开云体育

That comment from Karst was the first time I had heard of the limitations on the number of DR4088LN units

That is incorrect quoting ! ? I was referrring to you, mentioning that you had all DR5088RC !!! when I wrote that I never had seen the problem before.

?

Eddie Jones	Wed, Mar 20, 12:47?AM (3 days ago) ?	?
?

?

?

?

?

?

5088RC and I use railcom if that matters.

?

Thanks Eddie

?

From:?Karst Drenth [Drenth Design & Consulting B.V.] <drenth.design.consulting@gmail.com>
Sent:?Tuesday, March 19, 2024 2:59 PM
To:?Eddie Jones <smartfxsoftware@...>
Subject:?Re: Request Activation Code for: 5000D0011927

?

What type of feedbask units do you have ?

?

It was the first time I heared about DR5088RC problems in this context.

The DR4088LN problem is already known for more than 5 years.... That also the DR5033 suffer from the same dissease (hanging up LocoNet on high trafic) became aparent quite soon after that 4088LN problem was discovered.

?

But looking at your schematic... There is some things I would do differently.?

?

First: give each DR5088RC a different "Report Delay"( start with 750 or 1000 and then increment by 130 on each subsequent DR5088 )

Second: consider your DR5033 to operate from them as CDE device behind the DR5039

Third: get rid of the 5099. One direct LocoNet cable from YD7001 LocoNet-B to DR5039 will do.

?

Since you now effectively only have left 3x DR4099LN, thy should report just fine.

?

Further, you may want to switch on this:

?

Greets,

Karst

?

?

?