¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
  1. Bpq32
  2. Messages
Expanded Topics Messages
Date
Slackware 15 Build Fail

 

Trying to get the latest and greatest, since it has been a while since
I compiled a fresh binary on my slackware box. Looks like it is
looking for a library related to The Internet of Things client
"libpaho-mqtt3a" (or at least the library for it). I am thinking this
is a new dependency that does not come bundled with Slackware 15.
Unfortunately not in the Slackbuilds 3rd party repo.

gcc -DLINBPQ -MMD -g -rdynamic -fcommon -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
-c -o RHP.o RHP.c

gcc pngwtran.o pngrtran.o pngset.o pngrio.o pngwio.o pngtrans.o
pngrutil.o pngwutil.o pngread.o pngwrite.o png.o pngerror.o pngget.o
pngmem.o APRSIconData.o AISCommon.o upnp.o APRSStdPages.o HSMODEM.o
WinRPR.o KISSHF.o TNCEmulators.o bpqhdlc.o SerialPort.o adif.o
WebMail.o utf8Routines.o VARA.o LzFind.o Alloc.o LzmaDec.o LzmaEnc.o
LzmaLib.o Multicast.o ARDOP.o IPCode.o FLDigi.o linether.o CMSAuth.o
APRSCode.o BPQtoAGW.o KAMPactor.o AEAPactor.o HALDriver.o MULTIPSK.o
BBSHTMLConfig.o ChatHTMLConfig.o BBSUtilities.o bpqaxip.o BPQINP3.o
BPQNRR.o cMain.o Cmd.o CommonCode.o HTMLCommonCode.o compatbits.o
config.o datadefs.o FBBRoutines.o HFCommon.o Housekeeping.o HTTPcode.o
kiss.o L2Code.o L3Code.o L4Code.o lzhuf32.o MailCommands.o
MailDataDefs.o LinBPQ.o MailRouting.o MailTCP.o MBLRoutines.o md5.o
Moncode.o NNTPRoutines.o RigControl.o TelnetV6.o WINMOR.o TNCCode.o
UZ7HODrv.o WPRoutines.o SCSTrackeMulti.o SCSPactor.o SCSTracker.o
HanksRT.o UIRoutines.o AGWAPI.o AGWMoncode.o DRATS.o FreeDATA.o
base64.o Events.o nodeapi.o mailapi.o mqtt.o RHP.o -Xlinker
-Map=output.map -l:libminiupnpc.so -lrt -lm -lz -l:libpaho-mqtt3a.a
-l:libjansson.a -lpthread -lconfig -lpcap -o linbpq

/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -l:libpaho-mqtt3a.a

/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -l:libjansson.a

collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

make: *** [makefile:35: linbpq] Error 1

Please advise :D



--
Thanks,
Chris Maness
Re: Not all links show on web page

 

Attached is a pcap file that was taken while clicking the links link.

Truncated list (CLI showed 41, I believe)
image.png

Thanks,
Lee K5DAT


On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 1:01?AM John G8BPQ via <john.wiseman=[email protected]> wrote:
Would it be possible to get a packet trace of a truncated page? I use WIreshark.

Thanks,
John

_._,_._,_

links-cap.pcap
links-cap.pcap

Re: TCP Master/Slave question

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Yes, that is a recent change to AXTCP/UDP. An XID is sent before the SABM to attempt to negotiate an ax.25 V2.2 connection. If the other send replies with an XID response a SABM is then sent. AXTCP Master/Slave only selects which end established the TCP connection, not which end opens the ax.25 link.


On 20/05/2025 15:18, Mark Taylor wrote:

Those packet finally stopped at 56 past the hour.? They continued for 30 minutes and through several restarts.
?
Still curious about the XID packets.? It seems to be a change from previous versions.
?
?
73,
Mark, N5MDT
Montgomery, Texas
?
?
?
Re: One user can send a message the other cannot.

 

Thanks John. I was looking for the setting then it struck me that I could use an RSL GE7TWZ for the responder mailbox and G7TWZ for my normal account.
Testing GE7TWZ with FBB seems to work. I'll have to play with a multi-forward routed message, when I get time.
Thanks again as ever,
73, Ray
?
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 12:53 PM, John G8BPQ wrote:

BPQ will hold messages if it thinks the from call is invalid, though this can be disabled in the config.

73,
John
Re: TCP Master/Slave question

 

Those packet finally stopped at 56 past the hour.? They continued for 30 minutes and through several restarts.
?
Still curious about the XID packets.? It seems to be a change from previous versions.
?
?
73,
Mark, N5MDT
Montgomery, Texas
?
?
?
TCP Master/Slave question

 

John,
?
As the TCP-SLAVE side of a connection I assumed that I would never initiate a connection. I am seeing the following:
?
13:35:48T N5MDT-13>N4NVD-3 Port=2 <XID C P> 2=21 3=22a486 RX Paclen=256 RX Window=7?
?
I have different ports for AXUDP (port 1) and AXTCP (port 2.)
The above line is obviously the Port 2 Monitor and it looks to me like it is a connection request being initiated by me.? However, I am seeing a similar line to a well established and connected AXTCP link to N3HYM.
?
?
Now, earlier today, I switched N4NVD from TCP (port 2) back to UDP (port 1) and restarted.? The UDP route is stable using port 1.? However, I am still seeing the above line in the port 2 monitor.
?
So, what exactly is the XID packet?? When should I expect to see these cease for N4NVD?
?
The axipcache1.cfg file contains only port 1 connections.? I do not see a port 2 cache file. Is there one that I can empty to stop these XID packets to N4NVD sooner than letting it time out on its own?
?
?
Thanks
--
73,
Mark, N5MDT
Montgomery, Texas
?
?
?
Re: Not all links show on web page

 

I don't see why not. I should be able to capture it on the linux side with tcpdump in pcap format. I'll give that a whirl.

Lee K5DAT

On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 1:01?AM John G8BPQ via <john.wiseman=[email protected]> wrote:
Would it be possible to get a packet trace of a truncated page? I use WIreshark.

Thanks,
John

On 19/05/2025 23:12, Lee Bengston via wrote:
In this example (Firefox in Windows, and the latest .71 release of pilinbpq), the GUI shows the first 18 links of 41 total.
image.png

Sometimes when I click it again, I only get the first one.
image.png

And sometimes I get the full list.

image.png

The CLI list is shown below.

SHAWNO:K5DAT-7} Links

K5DAT-5 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=10 T=3 V=2 Q=0

N3HYM-5 K5DAT-7 S=1 P=3 T=3 V=2 Q=0

VE2PKT-4 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2 Q=0

N9HWP-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

W0ARP-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2 Q=0

WW2BSA-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

VK5LEX-3 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

GB7BED-5 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

PY2BIL-4 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

PA8F-2 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

WW6Q-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

KB9SOZ-7 K5DAT-7 S=6 P=3 T=3 V=2 Q=0

KE0GB-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2 Q=0

VK3AT-1 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

KK4DIV-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2 Q=0

N4NVD-3 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=10 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

WA8RSA-5 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

W9GM-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

K7EK-6 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=10 T=3 V=2 Q=0

N5MDT-13 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

NC8Q-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

KB8OAK-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

N9PMO-2 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

SV1IW-12 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2 Q=0

IW2OHX-15 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

KD9KGQ-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

W1DTX-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

N3FUD-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=10 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

N9SEO-3 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=10 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

KA0PND-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

WA3WLH-15 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

W7BMH-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

VE3CGR-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

K5GEO-5 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

KF5JRV-2 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

KC0GIS-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

PI1LAP-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

VE7GN-1 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

KB9PVH-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

KQ6UP-9 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=10 T=3 V=2 Q=0

KD5TCY-2 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0


73,
Lee K5DAT
Re: One user can send a message the other cannot.

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

BPQ will hold messages if it thinks the from call is invalid, though this can be disabled in the config.

73,
John

On 20/05/2025 10:32, razza30 via groups.io wrote:

Thanks, I suspected as much. I will have a play between BPQ systems and see how that goes.
?
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 09:10 AM, John G8BPQ wrote:
GB7CIP is rejecting the message:

250519 20:44:16 >GB7CIP ? ?FA P WORPIN GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO PING 2498_GB7WOR 55
250519 20:44:16 >GB7CIP ? ?F> 33
250519 20:44:21 <GB7CIP ? ?FS R

I'm not familiar with FBB, but I suspect it is because WORPIN in not at valid callsign
Re: One user can send a message the other cannot.

 

Thanks, I suspected as much. I will have a play between BPQ systems and see how that goes.
?
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 09:10 AM, John G8BPQ wrote:

GB7CIP is rejecting the message:

250519 20:44:16 >GB7CIP ? ?FA P WORPIN GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO PING 2498_GB7WOR 55
250519 20:44:16 >GB7CIP ? ?F> 33
250519 20:44:21 <GB7CIP ? ?FS R

I'm not familiar with FBB, but I suspect it is because WORPIN in not at valid callsign
Re: One user can send a message the other cannot.

 

Hi John,
I was hoping to have two traces where my BBS sent a good and a failed message for comparison. Unfortunately, the second trace was longer as GB7CIP sent me a message making them not quite comparable. You can ignore, as you are a trace reading expert! :-)
?
Ironically, it was his auto-reply system replying to the first (good) message I sent.
?
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 09:15 AM, John G8BPQ wrote:

I'm not sure what you are saying here. Can you clarify?

Thanks,
John
Re: One user can send a message the other cannot.

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

I'm not sure what you are saying here. Can you clarify?

Thanks,
John


On 19/05/2025 22:02, razza30 via groups.io wrote:

The rest of the second trace....
250519 20:44:29 |GB7CIP ? ?Uncompressing Message Comp Len 243 Msg Len 333 CRC 50a
250519 20:44:29 ?GB7CIP ? ?Msg 2499 Routing Trace To G7TWZ Via GB7WOR.#32.GBR.EURO
250519 20:44:29 ?GB7CIP ? ?Routing Trace Type P TO G7TWZ VIA GB7WOR.#32.GBR.EURO Route On WW EU GBR #32 GB7WOR
250519 20:44:29 ?GB7CIP ? ?SendPtoMultiple is set. Checking for best match level
250519 20:44:29 ?GB7CIP ? ?Routing Trace GB7WOR Matches implied AT GB7WOR
250519 20:44:29 ?GB7CIP ? ?Message matches this BBS and ForwardToMe not set - not queuing message
250519 20:44:30 >GB7CIP ? ?FF
250519 20:44:33 <GB7CIP ? ?FQ
250519 20:44:34 |GB7CIP ? ?GB7CIP Disconnected
?
Which is not as clean as I would like as GB7CIP is delivering a message to GB7WOR (me) also.
Re: One user can send a message the other cannot.

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

GB7CIP is rejecting the message:

250519 20:44:16 >GB7CIP ? ?FA P WORPIN GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO PING 2498_GB7WOR 55
250519 20:44:16 >GB7CIP ? ?F> 33
250519 20:44:21 <GB7CIP ? ?FS R

I'm not familiar with FBB, but I suspect it is because WORPIN in not at valid callsign



On 19/05/2025 21:53, razza30 via groups.io wrote:

I have written a message responder app using the POP3/SMTP interfaces. That seems to be working OK, but when I send from the account I created for that purpose (worpin@gb7wor.#32.gbr.euro) it fails. I have some traces using the standard HTML webmail interface, using my account (G7TWZ) which works fine:
250519 20:37:33 | ? ? ? ? ?Webmail Connect from G7TWZ
250519 20:37:48 ?G7TWZ ? ? Msg 2497 Routing Trace To PING Via GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO
250519 20:37:48 ?G7TWZ ? ? Routing Trace Type P TO PING VIA GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO Route On WW EU GBR #32 GB7CIP
250519 20:37:48 ?G7TWZ ? ? SendPtoMultiple is set. Checking for best match level
250519 20:37:48 ?G7TWZ ? ? Routing Trace GB7CIP Matches implied AT GB7CIP
250519 20:38:07 |GB7CIP ? ?Connecting to BBS GB7CIP
250519 20:38:07 <GB7CIP ? ?*** CONNECTED
250519 20:38:07 >GB7CIP ? ?C 1 GB7CIP-0
250519 20:38:09 <GB7CIP ? ?WORNOD:GB7WOR-7} Connected to GB7CIP
250519 20:38:10 <GB7CIP ? ?[FBB-7.0.11-AB1FHMRX$]
250519 20:38:10 <GB7CIP ? ?{PROTUS-4.1 2}
250519 20:38:10 <GB7CIP ? ?GB7CIP Mailbox, QTH Caterham Surrey GBR.
250519 20:38:10 <GB7CIP ? ?Msg(s) to Fwd 0 ?0 Kb
250519 20:38:10 <GB7CIP ? ?(2) GB7CIP BBS>
250519 20:38:10 >GB7CIP ? ?[BPQ-6.0.24.69-B1FIHJM$]
250519 20:38:10 >GB7CIP ? ?FA P G7TWZ GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO PING 2497_GB7WOR 55
250519 20:38:10 >GB7CIP ? ?F> 90
250519 20:38:14 <GB7CIP ? ?FS Y
250519 20:38:14 | ? ? ? ? ?Compressed Message Comp Len 66 Msg Len 57 CRC 8bd1
250519 20:39:19 <GB7CIP ? ?FF
250519 20:39:19 >GB7CIP ? ?FQ
250519 20:39:22 |GB7CIP ? ?GB7CIP Disconnected
?
I have the same from the worpin account, which fails:
250519 20:43:06 | ? ? ? ? ?Webmail Connect from WORPIN
250519 20:43:29 ?WORPIN ? ?Msg 2498 Routing Trace To PING Via GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO
250519 20:43:29 ?WORPIN ? ?Routing Trace Type P TO PING VIA GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO Route On WW EU GBR #32 GB7CIP
250519 20:43:29 ?WORPIN ? ?SendPtoMultiple is set. Checking for best match level
250519 20:43:29 ?WORPIN ? ?Routing Trace GB7CIP Matches implied AT GB7CIP
250519 20:43:56 |GB7CIP ? ?Connecting to BBS GB7CIP
250519 20:43:56 <GB7CIP ? ?*** CONNECTED
250519 20:43:56 >GB7CIP ? ?C 1 GB7CIP-0
250519 20:43:58 <GB7CIP ? ?WORNOD:GB7WOR-7} Connected to GB7CIP
250519 20:44:16 <GB7CIP ? ?[FBB-7.0.11-AB1FHMRX$]
250519 20:44:16 <GB7CIP ? ?{PROTUS-4.1 2}
250519 20:44:16 <GB7CIP ? ?GB7CIP Mailbox, QTH Caterham Surrey GBR.
250519 20:44:16 <GB7CIP ? ?Msg(s) to Fwd 1 ?0 Kb
250519 20:44:16 <GB7CIP ? ?(2) GB7CIP BBS>
250519 20:44:16 >GB7CIP ? ?[BPQ-6.0.24.69-B1FIHJM$]
250519 20:44:16 >GB7CIP ? ?FA P WORPIN GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO PING 2498_GB7WOR 55
250519 20:44:16 >GB7CIP ? ?F> 33
250519 20:44:21 <GB7CIP ? ?FS R
250519 20:44:21 <GB7CIP ? ?FA P GB7CIP GB7WOR.#32.GBR.EURO G7TWZ 32967_GB7CIP 186
250519 20:44:21 <GB7CIP ? ?F> B8
250519 20:44:21 >GB7CIP ? ?FS +
?
Any ideas?
?
Re: One user can send a message the other cannot.

 

Is it possible in BPQ (or FBB which is what the destination BBS GB7CIP is using) there is an issue with no numeric in the call sign?
I know that the destination has a similar responder testing arrangement, he uses the account name "ping" (no numeric) in full ping@gb7cip.#32.gbr.euro
His works fine with me.
Re: Not all links show on web page

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Would it be possible to get a packet trace of a truncated page? I use WIreshark.

Thanks,
John

On 19/05/2025 23:12, Lee Bengston via groups.io wrote:

In this example (Firefox in Windows, and the latest .71 release of pilinbpq), the GUI shows the first 18 links of 41 total.
image.png

Sometimes when I click it again, I only get the first one.
image.png

And sometimes I get the full list.

image.png

The CLI list is shown below.

SHAWNO:K5DAT-7} Links

K5DAT-5 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=10 T=3 V=2 Q=0

N3HYM-5 K5DAT-7 S=1 P=3 T=3 V=2 Q=0

VE2PKT-4 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2 Q=0

N9HWP-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

W0ARP-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2 Q=0

WW2BSA-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

VK5LEX-3 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

GB7BED-5 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

PY2BIL-4 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

PA8F-2 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

WW6Q-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

KB9SOZ-7 K5DAT-7 S=6 P=3 T=3 V=2 Q=0

KE0GB-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2 Q=0

VK3AT-1 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

KK4DIV-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2 Q=0

N4NVD-3 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=10 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

WA8RSA-5 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

W9GM-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

K7EK-6 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=10 T=3 V=2 Q=0

N5MDT-13 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

NC8Q-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

KB8OAK-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

N9PMO-2 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

SV1IW-12 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2 Q=0

IW2OHX-15 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

KD9KGQ-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

W1DTX-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

N3FUD-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=10 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

N9SEO-3 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=10 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

KA0PND-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

WA3WLH-15 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

W7BMH-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

VE3CGR-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

K5GEO-5 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

KF5JRV-2 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

KC0GIS-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

PI1LAP-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

VE7GN-1 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

KB9PVH-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

KQ6UP-9 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=10 T=3 V=2 Q=0

KD5TCY-2 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0


73,
Lee K5DAT
Sample LinBPQ Configuration

 

Good Evening All,
?
I have been fighting to get a simple UHF node up in my town that would work as a RMS and Chat node. I wanted to share this example config file for any newcomers to this software (like myself) to have a easy way to get started, and hopefully expand onto what is in this basic setup. Now that I have something simple built, time to get my friends to pick up some TNC's ?
?
?
73's
Scott, N1OF
?
?
Re: Not all links show on web page

 

In this example (Firefox in Windows, and the latest .71 release of pilinbpq), the GUI shows the first 18 links of 41 total.
image.png

Sometimes when I click it again, I only get the first one.
image.png

And sometimes I get the full list.

image.png

The CLI list is shown below.

SHAWNO:K5DAT-7} Links

K5DAT-5 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=10 T=3 V=2 Q=0

N3HYM-5 K5DAT-7 S=1 P=3 T=3 V=2 Q=0

VE2PKT-4 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2 Q=0

N9HWP-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

W0ARP-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2 Q=0

WW2BSA-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

VK5LEX-3 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

GB7BED-5 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

PY2BIL-4 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

PA8F-2 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

WW6Q-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

KB9SOZ-7 K5DAT-7 S=6 P=3 T=3 V=2 Q=0

KE0GB-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2 Q=0

VK3AT-1 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

KK4DIV-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2 Q=0

N4NVD-3 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=10 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

WA8RSA-5 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

W9GM-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

K7EK-6 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=10 T=3 V=2 Q=0

N5MDT-13 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

NC8Q-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

KB8OAK-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

N9PMO-2 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

SV1IW-12 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2 Q=0

IW2OHX-15 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

KD9KGQ-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

W1DTX-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

N3FUD-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=10 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

N9SEO-3 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=10 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

KA0PND-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

WA3WLH-15 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

W7BMH-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

VE3CGR-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

K5GEO-5 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

KF5JRV-2 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

KC0GIS-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

PI1LAP-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

VE7GN-1 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

KB9PVH-7 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0

KQ6UP-9 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=10 T=3 V=2 Q=0

KD5TCY-2 K5DAT-7 S=5 P=3 T=3 V=2.2 Q=0


73,
Lee K5DAT
Re: Not all links show on web page

 

Currently all my links are up and the display is normal.
if it helps, normally I monitor this on my win7 running Firefox,
or on my tablet running safari. With the node running on a rasPi
?
?
Re: One user can send a message the other cannot.

 

The rest of the second trace....
250519 20:44:29 |GB7CIP ? ?Uncompressing Message Comp Len 243 Msg Len 333 CRC 50a
250519 20:44:29 ?GB7CIP ? ?Msg 2499 Routing Trace To G7TWZ Via GB7WOR.#32.GBR.EURO
250519 20:44:29 ?GB7CIP ? ?Routing Trace Type P TO G7TWZ VIA GB7WOR.#32.GBR.EURO Route On WW EU GBR #32 GB7WOR
250519 20:44:29 ?GB7CIP ? ?SendPtoMultiple is set. Checking for best match level
250519 20:44:29 ?GB7CIP ? ?Routing Trace GB7WOR Matches implied AT GB7WOR
250519 20:44:29 ?GB7CIP ? ?Message matches this BBS and ForwardToMe not set - not queuing message
250519 20:44:30 >GB7CIP ? ?FF
250519 20:44:33 <GB7CIP ? ?FQ
250519 20:44:34 |GB7CIP ? ?GB7CIP Disconnected
?
Which is not as clean as I would like as GB7CIP is delivering a message to GB7WOR (me) also.
One user can send a message the other cannot.

 

I have written a message responder app using the POP3/SMTP interfaces. That seems to be working OK, but when I send from the account I created for that purpose (worpin@gb7wor.#32.gbr.euro) it fails. I have some traces using the standard HTML webmail interface, using my account (G7TWZ) which works fine:
250519 20:37:33 | ? ? ? ? ?Webmail Connect from G7TWZ
250519 20:37:48 ?G7TWZ ? ? Msg 2497 Routing Trace To PING Via GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO
250519 20:37:48 ?G7TWZ ? ? Routing Trace Type P TO PING VIA GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO Route On WW EU GBR #32 GB7CIP
250519 20:37:48 ?G7TWZ ? ? SendPtoMultiple is set. Checking for best match level
250519 20:37:48 ?G7TWZ ? ? Routing Trace GB7CIP Matches implied AT GB7CIP
250519 20:38:07 |GB7CIP ? ?Connecting to BBS GB7CIP
250519 20:38:07 <GB7CIP ? ?*** CONNECTED
250519 20:38:07 >GB7CIP ? ?C 1 GB7CIP-0
250519 20:38:09 <GB7CIP ? ?WORNOD:GB7WOR-7} Connected to GB7CIP
250519 20:38:10 <GB7CIP ? ?[FBB-7.0.11-AB1FHMRX$]
250519 20:38:10 <GB7CIP ? ?{PROTUS-4.1 2}
250519 20:38:10 <GB7CIP ? ?GB7CIP Mailbox, QTH Caterham Surrey GBR.
250519 20:38:10 <GB7CIP ? ?Msg(s) to Fwd 0 ?0 Kb
250519 20:38:10 <GB7CIP ? ?(2) GB7CIP BBS>
250519 20:38:10 >GB7CIP ? ?[BPQ-6.0.24.69-B1FIHJM$]
250519 20:38:10 >GB7CIP ? ?FA P G7TWZ GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO PING 2497_GB7WOR 55
250519 20:38:10 >GB7CIP ? ?F> 90
250519 20:38:14 <GB7CIP ? ?FS Y
250519 20:38:14 | ? ? ? ? ?Compressed Message Comp Len 66 Msg Len 57 CRC 8bd1
250519 20:39:19 <GB7CIP ? ?FF
250519 20:39:19 >GB7CIP ? ?FQ
250519 20:39:22 |GB7CIP ? ?GB7CIP Disconnected
?
I have the same from the worpin account, which fails:
250519 20:43:06 | ? ? ? ? ?Webmail Connect from WORPIN
250519 20:43:29 ?WORPIN ? ?Msg 2498 Routing Trace To PING Via GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO
250519 20:43:29 ?WORPIN ? ?Routing Trace Type P TO PING VIA GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO Route On WW EU GBR #32 GB7CIP
250519 20:43:29 ?WORPIN ? ?SendPtoMultiple is set. Checking for best match level
250519 20:43:29 ?WORPIN ? ?Routing Trace GB7CIP Matches implied AT GB7CIP
250519 20:43:56 |GB7CIP ? ?Connecting to BBS GB7CIP
250519 20:43:56 <GB7CIP ? ?*** CONNECTED
250519 20:43:56 >GB7CIP ? ?C 1 GB7CIP-0
250519 20:43:58 <GB7CIP ? ?WORNOD:GB7WOR-7} Connected to GB7CIP
250519 20:44:16 <GB7CIP ? ?[FBB-7.0.11-AB1FHMRX$]
250519 20:44:16 <GB7CIP ? ?{PROTUS-4.1 2}
250519 20:44:16 <GB7CIP ? ?GB7CIP Mailbox, QTH Caterham Surrey GBR.
250519 20:44:16 <GB7CIP ? ?Msg(s) to Fwd 1 ?0 Kb
250519 20:44:16 <GB7CIP ? ?(2) GB7CIP BBS>
250519 20:44:16 >GB7CIP ? ?[BPQ-6.0.24.69-B1FIHJM$]
250519 20:44:16 >GB7CIP ? ?FA P WORPIN GB7CIP.#32.GBR.EURO PING 2498_GB7WOR 55
250519 20:44:16 >GB7CIP ? ?F> 33
250519 20:44:21 <GB7CIP ? ?FS R
250519 20:44:21 <GB7CIP ? ?FA P GB7CIP GB7WOR.#32.GBR.EURO G7TWZ 32967_GB7CIP 186
250519 20:44:21 <GB7CIP ? ?F> B8
250519 20:44:21 >GB7CIP ? ?FS +
?
Any ideas?
?
Re: Not all links show on web page

 


The thread above is from 2023, but I noticed it long before that. I've always used CLI to list links and routes, so I've hardly missed anything.

73,
Lee K5DAT
21 - 40 of 43805