ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
esc to dismiss
I use this one,but I added Logic inverter for FTDI. 
|
What modem do you use for digital ?
Data: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 10:19:29 -0700
Assunto: Re: [YaesuFT847] CAT Isolated?
Thx Jaime for answer. I will use Digital Modes for VHF.
|
Thx Jaime for answer. I will use Digital Modes for VHF.
|
Thx Jeff for answering. It will work fine but I want to isolate between PC and Yaesu.?Does this null modem cable (FTDI,Profilic,CH340 etc.) provide isolation between the PC and Yaesu? As far as I know it doesn't.
|
Thx Yvan for answer the question but in my country we can not order because We can not use Paypal. It is banned on TR.
|
Or:
What do you use for Digital modes/cw ?
73
CU3AK
Eloy
Data: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 14:50:56 +0000
Assunto: Re: [YaesuFT847] CAT Isolated?
|
ebay.co.uk
FTDI USB Cat cable for Yaesu FT-847 & VR-5000
|
|
?
I’ve just ordered one of these if that’s of any help
Sent from Jeff M0UHF?
On 30 Oct 2023, at 14:45, yvan skopek via groups.io <yvskop@...> wrote:
?
Hello dr om,
I use FT847 with SUCCI interface and no problems, I connect FT847 by his cable to SUCCI interface (eBay) you must specified then it is for FT847.
I use it more then 10 years with UCX Log and SatPC32 prgm without problems...
vy 73 Yvan HB9CSM
Le lundi, 30 octobre 2023 à 11:35:19 UTC+1, TA2YGT <asena.34.ask@...> a écrit :
Hello everyone,
I bought a second hand Yaesu FT847 and then I was build a isolated interface for DATA IN/OUT port. It works very well but I haven't build null modem cable for CAT control.
I am not familiar with the CAT communication protocol. I use FTDI for PTT control. In FTDI, RX and TX ports are empty and I want to use these ports because I want to using interface one USB cable. Of course, using optocoupler. How can I do it? How should I connect the optocouplers or what kind of circuit should I create?
Thx and 73.
?
--
Yvan
|
|
|
?
I’ve just ordered one of these if that’s of any help
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 30 Oct 2023, at 14:45, yvan skopek via groups.io <yvskop@...> wrote:
?
Hello dr om,
I use FT847 with SUCCI interface and no problems, I connect FT847 by his cable to SUCCI interface (eBay) you must specified then it is for FT847.
I use it more then 10 years with UCX Log and SatPC32 prgm without problems...
vy 73 Yvan HB9CSM
Le lundi, 30 octobre 2023 à 11:35:19 UTC+1, TA2YGT <asena.34.ask@...> a écrit :
Hello everyone,
I bought a second hand Yaesu FT847 and then I was build a isolated interface for DATA IN/OUT port. It works very well but I haven't build null modem cable for CAT control.
I am not familiar with the CAT communication protocol. I use FTDI for PTT control. In FTDI, RX and TX ports are empty and I want to use these ports because I want to using interface one USB cable. Of course, using optocoupler. How can I do it? How should
I connect the optocouplers or what kind of circuit should I create?
Thx and 73.
?
--
Yvan
Hello dr om,
I use FT847 with SUCCI interface and no problems, I connect FT847 by his cable to SUCCI interface (eBay) you must specified then it is for FT847. I use it more then 10 years with UCX Log and SatPC32 prgm without problems...
vy 73 Yvan HB9CSM
Le lundi, 30 octobre 2023 à 11:35:19 UTC+1, TA2YGT <asena.34.ask@...> a écrit :
Hello everyone,
I bought a second hand Yaesu FT847 and then I was build a isolated interface for DATA IN/OUT port. It works very well but I haven't build null modem cable for CAT control.
I am not familiar with the CAT communication protocol. I use FTDI for PTT control. In FTDI, RX and TX ports are empty and I want to use these ports because I want to using interface one USB cable. Of course, using optocoupler. How can I do it? How should I connect the optocouplers or what kind of circuit should I create?
Thx and 73.
?
-- Yvan
|
Hello everyone,
I bought a second hand Yaesu FT847 and then I was build a isolated interface for DATA IN/OUT port. It works very well but I haven't build null modem cable for CAT control.
I am not familiar with the CAT communication protocol. I use FTDI for PTT control. In FTDI, RX and TX ports are empty and I want to use these ports because I want to using interface one USB cable. Of course, using optocoupler. How can I do it? How should I connect the optocouplers or what kind of circuit should I create?
Thx and 73.
?
|
Din plugs for FT840 and FT847
Can someone point me to the correct mini dip
plugs for the FT840 and FT847.? I am looking for them for the
tuner jacks in particular.? On the FT840 one appears to be a 5 pin
mini din but the center pin is missing like it is a 6 pin with the
middle pin missing.? The 5 pins DINs I saw were equally spaced so
not the same.? The Tuner2 plug appears to be an 8 pin mini din.?
The CAT connector is 6 pin and the plugs I have fit it but not
sure what to look for particularly for the Tune1 input.
Thank you.
Jim Pruitt
WA7DUY
|
Re: 847 and SIGNALINK USB
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 02:07 PM, Micky Corrow wrote:
Doesn't the 847 use a different output port for VHF/UHF?
for SSB modes you must use the 1/8" TRS data jack for audio in/out and keying?? the circuit is shown in the manual?? neither of my 847s are deaf? ? not great? but not deaf ??
|
Re: Dual VFO tracking - Split
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 07:36 PM, Tom DJ6TB wrote:
When receiving, you have to adjust in one direction; when transmitting, it's the other way round.
HI All 100% correct!
?
I would also add that compared to the position of the minimum distance (= height at EL 90 degrees), you will have the frequency of the SATELLITE which for the IO-117, would seem slightly lower than the 435,310 announced.
?
- Start SAT approaching:
Doopler RX DW > ~435.310 to go lower
Doopler TX UP < ~435.310 to go up
?
SAT 90 degrees:
Doopler RX DW = 0 TX = 345.310 (~435.308.6)
Doopler TX UP = 0 RX = 345.310 (~435.308.6)
?
-SAT moves away from me:
Doopler TX DW < ~435.310 to go lower
Doopler RX UP > ~435.310 to go up
?
Don't misunderstand the list above, in the sense that if for example the doopler is 5kHz, with the satellite, when approaching we will have FREQ+5kHz in RX and when descending
And
FREQ-5kHz in TX and up
?
i.e. doopler (UPLINK+ / DOWLINK-) are backwards, and NOT QRG EQUAL RX and TX in doopler, as I also thought at the beginning!
?
I too have dedicated myself to the GreenCube with my FT847 which I have been using on satellites since its arrival on sale with many thousands of QSOs via SAT: at moment FIRST WORLD PLACE SPACE SAT SLOT IN CLUBLOG ;-) ;-)
?
On the GC in the 3 orbits made I completed a ~30 'QSO' (the first time to understand clearly I received everything but I only digipeated 2 time with my call/digipeater and 1 QSOs when I was in minimum distance maximum elevation, i.e. ~RX=TX.
?
Then I tried to understand the necessary doopler which is very important on GC.
?
Then I built a mini soft home made to manage the doopler which I combined with my AZ/EL tracker to understand where to tune exactly.
I saw that it must be very precise..
?
In fact, in the 2 following orbits "calculated" with the my soft, I made about 30 successful contacts and many, many digipearers...
?
In UHf my FT847 is also a little shifted between RX and TX already and is not precise by a few hundred Hz and I had to correct that in the UP/DW too.
?
FT847 CAT apparently does not have the management of VFO B in split, I was unable to use a DOOPLER in TX with SPLIT on VFO B.
?
I couldn't find any information on the CAT manual to select and send the CAT VFO B of the FT847.
?
Is there just no possibility or trick to manage both the RX and the VFO B TX together?
?
Since full duplex is not needed, I'm thinking of a solution by working only on MAIN VFO A, moving between RX and TX if it doesn't require too much speed due to the latency of this continuous change... I'm trying right now!!
If anyone wants to join this option and evidence make themselves heard...
?
ps: even openAI wasn't clear about the doopler and gave me the two possibilities without knowing what it was, it invented... absurd AI :-) ;-)
?
73
Frank
|
Re: Dual VFO tracking - Split
Hi Spence,
the fact that you have to use different frequencies when
transmitting and receiving is quite simply the Doppler principle. It
also has nothing to do with linear.
Of course, these two frequencies are different, mirroring each other
around the frequency of the Greencube.
The aim must be to feed the satellite's QRG. When receiving, you
have to adjust in one direction; when transmitting, it's the other
way round.
Only if the satellite is directly above you or if its movement path
is exactly at a 90° angle to you, then both frequencies are
identical (in my case 435.308400 MHz).
73, Tom, DJ6TB
Am 21.10.2023 um 12:03 schrieb Spence
M0STO via groups.io:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Hi Tom,
? ? ? ? ? ? ?I am totally confused on this matter as I have
spoken to a well known source that tells me if the transponder
is linear then the uplink and downlink frequencies are the same
on a Digipeater satellite on the same band. As GC is 435.310mhz
then transmitting (assuming the correct Doppler is employed)
whatever the RX frequency is then the TX should be the same?
? Now I dispute this as I’ve tried RX and TX without split
and I’ve never had a single packet received or an ACK from GC.
If the other spice is correct then it should send packets that
are received from me without issue. Either GC has some kind of
audio band pass filter (I always use 1500hz as my CF) or
something else is afoot here.?
? Re: sub-VFO. Yes you’re correct and after much research I
found that the sub VFO cannot be adjusted with CAT commands,
there was never a provision for it.
? Now my mind is really scrambled because every program I’ve
used eg: HRD, PSTrotator, Sat-PC32 all try to implement Doppler
shift for RX and TX on different frequencies. For example, if
the satellite is just over the horizon on 435.313mhz RX then the
TX is set at 435.307mhz and all programs follow this trend, non
seem to think that the satellite is linear and thus should be on
the same frequencies. As the satellite comes close the RX moves
close to 435.310mhz on RX and that same for TX with RX going
down in frequency and TX going up in frequency. When the
satellite is overhead at say 90 degrees the RX and TX should be
both at 435.310mhz and then when it’s going away from me the RX
goes down past 435.310mhz towards 435.307mhz and the TX goes up
to towards 435.313mhz and eventually the satellite disappears
beyond the horizon.
? I don’t claim to be an expert in satellite and until GC
came along I had never worked a DigiPeater satellite so this has
been a steep learning curve for me. I have worked VK from the UK
using 6700 delay and successfully made a 10,700 mile QSO of
sorts.?
? Using my FT991A which does allow Sub-VFO changes via CAT I
can work GC easily and have many USA and Japanese contacts (of
course Europe too) with little effort and the Doppler was set
and the Downlink frequency was 435.312mhz and Uplink 435.308mhz.
So that sort of debunks the totally linear idea unless GC has a
really wide audio passband.?
? Again, satellite is very new to me and I’m trying to get my
head around it as the physics say up and down are the same on a
same frequency DigiPeater, however, GC seems to defy this
convention and I’m curious why?
?Sorry to burned the group with this but I’ve looked hard
into resolving g this but I just get conflicting information.
The kindest regards,
De Spence M0STO?
Sent while portable! please excuse typos.
?
Hi Spence,
I am working the GC since 6 month and I did not find a
solution for that problem so long
So I drive the main vfo by gpredict (via cat) and adjust
the sub-vfo manually by those values gpredict shows in the
TX-qrg window.
I think the FT-847 has no option to adjust sub-vfo in
split mode on the same band.
There are videos on youtube which show hints by using
satpc-32. But you have to trigger rx/tx/rx/tx manually and
so you (normally) miss the reception of your own
transmission digipeated by the satellite.
73, Tom, DJ6TB
Am 01.10.2023 um 23:49 schrieb
Spence M0STO via groups.io:
?
Dear group,
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Perhaps if I explain a little
background and what I’ve tried it may help to prevent
things I’ve done being repeated.
GreenCube is my problem! Working GreenCube is a
nightmare because of one reason, it’s a satellite and
it’s also a digipeater.
? Every program I’ve tried will happily tune the
main VFO but will not change the sub VFO. PSTrotator,
HRD etc. OmniRig does not seem to like to change the
sub VFO while it’s tuning the main VFO.?
? The FT847 has a major drawback though. In
satellite mode split mode this is achieved easily
because the bands are V/U or U/V uplink and downlink
and full duplex but GreenCube sits on the same
frequency (bar Doppler correction). So the radio will
“error” when trying to TX on the same band, that’s
common knowledge.?
? The issue is when in split mode (the only real
way to work GreenCube and Doppler shift), as above,
all software shows the VFO change in software but not
on the radio. I’ve had extensive conversations with
Codrut (PSTrotator) and after many adjustments to his
software he can’t manage to get the sub VFO to alter
with the main VFO. The nearest I’ve been to achieving
this was in HRD and setting the Uplink and Downlink
manually but as above only the “main” downlink VFO
would alter.
? I know that some versions of the FT847 had some
issues with asynchronous communications but this
wouldn’t affect the communication when altering the
frequency.?
? I plan to inspect the bit data and see if sub-VFO
commands are actually being sent. I’ve successfully
sent manual commands to turn on sat mode, LSB/USB
mode, enter frequencies etc.?
? I wonder if anyone has any thoughts on this?
|
Please see the list of CAT commands but none
mention Split?! And there isn’t a provision for
altering the sub-VFO in the command structure that I
can see!.
? Is it actually possible? Even repeater mode
would’t work as it would have a constant frequency
indifference and not change with Doppler bringing
uplink and down link together at 90degrees (straight
above would probably have 0 Doppler shift).
?Any thoughts appreciated,
De Spence M0STO?
Sent while portable! please excuse typos.
Re: 847 and SIGNALINK USB
All that I know is I am using the Data Port to the Signalink. Gary
Doesn't the 847 use a different output port for VHF/UHF?
Micky K1XH
|
Re: 847 and SIGNALINK USB
Doesn't the 847 use a different output port for VHF/UHF?
Micky K1XH
|
Anyone have noise issues with the SIGNALINK USB on MSK144 with the FT-847.
My FT847 is quite deaf on 6 meter MSK144 and it seems the issue is Noise with the Signalink USB. I utilize the Data Port on the Rear of the 847 and I use the Signalink Module SLMODHT. The combination works fine on HF but my 847 is very deaf on VHF.....Can't seem to figure out why.
Any suggestions? or experience?
Gary? W7FSI DN-24
|
Re: Dual VFO tracking - Split
Hi Tom, ? ? ? ? ? ? ?I am totally confused on this matter as I have spoken to a well known source that tells me if the transponder is linear then the uplink and downlink frequencies are the same on a Digipeater satellite on the same band. As GC is 435.310mhz then transmitting (assuming the correct Doppler is employed) whatever the RX frequency is then the TX should be the same?
? Now I dispute this as I’ve tried RX and TX without split and I’ve never had a single packet received or an ACK from GC. If the other spice is correct then it should send packets that are received from me without issue. Either GC has some kind of audio band pass filter (I always use 1500hz as my CF) or something else is afoot here.?
? Re: sub-VFO. Yes you’re correct and after much research I found that the sub VFO cannot be adjusted with CAT commands, there was never a provision for it.
? Now my mind is really scrambled because every program I’ve used eg: HRD, PSTrotator, Sat-PC32 all try to implement Doppler shift for RX and TX on different frequencies. For example, if the satellite is just over the horizon on 435.313mhz RX then the TX is set at 435.307mhz and all programs follow this trend, non seem to think that the satellite is linear and thus should be on the same frequencies. As the satellite comes close the RX moves close to 435.310mhz on RX and that same for TX with RX going down in frequency and TX going up in frequency. When the satellite is overhead at say 90 degrees the RX and TX should be both at 435.310mhz and then when it’s going away from me the RX goes down past 435.310mhz towards 435.307mhz and the TX goes up to towards 435.313mhz and eventually the satellite disappears beyond the horizon.
? I don’t claim to be an expert in satellite and until GC came along I had never worked a DigiPeater satellite so this has been a steep learning curve for me. I have worked VK from the UK using 6700 delay and successfully made a 10,700 mile QSO of sorts.?
? Using my FT991A which does allow Sub-VFO changes via CAT I can work GC easily and have many USA and Japanese contacts (of course Europe too) with little effort and the Doppler was set and the Downlink frequency was 435.312mhz and Uplink 435.308mhz. So that sort of debunks the totally linear idea unless GC has a really wide audio passband.?
? Again, satellite is very new to me and I’m trying to get my head around it as the physics say up and down are the same on a same frequency DigiPeater, however, GC seems to defy this convention and I’m curious why?
?Sorry to burned the group with this but I’ve looked hard into resolving g this but I just get conflicting information.
The kindest regards,
De Spence M0STO?
Sent while portable! please excuse typos.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 21 Oct 2023, at 08:21, Tom DJ6TB <tom.io@...> wrote:
?
Hi Spence,
I am working the GC since 6 month and I did not find a solution
for that problem so long
So I drive the main vfo by gpredict (via cat) and adjust the
sub-vfo manually by those values gpredict shows in the TX-qrg
window.
I think the FT-847 has no option to adjust sub-vfo in split mode
on the same band.
There are videos on youtube which show hints by using satpc-32.
But you have to trigger rx/tx/rx/tx manually and so you (normally)
miss the reception of your own transmission digipeated by the
satellite.
73, Tom, DJ6TB
Am 01.10.2023 um 23:49 schrieb Spence
M0STO via groups.io:
?
Dear group,
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Perhaps if I explain a little
background and what I’ve tried it may help to prevent things
I’ve done being repeated.
GreenCube is my problem! Working GreenCube is a nightmare
because of one reason, it’s a satellite and it’s also a
digipeater.
? Every program I’ve tried will happily tune the main VFO
but will not change the sub VFO. PSTrotator, HRD etc. OmniRig
does not seem to like to change the sub VFO while it’s tuning
the main VFO.?
? The FT847 has a major drawback though. In satellite mode
split mode this is achieved easily because the bands are V/U
or U/V uplink and downlink and full duplex but GreenCube sits
on the same frequency (bar Doppler correction). So the radio
will “error” when trying to TX on the same band, that’s common
knowledge.?
? The issue is when in split mode (the only real way to
work GreenCube and Doppler shift), as above, all software
shows the VFO change in software but not on the radio. I’ve
had extensive conversations with Codrut (PSTrotator) and after
many adjustments to his software he can’t manage to get the
sub VFO to alter with the main VFO. The nearest I’ve been to
achieving this was in HRD and setting the Uplink and Downlink
manually but as above only the “main” downlink VFO would
alter.
? I know that some versions of the FT847 had some issues
with asynchronous communications but this wouldn’t affect the
communication when altering the frequency.?
? I plan to inspect the bit data and see if sub-VFO
commands are actually being sent. I’ve successfully sent
manual commands to turn on sat mode, LSB/USB mode, enter
frequencies etc.?
? I wonder if anyone has any thoughts on this?
|
Please see the list of CAT commands but none mention
Split?! And there isn’t a provision for altering the sub-VFO
in the command structure that I can see!.
? Is it actually possible? Even repeater mode would’t work
as it would have a constant frequency indifference and not
change with Doppler bringing uplink and down link together at
90degrees (straight above would probably have 0 Doppler
shift).
?Any thoughts appreciated,
De Spence M0STO?
Sent while portable! please excuse typos.
Re: Dual VFO tracking - Split
Hi Spence,
I am working the GC since 6 month and I did not find a solution
for that problem so long
So I drive the main vfo by gpredict (via cat) and adjust the
sub-vfo manually by those values gpredict shows in the TX-qrg
window.
I think the FT-847 has no option to adjust sub-vfo in split mode
on the same band.
There are videos on youtube which show hints by using satpc-32.
But you have to trigger rx/tx/rx/tx manually and so you (normally)
miss the reception of your own transmission digipeated by the
satellite.
73, Tom, DJ6TB
Am 01.10.2023 um 23:49 schrieb Spence
M0STO via groups.io:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
?
Dear group,
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Perhaps if I explain a little
background and what I’ve tried it may help to prevent things
I’ve done being repeated.
GreenCube is my problem! Working GreenCube is a nightmare
because of one reason, it’s a satellite and it’s also a
digipeater.
? Every program I’ve tried will happily tune the main VFO
but will not change the sub VFO. PSTrotator, HRD etc. OmniRig
does not seem to like to change the sub VFO while it’s tuning
the main VFO.?
? The FT847 has a major drawback though. In satellite mode
split mode this is achieved easily because the bands are V/U
or U/V uplink and downlink and full duplex but GreenCube sits
on the same frequency (bar Doppler correction). So the radio
will “error” when trying to TX on the same band, that’s common
knowledge.?
? The issue is when in split mode (the only real way to
work GreenCube and Doppler shift), as above, all software
shows the VFO change in software but not on the radio. I’ve
had extensive conversations with Codrut (PSTrotator) and after
many adjustments to his software he can’t manage to get the
sub VFO to alter with the main VFO. The nearest I’ve been to
achieving this was in HRD and setting the Uplink and Downlink
manually but as above only the “main” downlink VFO would
alter.
? I know that some versions of the FT847 had some issues
with asynchronous communications but this wouldn’t affect the
communication when altering the frequency.?
? I plan to inspect the bit data and see if sub-VFO
commands are actually being sent. I’ve successfully sent
manual commands to turn on sat mode, LSB/USB mode, enter
frequencies etc.?
? I wonder if anyone has any thoughts on this?
|
Please see the list of CAT commands but none mention
Split?! And there isn’t a provision for altering the sub-VFO
in the command structure that I can see!.
? Is it actually possible? Even repeater mode would’t work
as it would have a constant frequency indifference and not
change with Doppler bringing uplink and down link together at
90degrees (straight above would probably have 0 Doppler
shift).
?Any thoughts appreciated,
De Spence M0STO?
Sent while portable! please excuse typos.
Re: FT-847 only transmitting on FM mode. de: W1SMS
Will do
Get
On 10 Oct 2023, at 21:14, Steven Simons < ssimons@...> wrote:
Andrew,
Nice to meet you and thanks for the repair tips.
I do have a copy of the service manual - which I plan on reviewing prior to performing any adjustments.
I'll probe the test points you refer to and see what I find.
"stay tuned"....
de: W1SMS
|
Re: FT-847 only transmitting on FM mode. de: W1SMS
You can download load the manuals on this forum, have a poke about
73
Andrew
G8UUG
Get
On 10 Oct 2023, at 21:14, Steven Simons < ssimons@...> wrote:
Andrew,
Nice to meet you and thanks for the repair tips.
I do have a copy of the service manual - which I plan on reviewing prior to performing any adjustments.
I'll probe the test points you refer to and see what I find.
"stay tuned"....
de: W1SMS
|
Jeff M0UHF
Frank
Spence G5STO
Andrew Lenton