Re: Rigcontrol SCAN and beacons
Ahh I wonder if ATTACH would work with anything using KISSHF ports? How would you send a beacon in that case?
By
N9SEO
·
#42766
·
|
Re: Rigcontrol SCAN and beacons
Sorry yea BPQ is the source of the beacon, I cant think of another way to do with scan type programming.
By
N9SEO
·
#42765
·
|
Re: Rigcontrol SCAN and beacons
Hi Mark, Yea I had thought of that too. But I dont think those block out any forwarding script commands that might run with competing commands. Or if you use the builtin beacon, it does not block the
By
N9SEO
·
#42764
·
|
Re: Rigcontrol SCAN and beacons
Oh, that makes better sense reading it that way. Kayne, is BPQ the source of the beaconing or is the modem configured to beacon on its own? -- 73, Mark, N5MDT Montgomery, Texas
By
Mark Taylor
·
#42763
·
|
Re: Rigcontrol SCAN and beacons
I think Kayne is asking for a change in BPQ so that beacons automatically pause scanning. With respect to doing it externally in a script, it's better to pause scanning by using attach. That's what
By
Lee Bengston
·
#42762
·
|
Re: Rigcontrol SCAN and beacons
I'm thinking there are two possible commands to use. Which one to use would be your choice.? There are probably others. SCANSTOP STOPPORT Either one of those might do what you want. -- 73, Mark,
By
Mark Taylor
·
#42761
·
|
Rigcontrol SCAN and beacons
Hi, Is there any way to temporarily lock a scanning radio while the modem is beaconing? I've had a long standing issue where I've disabled my beacons because I use a scan program and while they were
By
N9SEO
·
#42760
·
|
Re: My errant WP Update this morning.
Hi, John: Thanks. I was thinking that a /G can only create a new WP record or update an existing /G record /I can create a new WP record or update an existing /I or /G record. /U can create or update
By
Chuck Gelm
·
#42759
·
|
Re: My errant WP Update this morning.
I corrected your HA on my system, it did not have the #NOKY but does now. 73 Jim KI0BK
By
Jim - KI0BK
·
#42758
·
|
Re: My errant WP Update this morning.
Ironically my address is incorrect in a WP update I received from Gary not long ago. Similarly the errant address included only the state and not the region. So it appears that someone is adding or
By
Lee Bengston
·
#42757
·
|
Re: My errant WP Update this morning.
K7EK.#NOKY.KY.USA.NOAM is the correct address. It remains correct in my configuration. I'd like to know the source of the errant WP address.It did not come from me.? This has happened several
By
Gary - K7EK
·
#42756
·
|
Re: My errant WP Update this morning.
/U indicates an update to the User record by the user (maybe by entering the NAME command. etc) or SYSOP or by the SYSOP editing the WP database. The BBS log may show something. Other are /I for
By
John G8BPQ
·
#42755
·
|
Re: My errant WP Update this morning.
GM Chuck, My understanding is that when you receive a WP update, whatever is in that update gets written to your local WP database regardless of what is in your user record. So you probably received
By
Lee Bengston
·
#42754
·
|
Re: My errant WP Update this morning.
Not sure why it changed here but I have corrected the WP entry. Ron VE3CGR
By
Ron Gibson
·
#42753
·
|
Re: My errant WP Update this morning.
There could be tons of reasons. The WP message did not come from Gary himself, but from one of his forwarding partners, VE3CGR, Ron, is the one I received. If this is a new connection between them
By
Mark Taylor
·
#42752
·
|
My errant WP Update this morning.
I found this line in this morning's WP Update: On 241212 K7EK/U @ K7EK.#KY.USA.NOAM zip 40160 Gary Radcliff, KY My 'User' HA data for K7EK remains: K7EK.#NOKY.KY.USA.NOAM So, I don't know why my fresh
By
Chuck Gelm
·
#42751
·
|
Re: Traffic over the BBS system
Tnx John!Chrisww2bsa
By
Chris Lance WW2BSA
·
#42750
·
|
Re: Traffic over the BBS system
I try to keep this wiki page for the RRI group up to date. Check nts-digital.net Most of this info is in the progress of being migrated over to the RRI website. Ray N3HYM
By
Ray Adkins
·
#42749
·
|
Re: Any BPQ32 sysops running robust packet?
Hello Jim, I have been trying, but so far no luck. Please confirm that you are running 300 baud. I'll keep trying. My BPQ32 BBS, K7EK, is on this schedule: 0000-1059z: 3.585 mhz, 3.586, 3.587, 3.597
By
Gary - K7EK
·
#42748
·
|
Re: Traffic over the BBS system
Thanks John, that changes my entire paragraph about multiple NTS forwarding partners.... Edited: Let's say you have two forwarding partners that will accept type T messages. ?This requires some
By
Mark Taylor
·
#42747
·
|