¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date
Re: Unidentified node appeared on AXIP
The only 'amateur radio AXIP Network' are the 44.x.x.x addresses, and now that some of those addresses have been sold off there is no way to be sure which are and which are not, unles you look up what
By Mark Taylor · #41949 ·
Re: Unidentified node appeared on AXIP
Hi! Looks like you had a direct connection with the CB station.
By Marc-Andre Alpers (DO4OA) · #41948 ·
Re: Unidentified node appeared on AXIP
There is a Dutch packet network on CB Channel 36 LSB at 300 and 1200bd. Sometimes I hear it here in Brazil. Em seg., 19 de ago. de 2024 10:10, Charles Hargrove via groups.io
By Mauro Veiga · #41947 ·
Re: Unidentified node appeared on AXIP
I recommend not using AUTOADDMAP unless you have a very compelling reason to use it. 73, John
By John G8BPQ · #41946 ·
Re: Unidentified node appeared on AXIP
trace it backward to see who gave you that node entry and so on and so on...
By Charles Hargrove · #41945 ·
Re: Unidentified node appeared on AXIP
Hmmm.. I wonder why it is permitted on the amateur AXIP network? Best regards, Gary, K7EK ?Get BlueMail for Android ?
By Gary - K7EK · #41944 ·
Re: Unidentified node appeared on AXIP
European CB callsign/node. --
By Charles Hargrove · #41943 ·
Unidentified node appeared on AXIP
HARDIN:K7EK-7} Routes to: AP3:AP3NOD 203 4 3 AP3NOD This node was noticed today. I connected and it appearsto be in Germany. Unfortunately, I could not find anybona fide amateur call sign associated
By Gary - K7EK · #41942 ·
Re: Packets don't get acknowledged by the receiving node
So after some setbacks, I was able to try a new setup, where the client side actually ran paracon instead of bpq32, with miniircd on the server, and it worked perfectly with miniircd's small script. I
By reede7376@... · #41941 ·
Re: IL2P in HF
[email protected]> wrote: By the way, Roy WW6Q and I are running both the QPSK V26A 600 and IL2P modems on 7101.3 usb @ 2000Hz - doesn't seem to be a problem given one uses one or the other, and
By Lee Bengston · #41940 ·
Re: Packets don't get acknowledged by the receiving node
Reede I think the thing to consentrate on is why 7 cannot get to 1? It sends 3 packets and fails. This says 1 has a) not decoded these b) stopped working / replying to that callsign / L2 circuit. My
By Steve G7TAJ · #41939 ·
Building with libminiupnpc 2.2.8
Hi there, libminiupnpc has been updated and now UPNP_GetValidIGD() requires another argument - you can see the change and new definition on Github here: This line (
By Dave Hibberd · #41938 ·
Re: Packets don't get acknowledged by the receiving node
That TXDELAY looks way too short. I suggest 350 as a good starting point. Ron VE3CGR -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software. www.avg.com
By Ron Gibson · #41937 ·
Re: Packets don't get acknowledged by the receiving node
Brent, I took a look at the readout for the client side direwolf. It looks very similar if not identical to the server side. Maybe that means that something is getting fudged between bpq and direwolf
By reede7376@... · #41936 ·
Re: Packets don't get acknowledged by the receiving node
And, to answer your original question. This does not look like a situation where too much data is being sent through direwolf. It is only sending 4 packets before waiting for an ack. This looks more
By Brent WG0A · #41935 ·
Re: Packets don't get acknowledged by the receiving node
When it goes wrong, can you still.connect to the other station or do you have to restart things? The log shows it trying but no reply, so as suggested, things have crashed? Direwolf is not good with
By Steve G7TAJ · #41934 ·
Re: Packets don't get acknowledged by the receiving node
Is there anything telling in the direwolf logs from the other side of that link. I feels like something on the other side of the link may have gone sideways. For the record, I've been running bpq and
By Brent WG0A · #41933 ·
Re: Packets don't get acknowledged by the receiving node
I tried using the higher TXDELAY, but it didn't seem to make a difference. It seems like it is on the verge of losing connection at one point but recovers. Sorry, I'm a tad new to this stuff.. how
By reede7376@... · #41932 ·
Re: Packets don't get acknowledged by the receiving node
That's not really what I was getting at but it could be worth a try. I was meaning slow down the data rate. It seems the remote end stops replying. Does it recover after the
By Steve G7TAJ · #41931 ·
Re: Packets don't get acknowledged by the receiving node
Typically you can bring the TXD down to 350 ms for radios since the 90s. -- Charles J. Hargrove - N2NOV NYC-ARECS/RACES Citywide Radio Officer/Skywarn Coord. NYC-ARECS/RACES Nets 441.100/136.5
By Charles Hargrove · #41930 ·