¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Re: Reducing unwanted X-Rays with filters.
If it's the one with Am_X8, the detector WAS the target. Nothing but air between them. An effort to see it for myself rather than go to the attenuation charts. Info gathered will be useful later.Geo
By GEOelectronics@... · #650 ·
Re: Ken's "Mystery Wire"
Here's the one from just now, done with the new filter stack: .mca attached.
By GEOelectronics@... · #649 ·
Re: Ken's "Mystery Wire"
I think you¡¯re right, Dud. I questioned the identification of Kr and Ru, but didn¡¯t pursue the possibilities of Kb or sum peaks. Both of your arguments seem like probable explanations given the
By Ken Sejkora · #648 ·
Re: Reducing unwanted X-Rays with filters. TUBE EXCITERS
Beautiful results, 10 second scan. This was a cool project and great experience for the cabinet XRF machine project. .mca file attached. Geo>K0FF
By GEOelectronics@... · #647 ·
Reducing unwanted X-Rays with filters. TUBE EXCITERS
A typical X-Ray tube exciter module as made by Kevex, Oxford, Thermo and others is a 10 Watt 50 kV tube that can handle 0.2 mA? (200 microAmps) of current. This is a good match to "X-Ray Image
By GEOelectronics@... · #646 ·
Re: Ken's "Mystery Wire"
Geo, I don¡¯t have the .mca file but looking at the mystery wire .png the Ka1 Ru reported at 19.7 would actually be the Mo Kb1 at 19.6. The no match at 15.55 would appear to be a Ni -Cu sum peak at
By Dude · #645 ·
Re: Reducing unwanted X-Rays with filters.
I¡¯ve been out all week with the flu and playing catch up right now. Charles¡¯s new labeling looks nice. If someone is going to run another Al filter test it would be nice to use a metal standard
By Dude · #644 ·
Re: Ken's "Mystery Wire"
Interesting observation, Geo. I had noticed the same thing, that the end seems to be more ¡®magnetic¡¯ than the sides. It might be interesting to take a weak magnet and try the same thing with a
By Ken Sejkora · #643 ·
Re: Ken's "Mystery Wire"
Looks good Ken. I get? 0.00850 but the millivoltmeter hasn't been turned on for a while. Will check again tomorrow after leaving it on overnight. One desk in the shop is setup just for resistor
By GEOelectronics@... · #642 ·
Re: Reducing unwanted X-Rays with filters. ISOTOPE EXCITERS
Thanks Charles. Even a little helps. Most of my interference is scattered off the target, so the less we present to it the better. No way nor do we need to worry about the 59.5, it's above the range
By GEOelectronics@... · #641 ·
Re: Reducing unwanted X-Rays with filters. ISOTOPE EXCITERS
Excellent, George. I have some 1/64" Al sheeting that I'll try when I get a chance. About 5 layers should do it. Charles
By Charles David Young · #640 ·
Re: Ken's "Mystery Wire"
Interesting. Now that you reminded, I think there are still some neutral coil adjusting tools down in the workshop, left over from the radio says. I'll dig one of those out and test it on XRF. for
By GEOelectronics@... · #639 ·
Reducing unwanted X-Rays with filters. ISOTOPE EXCITERS
In medical X-Ray imaging, it was long ago discovered that the lowest energies coming from the X-Ray generator did nothing at all to improve the image on the film, but rather, instead of penetrating
By GEOelectronics@... · #638 ·
Re: Ta Y Zr La Ce XRF
Nice work Charles. Ask if you have any questions, but looks like you already have it figured out.Geo
By GEOelectronics@... · #637 ·
Ta Y Zr La Ce XRF
I am getting ready to start a series of tests so I wanted to make sure my detector is calibrated correctly using a series of elements. The results show the calibration to be pretty darn close. In
By Charles David Young · #636 ·
Re: Ken's "Mystery Wire"
All good tests and yes they add to the knowledge base. Use what you have, make the most of it.Your last clue was the give away, it's a "taught-wire PID". We won't talk about its tech but we can sure
By GEOelectronics@... · #635 ·
Re: Ken's "Mystery Wire"
Greetings to the group, Some more interesting properties of the ¡°mystery wire¡±. Although I don¡¯t have a way to quantify the results, I can at least qualify the results. Regarding the magnetic
By Ken Sejkora · #634 ·
Re: Ken's "Mystery Wire"
Hi Geo, I moved in June 2019, so there are still boxes of junk (er, I mean ¡°components¡±) waiting to be unpacked. I couldn¡¯t find my 1% 100-Ohm power resistor or original test jig, but was able
By Ken Sejkora · #633 ·
Re: 'Resolution' of XRF?
Thanks for your thoughts Ken. Yes for sure we know relative thickness is a factor both in pure bare metal XRF and especially in plated items.The copper foil is measured to be .001" or 0.0254mmthe
By GEOelectronics@... · #632 ·
Re: 'Resolution' of XRF?
Thanks for the brain teaser, Geo. Just a couple of guesses, and ideas for additional experiments. My first inclination is that in your element ¡®sandwich¡¯, the copper foil was significantly
By Ken Sejkora · #631 ·