Do-able? yes. Clean? no.
When you transition from individual-values to shared-value, do you
want them to wait for the next propagation to become synchronized? Or
is it necessary to track the last change and propagate that?
In shared, if one of them gets a repropagation of the current value,
should they all get a repropagation?
Mmmm. Friday puzzles!
On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 10:27:16 -0600, Heath Volmer <hvolmer@...>
wrote:
Say I have five analogs. I want all of those analogs to be the same value,
depending on which one changes last. This will be enabled or disabled, so
that sometimes they will all be in line and other times they will be
independent.
Is there a clean way to do this? I can see an ABUF or SBUF with each
combination of analogs coming in and going out but I'm not sure about
creating and explosive looping scenario. I think the ABUF might protect
from this...
