开云体育

Thanks, Yes, I'll be doing the Linux version today. 73, John

1) The WINRPR driver works, but QtTermTCP shows the same (Rx) color in the monitor for both transmit and receive. I don't see that on any other ports. It's a minor but strange thing. Despite not

PSKA an FSKA level can not be the same, PSKA levels will be 30 higher than FSKA settings. Google pactor level settings , there is a whole article on it. My BBS runs PSKA at 225 and FSKA at

Thanks John, Everything works again… great! Don’t forget to correct the Linux version too ? 73 Louis ve2nzr De : [email protected] <[email protected]> De la part de John G8BPQ

Sorry, that is a bug I've recently introduced. I've uploaded a new BPQMail.exe to my Beta site that should fix it, but you'll need to re-input the ISP Host Name. 73, John

Can I do the same thing with the IPGATEWAY route command? ROUTE 44.131.11.0/29 ( http://44.131.11.0/29 ) 44.131.11.1 # All subnet 44.131.11.0/29 ( http://44.131.11.0/29 ) is reachable over radio

Hi to all, Want to know if other person has the same problem than me. I have “Mail Server Version 6.0.24.62” and “Console Version .0.24.65”. Can’t find both programs with the

Well it looks like I answered my own question Yes the bbsuser section can be replaced with another section only need to review and change user settings (ie sysop .. etc) from the program interface or

Once I got down to looking it was pretty simple so in the next build it will be sorted. I'm looking at doing something like G7UOD's AXIP list. 73, John

[email protected]> wrote: I believe the context of the request for shell capability is to allow BPQ to add static routes in the host OS upon startup. It s

All I might be looking for something that is a bit much. Is there anything available that I could use too import the BBSUSER section from the BPQMAIl.CFG file Or can I just take the BBSUSERS

It has to be a turnover/timing problem. If I switch radios it works fine, but I am not wearing out the relays of my nice TS-590S. I have my FT-710 as my sacrificial lamb. The crazy thing is the

What modes do you support, Pactor, packet, VARA, ? contact me direct via call at ARRL.net jim KI0BK Olathe KS

Chris, I have similar problems to yours, but I’ll add that incoming connects from the same station works great, but out going shows the same actions as you see, first packet green, all others

Maybe a better question to ask is what is all the possible tweakable parameters on the BPQ side. I think I found two that are not talked about

I can connect to some BBS with Pactor, but I have a new neighbor that it is not playing well with. The strange thing is that I can connect just fine to him with Winl2K. I have set the FSK and PSK

There is a good reason protocols like telnet are no longer used on public networks. The FBB? technique (also used by Kantronics) obscure but do not effectively hide the password, and monitoring

Sorry, I know this is getting slightly off-topic. Those partial character challenge/response systems that have been popular with packet systems over the years are really bad form a security

IIRC FBB used to have a "superuser" auth mechanism where a connected station would be challenged with a password prompt. The prompt was not looking for the whole password but rather a random

I'll think about that though there may be security implications. 73, John