¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: Xrf old faucet


 

Today I'm waiting for the last test to finish, it is a follow-up 24Hr B/G background test to finish off a week long study of a single sample of uranium without lower daughters.

The first step was to run a calibration test and record that, then a 3 day long run with the sample, then another calibration verification to prove before and after calibration, now a 24 Hr background test.

During the day long runs, the timer is set to stop at intervals so I can recorded the data up to that point in time, then timer is reset until the next interval has elapsed. A 3 day run may take 4 or more? days to complete with this stop-start situation. This allows data to build up but with a track-record of the process.?

Intermediate run times can be helpful later when comparing segments of the current run against older stored runs. When comparing two different samples, it is useful to have one of the major peaks be about the same height, display both scans on the same screen in LINEAR mode, allows direct comparisons to be made of peaks.

Without expensive software, we must rely on direct comparison between similar samples, one of which is calibrated or verified,? to achieve quantification values. For example I had Cs-137-in-soil samples made up at a certified lab into different sealed containers that fit our various sample holders. Jars, test tubes, etc. The contents ae weighed and gives a good starting place to compare unknow samples to a know one. The process to make such a sample set is very labor-intensive and so is the paper work trail.

Years of collecting have supplied similar exempt quantity standards for alpha-beta-gamma sources, as well as radium quantification standards and Uranium ore concentration standards and Unat and DU items (i.e. FiestaWare dIshes).


Since our sensors operate with a 5 X 5 mm (25mm^2) sensitive area, we must also take that into account and temper our quantification attempts accordingly. Many check sources have an active area that is smaller than the sensor sensitive area, but quite a few check sources are much larger, especially the electroplated ones.?

Geo


From: "taray singh via groups.io" <sukhjez@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2020 10:35:16 AM
Subject: Re: [XRF] Xrf old faucet

Another thing?
The plastic mount is a tape?reel with a?hole in the center
Perfect of samples to be placed on top
The pic of the tap is without the reel
It is just an object to help me take a pic shot
In case anyone is wondering..
Taray




On Friday, November 13, 2020, 12:25 AM, GEOelectronics@... wrote:

Thanks for the interesting report. Also on the old forum a member took scraping from white deposits left in the burner of his cooking stove,

In the outside environment I take samples from cracks and crevices of rain drain grates, very good at collecting and concentrating heavy particles, too small to see.

Geo




From: "taray singh via groups.io" <sukhjez@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2020 10:17:48 AM
Subject: [XRF] Xrf old faucet

Hi guys

I have done this before in the old forum

This time with better results?

My faucet spout has a??silvery shiny surface with some mottling.Blocked by water deposits due water stagnation.

But I have a confession to make

The faucet was??mounted on white rounded plaster holder at the base

Not in the path of the primary beam

The results show various elements?

Ni,Cu,Zn??,Pb and perhaps Fe

Ni is the??shiny outer coating?

Zinc is the faucet spout

Cu is coming from brass??within (Cu and Zn)

Pb from solder?

Fe if present from plates/escutcheon ?

Zn causing corrosion and??heavy deposits

This cheap Chinese Zn faucet is a bad choice?

Deposits are contributing too

That will be another topic
Taray

?



Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.