开云体育

On Apr 22, 2012, at 8:18 AM, Mark <markrkaye@...> wrote:



i use an ASUS G73S
very good cooling

mark

--- In Crestron@..., "oldspunky" <paul@...> wrote:

For the past 5 or 6 years the laptops I use for program development have

been dying (about 1 a year). I have tried Toshiba, Lenovo, HP, and
Panasonic Toughbooks. So this time I tried a Mac Powerbook (with VMware
Fusion and Windows 7. Now the Mac is getting clunky too.

I am probably overloading them, but when I have several copies of Simpl

Windows, Vtpro-e, Autocad, xpanel, Toolbox, and probably a Clearone or
Biamp configuration file (and perhaps Photoshop) all open at the same time
the laptops get pretty hot. Unfortunately I usually need all those things
when working on a program or bringing up a system.

I do a lot of my programming on the road so using a desktop is probably

not an option.

I have been using Radioshack fans and they seem to help, but my Mac is

still getting hot enough to fry eggs or my hands. Any ideas? Or should I
just accept this and budget a new laptop (and software) every year or so.?

Thanks,
Paul

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

--- In Crestron@..., Nathan Hesson <nhesson@...> wrote:

Not that I know of. When I asked TB about it they said, programs that used
the prodigy composer couldn't be opened in SB but you could still build a
prodigy system in SB from scratch without the composer.

On Sunday, April 22, 2012, davids7311 wrote:

Is it a feature that can be deselected ?

--- In Crestron@... <javascript:;>, Nathan Hesson <nhesson@>
wrote:

That's a feature of the new version of SB.
On Apr 22, 2012 6:35 AM, "davids7311" <dserouge@> wrote:

Hi,
Since i've updated SB to version 3.13.014, when i try to load a prodigy
project in SB it's always open with the prodigy wizard. i'm unable to

edit

my project with the SB interface. Do you have an idea for this problem

?

Thanks



------------------------------------

Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the
Database area.

Yahoo!

Groups Links

------------------------------------




Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the
Database area.
Yahoo!
Groups Links

On Sunday, April 22, 2012, davids7311 wrote:

Is it a feature that can be deselected ?

--- In Crestron@... <javascript:;>, Nathan Hesson <nhesson@...>
wrote:

That's a feature of the new version of SB.
On Apr 22, 2012 6:35 AM, "davids7311" <dserouge@...> wrote:

Hi,
Since i've updated SB to version 3.13.014, when i try to load a prodigy
project in SB it's always open with the prodigy wizard. i'm unable to

edit

my project with the SB interface. Do you have an idea for this problem

?

Thanks



------------------------------------

Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the
Database area.

Yahoo!

Groups Links

------------------------------------




Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the
Database area.
Yahoo!
Groups Links

--- In Crestron@..., "rabih" <marselle001@...> wrote:

Is the trafic on Port A is passed internaly to port B if the ports are connected in differenet V-lan

--- In Crestron@..., Nathan Hesson <nhesson@...> wrote:

That's a feature of the new version of SB.
On Apr 22, 2012 6:35 AM, "davids7311" <dserouge@...> wrote:

Hi,
Since i've updated SB to version 3.13.014, when i try to load a prodigy
project in SB it's always open with the prodigy wizard. i'm unable to edit
my project with the SB interface. Do you have an idea for this problem ?

Thanks



------------------------------------




Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the
Database area.
Yahoo!
Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

On Apr 22, 2012 6:35 AM, "davids7311" <dserouge@...> wrote:

Hi,
Since i've updated SB to version 3.13.014, when i try to load a prodigy
project in SB it's always open with the prodigy wizard. i'm unable to edit
my project with the SB interface. Do you have an idea for this problem ?

Thanks



------------------------------------




Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the
Database area.
Yahoo!
Groups Links

--- In Crestron@..., "oldspunky" <paul@...> wrote:

For the past 5 or 6 years the laptops I use for program development have been dying (about 1 a year). I have tried Toshiba, Lenovo, HP, and Panasonic Toughbooks. So this time I tried a Mac Powerbook (with VMware Fusion and Windows 7. Now the Mac is getting clunky too.

I am probably overloading them, but when I have several copies of Simpl Windows, Vtpro-e, Autocad, xpanel, Toolbox, and probably a Clearone or Biamp configuration file (and perhaps Photoshop) all open at the same time the laptops get pretty hot. Unfortunately I usually need all those things when working on a program or bringing up a system.

I do a lot of my programming on the road so using a desktop is probably not an option.

I have been using Radioshack fans and they seem to help, but my Mac is still getting hot enough to fry eggs or my hands. Any ideas? Or should I just accept this and budget a new laptop (and software) every year or so.?

Thanks,
Paul

--- In Crestron@..., "mcjaran" <mcjaran@...> wrote:

Anyone familiar with the commands differences between the QDX6000 and the HDX9000.

Using the HDX TCPIP Module to control the QDX but quite a few of the commands dont really work, not been familiar with the units capabilities i am wondering what commands im leaving out.

All IR emulators work some of the others do as well.

--- In Crestron@..., "stefuel2" <stefuel@...> wrote:

Should someone only forward the required ports when they are expecting service/updates or should they leave them forwarded???

On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Chip <cfm@...> wrote:

Yeah - I've been digging this! Nice work guys... :)

- Chip


--- In Crestron@..., Eric Walters <sentry07@...> wrote:

Thank you for participating in this week's "Can It Be Done In SIMPL"
challenge. Stay tuned for next week's challenge.

On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Kool-Aid Drinker <
crug@...> wrote:

Nice. I ended up using the same number of symbols for a basic version,
but saved a crap-ton on digital signals.

Four SUB$ also looks better in terms of when to send the checksum (if
you're into that whole automatic send thing). Currently, I'm sending
it 1 tick after the string arrives, having no easy way to tell when
processing is done. Adding SAW pulses to the outputs of the SUB$ would
let you determine the last character was processed.


On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 11:04:22 -0700, Eric Walters <sentry07@...>
wrote:

If you want less moving parts, 4 SUB$ in 2 pairs will break your

string

into even and odd bytes. One SUB$ with parameters (1,1) goes into a

STOA,

the other SUB$ with parameters (2,100) feed the other set of SUB$. So

when

you get a string in, it hits one pair of SUB$. They push one byte into

your

logic, and the rest of the string to the other set. They push one byte

into

logic and the rest of the string back to the first two. I had gotten

that

far and put in the ATODs, XORs, and DTOAs to do the XOR logic, but the

SUB$

were getting too much priority over the XOR logic and nothing was

getting

calculated.

On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Kool-Aid Drinker <

crug@...

wrote:

Yup. It expects the string to be checksummmed to arrive whole, and
then deals however many bytes are in that serial signal.

Having the string arrive in pieces would require extra logic, but
should be do-able.

Basic idea is: SIO and INIT break the string into analog bytes,

TOGGLE

and ABUFs sort them into even and odd, ATOD decomposes the bytes,

XORs

do the deed, DFFs keeps the running total, DTOA, ATOS, blah blah

blah.

On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 08:03:57 -0000, "Chip" <cfm@...> wrote:

Did that account for messages of varying lengths?

- Chip


--- In Crestron@..., Kool-Aid Drinker <crug@> wrote:

Only took 51 symbols for a basic version of the checksum that

started

the thread.

------------------------------------

Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the
Database area.

Yahoo!

Groups Links

------------------------------------




Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the
Database area.
Yahoo!
Groups Links

--- In Crestron@..., Eric Walters <sentry07@...> wrote:

Thank you for participating in this week's "Can It Be Done In SIMPL"
challenge. Stay tuned for next week's challenge.

On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Kool-Aid Drinker <
crug@...> wrote:

Nice. I ended up using the same number of symbols for a basic version,
but saved a crap-ton on digital signals.

Four SUB$ also looks better in terms of when to send the checksum (if
you're into that whole automatic send thing). Currently, I'm sending
it 1 tick after the string arrives, having no easy way to tell when
processing is done. Adding SAW pulses to the outputs of the SUB$ would
let you determine the last character was processed.


On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 11:04:22 -0700, Eric Walters <sentry07@...>
wrote:

If you want less moving parts, 4 SUB$ in 2 pairs will break your string
into even and odd bytes. One SUB$ with parameters (1,1) goes into a STOA,
the other SUB$ with parameters (2,100) feed the other set of SUB$. So when
you get a string in, it hits one pair of SUB$. They push one byte into

your

logic, and the rest of the string to the other set. They push one byte

into

logic and the rest of the string back to the first two. I had gotten that
far and put in the ATODs, XORs, and DTOAs to do the XOR logic, but the

SUB$

were getting too much priority over the XOR logic and nothing was getting
calculated.

On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Kool-Aid Drinker <

crug@...

wrote:

Yup. It expects the string to be checksummmed to arrive whole, and
then deals however many bytes are in that serial signal.

Having the string arrive in pieces would require extra logic, but
should be do-able.

Basic idea is: SIO and INIT break the string into analog bytes, TOGGLE
and ABUFs sort them into even and odd, ATOD decomposes the bytes, XORs
do the deed, DFFs keeps the running total, DTOA, ATOS, blah blah blah.

On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 08:03:57 -0000, "Chip" <cfm@...> wrote:

Did that account for messages of varying lengths?

- Chip


--- In Crestron@..., Kool-Aid Drinker <crug@> wrote:

Only took 51 symbols for a basic version of the checksum that started
the thread.

------------------------------------




Check out the Files area for useful modules, documents, and drivers.

A contact list of Crestron dealers and programmers can be found in the
Database area.
Yahoo!
Groups Links

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

--- In Crestron@..., "jfa_crestron" <jfa_crestron@...> wrote:

Can someone recommend which USB serial adaptor to purchase that will work with the CNXLIR Learner? I have a new HP desktop and can't find a 9 pin serial card that connects with this computer.

--- In Crestron@..., "jfa_crestron" <jfa_crestron@...> wrote:

Can someone recommend which USB serial adaptor to purchase that will work with the CNXLIR Learner? I have a new HP desktop and can't find a 9 pin serial card that connects with this computer.