¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Trying to get VARA working - no PTT?

 

Sorry, forgot to mention. I am using a Signalink USB between remote PC and HF rig.

Best,
Brian, KA3VSp


Trying to get VARA working - no PTT?

 

Hello everyone. I've been trying to get my HF VARA port for forwarding working on BPQ32. My VARA install on on a remote Windows PC. I have? WinmorControl??working running with the command?WinmorControl COM1:4800 which starts VARA when I start BPQ32.

My forwarding script has the 'ATTACH 6' for port and then the connect line to connect to my forwarding partner. When I attempt to initiate?a forward, BPQ shows that the session is attempting but my HF rig never keys. I've played with several PTT parameters...too many to remember what I did.?

Below is my script. Does anyone have any suggestions on why my PTT isn't working?

Thanks,
Brian, KA3VSP



?Port 6 ?
PORT
PORTNUM=6
ID=HF VARA Backbone
DRIVER=VARA
CONFIG
ADDR 192.168.1.226 8300 PATH REMOTE:C:\VARA\VARA.exe
BW500
RIGCONTROL REMOTE YAESU FT2000
ENDPORT



Re: Reducing syslog output

 

That's sad, but also a timesaver, thanks Matthew.

John, really looking to you on this one then please :-)

Thanks
Tom

On Sun, 21 May 2023 at 13:50, Matthew 2E0SIP <groups.io@...> wrote:
Another approach might be for me to work out how to filter them in rsyslog.conf

You might be out of luck there, a?precursory glance suggests that Debian is using journald and the maintainers aren't interested in providing a mechanism to filter logs before they're written to the journal -?

I could be wrong though

?

Cheers

Matthew

2E0SIP


Re: LinBPQ configuration backup files

 

You don't say what platform you are running it on - I use a Raspberry
pi and take a back -up every couple of months. I have only had to use
the back-up once and the complete back-up on the card worked just as the
original.

73 de Dave
gm3yew

---

On Sat, 20 May 2023 13:37:21 -0400
"Heber Soto" <np4jn@...> wrote:

Hello

We have multiple nodes running LinBPQ and I am interested in
automating backup of all nodes to a central FTP site.

Beside de config bpq32.cfg what other files should be backup so if a
new image is installed in the raspberry pi copying the set of files
will have the *node/bbs/user/chat/routes* working as before?


Re: Reducing syslog output

 

Another approach might be for me to work out how to filter them in rsyslog.conf

You might be out of luck there, a?precursory glance suggests that Debian is using journald and the maintainers aren't interested in providing a mechanism to filter logs before they're written to the journal -?

I could be wrong though

?

Cheers

Matthew

2E0SIP


Re: Reducing syslog output

 

That would be most helpful if you could please.

Another approach might be for me to work out how to filter them in rsyslog.conf

Cheers
Tom

On Sun, 21 May 2023 at 13:03, John G8BPQ <john.wiseman@...> wrote:
There is no way to stop these being written. They are primarily for debugging, so suppressing them will only be a problem when something goes wrong. Maybe I should add a debug level option

73,
John



On 21/05/2023 12:31, Tom M0LTE wrote:
Hi
I'm looking to reduce BPQ's syslog output in order to preserve the life of my Pi's SD card. (I don't wish to move to temporary logging or a read-only filesystem.)

I see many lines like

May 21 11:34:28 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: BPQ32 Heartbeat Buffers 999#015

and periodically:
May 21 08:29:29 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: Resolving
May 21 08:29:29 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: Resolving
May 21 08:39:32 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: CMS #0 54.80.14.54 Official name :
May 21 08:39:32 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: CMS #1 54.80.114.144 Official name :
May 21 08:54:42 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: CMS #0 54.80.114.144 Official name :
May 21 08:54:42 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: CMS #1 54.80.14.54 Official name :

Is there a way to disable that logging through config? Or am I best off commenting out lines in source code?

Filtering those out from today's syslog leaves me with this:
May 21 01:00:02 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: |Enter HouseKeeping#015
May 21 07:11:15 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: BPQ32 L2 Link to Neighbour GB7CIP-5? ?lost#015
May 21 09:34:35 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: BPQ32 L2 Link to Neighbour GB7WOD? ? ?lost#015
May 21 10:01:05 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: BPQ32 L2 Link to Neighbour GB7WOD? ? ?lost#015
May 21 11:03:41 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: BPQ32 overlong KISS frame - len = 539 Port 1#015
May 21 11:03:53 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: BPQ32 L2 Link to Neighbour GB7WOD? ? ?lost#015
May 21 11:09:12 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: Saving WP Database to /opt/linbpq/WP.cfg#012#015
May 21 11:55:34 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: BPQ32 L2 Link to Neighbour GB7WOD? ? ?lost#015
May 21 12:06:00 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: BPQ32 L2 Link to Neighbour G5ODB? ? ? lost#015
May 21 12:07:24 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: Delete Node for ALIAS:G5ODB Called with active L4 Session - State 5#015

most of which seems fairly useful - excepting "Enter HouseKeeping" and "Saving WP Database" which I see as internal.

Cheers
Tom


Re: Unable to decode QtSoundModem Beta v0.0.0.62 1200 baud AFSK

 

Thanks John, I'll test it later on and let you know how I get on

Cheers
Matthew


Re: Unable to decode QtSoundModem Beta v0.0.0.62 1200 baud AFSK

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

I've found the problem. The latest build in Beta (.64) should fix it.

73,
John

On 20/05/2023 19:42, John G8BPQ wrote:

Thanks, Matthew. That is a great help.

73,
John


On 20/05/2023 18:51, Matthew 2E0SIP wrote:
Hi All,

Nino KK4HEJ has kindly done some analysis and said the following:

I think I figured this out... the opening flag in FX25_NONE_2 is invalid, 0xFE rather than 0x7E. When I loosen my AX25 routine to accept this as an opening flag, I get the same decodes as Direwolf.

Hopefully that gives you something to go on.

Cheers
Matthew?



Re: Reducing syslog output

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

There is no way to stop these being written. They are primarily for debugging, so suppressing them will only be a problem when something goes wrong. Maybe I should add a debug level option

73,
John


On 21/05/2023 12:31, Tom M0LTE wrote:

Hi
I'm looking to reduce BPQ's syslog output in order to preserve the life of my Pi's SD card. (I don't wish to move to temporary logging or a read-only filesystem.)

I see many lines like

May 21 11:34:28 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: BPQ32 Heartbeat Buffers 999#015

and periodically:
May 21 08:29:29 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: Resolving update.g8bpq.net#015
May 21 08:29:29 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: Resolving chatupdate.g8bpq.net#015
May 21 08:39:32 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: CMS #0 54.80.14.54 Official name : ec2-54-80-14-54.compute-1.amazonaws.com#015
May 21 08:39:32 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: CMS #1 54.80.114.144 Official name : ec2-54-80-114-144.compute-1.amazonaws.com#015
May 21 08:54:42 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: CMS #0 54.80.114.144 Official name : ec2-54-80-114-144.compute-1.amazonaws.com#015
May 21 08:54:42 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: CMS #1 54.80.14.54 Official name : ec2-54-80-14-54.compute-1.amazonaws.com#015

Is there a way to disable that logging through config? Or am I best off commenting out lines in source code?

Filtering those out from today's syslog leaves me with this:
May 21 01:00:02 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: |Enter HouseKeeping#015
May 21 07:11:15 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: BPQ32 L2 Link to Neighbour GB7CIP-5? ?lost#015
May 21 09:34:35 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: BPQ32 L2 Link to Neighbour GB7WOD? ? ?lost#015
May 21 10:01:05 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: BPQ32 L2 Link to Neighbour GB7WOD? ? ?lost#015
May 21 11:03:41 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: BPQ32 overlong KISS frame - len = 539 Port 1#015
May 21 11:03:53 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: BPQ32 L2 Link to Neighbour GB7WOD? ? ?lost#015
May 21 11:09:12 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: Saving WP Database to /opt/linbpq/WP.cfg#012#015
May 21 11:55:34 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: BPQ32 L2 Link to Neighbour GB7WOD? ? ?lost#015
May 21 12:06:00 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: BPQ32 L2 Link to Neighbour G5ODB? ? ? lost#015
May 21 12:07:24 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: Delete Node for ALIAS:G5ODB Called with active L4 Session - State 5#015

most of which seems fairly useful - excepting "Enter HouseKeeping" and "Saving WP Database" which I see as internal.

Cheers
Tom


Reducing syslog output

 

Hi
I'm looking to reduce BPQ's syslog output in order to preserve the life of my Pi's SD card. (I don't wish to move to temporary logging or a read-only filesystem.)

I see many lines like

May 21 11:34:28 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: BPQ32 Heartbeat Buffers 999#015

and periodically:
May 21 08:29:29 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: Resolving update.g8bpq.net#015
May 21 08:29:29 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: Resolving chatupdate.g8bpq.net#015
May 21 08:39:32 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: CMS #0 54.80.14.54 Official name : ec2-54-80-14-54.compute-1.amazonaws.com#015
May 21 08:39:32 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: CMS #1 54.80.114.144 Official name : ec2-54-80-114-144.compute-1.amazonaws.com#015
May 21 08:54:42 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: CMS #0 54.80.114.144 Official name : ec2-54-80-114-144.compute-1.amazonaws.com#015
May 21 08:54:42 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: CMS #1 54.80.14.54 Official name : ec2-54-80-14-54.compute-1.amazonaws.com#015

Is there a way to disable that logging through config? Or am I best off commenting out lines in source code?

Filtering those out from today's syslog leaves me with this:
May 21 01:00:02 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: |Enter HouseKeeping#015
May 21 07:11:15 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: BPQ32 L2 Link to Neighbour GB7CIP-5? ?lost#015
May 21 09:34:35 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: BPQ32 L2 Link to Neighbour GB7WOD? ? ?lost#015
May 21 10:01:05 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: BPQ32 L2 Link to Neighbour GB7WOD? ? ?lost#015
May 21 11:03:41 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: BPQ32 overlong KISS frame - len = 539 Port 1#015
May 21 11:03:53 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: BPQ32 L2 Link to Neighbour GB7WOD? ? ?lost#015
May 21 11:09:12 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: Saving WP Database to /opt/linbpq/WP.cfg#012#015
May 21 11:55:34 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: BPQ32 L2 Link to Neighbour GB7WOD? ? ?lost#015
May 21 12:06:00 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: BPQ32 L2 Link to Neighbour G5ODB? ? ? lost#015
May 21 12:07:24 gb7rdg-node LINBPQ[3390]: Delete Node for ALIAS:G5ODB Called with active L4 Session - State 5#015

most of which seems fairly useful - excepting "Enter HouseKeeping" and "Saving WP Database" which I see as internal.

Cheers
Tom


Re: Unable to decode QtSoundModem Beta v0.0.0.62 1200 baud AFSK

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Thanks, Matthew. That is a great help.

73,
John


On 20/05/2023 18:51, Matthew 2E0SIP wrote:

Hi All,

Nino KK4HEJ has kindly done some analysis and said the following:

I think I figured this out... the opening flag in FX25_NONE_2 is invalid, 0xFE rather than 0x7E. When I loosen my AX25 routine to accept this as an opening flag, I get the same decodes as Direwolf.

Hopefully that gives you something to go on.

Cheers
Matthew?


Re: Unable to decode QtSoundModem Beta v0.0.0.62 1200 baud AFSK

 

Hi All,

Nino KK4HEJ has kindly done some analysis and said the following:

I think I figured this out... the opening flag in FX25_NONE_2 is invalid, 0xFE rather than 0x7E. When I loosen my AX25 routine to accept this as an opening flag, I get the same decodes as Direwolf.

Hopefully that gives you something to go on.

Cheers
Matthew?


Application Line Format

 

Is there a way to add an application line that will let you connect to a node and then issue a command once connected?

Exsample? ? C MELNOD (then add cmd TALK)

--
Apologies for any grammar?or spelling errors!
--
73 de Glenn N3MEL
(FRNPA) 1st Responders Network of Pa
PKT:145.090 &?VARA HF:3.596?WL2K:145.670
Emergency Coordinator
Chester County ARES/RACES


LinBPQ configuration backup files

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Hello

We have multiple nodes running LinBPQ and I am interested in automating backup of all nodes to a central FTP site.

Beside de config bpq32.cfg what other files should be backup so if a new image is installed in the raspberry pi copying the set of files will have the node/bbs/user/chat/routes working as before?

-- 
Gracias 73,

Heber
NP4JN


Re: Unable to decode QtSoundModem Beta v0.0.0.62 1200 baud AFSK

 

Hi John,

I'm using 64 bit Windows 11.

Thanks
Matthew?


Re: Unable to decode QtSoundModem Beta v0.0.0.62 1200 baud AFSK

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Matthew,

I can reproduce the problem on my Pi 4 (64 bit) but not my Windows machine. What platform are you using?

Thanks,
John


On 20/05/2023 02:10, Matthew 2E0SIP wrote:

Hi Red,

Thanks for spending the time to verify and document the issue.

Much appreciated

Matthew



Re: Unable to decode QtSoundModem Beta v0.0.0.62 1200 baud AFSK

 

Hi Red,

Thanks for spending the time to verify and document the issue.

Much appreciated

Matthew


Re: Unable to decode QtSoundModem Beta v0.0.0.62 1200 baud AFSK

 

For reference:

Here is me reproducing the bug Matt reported:?

Note: 1200 baud tested in video, but also tested 300 baud as well, same results.

73
Red


Re: Unable to decode QtSoundModem Beta v0.0.0.62 1200 baud AFSK

 

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 02:26 PM, Matthew 2E0SIP wrote:

Hi Red,

Latest recordings attached, unproto frames with the 80 char string "FqWFkDtfi7m81dnPDb0kFqWFkDtfi7m81dnPDb0kFqWFkDtfi7m81dnPDb0kFqWFkDtfi7m81dnPDb0k"

Just to clarify the other recordings were also unproto frames.

Thanks
Matthew

?


Matt, John- I opened these files and cut the static out and then played them over the radio and managed to decode only the FX25 packets, the standard AX25 do not decode at all so same findings as Matthew, so something may be up with the preamble/TXDelay issue we encountered when you initially implemented IL2P.?

The FX25 packets decoded:

1:Fm M6IJY To M0OUK <UI C ?pid=F0 Len=81>[22:29:39R][+++][+++]
FqWFkDtfi7m81dnPDb0kFqWFkDtfi7m81dnPDb0kFqWFkDtfi7m81dnPDb0kFqWFkDtfi7m81dnPDb0k
1:Fm M6IJY To M0OUK <UI C ?pid=F0 Len=81>[22:29:41R][+++][+++]
FqWFkDtfi7m81dnPDb0kFqWFkDtfi7m81dnPDb0kFqWFkDtfi7m81dnPDb0kFqWFkDtfi7m81dnPDb0k
1:Fm M6IJY To M0OUK <UI C ?pid=F0 Len=81>[22:29:42R][+++][+++]
FqWFkDtfi7m81dnPDb0kFqWFkDtfi7m81dnPDb0kFqWFkDtfi7m81dnPDb0kFqWFkDtfi7m81dnPDb0k

The AX25:

[none lol]?


73
Red


Re: Unable to decode QtSoundModem Beta v0.0.0.62 1200 baud AFSK

 

Hi Red,

Latest recordings attached, unproto frames with the 80 char string "FqWFkDtfi7m81dnPDb0kFqWFkDtfi7m81dnPDb0kFqWFkDtfi7m81dnPDb0kFqWFkDtfi7m81dnPDb0k"

Just to clarify the other recordings were also unproto frames.

Thanks
Matthew

?