Re: 16:58:37T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX Paclen=256 RX Window=7
What if the other end of the RF circuit is _not_ using BPQ32/LinBPQ at all?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 5/29/2025 9:46 AM, John G8BPQ via groups.io wrote: If the other end is running a reasonably up to date version of linbpq it should?always?respond?to?XID?with?something.
--
Charles J. Hargrove - N2NOV
NYC-ARECS/RACES Citywide Radio Officer/Skywarn Coord.
NYC-ARECS/RACES Nets 441.100/136.5 PL
ARnewsline Broadcast Mon. @ 8:00PM
NYC-ARECS Weekly Net Mon. @ 8:30PM
NY-NBEMS Net Saturdays @ 10AM & USeast-NBEMS Net Wednesdays @ 7PM
on 7.036 Mhz USB (alt 3.536)/1500 hz waterfall spot; MFSK-16 or 32
"Information is the oxygen of the modern age. It seeps through the walls topped
by barbed wire, it wafts across the electrified borders." - Ronald Reagan
"The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates." - Tacitus
"Molann an obair an fear" - Irish Saying
(The work praises the man.)
"No matter how big and powerful government gets, and the many services it
provides, it can never take the place of volunteers." - Ronald Reagan
|
Re: 16:58:37T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX Paclen=256 RX Window=7
Yes,
Normally one station sends XID command, the other responds with XID response, then the usual SABM (C C P) is sent.
73, John
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 29/05/2025 15:49, Misko YT7MPB via groups.io wrote: I just did some tests: I deleted the BPQNODES.dat before I started the
club node (YU7BPQ). Then I initiated outgoing fwd with my home test BBS
(YT7MPB-2) that runs on top of the node (YT7MPB-1, but can hear & reach
the bbs directly). Some mail exchange occurred. At some point the remote
node sent its node list, and the local node responded by sending XID line,
while the remote node replied by sending its own XID line:
....
13:39:31R YT7MPB-2>YU7BPQ Port=3 <RR R F R5>
13:39:31T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-2 Port=3 <I C P S5 R1>:
)S<~I}6
{0c"PPHousekeeping Results 0vjoq7\fw=`^;fV_pnpos<>nOs:Wv;}
zL[
?ckzc]aUR39i9.=/bccp{e/
13:39:37T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-2 Port=3 <RR C P R1>
13:39:39R YT7MPB-2>YU7BPQ Port=3 <RR R F R6>
13:39:39T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-2 Port=3 <I C P S6 R1>:
uv|]9vGgv63W -pJ|VAv*fQXFvC)6T'g$kvK=*QjT;FGnIq'kbG<SA`c
13:39:43R YT7MPB-2>YU7BPQ Port=3 <RR R F R7>
13:40:12R YT7MPB-1>NODES Port=3 <UI C> NODES broadcast from DKTP
DKTBBS:YT7MPB-2 via YT7MPB-1 qlty=255
DKTCHT:YT7MPB-8 via YT7MPB-1 qlty=255
LIMBBS:YT7MPB-6 via YT7MPB-5 qlty=191
LIMAN:YT7MPB-5 via YT7MPB-5 qlty=192
13:40:23T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX Paclen=256 RX
Window=7
13:40:26R YT7MPB-1>YU7BPQ Port=3 <XID R F> 2=21 3=22a480 RX Paclen=256 RX
Window=7
13:40:26T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <C C P>
13:40:28R YT7MPB-1>YU7BPQ Port=3 <UA R F>
13:40:28R YT7MPB-1>YU7BPQ Port=3 <I C S0 R0>:
Welcome to DKTP test node in Novi Sad.
Type BBS <enter> for ema
13:40:29R YT7MPB-1>YU7BPQ Port=3 <I C P S1 R0>:
il facility.
Type ? <enter> for list of commands.
13:40:29T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <RR R F R2>
13:41:11R YT7MPB-1>ID Port=3 <UI C>:
BPQ 6.0.24.71 (DKTP)
....
Is that the expected communication between two nodes?
Misko YT7MPB
If the other end is running a reasonably up to date version of linbpq it
should always respond to XID with something.
Do you have a packet trace showing the XID arriving?
Thanks,
John
On 29/05/2025 10:25, Misko YT7MPB via groups.io wrote:
At this stage, I did not see that the other end (YT7MPB-1) replies
with anything. Btw, the other end does not run Direwolf. There is a
TNC2 in KISS mode. (It also ran an older version of linbpq, and I just
upgraded it to .71 as well but to no avail.)
At the moment I am unsure about the actual version of Direwolf the
club station runs. (It shall be 1.7 or so as I recall.)
And yes, the frame is actually being transmitted to the air every few
seconds, while the other end (YT7MPB-1) does not reply to it. Seems as
if the other end is incapable to react i.e. does not understand what
to do. I mean no response from the other end.
Misko YT7MPB
On 5/29/2025 8:16 AM, John G8BPQ via groups.io wrote:
BPQ now tries to use ax.25 v2.2 for Node to Node links, so it sends an
XID to negotiate that. I expect the other end to either reply with an
XID response either accepting or rejecting the settings I offer, or
reject with either FRMR or DM.
If you were running Direwolf in AGW mode I could understand it
processing the XID but as it is in KISS mode it should just pass it
through. Is the frame actually being sent? If so it could be that
Direwolf is simply reporting what it sees as errors in the XID as it
monitors it. I believe the Direwolf implementation of 2.2 is flawed as
it expects extended addressing to be offered.
73, John
On 28/05/2025 18:09, Misko YT7MPB via groups.io wrote:
John,
Seems that my HF ports are pretty well for now. But there is a new
issue
that I got with my VHF port running Direwolf:
My BPQ node (YU7BPQ) communicated well with my home test node
(YT7MPB-1)
when I ran .065 version. When I upgraded to the .71 version, I noticed
this strange behavior:
16:51:52T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX
Paclen=256 RX
Window=7
16:51:57T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX
Paclen=256 RX
Window=7
16:52:59T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX
Paclen=256 RX
Window=7
16:53:05T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX
Paclen=256 RX
Window=7
The above I see in the QtTerm window, every 5 second another line
comes.
The Direwolf itself was not changed. But it started showing this:
[0L] YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1:(XID cmd, p=1)XID error: Expected Balanced ABM
to be
set.
XID error: Expected one of Half or Full Duplex be set.
XID error: Expected Extended Address to be set.
? REJ modulo-8 I-Field-Length-Rx=256 Window-Size-Rx=7
[0L] YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1:(XID cmd, p=1)XID error: Expected Balanced ABM
to be
set.
XID error: Expected one of Half or Full Duplex be set.
XID error: Expected Extended Address to be set.
? REJ modulo-8 I-Field-Length-Rx=256 Window-Size-Rx=7
... etc etc ...
My VHF port config is here:
PORT
??? PORTNUM=3???????????????? ; Port number
??? ID=1200 Baud 144.875 MHz? ; PORTS command text
??? ;ID=1200 Baud 144.800 MHz? ; PORTS command text
??? TYPE=ASYNC??????????????? ; RS232 connection
??? IPADDR=127.0.0.1????????? ; DIREWOLF
??? TCPPORT=8001????????????? ; DIREWOLF
??? SPEED=19200
??? CHANNEL=A???????????????? ; TNC channel
??? MAXFRAME=1??????????????? ; Max outstanding frames?????????? by
VE1AMA
(SK)??? Network105 founder
??? ;MAXFRAME=3??????????????? ; Max outstanding frames
??? ;FRACK=5000??????????????? ; Level 2 timeout (ms)
??? FRACK=6000??????????????? ; Level 2 timeout (ms)???????????? by
VE1AMA
(SK)??? test Dec 30, 2021
??? ;RESPTIME=500?????????????? ; Level 2 delayed ACK (ms)
??? RESPTIME=2000?????????????? ; Level 2 delayed ACK (ms) test Dec
19, 2020
??? RETRIES=10??????????????? ; Level 2 max retries
??? ;PACLEN=236??????????????? ; Max packet length (bytes)
??? PACLEN=128??????????????? ; Max packet length (bytes)?????? by
VE1AMA
(SK)??? Network105 founder
??? ;PACLEN=40??????????????? ; Max packet length (bytes) by
UZ1HO??? "for
FX25 in EU"
??? ;TXDELAY=480?????????????? ; Transmit keyup delay (ms)
??? TXDELAY=400?????????????? ; Transmit keyup delay (ms)
??? ;TXDELAY=100?????????????? ; Transmit keyup delay (ms)
??? SLOTTIME=100????????????? ; CMSA interval timer (ms)
??? TXTAIL=30
??? PERSIST=64???? ; Persistence (256/(# transmissions-1)
??? DIGIFLAG=0?????? ; Allow Digipeat on this port
??? QUALITY=255????? ; salje nodes listu
??? ;QUALITY=0????? ; nesalje nodes listu
??? ;WL2KREPORT PUBLIC, www.winlink.org, 8778, CR6MPB, IN51GD, 00-23,
144875000, PKT1200, 10, 20, 5, 0
??? WL2KREPORT PUBLIC, www.winlink.org, 8778, YT7MPB-10, JN95WG,
00-23,
144875000, PKT1200, 10, 20, 5, 0
??? ;WL2KREPORT PUBLIC, www.winlink.org, 8778, II1CIT, JN44LJ, 00-23,
144800000, PKT1200, 10, 20, 5, 0
ENDPORT
Any solution?
Misko YT7MPB
|
Re: 16:58:37T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX Paclen=256 RX Window=7
I just did some tests: I deleted the BPQNODES.dat before I started the
club node (YU7BPQ). Then I initiated outgoing fwd with my home test BBS
(YT7MPB-2) that runs on top of the node (YT7MPB-1, but can hear & reach
the bbs directly). Some mail exchange occurred. At some point the remote
node sent its node list, and the local node responded by sending XID line,
while the remote node replied by sending its own XID line:
....
13:39:31R YT7MPB-2>YU7BPQ Port=3 <RR R F R5>
13:39:31T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-2 Port=3 <I C P S5 R1>:
)S<~I}6
{0c"PPHousekeeping Results 0vjoq7\fw=`^;fV_pnpos<>nOs:Wv;}
zL[
?ckzc]aUR39i9.=/bccp{e/
13:39:37T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-2 Port=3 <RR C P R1>
13:39:39R YT7MPB-2>YU7BPQ Port=3 <RR R F R6>
13:39:39T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-2 Port=3 <I C P S6 R1>:
uv|]9vGgv63W -pJ|VAv*fQXFvC)6T'g$kvK=*QjT;FGnIq'kbG<SA`c
13:39:43R YT7MPB-2>YU7BPQ Port=3 <RR R F R7>
13:40:12R YT7MPB-1>NODES Port=3 <UI C> NODES broadcast from DKTP
DKTBBS:YT7MPB-2 via YT7MPB-1 qlty=255
DKTCHT:YT7MPB-8 via YT7MPB-1 qlty=255
LIMBBS:YT7MPB-6 via YT7MPB-5 qlty=191
LIMAN:YT7MPB-5 via YT7MPB-5 qlty=192
13:40:23T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX Paclen=256 RX
Window=7
13:40:26R YT7MPB-1>YU7BPQ Port=3 <XID R F> 2=21 3=22a480 RX Paclen=256 RX
Window=7
13:40:26T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <C C P>
13:40:28R YT7MPB-1>YU7BPQ Port=3 <UA R F>
13:40:28R YT7MPB-1>YU7BPQ Port=3 <I C S0 R0>:
Welcome to DKTP test node in Novi Sad.
Type BBS <enter> for ema
13:40:29R YT7MPB-1>YU7BPQ Port=3 <I C P S1 R0>:
il facility.
Type ? <enter> for list of commands.
13:40:29T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <RR R F R2>
13:41:11R YT7MPB-1>ID Port=3 <UI C>:
BPQ 6.0.24.71 (DKTP)
....
Is that the expected communication between two nodes?
Misko YT7MPB
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
If the other end is running a reasonably up to date version of linbpq it
should always respond to XID with something.
Do you have a packet trace showing the XID arriving?
Thanks,
John
On 29/05/2025 10:25, Misko YT7MPB via groups.io wrote:
At this stage, I did not see that the other end (YT7MPB-1) replies
with anything. Btw, the other end does not run Direwolf. There is a
TNC2 in KISS mode. (It also ran an older version of linbpq, and I just
upgraded it to .71 as well but to no avail.)
At the moment I am unsure about the actual version of Direwolf the
club station runs. (It shall be 1.7 or so as I recall.)
And yes, the frame is actually being transmitted to the air every few
seconds, while the other end (YT7MPB-1) does not reply to it. Seems as
if the other end is incapable to react i.e. does not understand what
to do. I mean no response from the other end.
Misko YT7MPB
On 5/29/2025 8:16 AM, John G8BPQ via groups.io wrote:
BPQ now tries to use ax.25 v2.2 for Node to Node links, so it sends an
XID to negotiate that. I expect the other end to either reply with an
XID response either accepting or rejecting the settings I offer, or
reject with either FRMR or DM.
If you were running Direwolf in AGW mode I could understand it
processing the XID but as it is in KISS mode it should just pass it
through. Is the frame actually being sent? If so it could be that
Direwolf is simply reporting what it sees as errors in the XID as it
monitors it. I believe the Direwolf implementation of 2.2 is flawed as
it expects extended addressing to be offered.
73, John
On 28/05/2025 18:09, Misko YT7MPB via groups.io wrote:
John,
Seems that my HF ports are pretty well for now. But there is a new
issue
that I got with my VHF port running Direwolf:
My BPQ node (YU7BPQ) communicated well with my home test node
(YT7MPB-1)
when I ran .065 version. When I upgraded to the .71 version, I noticed
this strange behavior:
16:51:52T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX
Paclen=256 RX
Window=7
16:51:57T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX
Paclen=256 RX
Window=7
16:52:59T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX
Paclen=256 RX
Window=7
16:53:05T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX
Paclen=256 RX
Window=7
The above I see in the QtTerm window, every 5 second another line
comes.
The Direwolf itself was not changed. But it started showing this:
[0L] YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1:(XID cmd, p=1)XID error: Expected Balanced ABM
to be
set.
XID error: Expected one of Half or Full Duplex be set.
XID error: Expected Extended Address to be set.
? REJ modulo-8 I-Field-Length-Rx=256 Window-Size-Rx=7
[0L] YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1:(XID cmd, p=1)XID error: Expected Balanced ABM
to be
set.
XID error: Expected one of Half or Full Duplex be set.
XID error: Expected Extended Address to be set.
? REJ modulo-8 I-Field-Length-Rx=256 Window-Size-Rx=7
... etc etc ...
My VHF port config is here:
PORT
??? PORTNUM=3???????????????? ; Port number
??? ID=1200 Baud 144.875 MHz? ; PORTS command text
??? ;ID=1200 Baud 144.800 MHz? ; PORTS command text
??? TYPE=ASYNC??????????????? ; RS232 connection
??? IPADDR=127.0.0.1????????? ; DIREWOLF
??? TCPPORT=8001????????????? ; DIREWOLF
??? SPEED=19200
??? CHANNEL=A???????????????? ; TNC channel
??? MAXFRAME=1??????????????? ; Max outstanding frames?????????? by
VE1AMA
(SK)??? Network105 founder
??? ;MAXFRAME=3??????????????? ; Max outstanding frames
??? ;FRACK=5000??????????????? ; Level 2 timeout (ms)
??? FRACK=6000??????????????? ; Level 2 timeout (ms)???????????? by
VE1AMA
(SK)??? test Dec 30, 2021
??? ;RESPTIME=500?????????????? ; Level 2 delayed ACK (ms)
??? RESPTIME=2000?????????????? ; Level 2 delayed ACK (ms) test Dec
19, 2020
??? RETRIES=10??????????????? ; Level 2 max retries
??? ;PACLEN=236??????????????? ; Max packet length (bytes)
??? PACLEN=128??????????????? ; Max packet length (bytes)?????? by
VE1AMA
(SK)??? Network105 founder
??? ;PACLEN=40??????????????? ; Max packet length (bytes) by
UZ1HO??? "for
FX25 in EU"
??? ;TXDELAY=480?????????????? ; Transmit keyup delay (ms)
??? TXDELAY=400?????????????? ; Transmit keyup delay (ms)
??? ;TXDELAY=100?????????????? ; Transmit keyup delay (ms)
??? SLOTTIME=100????????????? ; CMSA interval timer (ms)
??? TXTAIL=30
??? PERSIST=64???? ; Persistence (256/(# transmissions-1)
??? DIGIFLAG=0?????? ; Allow Digipeat on this port
??? QUALITY=255????? ; salje nodes listu
??? ;QUALITY=0????? ; nesalje nodes listu
??? ;WL2KREPORT PUBLIC, www.winlink.org, 8778, CR6MPB, IN51GD, 00-23,
144875000, PKT1200, 10, 20, 5, 0
??? WL2KREPORT PUBLIC, www.winlink.org, 8778, YT7MPB-10, JN95WG,
00-23,
144875000, PKT1200, 10, 20, 5, 0
??? ;WL2KREPORT PUBLIC, www.winlink.org, 8778, II1CIT, JN44LJ, 00-23,
144800000, PKT1200, 10, 20, 5, 0
ENDPORT
Any solution?
Misko YT7MPB
|
Re: 16:58:37T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX Paclen=256 RX Window=7
If the other end is running a reasonably up to date version of linbpq it should always respond to XID with something.
Do you have a packet trace showing the XID arriving?
Thanks,
John
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 29/05/2025 10:25, Misko YT7MPB via groups.io wrote: At this stage, I did not see that the other end (YT7MPB-1) replies with anything. Btw, the other end does not run Direwolf. There is a TNC2 in KISS mode. (It also ran an older version of linbpq, and I just upgraded it to .71 as well but to no avail.)
At the moment I am unsure about the actual version of Direwolf the club station runs. (It shall be 1.7 or so as I recall.)
And yes, the frame is actually being transmitted to the air every few seconds, while the other end (YT7MPB-1) does not reply to it. Seems as if the other end is incapable to react i.e. does not understand what to do. I mean no response from the other end.
Misko YT7MPB
On 5/29/2025 8:16 AM, John G8BPQ via groups.io wrote:
BPQ now tries to use ax.25 v2.2 for Node to Node links, so it sends an
XID to negotiate that. I expect the other end to either reply with an
XID response either accepting or rejecting the settings I offer, or
reject with either FRMR or DM.
If you were running Direwolf in AGW mode I could understand it
processing the XID but as it is in KISS mode it should just pass it
through. Is the frame actually being sent? If so it could be that
Direwolf is simply reporting what it sees as errors in the XID as it
monitors it. I believe the Direwolf implementation of 2.2 is flawed as
it expects extended addressing to be offered.
73, John
On 28/05/2025 18:09, Misko YT7MPB via groups.io wrote:
John,
Seems that my HF ports are pretty well for now. But there is a new issue
that I got with my VHF port running Direwolf:
My BPQ node (YU7BPQ) communicated well with my home test node (YT7MPB-1)
when I ran .065 version. When I upgraded to the .71 version, I noticed
this strange behavior:
16:51:52T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX Paclen=256 RX
Window=7
16:51:57T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX Paclen=256 RX
Window=7
16:52:59T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX Paclen=256 RX
Window=7
16:53:05T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX Paclen=256 RX
Window=7
The above I see in the QtTerm window, every 5 second another line comes.
The Direwolf itself was not changed. But it started showing this:
[0L] YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1:(XID cmd, p=1)XID error: Expected Balanced ABM to be
set.
XID error: Expected one of Half or Full Duplex be set.
XID error: Expected Extended Address to be set.
? REJ modulo-8 I-Field-Length-Rx=256 Window-Size-Rx=7
[0L] YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1:(XID cmd, p=1)XID error: Expected Balanced ABM to be
set.
XID error: Expected one of Half or Full Duplex be set.
XID error: Expected Extended Address to be set.
? REJ modulo-8 I-Field-Length-Rx=256 Window-Size-Rx=7
... etc etc ...
My VHF port config is here:
PORT
??? PORTNUM=3???????????????? ; Port number
??? ID=1200 Baud 144.875 MHz? ; PORTS command text
??? ;ID=1200 Baud 144.800 MHz? ; PORTS command text
??? TYPE=ASYNC??????????????? ; RS232 connection
??? IPADDR=127.0.0.1????????? ; DIREWOLF
??? TCPPORT=8001????????????? ; DIREWOLF
??? SPEED=19200
??? CHANNEL=A???????????????? ; TNC channel
??? MAXFRAME=1??????????????? ; Max outstanding frames?????????? by
VE1AMA
(SK)??? Network105 founder
??? ;MAXFRAME=3??????????????? ; Max outstanding frames
??? ;FRACK=5000??????????????? ; Level 2 timeout (ms)
??? FRACK=6000??????????????? ; Level 2 timeout (ms)???????????? by
VE1AMA
(SK)??? test Dec 30, 2021
??? ;RESPTIME=500?????????????? ; Level 2 delayed ACK (ms)
??? RESPTIME=2000?????????????? ; Level 2 delayed ACK (ms) test Dec
19, 2020
??? RETRIES=10??????????????? ; Level 2 max retries
??? ;PACLEN=236??????????????? ; Max packet length (bytes)
??? PACLEN=128??????????????? ; Max packet length (bytes)?????? by VE1AMA
(SK)??? Network105 founder
??? ;PACLEN=40??????????????? ; Max packet length (bytes) by
UZ1HO??? "for
FX25 in EU"
??? ;TXDELAY=480?????????????? ; Transmit keyup delay (ms)
??? TXDELAY=400?????????????? ; Transmit keyup delay (ms)
??? ;TXDELAY=100?????????????? ; Transmit keyup delay (ms)
??? SLOTTIME=100????????????? ; CMSA interval timer (ms)
??? TXTAIL=30
??? PERSIST=64???? ; Persistence (256/(# transmissions-1)
??? DIGIFLAG=0?????? ; Allow Digipeat on this port
??? QUALITY=255????? ; salje nodes listu
??? ;QUALITY=0????? ; nesalje nodes listu
??? ;WL2KREPORT PUBLIC, www.winlink.org, 8778, CR6MPB, IN51GD, 00-23,
144875000, PKT1200, 10, 20, 5, 0
??? WL2KREPORT PUBLIC, www.winlink.org, 8778, YT7MPB-10, JN95WG, 00-23,
144875000, PKT1200, 10, 20, 5, 0
??? ;WL2KREPORT PUBLIC, www.winlink.org, 8778, II1CIT, JN44LJ, 00-23,
144800000, PKT1200, 10, 20, 5, 0
ENDPORT
Any solution?
Misko YT7MPB
|
Very good, John Thank you and have a blessed day
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 02:15, John G8BPQ via groups.io < john.wiseman@...> wrote: I would put IN in TraceCalls. Then in the digipeated packet IN2 will be replaced by your call so people can see which stations the packet passed through .
73, John
On 29/05/2025 03:43, Don via groups.io wrote:
In my area IN1-1 and 2-1 are used. Is the below a correct implementation of this?
?
?TraceCalls=WIDE,TRACE ?
?FloodCalls=IN ? ? ? ??
?DigiCalls=W9JUN-10 ? ??
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
?;ReplaceDigiCalls ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
?MaxTraceHops=2 ? ? ? ??
?MaxFloodHops=2
?
Couple examples:
?
Digipeater IN2 audio level = 52(12/10) ? ?__|||____ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
[0.3] N9LYA-3>APBPQ1,N9LQP-2,
IN2*:@290240z3844.42N/08628.33W_235/000g000t066r000P004p000h99b10190/MITWXN Mitchell IN N9LYA-3 KINMITCH1 Weather Station (linBPQ) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
Weather Report, WEATHER Station (blue), John G8BPQ Digipeater/IGate ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
N 38 44.4200, W 086 28.3300 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
wind 0.0 mph, direction 235, gust 0, temperature 66, rain 0.00 in last hour, rain 0.04 since midnight, rain 0.00 in last 24 hours, humidity 99, barometer 30.09, "/MITWXN Mitchell IN N9LYA-3 KINMITCH1 Weather Station (linBPQ)" ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Digipeater IN2 audio level = 54(12/10) ? ?____|____ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
[0.4] WB9TLH-11>APMI06,N9LQP-2,
IN2*:@290242z3904.07N/08637.65W_109/000g000t061r000p026P026h54b10174Kirksville ?IN WX Digi Gate ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
|
Re: 16:58:37T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX Paclen=256 RX Window=7
At this stage, I did not see that the other end (YT7MPB-1) replies with anything. Btw, the other end does not run Direwolf. There is a TNC2 in KISS mode. (It also ran an older version of linbpq, and I just upgraded it to .71 as well but to no avail.)
At the moment I am unsure about the actual version of Direwolf the club station runs. (It shall be 1.7 or so as I recall.)
And yes, the frame is actually being transmitted to the air every few seconds, while the other end (YT7MPB-1) does not reply to it. Seems as if the other end is incapable to react i.e. does not understand what to do. I mean no response from the other end.
Misko YT7MPB
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 5/29/2025 8:16 AM, John G8BPQ via groups.io wrote: BPQ now tries to use ax.25 v2.2 for Node to Node links, so it sends an
XID to negotiate that. I expect the other end to either reply with an
XID response either accepting or rejecting the settings I offer, or
reject with either FRMR or DM.
If you were running Direwolf in AGW mode I could understand it
processing the XID but as it is in KISS mode it should just pass it
through. Is the frame actually being sent? If so it could be that
Direwolf is simply reporting what it sees as errors in the XID as it
monitors it. I believe the Direwolf implementation of 2.2 is flawed as
it expects extended addressing to be offered.
73, John
On 28/05/2025 18:09, Misko YT7MPB via groups.io wrote:
John,
Seems that my HF ports are pretty well for now. But there is a new issue
that I got with my VHF port running Direwolf:
My BPQ node (YU7BPQ) communicated well with my home test node (YT7MPB-1)
when I ran .065 version. When I upgraded to the .71 version, I noticed
this strange behavior:
16:51:52T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX Paclen=256 RX
Window=7
16:51:57T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX Paclen=256 RX
Window=7
16:52:59T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX Paclen=256 RX
Window=7
16:53:05T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX Paclen=256 RX
Window=7
The above I see in the QtTerm window, every 5 second another line comes.
The Direwolf itself was not changed. But it started showing this:
[0L] YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1:(XID cmd, p=1)XID error: Expected Balanced ABM to be
set.
XID error: Expected one of Half or Full Duplex be set.
XID error: Expected Extended Address to be set.
REJ modulo-8 I-Field-Length-Rx=256 Window-Size-Rx=7
[0L] YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1:(XID cmd, p=1)XID error: Expected Balanced ABM to be
set.
XID error: Expected one of Half or Full Duplex be set.
XID error: Expected Extended Address to be set.
REJ modulo-8 I-Field-Length-Rx=256 Window-Size-Rx=7
... etc etc ...
My VHF port config is here:
PORT
PORTNUM=3 ; Port number
ID=1200 Baud 144.875 MHz ; PORTS command text
;ID=1200 Baud 144.800 MHz ; PORTS command text
TYPE=ASYNC ; RS232 connection
IPADDR=127.0.0.1 ; DIREWOLF
TCPPORT=8001 ; DIREWOLF
SPEED=19200
CHANNEL=A ; TNC channel
MAXFRAME=1 ; Max outstanding frames by
VE1AMA
(SK) Network105 founder
;MAXFRAME=3 ; Max outstanding frames
;FRACK=5000 ; Level 2 timeout (ms)
FRACK=6000 ; Level 2 timeout (ms) by
VE1AMA
(SK) test Dec 30, 2021
;RESPTIME=500 ; Level 2 delayed ACK (ms)
RESPTIME=2000 ; Level 2 delayed ACK (ms) test Dec
19, 2020
RETRIES=10 ; Level 2 max retries
;PACLEN=236 ; Max packet length (bytes)
PACLEN=128 ; Max packet length (bytes) by VE1AMA
(SK) Network105 founder
;PACLEN=40 ; Max packet length (bytes) by
UZ1HO "for
FX25 in EU"
;TXDELAY=480 ; Transmit keyup delay (ms)
TXDELAY=400 ; Transmit keyup delay (ms)
;TXDELAY=100 ; Transmit keyup delay (ms)
SLOTTIME=100 ; CMSA interval timer (ms)
TXTAIL=30
PERSIST=64 ; Persistence (256/(# transmissions-1)
DIGIFLAG=0 ; Allow Digipeat on this port
QUALITY=255 ; salje nodes listu
;QUALITY=0 ; nesalje nodes listu
;WL2KREPORT PUBLIC, www.winlink.org, 8778, CR6MPB, IN51GD, 00-23,
144875000, PKT1200, 10, 20, 5, 0
WL2KREPORT PUBLIC, www.winlink.org, 8778, YT7MPB-10, JN95WG, 00-23,
144875000, PKT1200, 10, 20, 5, 0
;WL2KREPORT PUBLIC, www.winlink.org, 8778, II1CIT, JN44LJ, 00-23,
144800000, PKT1200, 10, 20, 5, 0
ENDPORT
Any solution?
Misko YT7MPB
|
Re: 16:58:37T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX Paclen=256 RX Window=7
BPQ now tries to use ax.25 v2.2 for Node to Node links, so it sends an XID to negotiate that. I expect the other end to either reply with an XID response either accepting or rejecting the settings I offer, or reject with either FRMR or DM.
If you were running Direwolf in AGW mode I could understand it processing the XID but as it is in KISS mode it should just pass it through. Is the frame actually being sent? If so it could be that Direwolf is simply reporting what it sees as errors in the XID as it monitors it. I believe the Direwolf implementation of 2.2 is flawed as it expects extended addressing to be offered.
73, John
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 28/05/2025 18:09, Misko YT7MPB via groups.io wrote: John,
Seems that my HF ports are pretty well for now. But there is a new issue
that I got with my VHF port running Direwolf:
My BPQ node (YU7BPQ) communicated well with my home test node (YT7MPB-1)
when I ran .065 version. When I upgraded to the .71 version, I noticed
this strange behavior:
16:51:52T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX Paclen=256 RX
Window=7
16:51:57T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX Paclen=256 RX
Window=7
16:52:59T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX Paclen=256 RX
Window=7
16:53:05T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX Paclen=256 RX
Window=7
The above I see in the QtTerm window, every 5 second another line comes.
The Direwolf itself was not changed. But it started showing this:
[0L] YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1:(XID cmd, p=1)XID error: Expected Balanced ABM to be
set.
XID error: Expected one of Half or Full Duplex be set.
XID error: Expected Extended Address to be set.
REJ modulo-8 I-Field-Length-Rx=256 Window-Size-Rx=7
[0L] YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1:(XID cmd, p=1)XID error: Expected Balanced ABM to be
set.
XID error: Expected one of Half or Full Duplex be set.
XID error: Expected Extended Address to be set.
REJ modulo-8 I-Field-Length-Rx=256 Window-Size-Rx=7
... etc etc ...
My VHF port config is here:
PORT
PORTNUM=3 ; Port number
ID=1200 Baud 144.875 MHz ; PORTS command text
;ID=1200 Baud 144.800 MHz ; PORTS command text
TYPE=ASYNC ; RS232 connection
IPADDR=127.0.0.1 ; DIREWOLF
TCPPORT=8001 ; DIREWOLF
SPEED=19200
CHANNEL=A ; TNC channel
MAXFRAME=1 ; Max outstanding frames by VE1AMA
(SK) Network105 founder
;MAXFRAME=3 ; Max outstanding frames
;FRACK=5000 ; Level 2 timeout (ms)
FRACK=6000 ; Level 2 timeout (ms) by VE1AMA
(SK) test Dec 30, 2021
;RESPTIME=500 ; Level 2 delayed ACK (ms)
RESPTIME=2000 ; Level 2 delayed ACK (ms) test Dec 19, 2020
RETRIES=10 ; Level 2 max retries
;PACLEN=236 ; Max packet length (bytes)
PACLEN=128 ; Max packet length (bytes) by VE1AMA
(SK) Network105 founder
;PACLEN=40 ; Max packet length (bytes) by UZ1HO "for
FX25 in EU"
;TXDELAY=480 ; Transmit keyup delay (ms)
TXDELAY=400 ; Transmit keyup delay (ms)
;TXDELAY=100 ; Transmit keyup delay (ms)
SLOTTIME=100 ; CMSA interval timer (ms)
TXTAIL=30
PERSIST=64 ; Persistence (256/(# transmissions-1)
DIGIFLAG=0 ; Allow Digipeat on this port
QUALITY=255 ; salje nodes listu
;QUALITY=0 ; nesalje nodes listu
;WL2KREPORT PUBLIC, www.winlink.org, 8778, CR6MPB, IN51GD, 00-23,
144875000, PKT1200, 10, 20, 5, 0
WL2KREPORT PUBLIC, www.winlink.org, 8778, YT7MPB-10, JN95WG, 00-23,
144875000, PKT1200, 10, 20, 5, 0
;WL2KREPORT PUBLIC, www.winlink.org, 8778, II1CIT, JN44LJ, 00-23,
144800000, PKT1200, 10, 20, 5, 0
ENDPORT
Any solution?
Misko YT7MPB
|
I would put IN in TraceCalls. Then in the digipeated packet IN2 will
be replaced by your call so people can see which stations the packet
passed through .
73, John
On 29/05/2025 03:43, Don via groups.io
wrote:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
In my area IN1-1 and 2-1 are used. Is the below a correct
implementation of this?
?
?TraceCalls=WIDE,TRACE ?
?FloodCalls=IN ? ? ? ??
?DigiCalls=W9JUN-10 ? ??
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
?;ReplaceDigiCalls ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
?MaxTraceHops=2 ? ? ? ??
?MaxFloodHops=2
?
Couple examples:
?
Digipeater IN2 audio level = 52(12/10) ? ?__|||____ ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
[0.3]
N9LYA-3>APBPQ1,N9LQP-2, IN2*:@290240z3844.42N/08628.33W_235/000g000t066r000P004p000h99b10190/MITWXN
Mitchell IN N9LYA-3 KINMITCH1 Weather Station (linBPQ) ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ??
Weather Report, WEATHER Station (blue), John G8BPQ
Digipeater/IGate ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ?
N 38 44.4200, W 086 28.3300 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
wind 0.0 mph, direction 235, gust 0, temperature 66, rain 0.00
in last hour, rain 0.04 since midnight, rain 0.00 in last 24
hours, humidity 99, barometer 30.09, "/MITWXN Mitchell IN
N9LYA-3 KINMITCH1 Weather Station (linBPQ)" ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Digipeater IN2 audio level = 54(12/10) ? ?____|____ ? ? ? ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
[0.4]
WB9TLH-11>APMI06,N9LQP-2, IN2*:@290242z3904.07N/08637.65W_109/000g000t061r000p026P026h54b10174Kirksville
?IN WX Digi Gate ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
|
In my area IN1-1 and 2-1 are used. Is the below a correct implementation of this?
?
?TraceCalls=WIDE,TRACE ?
?FloodCalls=IN ? ? ? ??
?DigiCalls=W9JUN-10 ? ??
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
?;ReplaceDigiCalls ? ? ?
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
?MaxTraceHops=2 ? ? ? ??
?MaxFloodHops=2
?
Couple examples:
?
Digipeater IN2 audio level = 52(12/10) ? ?__|||____ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
[0.3] N9LYA-3>APBPQ1,N9LQP-2,IN2*:@290240z3844.42N/08628.33W_235/000g000t066r000P004p000h99b10190/MITWXN Mitchell IN N9LYA-3 KINMITCH1 Weather Station (linBPQ) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
Weather Report, WEATHER Station (blue), John G8BPQ Digipeater/IGate ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
N 38 44.4200, W 086 28.3300 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
wind 0.0 mph, direction 235, gust 0, temperature 66, rain 0.00 in last hour, rain 0.04 since midnight, rain 0.00 in last 24 hours, humidity 99, barometer 30.09, "/MITWXN Mitchell IN N9LYA-3 KINMITCH1 Weather Station (linBPQ)" ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Digipeater IN2 audio level = 54(12/10) ? ?____|____ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
[0.4] WB9TLH-11>APMI06,N9LQP-2,IN2*:@290242z3904.07N/08637.65W_109/000g000t061r000p026P026h54b10174Kirksville ?IN WX Digi Gate ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ??
|
Re: How to find HA forwarding peer
Hi Mark, I will 100% take you up on that offer. I am still very new to BPQ and specially HA routing.? I'll shoot you an email at the address on your site and we can zoom meeting or google meet and get me up to speed
?
73
Ken
AC0TG
|
Good evening
?
This is what I'm after: MAP call address UDP 10093 B
|
16:58:37T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX Paclen=256 RX Window=7
John,
Seems that my HF ports are pretty well for now. But there is a new issue
that I got with my VHF port running Direwolf:
My BPQ node (YU7BPQ) communicated well with my home test node (YT7MPB-1)
when I ran .065 version. When I upgraded to the .71 version, I noticed
this strange behavior:
16:51:52T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX Paclen=256 RX
Window=7
16:51:57T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX Paclen=256 RX
Window=7
16:52:59T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX Paclen=256 RX
Window=7
16:53:05T YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1 Port=3 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX Paclen=256 RX
Window=7
The above I see in the QtTerm window, every 5 second another line comes.
The Direwolf itself was not changed. But it started showing this:
[0L] YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1:(XID cmd, p=1)XID error: Expected Balanced ABM to be
set.
XID error: Expected one of Half or Full Duplex be set.
XID error: Expected Extended Address to be set.
REJ modulo-8 I-Field-Length-Rx=256 Window-Size-Rx=7
[0L] YU7BPQ>YT7MPB-1:(XID cmd, p=1)XID error: Expected Balanced ABM to be
set.
XID error: Expected one of Half or Full Duplex be set.
XID error: Expected Extended Address to be set.
REJ modulo-8 I-Field-Length-Rx=256 Window-Size-Rx=7
... etc etc ...
My VHF port config is here:
PORT
PORTNUM=3 ; Port number
ID=1200 Baud 144.875 MHz ; PORTS command text
;ID=1200 Baud 144.800 MHz ; PORTS command text
TYPE=ASYNC ; RS232 connection
IPADDR=127.0.0.1 ; DIREWOLF
TCPPORT=8001 ; DIREWOLF
SPEED=19200
CHANNEL=A ; TNC channel
MAXFRAME=1 ; Max outstanding frames by VE1AMA
(SK) Network105 founder
;MAXFRAME=3 ; Max outstanding frames
;FRACK=5000 ; Level 2 timeout (ms)
FRACK=6000 ; Level 2 timeout (ms) by VE1AMA
(SK) test Dec 30, 2021
;RESPTIME=500 ; Level 2 delayed ACK (ms)
RESPTIME=2000 ; Level 2 delayed ACK (ms) test Dec 19, 2020
RETRIES=10 ; Level 2 max retries
;PACLEN=236 ; Max packet length (bytes)
PACLEN=128 ; Max packet length (bytes) by VE1AMA
(SK) Network105 founder
;PACLEN=40 ; Max packet length (bytes) by UZ1HO "for
FX25 in EU"
;TXDELAY=480 ; Transmit keyup delay (ms)
TXDELAY=400 ; Transmit keyup delay (ms)
;TXDELAY=100 ; Transmit keyup delay (ms)
SLOTTIME=100 ; CMSA interval timer (ms)
TXTAIL=30
PERSIST=64 ; Persistence (256/(# transmissions-1)
DIGIFLAG=0 ; Allow Digipeat on this port
QUALITY=255 ; salje nodes listu
;QUALITY=0 ; nesalje nodes listu
;WL2KREPORT PUBLIC, www.winlink.org, 8778, CR6MPB, IN51GD, 00-23,
144875000, PKT1200, 10, 20, 5, 0
WL2KREPORT PUBLIC, www.winlink.org, 8778, YT7MPB-10, JN95WG, 00-23,
144875000, PKT1200, 10, 20, 5, 0
;WL2KREPORT PUBLIC, www.winlink.org, 8778, II1CIT, JN44LJ, 00-23,
144800000, PKT1200, 10, 20, 5, 0
ENDPORT
Any solution?
Misko YT7MPB
|
On 5/28/25 09:55, Charles Hargrove via
groups.io wrote:
The
IN in this line should be ON.
On 5/28/2025 8:44 AM, Chuck Gelm wrote:
VE3MIS??VE3MIS.#SCON.IN.CAN.NOAM?Daniel??Mississauga,?ON
I deleted this record.
Thanks.
?
|
Re: Bad config record RADIO=1
John, Thank you! As soon as I made the config the way you suggested, the error msg from the Subject disappeared. The boot process shows now: Initialising Port 01 Telnet Server Initialising Port 02 SCS Pactor /dev/ttyUSB1 Initialising Port 03 TCPKISS IP 127.0.0.1 Port 8001 Chan A Initialising Port 04 UZ7HO Host 127.0.0.1 Port 8000 Chan A Initialising Port 05 UZ7HO Host 127.0.0.1 Port 8000 Chan B Initialising Port 06 KAM Pactor /dev/ttyUSB3 Interestingly, I did not have that error msg with older versions. It makes me wonder why it appeared with the .71 version. Anyway, it seems ok now. PS: At this stage I did not change syntax of RADIO=1 lines that other folks suggested because it works for me as is. Shall I do that? Misko YT7MPB On 5/27/25 22:45, John G8BPQ via groups.io wrote: Misco,
The first line of the CONFIG section has to be the ADDR line.
73,
John
On 27/05/2025 17:42, Misko YT7MPB via groups.io wrote:
Here they are:
PORT
PORTNUM=4 ; Port number
ID=300 Baud HF packet ; PORTS command text
TYPE=ASYNC ; RS232 connection
DRIVER=UZ7HO
CHANNEL=A ; TNC channel
;PORTCALL=CR6MPB
PORTCALL=YU7BPQ
;PORTCALL=3B8YT
;PORTCALL=II1CIT
;PORTCALL=J41MPB
INTERLOCK=1 ; Optional - set if you have two ports sharing the same radio.
; Set the same Interlock value on both ports.
;IPADDR=127.0.0.1 ; DIREWOLF
;TCPPORT=8002 ; DIREWOLF
CONFIG
RADIO=1
ADDR 127.0.0.1 8000
MAXSESSIONS=5
UPDATEMAP
BEACONAFTERSESSION
SPEED=19200
MAXFRAME=1 ; Max outstanding frames by
UT1HZM 2 (105NETWORK says 1)
;FRACK=12000 ; Level 2 timeout (ms) by
UT1HZM 12-15second (or 12000-15000 if not in seconds) 5000 by 105NET
FRACK=5000 ; From his manual by VE1AMA
(SK) test Dec 30, 2021
DWAIT=0 ; From his manual by VE1AMA
(SK) Network105 founder
RESPTIME=2000 ; Level 2 delayed ACK (ms) by
UT1HZM 2000 (2sec)
RETRIES=10 ; Level 2 max retries by UT1HZM
12 or 15 (?) ; PACLEN=236 ; Max packet length (bytes)
; PACLEN=64 ; Max packet length (bytes) by
UT1HZM 64 or 80 PACLEN=100 ; Max packet length (bytes) by
UT1HZM "for better FEC"
; PACLEN=100 ; Max packet length (bytes) by
UZ7HO "for FX25 in EU"
; PACLEN=60 ; Max packet length (bytes) by VE1AMA
(SK) test 30, 2021
; TXDELAY=480 ; Transmit keyup delay (ms)
TXDELAY=300 ; Transmit keyup delay (ms) by
UT1HZM 250-350msec
SLOTTIME=100 ; CMSA interval timer (ms) by UT1HZM
100 TXTAIL=30 ; by UT1HZM 30 or 50
PERSIST=90 ; Persistence (256/(# transmissions-1) by
UT1HZM 90 DIGIFLAG=0 ; Allow Digipeat on this port
; PORTCALL=YT7MPB-9
QUALITY=255 ; salje nodes listu
;QUALITY=0 ; nesalje nodes listu
ENDPORT
PORT
PORTNUM=5 ; Port number
ID=300 Baud HF packet ; PORTS command text
TYPE=ASYNC ; RS232 connection
DRIVER=UZ7HO
CHANNEL=B ; TNC channel
;PORTCALL=CR6MPB
PORTCALL=YU7BPQ
;PORTCALL=3B8YT
;PORTCALL=II1CIT
;PORTCALL=J41MPB
INTERLOCK=1 ; Optional - set if you have two ports sharing
the same radio.
; Set the same Interlock value on both ports.
;IPADDR=127.0.0.1 ; DIREWOLF
;TCPPORT=8002 ; DIREWOLF
CONFIG
RADIO=1
ADDR 127.0.0.1 8000
MAXSESSIONS=5
UPDATEMAP
BEACONAFTERSESSION
SPEED=19200
MAXFRAME=1 ; Max outstanding frames by
UT1HZM 2 (105NETWORK says 1)
;FRACK=12000 ; Level 2 timeout (ms) by
UT1HZM 12-15second (or 12000-15000 if not in seconds) 5000 by 105NET
FRACK=5000 ; From his manual by VE1AMA
(SK) test Dec 30, 2021
DWAIT=0 ; From his manual by VE1AMA
(SK) Network105 founder
RESPTIME=2000 ; Level 2 delayed ACK (ms) by
UT1HZM 2000 (2sec)
RETRIES=10 ; Level 2 max retries by UT1HZM
12 or 15 (?) ; PACLEN=236 ; Max packet length (bytes)
; PACLEN=64 ; Max packet length (bytes) by
UT1HZM 64 or 80 ; PACLEN=100 ; Max packet length (bytes) by
UT1HZM "for better FEC"
PACLEN=100 ; Max packet length (bytes) by UZ7HO
"for FX25 in EU"
; PACLEN=60 ; Max packet length (bytes) by VE1AMA
(SK) test 30, 2021
; TXDELAY=480 ; Transmit keyup delay (ms)
TXDELAY=300 ; Transmit keyup delay (ms) by
UT1HZM 250-350msec
SLOTTIME=100 ; CMSA interval timer (ms) by UT1HZM
100 TXTAIL=30 ; by UT1HZM 30 or 50
PERSIST=90 ; Persistence (256/(# transmissions-1) by
UT1HZM 90 DIGIFLAG=0 ; Allow Digipeat on this port
; PORTCALL=YT7MPB-9
QUALITY=255 ; salje nodes listu
;QUALITY=0 ; nesalje nodes listu
ENDPORT
Can you post the port definitions for port 4 and 5?
Thanks,
John
On 27/05/2025 15:26, Misko YT7MPB via groups.io wrote:
John,
I just upgraded linbpq from version 6.0.24.65 to version 6.0.24.71 and
noticed an error (see the Subject):
Initialising Port 01 Telnet Server
Initialising Port 02 SCS Pactor /dev/ttyUSB1
Initialising Port 03 TCPKISS IP 127.0.0.1 Port 8001 Chan A
Initialising Port 04
Bad config record RADIO=1
UZ7HO Host 127.0.0.1 Port 8000 Chan A
Initialising Port 05
Bad config record RADIO=1
UZ7HO Host 127.0.0.1 Port 8000 Chan B
Initialising Port 06 KAM Pactor /dev/ttyUSB3
That did not appear in version 6.0.24.65:
Initialising Port 01 Telnet Server
Initialising Port 02 SCS Pactor /dev/ttyUSB1
Initialising Port 03 TCPKISS IP 127.0.0.1 Port 8001 Chan A
Initialising Port 04
UZ7HO Host 127.0.0.1 Port 8000 Chan A
Initialising Port 05
UZ7HO Host 127.0.0.1 Port 8000 Chan B
Initialising Port 06 KAM Pactor /dev/ttyUSB3
Misko YT7MPB
|
The IN in this line should be ON.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 5/28/2025 8:44 AM, Chuck Gelm wrote: VE3MIS??VE3MIS.#SCON.IN.CAN.NOAM?Daniel??Mississauga,?ON
--
Charles J. Hargrove - N2NOV
NYC-ARECS/RACES Citywide Radio Officer/Skywarn Coord.
NYC-ARECS/RACES Nets 441.100/136.5 PL
ARnewsline Broadcast Mon. @ 8:00PM
NYC-ARECS Weekly Net Mon. @ 8:30PM
NY-NBEMS Net Saturdays @ 10AM & USeast-NBEMS Net Wednesdays @ 7PM
on 7.036 Mhz USB (alt 3.536)/1500 hz waterfall spot; MFSK-16 or 32
"Information is the oxygen of the modern age. It seeps through the walls topped
by barbed wire, it wafts across the electrified borders." - Ronald Reagan
"The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates." - Tacitus
"Molann an obair an fear" - Irish Saying
(The work praises the man.)
"No matter how big and powerful government gets, and the many services it
provides, it can never take the place of volunteers." - Ronald Reagan
|
IN.USA.NOAM On 5/28/25 07:07, Don via groups.io wrote: Good day
Looking for an IN station to exchange udp mapping.
DonP Edited: NC8Q?de?NC8Q> ih in KA9LCF??KA9LCF.#NEIN.IN.USA.NOAM?BRADD?46818?FORT?WAYNE,?IN W9ECG??W9ECG.#NEIN.IN.USA.NOAM?Steuben?46703?CountUE?Angola,?IN KC9VYU??KC9VYU.#NEIN.IN.USA.NOAM?Joe?46725?Columbia?City N9LYA??N9LYA.#SIN.IN.USA.NOAM?Jerry?47446?Mitchell,?IN W9JUN??W9JUN.BPQ.#SEIN.IN.USA.NA?Don?47231?North?Vernon,?IN KC9VFR??KC9VFR.#NWIN.IN.USA.NOAM N9PXO??N9PXO.#NEIN.IN.USA.NOAM?JAMES?46761?LaGrange,?Indiana VE3MIS??VE3MIS.#SCON.IN.CAN.NOAM?Daniel??Mississauga,?ON KC9DDP??KC9DDP.#SIN.IN.USA.NOAM???Mitchell K9UY??K9UY.#SIN.IN.USA.NOAM?Hoosier?47446?Mitchell,?IN W9LCF??W9LCF.#NEIN.IN.USA.NOAM?Bradd?46845?288307 WW6Q??WW6Q.#NEIN.IN.USA.NOAM?Roy?46779?Pleasant?Lake,?IN K9BIF??K9BIF.#NEIN.IN.USA.NOAM?CHARLIE?46527?GOSHEN,?IN NC8Q?de?NC8Q> KA9LCF, N9LYA, W9LCF, and WW6Q have posted in this email list before.
|
Re: Bad config record RADIO=1
Remove the ¡°=¡° sign
ie
radio = 1 change to
radio 1
?
and as been pointed out, place the radio 1 line after the address line.
?
73
?
|
Well if you just want to play around i am trying to get a udp to work too¡.. but no partners.
You can try ve3pkg.dyndns.org on port 10093
I think i still have something wrong in my setup as i do not see my system listening on 10093 when i do a netstat.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On May 28, 2025, at 8:19?AM, Don via groups.io <donpjr@...> wrote:
? Yeah, I was just saying that I¡¯m in Indiana
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 08:18, Bob-va3rjs via groups.io < va3rjs@...> wrote: Yes after i emailed i realized what the IN was ? what can i say Canadian ham with a Canadian mind?
Bob
> On May 28, 2025, at 7:51?AM, Chuck Gelm <nc8q-aredn@...> wrote:
>
> ?On 5/28/25 07:26, Bob-va3rjs via groups.io wrote:
>> Wow i don¡¯t even know what that is¡..??
>
> Hi, Bob:
>
> I think DonP is seeking a link with a
> IN.USA.NOAM BBS.
>
> 73, Chuck
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Bob
va3rjs
|
Yeah, I was just saying that I¡¯m in Indiana
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 08:18, Bob-va3rjs via groups.io < va3rjs@...> wrote: Yes after i emailed i realized what the IN was ? what can i say Canadian ham with a Canadian mind?
Bob
> On May 28, 2025, at 7:51?AM, Chuck Gelm <nc8q-aredn@...> wrote:
>
> ?On 5/28/25 07:26, Bob-va3rjs via groups.io wrote:
>> Wow i don¡¯t even know what that is¡..??
>
> Hi, Bob:
>
> I think DonP is seeking a link with a
> IN.USA.NOAM BBS.
>
> 73, Chuck
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Bob
va3rjs
|
Hey, that¡¯s not a problem. We all have a learning curve and get involved with what we like.
I¡¯m looking for someone to share udp 10092 info.
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 08:16, Bob-va3rjs via groups.io < va3rjs@...> wrote: Oh ok sorry i have not played around with APRS on BPQ¡..
Bob
On May 28, 2025, at 7:50?AM, Don via groups.io <donpjr@...> wrote:
?
I have aprs working pretty well, so far.
It may be the evening before I can share any info, currently at work keeping ¡°the man¡± happy.
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 07:27, Bob-va3rjs via groups.io <
va3rjs@...> wrote:
Wow i don¡¯t even know what that is¡..??
I have a test node running here at my qth, been trying to get ?axudp working, have 2 rf links that i run every now and then.
I am game to try¡.. just let me know what you need!
Bob
On May 28, 2025, at 7:07?AM, Don via groups.io <donpjr@...> wrote:
?
Good day
?
Looking for an IN station to exchange udp mapping.
?
DonP
--
Bob
va3rjs
--
Bob
va3rjs
|
Don
Ken AC0TG