¿ªÔÆÌåÓýIIRC, with the MXA920 the best results are not in lobe mode but in automatic coverage mode where VX is looking at the actual beam angle and position. ? Proper setup and seat anchoring is key ¨C if seats can move around too much relative to the .1BRD the results will be lousy. IME, it¡¯s best if there¡¯s a landmark (for example, a power tablebox/popup where the client¡¯s facility staff can be trained ¡°when you reset the room before a meeting make sure each seat is centered on the popup¡± ¨C there is also an option for a ¡°ghost¡± image to mirror the accepted furniture layout but IME it¡¯s not a great choice for movable seats (but awesome for movable furniture) ? My most recent few 1Beyond deployments (each using a handful of MXA920s in automatic coverage mode) were pretty painless ¨C but also preparing the clients expectations is critical¡ª1Beyond isn¡¯t a magical unicorn that can find someone anywhere in the room [yet] ¨C it can find someone in places where its expecting to find them. ? -- Lincoln King-Cliby Commercial Market Director ? ? ? From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
On Behalf Of Marty via groups.io
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2025 8:41 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [crestron] VX automate / 1Beyond user feedback ? We're using two Shure MXA 920s. We treated the room for acoustics so no issues there, but the mic lobe placement was finicky and took some testing. The camera recalling the lobe when it's activated works great, but to get the coverage area tight enough to only grab 1-2 people based on the chairs was where we saw issues. That's where visual AI has helped mitigate those issues.? ? My experience is as long as your coverage areas from the mic lobes is EXACTLY where it should be, you won't see any issues.? |
