Re: Rigcontrol SCAN and beacons
Well, I'd be interesting in seeing peek at this mechanize. Looking at the python version, it cannot do javascript which I think that form at /Node/PortBeacon?X where X is port number uses. So someone
By
N9SEO
·
#42772
·
|
Re: Traffic over the BBS system
If there is a designated NTS-D FX/AX.25/IL2P BBS in Ohio, who is it? Look at the NTS-digital.net website for Easrern/Central/Western hub stations to send your traffic to enter the system. jim KI0BK
By
Jim - KI0BK
·
#42771
·
|
Re: Rigcontrol SCAN and beacons
OK Sorry I am mistaken UZ7HO works just I cannot get KISSHF to do that 'test'.
By
N9SEO
·
#42770
·
|
Re: Rigcontrol SCAN and beacons
Or ports in UZ7HO mode.
By
N9SEO
·
#42769
·
|
Re: Rigcontrol SCAN and beacons
Ahh well in that case just a manual test click via web ui appears that that does not work with the KISSHF driver.
By
N9SEO
·
#42768
·
|
Re: Rigcontrol SCAN and beacons
[email protected]> wrote: I should explain how the script works when using attach. First it's known that after attaching to a port, scanning is paused. The trick is once a port is attached, manually
By
Lee Bengston
·
#42767
·
|
Re: Rigcontrol SCAN and beacons
Ahh I wonder if ATTACH would work with anything using KISSHF ports? How would you send a beacon in that case?
By
N9SEO
·
#42766
·
|
Re: Rigcontrol SCAN and beacons
Sorry yea BPQ is the source of the beacon, I cant think of another way to do with scan type programming.
By
N9SEO
·
#42765
·
|
Re: Rigcontrol SCAN and beacons
Hi Mark, Yea I had thought of that too. But I dont think those block out any forwarding script commands that might run with competing commands. Or if you use the builtin beacon, it does not block the
By
N9SEO
·
#42764
·
|
Re: Rigcontrol SCAN and beacons
Oh, that makes better sense reading it that way. Kayne, is BPQ the source of the beaconing or is the modem configured to beacon on its own? -- 73, Mark, N5MDT Montgomery, Texas
By
Mark Taylor
·
#42763
·
|
Re: Rigcontrol SCAN and beacons
I think Kayne is asking for a change in BPQ so that beacons automatically pause scanning. With respect to doing it externally in a script, it's better to pause scanning by using attach. That's what
By
Lee Bengston
·
#42762
·
|
Re: Rigcontrol SCAN and beacons
I'm thinking there are two possible commands to use. Which one to use would be your choice.? There are probably others. SCANSTOP STOPPORT Either one of those might do what you want. -- 73, Mark,
By
Mark Taylor
·
#42761
·
|
Rigcontrol SCAN and beacons
Hi, Is there any way to temporarily lock a scanning radio while the modem is beaconing? I've had a long standing issue where I've disabled my beacons because I use a scan program and while they were
By
N9SEO
·
#42760
·
|
Re: My errant WP Update this morning.
Hi, John: Thanks. I was thinking that a /G can only create a new WP record or update an existing /G record /I can create a new WP record or update an existing /I or /G record. /U can create or update
By
Chuck Gelm
·
#42759
·
|
Re: My errant WP Update this morning.
I corrected your HA on my system, it did not have the #NOKY but does now. 73 Jim KI0BK
By
Jim - KI0BK
·
#42758
·
|
Re: My errant WP Update this morning.
Ironically my address is incorrect in a WP update I received from Gary not long ago. Similarly the errant address included only the state and not the region. So it appears that someone is adding or
By
Lee Bengston
·
#42757
·
|
Re: My errant WP Update this morning.
K7EK.#NOKY.KY.USA.NOAM is the correct address. It remains correct in my configuration. I'd like to know the source of the errant WP address.It did not come from me.? This has happened several
By
Gary - K7EK
·
#42756
·
|
Re: My errant WP Update this morning.
/U indicates an update to the User record by the user (maybe by entering the NAME command. etc) or SYSOP or by the SYSOP editing the WP database. The BBS log may show something. Other are /I for
By
John G8BPQ
·
#42755
·
|
Re: My errant WP Update this morning.
GM Chuck, My understanding is that when you receive a WP update, whatever is in that update gets written to your local WP database regardless of what is in your user record. So you probably received
By
Lee Bengston
·
#42754
·
|
Re: My errant WP Update this morning.
Not sure why it changed here but I have corrected the WP entry. Ron VE3CGR
By
Ron Gibson
·
#42753
·
|