Good, thanks and it looks fine, keep it up. I did my first 24 hour run with Si-PIN in Gamma Scan mode (no XRF exciting from internal or external) on one a weakly radioactive target over the weekend with critical calibration before and after- good news, no drift noticed at all. Sweet.
If anyone is tempted to buy the Amptek CdTe on eBay from Bulgaria, a little warning the ad picture is cut right out of he Amptek catalog...¡.caveat emptor.
Geo>K0FF
----- Original Message -----
From: Charles David Young <charlesdavidyoung@...>
To:
[email protected]Sent: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 07:19:56 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [XRF] Trinitite
Yes, that is correct, George.? The heavy black lines are what I consider firmly identified.
I normally expand the lower region and leave off the Bremsstrahlung and 59.5 peak to the right.
I never intentionally use smoothing.? I have not seen such a DPP option and I seriously doubt it would affect the stored data in any case.? In Theremino I have removed all smoothing unless you consider drawing a line from one peak to neighboring peaks smoothing.
Charles
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 03:11 PM, Charles David Young wrote:
?
Only 3 elements really stand out: Fe U Ba.?
Nice display, the Fe Kb1 line is well placed. Have you expanded the? X-axis to include 59.5 yet?
I'm interpreting the vertical black dotted lines are pretty certain and the lighter, smaller lines are under consideration still.
Are you doing smoothing at all? If so in the DPP or the Theremino program? If you do it in DPP, does it change the stored data or is it only temporary when invoked?
Geo
