" <ediablo80@> wrote:

Hey Guys-
I am new to the commercial world and am being asked to integrate a Tandberg C60 that has an all in one dual display system. Control to the Tandberg is fine but I have no idea what kind of monitors they are. DM Tools is reporting that they are FSN, FS5202C (L) and (R) but I can't find anything on the internet for that. I have tried NEC, Panasonic, Sharp, and Pionner codes but no control. Best is I get a return string for &#92;FF. So at least I know its responding. Has anyone worked with this kind of system? Are the displays normally controlled from the codec? I am confused.

TIA and apologize if this is a stupid question.
- Evan

Building a Rack....WHY CAN'T ALL THESE MANUFACTURES JUST GIVE ME A FREAKING D-CORD AND PUT THE TRANSFORMERS IN THE UNITS....ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR. Its so damn frustrating to try an hide all these things...........

So I ahve just recently begun playing around with Smart Graphics and I am experiencing some strangeness with indirect text. Here's teh issue: I set up text on a button/simple label, whatever -- I set the font size, text color, etc. Then when I send updates via serial joins on the panel the text reverts to a different font size in white text on the panel. I am guessing that the text is taking on the default font/color settings of the object's theme, but I am not sure.

Is anyone else experiencing this? Without creating a new theme and without sending formatted html font tags with every text update, is there a way to make the color/font size settings "remembered" so I can send plain text to the serial join?

Note: I have only so far been able to try this out on an Xpanel, so it could be a bug in Xpanel.

TIA, erik

Hi All,
Has anyone integrated one of the new Samsung plasmas, like the PN(xx)F8500AF? Specs say 'RS232' in stead of Ex-link. If so:

1. is it a real DB9 connector?
2. does it use the Ex-link Protocol? (I searched for a doc, and have a call in to my rep...)
3. does it have commands for custom picture memories?

IF I get a doc I will post...
TIA,
Chris K...............;)

I have Studio 1.4.63 on a machine that I'm trying to clean up. When I try
to uninstall it, the installer just hangs and nothing happens. Any
suggestions what I might do that won't leave things inconsistent?

--
Heath Volmer
Digital Domain Systems
Littleton, CO

Hey, Chip. Those modules are gone. Any chance you'd be willing to repost them? Thanks.

-Neal

--- In Crestron@..., "Chip" <cfm@> wrote:

Give it a look - it's not all that difficult.

I think I used to have some modules in the file section for various Google chart things - don't know if they've gotten purged or not.

- Chip


--- In Crestron@..., "solentelectricalservices" <pgrahamsley@> wrote:

the Google stuff is probably way over my head!

On a side noted, pulsed and latched are not interchangeable terms. Oulsed means activated for a set duration, latched mean once activated will stay active until you unlatch it. Saying pulsed with latched feedback doesn't make sense. :-)

--- In Crestron@..., "Sean" <seanzombie56@> wrote:

Nope my bad, the enable was being pulsed with latched FB.

Basically I was doing a combine rooms function, with laptop 1 FB latched, make room #2 match up with room #1. I got a little buffer happy and had laptop 2 FB in the same buffer, so the "match output" command that was tied to the two outputs in the same buffer never ran.

There were other buffers in the program that had the same outputs tied to multiple inputs that ran fine, but they had 1s instead of enables being pulsed.

I'm trying to edit an old program, trying to be nice and not yell at myself from two years ago for doing lazy programming. I should have just started over from scratch.


Sean

--- In Crestron@..., "eagrubbs" <eagrubbs@> wrote:

So in example 2 the buffer is behaving like an AND? I have never used a buffer for a latched signal without pulsing the enable or pulsing the input side of the buffer with enable latched.

--- In Crestron@..., "Sean" <seanzombie56@> wrote:

I most likely didnt make myself clear in the question. I also may be asleep at the wheel, long day.

So I'm basically asking whats the difference between these two buffers:

Buffer 1:
Enable = 1

Input 1 = Press 1 -----------> Source_On
Input 2 = Press 2 -----------> Source_On

When either "Press" goes high, Source_on is triggered by either button press.

Buffer 2:
Enable = 1

Input 1 = Latched_FB1 -----------> Source_on
Input 2 = Latched FB2 -----------> Source_on

When only one of the "Latched_FB" inputs goes high, source_on is still low. Which is standard buffer behavior.

Whats the difference? I understand buffers get evaluated top down and then propogate, but why does buffer 1 work?

Sean

--- In Crestron@..., "martinkup90" <martin@> wrote:

For as long as an input is latched from FB, the output will be high, so if any other input goes high, the output will see no difference and stay like it was.

--- In Crestron@..., "Sean" <seanzombie56@> wrote:

I'm working on a room a programmed years back and started questioning my buffer usage.

Simple question:

A buffer with a 1 as the enable, and two inputs, both inputs are presses that propagate to two outputs with the same signal on them.

Only 1 input will go high at a time, but I havent run into any issues with the outputs not going high to to enable other things.

In my knowledge of buffers I would think they evaluate the entire buffer then propagate to the outputs, leaving them both low. In this case, the outputs go high when only one of the inputs go high. I noticed this doesnt work when the inputs of the buffer are latched FB.

What am I missing?

Sean