Re: AXIP settings for hughes net
Are these UDP or TCP links?
Although limited, my experience linking with nodes using Hughes net (I am not a Hughes net customer) is that an AXTCP link is required with the Hughes net end being the TCP-Master and the other end being the TCP-Slave. The experience of others may differ but I was never able to maintain a reliable AXUDP link with any node on Hughes net because of how Hughes attempts to prevent what they term as "server" services and BPQ like AXIP connects apparently fall into their "server" category.
Hughes seems to try preventing these services at least in part by randomly and frequently changing the internet facing IP's and / or the IP's used in what some call double NAT'ing somewhere in between the Hughes net customer connection and the internet egress point. Services like DHCP make it seem to the Hughes customer that nothing has changed since new outbound connects are easily established however connection-less protocols like UDP are easily broken and must be reestablished after Hughes messes with things.
Again just my experience and others may differ but I would suggest trying AXTCP rather than AXUDP if you have not already done so.
73 de Rich WA3WLH
|
Still having problems with RIGCONTROL and WINRPR
Hi John/Red, I have a really tough time getting this to work reliably.? I wonder if you guys can look and offer any suggestions when you have time? I have a forward script like this that gets interrupted every time and reverts to the RIGCONTROL frequency selection:
RADIO 1
HAMLIB 192.168.200.113:4532 HAMLIB=4532
00:00
15,10.1473,PKT,F1,R2
15,10.1473,PKT,F1,H1
Forward script:
TIMES 0000-1200
RADIO 6 7.101
PAUSE 5
ATT 6
RPACKET
C N9LYA
ELSE
TIMES 1201-2349
RADIO 6 14.1065
PAUSE 5
ATT 6
RPACKET
C N9LYA
Problem being that as soon as forward script kicks in every hour, the radio swaps frequency as the forward script states above for a few seconds then reverts back to 10.1473.
Coincidentally without the TIMES lines, it will roll through the forward script frequencies, trying the first ok.? Then when its unsuccessful on the first option, the ELSEd second option will just swap frequency and state "Port is in use".
I"d really like to resolve this some day if it is.
Life for me would probably be simpler if I could exec shell scripts to do this in the interim from forward scripts I suppose.??? Am only thinking there is some sort of 'locking' issue bug here that only seems to effect WinRPR driver.
The port uses RADIO=1 and INTERLOCK=1 respectively.
PORT ;WinRPR Modem WA8DED HOST MODE Config
TYPE=EXTERNAL
INTERLOCK=1
ID=WinRPR
DRIVER=WinRPR
PACLEN=90
MHEARD=Y
PERMITTEDAPPLS=1,2,3,4,5
CONFIG
ADDR 192.168.200.113 8201
RADIO=1
SESSIONTIMELIMIT 10
USEAPPLCALLS
I 100 ; Set default paclen to 100 (rpr will adjust if needed)
T 25 ;Set TX DELAY
F 10 ;Set frack
W 30 ;Set SLOTTIME
P 16 ;Set PERSISTANCE
O 1 ;Set MAXFRAME
N 12 ;Set number of retries
@T2 150 ;AX.25 Timer 2, delay before ACK in 10ms increments
@T3 18000 ;AX.25 T3 timer default value
R 0 ;Enable DIGIPEAT
M IUSC ;Set Monitoring
i N9SEO-1 ;Set mycall!!!
Z 0 ;Set flow control
Y 1 ;Set single channel
E 1 ;Set echo
@I 100
%B R300 ; R300 used for UI
UPDATEMAP ;Update BPQ web site maps
ENDPORT
Is there any hope???????
73 N9SEO
|
Hi John, ? Thanks for the reply!? I didn’t include this in my original post (although I should have)…? my goal is to set up my BPQ Node to use AX/IP links to both “internet” and 44Net connected stations, and my understanding is that to do so requires an IPGATEWAY config section.? If I just need to set up routes in Windows, then I should be good.? Is that the case? ? ?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: [email protected] < [email protected]> On Behalf Of John G8BPQ Sent: Monday, May 1, 2023 3:37 AM To: [email protected]Subject: Re: [bpq32] IPGATEWAY with existing ampr-ripd gateway #bpqconfig #network ? Why do you want to run IPGATEWAY? If it is only to allow you to access 44 NET addresses you should only need to add routes to 44.0.0.0/9 and 44.128.0.0/10 to your windows machine pointing to your 44 Gateway machine.
IPGATEWAY is needed to route IP packets over your RF links, and/or to run an AMPRNET gateway if you don't already have one.
73,
John On 30/04/2023 20:46, Matt Atwood, WE1H wrote: Hi All,
I have a BPQ32 install that I would like to get on the 44Net.? I also have an existing ampr-ripd gateway on a seperate Linux box.? I've done some research and come up with the following IPGATEWAY definition.? Before I actually add this to my config file, I'd like those that know this stuff better than I do, to eyeball it and let me know if it is (likely) correct.? I tried a few other IPGATEWAY configs and broke things pretty badly (fortunately I was able to recover from them quickly).? So now, I want to check with you all. Adapter \Device\NPF_{ECDB1154-982B-48D3-A394-785AC42588E3}? # Windows adapter from bpqadapters.exe IPAddr 10.1.10.12? ? ? ? ? ?# IP address of the BPQ32 switch on my LAN (I do have an allocated 44Net address [44.52.67.2], should this be that or the actual IP?) IPNetmask 255.255.255.248? ? # Netmask of my AMPRNet allocation IPPorts 1? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? # BPQ Port I will use for links to IP systems. ROUTE 44.0.0.0/9 44.52.67.1 #With no "local" encap file, I think i need to add this route.? 44.52.67.1 is my 44Net gateway, or do I use it's local LAN address of 10.1.10.5? ROUTE 44.128.0.0/10 44.52.67.1 #Same here, which IP do I use? ****
Do I need a NAT statement for the BPQ box to translate the 44Net address to the LAN address??
If the above is correct (or when the above is correct), I assume it will allow me to make AX/IP connections to other 44Net addresses.
Your expert guidance is appreciated! --
73,
- Matt, WE1H
we1h AT arrl.net
? -- 73, - Matt, WE1H we1h AT arrl.net http://www.we1h.com
|
Why do you want to run IPGATEWAY? If it is only to allow you to
access 44 NET addresses you should only need to add routes to
44.0.0.0/9 and 44.128.0.0/10 to your windows machine pointing to
your 44 Gateway machine.
IPGATEWAY is needed to route IP packets over your RF links, and/or
to run an AMPRNET gateway if you don't already have one.
73,
John
On 30/04/2023 20:46, Matt Atwood, WE1H
wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Hi All,
I have a BPQ32 install that I would like to get on the 44Net.? I
also have an existing ampr-ripd gateway on a seperate Linux box.?
I've done some research and come up with the following IPGATEWAY
definition.? Before I actually add this to my config file, I'd
like those that know this stuff better than I do, to eyeball it
and let me know if it is (likely) correct.? I tried a few other
IPGATEWAY configs and broke things pretty badly (fortunately I was
able to recover from them quickly).? So now, I want to check with
you all.
IPGATEWAY
?
Adapter \Device\NPF_{ECDB1154-982B-48D3-A394-785AC42588E3}? #
Windows adapter from bpqadapters.exe
IPAddr 10.1.10.12? ? ? ? ? ?# IP address of the BPQ32 switch
on my LAN (I do have an allocated 44Net address [44.52.67.2],
should this be that or the actual IP?)
IPNetmask 255.255.255.248? ? # Netmask of my AMPRNet
allocation
IPPorts 1? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? # BPQ Port I will use for links to
IP systems.
?
ROUTE 44.0.0.0/9 44.52.67.1 #With no "local" encap file, I
think i need to add this route.? 44.52.67.1 is my 44Net gateway,
or do I use it's local LAN address of 10.1.10.5?
ROUTE 44.128.0.0/10 44.52.67.1 #Same here, which IP do I use?
****
Do I need a NAT statement for the BPQ box to translate the 44Net
address to the LAN address??
If the above is correct (or when the above is correct), I assume
it will allow me to make AX/IP connections to other 44Net
addresses.
Your expert guidance is appreciated!
--
73,
- Matt, WE1H
we1h AT arrl.net
|
Re: AXIP settings for hughes net
Yes, all my access to internet never drops. ?I can monitor the AXIP stream and I never see anything coming in. ?there are times where I try to connect to a station and it will connect and seems useable for that connection, but then I will never get a link with the two stations I have routes for. ?but, like I said, at some point, there gets a connection because I have seen bulls come into my node. ?just never a solid connection.
Anthony, KC0WEA
|
Re: AXIP settings for hughes net
When you loose the AXIP connection, do you still have access to internet via other devices that also use Hughes net?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Apr 30, 2023, at 2:19 PM, Anthony Bernardo KC0WEA < kc0wea@...> wrote:
All-
I am trying to run a node over Hughes net.? I am able to get interminentant connections via AXIP but nothing stable.? i was able to get a days worth of messages downloaded but the connect went away again.? Any ides if i need to be changing any settings to keep the connection more complete.??
i am using noip on a raspberry pi and everything seems to be working fine there.? i have looked and it doesn't appear that hughes is blocking the port.
Any suggestions?
73
Anthony
KC0WEA
|
AXIP settings for hughes net
All-
I am trying to run a node over Hughes net.? I am able to get interminentant connections via AXIP but nothing stable.? i was able to get a days worth of messages downloaded but the connect went away again.? Any ides if i need to be changing any settings to keep the connection more complete.??
i am using noip on a raspberry pi and everything seems to be working fine there.? i have looked and it doesn't appear that hughes is blocking the port.
Any suggestions?
73
Anthony
KC0WEA
|
Hi All, I have a BPQ32 install that I would like to get on the 44Net.? I also have an existing ampr-ripd gateway on a seperate Linux box.? I've done some research and come up with the following IPGATEWAY definition.? Before I actually add this to my config file, I'd like those that know this stuff better than I do, to eyeball it and let me know if it is (likely) correct.? I tried a few other IPGATEWAY configs and broke things pretty badly (fortunately I was able to recover from them quickly).? So now, I want to check with you all.
IPGATEWAY
?
Adapter \Device\NPF_{ECDB1154-982B-48D3-A394-785AC42588E3}? # Windows adapter from bpqadapters.exe
IPAddr 10.1.10.12? ? ? ? ? ?# IP address of the BPQ32 switch on my LAN (I do have an allocated 44Net address [44.52.67.2], should this be that or the actual IP?)
IPNetmask 255.255.255.248? ? # Netmask of my AMPRNet allocation
IPPorts 1? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? # BPQ Port I will use for links to IP systems.
?
ROUTE 44.0.0.0/9 44.52.67.1 #With no "local" encap file, I think i need to add this route.? 44.52.67.1 is my 44Net gateway, or do I use it's local LAN address of 10.1.10.5?
ROUTE 44.128.0.0/10 44.52.67.1 #Same here, which IP do I use?
****
Do I need a NAT statement for the BPQ box to translate the 44Net address to the LAN address??
If the above is correct (or when the above is correct), I assume it will allow me to make AX/IP connections to other 44Net addresses.
Your expert guidance is appreciated!
-- 73, - Matt, WE1H we1h AT arrl.net https://www.we1h.com
|
KISS over TCP (and UDP) support NETROM.
73,
John
On 30/04/2023 03:17, Lee Bengston
wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Hmm, it's also possible to set up KISS over TCP interfaces
in BPQ - either as client or server.? Given the KISS over TCP
clients of both BPQ and XR work with software such as
SoundModem and Dire Wolf, I'm betting they are compatible with
each other. Off the top of my head it seems those would be
AX25 only, i.e. no netrom, but that would be "better than
nada".
73,
Lee K5DAT
Hi Lee,?
I'm glad you were able to link up using axtcp, and
I'm happy to say that my connection still works :-)?
I have the port quality set low on the axtcp port so
that my mobile node doesn't upset the netrom network too
much when it comes and goes. It's also a good test of
inp3.?
Now I know thay xrouter and bpq's axtcp
implementations are different, I can work towards adding
bpq's method without breaking mine. It is already
possible for xr to do ax/kiss/tcp using a 'tcp'
interface with protocol=kiss, but I expect that mine and
John's framing methods are different!!
Regards?
Paula?
-------- Original message --------
From: Lee Bengston < kilo5dat@...>
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2023, 23:14
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [bpq32] AXTCP Links
Hi Paula,
As we found out, the XR and BPQ TCP
implementations are different/incompatible.? Just to
let you know, I do have a link up with G8PZT using
AXTCP (client) on XRLin, K5DAT-5 using port 9394 per
your private correction.
Thanks for the info,
Lee K5DAT
Hi Lee,
In case you (or anyone else :-) are interested, my
XRPi node G8PZT:KIDDER in
the middle of England has an open AXTCP server on
"" port
9393.
It has been in use for many years with Xrouter
clients, but as far as I know
never with BPQ.
So if you want to try it, I'd be interested to
know how you get on.
73, Paula
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lee Bengston" <kilo5dat@...>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2023 2:43 PM
Subject: [bpq32] AXTCP Links
> Hello to those on the list. I've just moved
to new rural location, and it
> appears my wireless based internet service
does not pass any unsolicited
> communication from the Internet to me. Even
though I am using my own
> router, the port forwarding and ampr-ripd
configurations are moot.
> Therefore I have no AXUDP using 10093, etc.
and no ampret.
>
> Anyone interested in restoring their link
with K5DAT-7 can use AXTCP with
> their side as the slave.? In that case the
map for K5DAT-7 would use this
> format if port 10200 were used:
>
> MAP K5DAT-7 0.0.0.0 TCP-Save 10200 B
>
> Each AXTCP link must use a unique TCP port,
and the slave side, i.e. your
> side, must forward the TCP port in the local
router to the BPQ host. Feel
> free to email me directly to work things out.
If there are further
> questions in general about AXTCP, feel free
to ask them on list.
>
> Unfortunately I don't have a solution for
JNOS and URONODE currently. As I
> recall XRouter supports AXTCP, so it may be a
solution there. When I get
> some time I may try an AXTCP link across the
LAN between BPQ and XRouter..
>
> 73,
> Lee K5DAT
>
>
>
>
>
>
|
Hi Lee, I've just checked the code and it seems xrouter can do "ax25kisstcp" as either server or client, and the full networking stack is available. So it looks like bpq and xrouter might be able to interconnect after all.?
The trouble is, I can't remember how to set it up, and the documentation never got done (I don't think). It needs someone with more patience than me to try it.?
Regards? Paula?
-------- Original message -------- From: Lee Bengston <kilo5dat@...> Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2023, 03:17 To: [email protected]Subject: Re: [bpq32] AXTCP Links Hmm, it's also possible to set up KISS over TCP interfaces in BPQ - either as client or server.? Given the KISS over TCP clients of both BPQ and XR work with software such as SoundModem and Dire Wolf, I'm betting they are compatible with each other. Off the top of my head it seems those would be AX25 only, i.e. no netrom, but that would be "better than nada".
73, Lee K5DAT
Hi Lee,?
I'm glad you were able to link up using axtcp, and I'm happy to say that my connection still works :-)?
I have the port quality set low on the axtcp port so that my mobile node doesn't upset the netrom network too much when it comes and goes. It's also a good test of inp3.?
Now I know thay xrouter and bpq's axtcp implementations are different, I can work towards adding bpq's method without breaking mine. It is already possible for xr to do ax/kiss/tcp using a 'tcp' interface with protocol=kiss, but I expect that mine and John's framing methods are different!!
Regards? Paula?
-------- Original message -------- From: Lee Bengston < kilo5dat@...> Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2023, 23:14 To: [email protected]Subject: Re: [bpq32] AXTCP Links Hi Paula,
As we found out, the XR and BPQ TCP implementations are different/incompatible.? Just to let you know, I do have a link up with G8PZT using AXTCP (client) on XRLin, K5DAT-5 using port 9394 per your private correction.
Thanks for the info, Lee K5DAT
Hi Lee,
In case you (or anyone else :-) are interested, my XRPi node G8PZT:KIDDER in
the middle of England has an open AXTCP server on "" port 9393.
It has been in use for many years with Xrouter clients, but as far as I know
never with BPQ.
So if you want to try it, I'd be interested to know how you get on.
73, Paula
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lee Bengston" <kilo5dat@...>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2023 2:43 PM
Subject: [bpq32] AXTCP Links
> Hello to those on the list. I've just moved to new rural location, and it
> appears my wireless based internet service does not pass any unsolicited
> communication from the Internet to me. Even though I am using my own
> router, the port forwarding and ampr-ripd configurations are moot.
> Therefore I have no AXUDP using 10093, etc. and no ampret.
>
> Anyone interested in restoring their link with K5DAT-7 can use AXTCP with
> their side as the slave.? In that case the map for K5DAT-7 would use this
> format if port 10200 were used:
>
> MAP K5DAT-7 0.0.0.0 TCP-Save 10200 B
>
> Each AXTCP link must use a unique TCP port, and the slave side, i.e. your
> side, must forward the TCP port in the local router to the BPQ host. Feel
> free to email me directly to work things out. If there are further
> questions in general about AXTCP, feel free to ask them on list.
>
> Unfortunately I don't have a solution for JNOS and URONODE currently. As I
> recall XRouter supports AXTCP, so it may be a solution there. When I get
> some time I may try an AXTCP link across the LAN between BPQ and XRouter..
>
> 73,
> Lee K5DAT
>
>
>
>
>
>
|
Hmm, it's also possible to set up KISS over TCP interfaces in BPQ - either as client or server.? Given the KISS over TCP clients of both BPQ and XR work with software such as SoundModem and Dire Wolf, I'm betting they are compatible with each other. Off the top of my head it seems those would be AX25 only, i.e. no netrom, but that would be "better than nada".
73, Lee K5DAT
Hi Lee,?
I'm glad you were able to link up using axtcp, and I'm happy to say that my connection still works :-)?
I have the port quality set low on the axtcp port so that my mobile node doesn't upset the netrom network too much when it comes and goes. It's also a good test of inp3.?
Now I know thay xrouter and bpq's axtcp implementations are different, I can work towards adding bpq's method without breaking mine. It is already possible for xr to do ax/kiss/tcp using a 'tcp' interface with protocol=kiss, but I expect that mine and John's framing methods are different!!
Regards? Paula?
-------- Original message -------- From: Lee Bengston < kilo5dat@...> Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2023, 23:14 To: [email protected]Subject: Re: [bpq32] AXTCP Links Hi Paula,
As we found out, the XR and BPQ TCP implementations are different/incompatible.? Just to let you know, I do have a link up with G8PZT using AXTCP (client) on XRLin, K5DAT-5 using port 9394 per your private correction.
Thanks for the info, Lee K5DAT
Hi Lee,
In case you (or anyone else :-) are interested, my XRPi node G8PZT:KIDDER in
the middle of England has an open AXTCP server on "" port 9393.
It has been in use for many years with Xrouter clients, but as far as I know
never with BPQ.
So if you want to try it, I'd be interested to know how you get on.
73, Paula
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lee Bengston" <kilo5dat@...>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2023 2:43 PM
Subject: [bpq32] AXTCP Links
> Hello to those on the list. I've just moved to new rural location, and it
> appears my wireless based internet service does not pass any unsolicited
> communication from the Internet to me. Even though I am using my own
> router, the port forwarding and ampr-ripd configurations are moot.
> Therefore I have no AXUDP using 10093, etc. and no ampret.
>
> Anyone interested in restoring their link with K5DAT-7 can use AXTCP with
> their side as the slave.? In that case the map for K5DAT-7 would use this
> format if port 10200 were used:
>
> MAP K5DAT-7 0.0.0.0 TCP-Save 10200 B
>
> Each AXTCP link must use a unique TCP port, and the slave side, i.e. your
> side, must forward the TCP port in the local router to the BPQ host. Feel
> free to email me directly to work things out. If there are further
> questions in general about AXTCP, feel free to ask them on list.
>
> Unfortunately I don't have a solution for JNOS and URONODE currently. As I
> recall XRouter supports AXTCP, so it may be a solution there. When I get
> some time I may try an AXTCP link across the LAN between BPQ and XRouter..
>
> 73,
> Lee K5DAT
>
>
>
>
>
>
|
Doh, that was supposed to be private mail, sorry everyone for the spam!!?
Sent from my Huawei tablet
-------- Original message -------- From: "Paula via groups.io" <g8pzt@...> Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2023, 02:35 To: [email protected]Subject: Re: [bpq32] AXTCP Links Hi Lee,?
I'm glad you were able to link up using axtcp, and I'm happy to say that my connection still works :-)?
I have the port quality set low on the axtcp port so that my mobile node doesn't upset the netrom network too much when it comes and goes. It's also a good test of inp3.?
Now I know thay xrouter and bpq's axtcp implementations are different, I can work towards adding bpq's method without breaking mine. It is already possible for xr to do ax/kiss/tcp using a 'tcp' interface with protocol=kiss, but I expect that mine and John's framing methods are different!!
Regards? Paula?
-------- Original message -------- From: Lee Bengston <kilo5dat@...> Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2023, 23:14 To: [email protected]Subject: Re: [bpq32] AXTCP Links Hi Paula,
As we found out, the XR and BPQ TCP implementations are different/incompatible.? Just to let you know, I do have a link up with G8PZT using AXTCP (client) on XRLin, K5DAT-5 using port 9394 per your private correction.
Thanks for the info, Lee K5DAT
Hi Lee,
In case you (or anyone else :-) are interested, my XRPi node G8PZT:KIDDER in
the middle of England has an open AXTCP server on "" port 9393.
It has been in use for many years with Xrouter clients, but as far as I know
never with BPQ.
So if you want to try it, I'd be interested to know how you get on.
73, Paula
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lee Bengston" <kilo5dat@...>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2023 2:43 PM
Subject: [bpq32] AXTCP Links
> Hello to those on the list. I've just moved to new rural location, and it
> appears my wireless based internet service does not pass any unsolicited
> communication from the Internet to me. Even though I am using my own
> router, the port forwarding and ampr-ripd configurations are moot.
> Therefore I have no AXUDP using 10093, etc. and no ampret.
>
> Anyone interested in restoring their link with K5DAT-7 can use AXTCP with
> their side as the slave.? In that case the map for K5DAT-7 would use this
> format if port 10200 were used:
>
> MAP K5DAT-7 0.0.0.0 TCP-Save 10200 B
>
> Each AXTCP link must use a unique TCP port, and the slave side, i.e. your
> side, must forward the TCP port in the local router to the BPQ host. Feel
> free to email me directly to work things out. If there are further
> questions in general about AXTCP, feel free to ask them on list.
>
> Unfortunately I don't have a solution for JNOS and URONODE currently. As I
> recall XRouter supports AXTCP, so it may be a solution there. When I get
> some time I may try an AXTCP link across the LAN between BPQ and XRouter..
>
> 73,
> Lee K5DAT
>
>
>
>
>
>
|
Hi Lee,?
I'm glad you were able to link up using axtcp, and I'm happy to say that my connection still works :-)?
I have the port quality set low on the axtcp port so that my mobile node doesn't upset the netrom network too much when it comes and goes. It's also a good test of inp3.?
Now I know thay xrouter and bpq's axtcp implementations are different, I can work towards adding bpq's method without breaking mine. It is already possible for xr to do ax/kiss/tcp using a 'tcp' interface with protocol=kiss, but I expect that mine and John's framing methods are different!!
Regards? Paula?
-------- Original message -------- From: Lee Bengston <kilo5dat@...> Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2023, 23:14 To: [email protected]Subject: Re: [bpq32] AXTCP Links Hi Paula,
As we found out, the XR and BPQ TCP implementations are different/incompatible.? Just to let you know, I do have a link up with G8PZT using AXTCP (client) on XRLin, K5DAT-5 using port 9394 per your private correction.
Thanks for the info, Lee K5DAT
Hi Lee,
In case you (or anyone else :-) are interested, my XRPi node G8PZT:KIDDER in
the middle of England has an open AXTCP server on "" port 9393.
It has been in use for many years with Xrouter clients, but as far as I know
never with BPQ.
So if you want to try it, I'd be interested to know how you get on.
73, Paula
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lee Bengston" <kilo5dat@...>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2023 2:43 PM
Subject: [bpq32] AXTCP Links
> Hello to those on the list. I've just moved to new rural location, and it
> appears my wireless based internet service does not pass any unsolicited
> communication from the Internet to me. Even though I am using my own
> router, the port forwarding and ampr-ripd configurations are moot.
> Therefore I have no AXUDP using 10093, etc. and no ampret.
>
> Anyone interested in restoring their link with K5DAT-7 can use AXTCP with
> their side as the slave.? In that case the map for K5DAT-7 would use this
> format if port 10200 were used:
>
> MAP K5DAT-7 0.0.0.0 TCP-Save 10200 B
>
> Each AXTCP link must use a unique TCP port, and the slave side, i.e. your
> side, must forward the TCP port in the local router to the BPQ host. Feel
> free to email me directly to work things out. If there are further
> questions in general about AXTCP, feel free to ask them on list.
>
> Unfortunately I don't have a solution for JNOS and URONODE currently. As I
> recall XRouter supports AXTCP, so it may be a solution there. When I get
> some time I may try an AXTCP link across the LAN between BPQ and XRouter..
>
> 73,
> Lee K5DAT
>
>
>
>
>
>
|
Hi Paula,
As we found out, the XR and BPQ TCP implementations are different/incompatible.? Just to let you know, I do have a link up with G8PZT using AXTCP (client) on XRLin, K5DAT-5 using port 9394 per your private correction.
Thanks for the info, Lee K5DAT
Hi Lee,
In case you (or anyone else :-) are interested, my XRPi node G8PZT:KIDDER in
the middle of England has an open AXTCP server on "" port 9393.
It has been in use for many years with Xrouter clients, but as far as I know
never with BPQ.
So if you want to try it, I'd be interested to know how you get on.
73, Paula
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lee Bengston" <kilo5dat@...>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2023 2:43 PM
Subject: [bpq32] AXTCP Links
> Hello to those on the list. I've just moved to new rural location, and it
> appears my wireless based internet service does not pass any unsolicited
> communication from the Internet to me. Even though I am using my own
> router, the port forwarding and ampr-ripd configurations are moot.
> Therefore I have no AXUDP using 10093, etc. and no ampret.
>
> Anyone interested in restoring their link with K5DAT-7 can use AXTCP with
> their side as the slave.? In that case the map for K5DAT-7 would use this
> format if port 10200 were used:
>
> MAP K5DAT-7 0.0.0.0 TCP-Save 10200 B
>
> Each AXTCP link must use a unique TCP port, and the slave side, i.e. your
> side, must forward the TCP port in the local router to the BPQ host. Feel
> free to email me directly to work things out. If there are further
> questions in general about AXTCP, feel free to ask them on list.
>
> Unfortunately I don't have a solution for JNOS and URONODE currently. As I
> recall XRouter supports AXTCP, so it may be a solution there. When I get
> some time I may try an AXTCP link across the LAN between BPQ and XRouter..
>
> 73,
> Lee K5DAT
>
>
>
>
>
>
|
Oh well, at least I now know that it doesn't work, and why it doesn't.?
Sent from my Huawei tablet
-------- Original message -------- From: John G8BPQ <john.wiseman@...> Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2023, 19:01 To: [email protected]Subject: Re: [bpq32] AXTCP Links
Yes, I just send kiss encapsulated packets.
73,
John
On 29/04/2023 17:52, Paula via
groups.io wrote:
Hi Red, thank you for the test. I haven't yet
decoded the packet, but I think there's a major difference
between how xrouter and bpq do axtcp.?
I don't know how bpq does it, but in xrouter the server and
client first exchange 17 byte packets to "register" their
callsign and aliases with each other.?
I'd forgotten about that. Doh!?
|
Yes, I just send kiss encapsulated packets.
73,
John
On 29/04/2023 17:52, Paula via
groups.io wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Hi Red, thank you for the test. I haven't yet
decoded the packet, but I think there's a major difference
between how xrouter and bpq do axtcp.?
I don't know how bpq does it, but in xrouter the server and
client first exchange 17 byte packets to "register" their
callsign and aliases with each other.?
I'd forgotten about that. Doh!?
|
Hi Red, thank you for the test. I haven't yet decoded the packet, but I think there's a major difference between how xrouter and bpq do axtcp.?
I don't know how bpq does it, but in xrouter the server and client first exchange 17 byte packets to "register" their callsign and aliases with each other.?
I'd forgotten about that. Doh!?
|
I got the DV Switch installed an working with my phone. pretty
neat stuff.
I run 4 raspberry pi's with dmr brandmiester, tgif, d-star an
wires-x
Ray N3HYM
On 4/29/2023 11:10 AM, Lee Bengston
wrote:
To BPQ users that lost a link with K5DAT-7, my node.
I apologize for that - I have moved, and the Internet
access is wireless based with no port forwarding.? Therefore I
can no longer support AXUDP links. Furthermore my amprnet
links were lost as well, and it appears I can no longer
support those also.
As mentioned in another thread, AXTCP works, and the map
below will work for K5DAT-7 if you forward TCP port 10200 from
your router to BPQ.
MAP K5DAT-7 0.0.0.0 TCP-Slave 10200 B
If you would prefer to use a different port, feel free to
email me privately, and I can set it up.? TCP 10093 may not be
a bad choice, especially if your router is already forwarding
both TCP and UDP 10093.
Thanks.
Lee K5DAT
--
Ray
V. Adkins N3HYM│ American Red Cross
Disaster Service Technology Team Lead
National
Capital and Greater Chesapeake Region
(240) 674-0568 (Cell)│ HH 5743│
HOIP 100482
N3HYM.COM │ SHARES NCS270 │WQRP255
|
Just made the change
Ray N3HYM
On 4/29/2023 11:10 AM, Lee Bengston
wrote:
MAP
K5DAT-7 0.0.0.0 TCP-Slave 10200 B
--
Ray
V. Adkins N3HYM│ American Red Cross
Disaster Service Technology Team Lead
National
Capital and Greater Chesapeake Region
(240) 674-0568 (Cell)│ HH 5743│
HOIP 100482
N3HYM.COM │ SHARES NCS270 │WQRP255
|
To BPQ users that lost a link with K5DAT-7, my node.
I apologize for that - I have moved, and the Internet access is wireless based with no port forwarding.? Therefore I can no longer support AXUDP links. Furthermore my amprnet links were lost as well, and it appears I can no longer support those also.
As mentioned in another thread, AXTCP works, and the map below will work for K5DAT-7 if you forward TCP port 10200 from your router to BPQ.
MAP K5DAT-7 0.0.0.0 TCP-Slave 10200 B
If you would prefer to use a different port, feel free to email me privately, and I can set it up.? TCP 10093 may not be a bad choice, especially if your router is already forwarding both TCP and UDP 10093.
Thanks. Lee K5DAT
|
Ray Adkins