Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- Bpq32
- Messages
Search
Re: Updating position in config
Thanks, Mark. I found the old grid square in the WL2KREPORT section of the bpq32.cfg file. I changed it to our new gridsqare but the node is still showing up with updated time stamps on ?with the old position. It is correct on , however. Could it be set somewhere else too? On September 13, 2024 at 04:27:16, Mark Taylor via (mtaylor@...) wrote:
|
Online BPQ Network Map Not Showing Stations
¿ªÔÆÌåÓý
All:
Is there an issue with the online BPQ Network Map? The site loads but there are no stations.? Tony -K2MO |
Updating position in config
We are moving our club BPQ packet station to a new site. I tried updating the LOCATOR to the new grid square and I changed the BTEXT to the new lat/long but I can't seem to get the location to update on aprs.fi (via winlink). Any suggestions? Where does winlink get the position report? |
Re: Can't update beacon from bpq32.cfg file
Thank you! LCM On September 11, 2024 at 23:20:35, John G8BPQ via (john.wiseman@...) wrote:
|
Re: Can't update beacon from bpq32.cfg file
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýYes, there is also a port specific beacon, set in the ports section of the web management interface and stored in UIUtil.cfg73, John On 12/09/2024 04:53, Levi wrote:
|
Can't update beacon from bpq32.cfg file
We are moving our club LinBPQ node from one site to another. As such I need to change the Beacon text to correctly show the new site. I have tried editing the ~/linbpq/bpq32.cfg file and restarting the node. However, the beacon that is transmitted over the air is not changing. It still shows the old text, despite having verified that it is updated in the configuration.
?
Is there another location, other than bpq32.cfg, that beacon text can be set that I may be forgetting about? |
Re: UPDATING BPQ 32 from 6.0.23.1 to BETA
Sounds Good Mark,?
I thought i was crazy when sysops were telling me they couldnt see me or that i kept dropping them, when all of mine clearly showed node tp node connections.?
once things work i leave them alone. untill i need to fix them again, part of the game i guess.?
?
yes on the re-connect my main objective is to pass traffic into and out of AZ any helpful observations appreciated.
?
im good on QRZ 73? |
Re: Possible Bug report
Here is the log of the P message received addressed to me, N5MDT from K7EK.
?
?
240911 17:20:59 |K7EK ? ? ?Incoming Connect from K7EK
240911 17:20:59 >K7EK ? ? ?[BPQ-6.0.24.42-B12FWIHJM$] 240911 17:20:59 >K7EK ? ? ?Hello Gary. Latest Message is 52519, Last listed is 0 240911 17:20:59 >K7EK ? ? ?de N5MDT>
240911 17:21:00 <K7EK ? ? ?[BPQ-6.0.24.42-B2FIHJM$]
240911 17:21:00 <K7EK ? ? ?FC EM 17489_K7EK 410 312 K7EK N5MDT.#STX.TX.USA.NOAM N5MDT P 240911 17:21:00 <K7EK ? ? ?F> 63 240911 17:21:00 >K7EK ? ? ?FS Y 240911 17:21:01 |K7EK ? ? ?Uncompressing Message Comp Len 312 Msg Len 410 CRC 94dd 240911 17:21:01 ?K7EK ? ? ?B2 Msg To: N5MDT@N5MDT.#STX.TX.USA.NOAM 240911 17:21:01 ?K7EK ? ? ?Msg 52520 Routing Trace To N5MDT Via N5MDT.#STX.TX.USA.NOAM 240911 17:21:01 ?K7EK ? ? ?Routing Trace Type P TO N5MDT VIA N5MDT.#STX.TX.USA.NOAM Route On WW NOAM USA TX #STX 240911 17:21:01 ?K7EK ? ? ?SendPtoMultiple is set. Checking for best match level 240911 17:21:01 ?K7EK ? ? ?Routing Trace HR Matches BBS KA5D Depth 4 240911 17:21:01 ?K7EK ? ? ?Routing Trace HR Matches BBS N4NVD Depth 4 240911 17:21:01 >K7EK ? ? ?FF 240911 17:21:02 <K7EK ? ? ?FQ 240911 17:21:02 |K7EK ? ? ?K7EK Disconnected |
Possible Bug report
John, can you check the code for "Send P Msgs to more than one BBS " and be sure it works as intended.
?
?
Gary, K7EK, and I sent several messages back and forth today to confirm what was happening, and this is it.
?
I have Send P Msgs to more than one BBS checked.
Gary and I are AXUDP linked and forwarding partners.
Gary and I are both on the latest beta, 6.0.24.42
?
Gary sent a personal message to me addressed to n5mdt -at- n5mdt.#stx.tx.usa.noam
My bbs received the message, forwarded it to all my forwarding partners that are also
in #stx.tx.usa.noam then changed the status to PF
?
I would think that if the message was received at the recipients HomeBBS then the
forwarding should end, and the status changed to PN.? (This is what happens without
that option checked.)
?
Gary sent another message to someone else in #stx.tx.usa.noam and my BBS properly
forward the message to all of my forwarding partners also in #stx.tx.usa.noam and
marked the status PF.
?
?
One thing I also noticed is the when the Send P Msgs to more than one BBS? was checked
and I replied to one of his messages my BBS would not send it back to him directly, but
would send it a different route even though I have his call in the TO field of his forwarding
record.?? But, that may be Net/Rom causing that.? I have not yet sent enough messages
to diagnose that..? With Send P Msgs to more than one BBS is unchecked then messages
are sent directly to Gary.
?
?
We are both going to save some logs in the event you need them.
?
Let me know what else you require.
?
Mark, N5MDT
?
?
? |
Re: UPDATING BPQ 32 from 6.0.23.1 to BETA
Glad you found and corrected a problem.? You had a lot of us thinking we were crazy!
?
Do you want to re-establish our link again? I know I was pretty rough on you in emails trying to convince you there even was a problem and wouldn't blame you if you refused...
?
?
73,
Mark, N5MDT
? |
Re: UPDATING BPQ 32 from 6.0.23.1 to BETA
Just Updated correctly to 6.0.24.42 YOU ARE CORRECT MARK SOMEONE ONE HAD TOLD ME TO REMOVE BROADCAST NODES A FEW MONTHS AGO while we looked for something. it has since been replaced. WIerd however many of my nodes were still broadcasting with only
?
BROADCAST QST
BROADCAST ID? ? ?( IHAVE JUST READDED A FEW DAYS AGO>>>)
BROADCAST NODES.
?
ALSO WHEN I UPDATED AND HAD ALL THESE PROBLEMS I WAS IN PARENT DIRECTORY uPDATE AUG21 WHICH IS AUG 2021 DATES COMPLETELY WRONG .DLL FOR 8-27-24 BPQ32.CONFIG UPDATE FILE.
I JUST FOUND CORRECT ONE TODAY INSTALLED WITHOUT ISSUE AND WORKING FINE FOR LAST COUPLE HOURS.
?
SERIOUSLY EVERYONE THANKS FOR THE HELP 73
?
? |
Re: UPDATING BPQ 32 from 6.0.23.1 to BETA
Hello Gary;
?
Im showing you K7EK in Links, Routes, Nodes as a Node to Node etc. Has been a very stable connection here.
?
To make matters worse I just found the correct 6.0.24.42 update file dated 8-27-24 and installed it and update mail.exe and chat.exe so i have same versions of all 6.0.24.42 and everything is working fine and you are still node to node connection here.?
?
Thanks for your patience, I did mention give it? a week or so. Now I think ive got caught up Version wise.? 73
?
Mark K7OI |
Re: Can't open forms dir
Yes, I think so as I was confused and tried both without and with underscore and seeing the same error.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
73, Bob (Boudewijn) VE3TOK On 2024-09-09 02:19, John G8BPQ wrote:
When I first added support for forms I used the name with a space but the Winlink download uses the underscore so to avoid confusion I accept both. Maybe it would be sensible only to give an error message if neither can be found. --
There is nothing permanent except change -Heraclitus |
Re: Can't open forms dir
When I first added support for forms I used the name with a space but the Winlink download uses the underscore so to avoid confusion I accept both. Maybe it would be sensible only to give an error message if neither can be found.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
73, John On 08/09/2024 22:59, Boudewijn (Bob) Tenty VE3TOK wrote:
BPQ is started with systemd and I see the following when checking the systemd status of BPQ |
Re: Can't open forms dir
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHi Garth, Yes, it is Linux and it is the real directory name including the underscore as needed and as I already said, everything is fine and working.That so called 'error' maybe confusing during setup regarding the underscore in those names. That is why I wanted to report this. Bob VE3TOK On 2024-09-08 19:31,
garthk@... wrote:
-- There is nothing permanent except change -Heraclitus |
Re: Can't open forms dir
On Sun, Sep 8, 2024 at 02:59 PM, Boudewijn (Bob) Tenty VE3TOK wrote:
BPQ is started with systemd and I see the following when checking the systemd status of BPQBob, If your forms are in /usr/local/hamradio/bpq/Standard_Templates you are running linux or something similar. At startup apparently the bpq program looks for both the 'Standard_Templates' and 'Standard Templates' directories and uses which ever it finds. And apparently places a message in the log is it cant find either (or both) of the forms directories.? In linux, only Standard_Templates will work, (the space will break the file name unless you quote the file name).
?
In my pilinbpq logs, I get the message that 'Standard Templates'? (no under score) cant be found (or something like that).? My forms are in the "Standard_Templates" (note underscore) and form operations all work just fine. I have treated this as an anomaly/amusement that doesn't cause any problems. The message is probably due to the way that John checks for the form directory/directories.
Garth W9KJ
? |
Can't open forms dir
BPQ is started with systemd and I see the following when checking the systemd status of BPQ
(systemctl status bpq),? 'cant open forms dir /usr/local/hamradio/bpq/Standard Templates 2 0'. The forms are stored in the regular Standard_Templates directory and I can access them normally from WebMail and 'Send Message'. Is there any particular reason why BPQ is reporting this or is it just a bug? Boudewijn (Bob) VE3TOK -- There is nothing permanent except change -Heraclitus |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss